1
|
Pan C, Chun J, Li D, Boese AC, Li J, Kang J, Umano A, Jiang Y, Song L, Magliocca KR, Chen ZG, Saba NF, Shin DM, Owonikoko TK, Lonial S, Jin L, Kang S. Hsp90B enhances MAST1-mediated cisplatin resistance by protecting MAST1 from proteosomal degradation. J Clin Invest 2020; 129:4110-4123. [PMID: 31449053 DOI: 10.1172/jci125963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2018] [Accepted: 06/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Microtubule-associated serine/threonine kinase 1 (MAST1) is a central driver of cisplatin resistance in human cancers. However, the molecular mechanism regulating MAST1 levels in cisplatin-resistant tumors is unknown. Through a proteomics screen, we identified the heat shock protein 90 B (hsp90B) chaperone as a direct MAST1 binding partner essential for its stabilization. Targeting hsp90B sensitized cancer cells to cisplatin predominantly through MAST1 destabilization. Mechanistically, interaction of hsp90B with MAST1 blocked ubiquitination of MAST1 at lysines 317 and 545 by the E3 ubiquitin ligase CHIP and prevented proteasomal degradation. The hsp90B-MAST1-CHIP signaling axis and its relationship with cisplatin response were clinically validated in cancer patients. Furthermore, combined treatment with a hsp90 inhibitor and the MAST1 inhibitor lestaurtinib further abrogated MAST1 activity and consequently enhanced cisplatin-induced tumor growth arrest in a patient-derived xenograft model. Our study not only uncovers the regulatory mechanism of MAST1 in tumors but also suggests a promising combinatorial therapy to overcome cisplatin resistance in human cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chaoyun Pan
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Jaemoo Chun
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Dan Li
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Austin C Boese
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Jie Li
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - JiHoon Kang
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Anna Umano
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Yunhan Jiang
- Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Lina Song
- Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Kelly R Magliocca
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Zhuo G Chen
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Nabil F Saba
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Dong M Shin
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Taofeek K Owonikoko
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Sagar Lonial
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Lingtao Jin
- Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Sumin Kang
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
So WV, Ou Yang TH, Yang X, Zhi J. Lack of UGT polymorphism association with idasanutlin pharmacokinetics in solid tumor patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2018; 83:209-213. [PMID: 30511219 PMCID: PMC6373577 DOI: 10.1007/s00280-018-3741-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2018] [Accepted: 11/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Idasanutlin is a selective small-molecule MDM2 antagonist. It activates the tumor suppressor TP53 and is in phase 3 clinical trial for acute myeloid leukemia. Nonclinical studies have shown that glucuronidation is the major metabolizing mechanism for idasanutlin and UGT1A3 is the major metabolizing enzyme. There are reported examples of UGT polymorphisms associated with drug metabolism or response. Thus, the aim of this analysis is to investigate if UGT polymorphism is associated with idasanutlin pharmacokinetics. Method Idasanutlin clearance was derived and normalized from two phase I studies. Its clearance level was compared between patients with different genotypes at 44 non-monomorphic UGT SNPs. Several single-locus and multi-locus association analysis, including haplotype association analysis and pairwise SNP interaction (epistasis) analyses were performed to investigate if there is any association between UGT genotypes and idasanutlin clearance. Results and conclusion A total of 69 patients who have both idasanutlin pharmacokinetic data and UGT genotyping data were analyzed for association. The major clearance enzyme for idasanutlin, UGT1A3, has no association with idasanutlin clearance. Further single-locus and multi-locus association analyses also suggest that no significant UGT polymorphism association with idasanutlin clearance can be detected with the current datasets. However, the possibility of association with rare allele(s) of UGT family genes cannot be excluded due to the limited sample size of the current phase I studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Venus So
- Roche Innovation Center New York, New York City, New York, 10016, USA.
| | - Tai-Hsien Ou Yang
- Roche Innovation Center New York, New York City, New York, 10016, USA
| | - Xing Yang
- Roche Innovation Center New York, New York City, New York, 10016, USA
| | - Jianguo Zhi
- Roche Innovation Center New York, New York City, New York, 10016, USA
| |
Collapse
|