1
|
Garcia-Diaz R, Sosa-Rubí SG, Lozano R, Serván-Mori E. Equity in out-of-pocket health expenditure: Evidence from a health insurance program reform in Mexico. J Glob Health 2023; 13:04134. [PMID: 37994845 PMCID: PMC10666565 DOI: 10.7189/jogh.13.04134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The fragmentation of health systems in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) deepens health inequities and shifts the economic burden of health care to families via out-of-pocket spending (OOPHE). This problem has been addressed by introducing public health insurance programs for poor people; however, there is a lack of knowledge about how equitable these programs are. We aimed to analyse the long-term effects of the Seguro Popular (SP) voluntary health insurance program, recently phased out and replaced by the Health Institute for Welfare (Instituto de Salud para el Bienestar (INSABI)), on OOPHE equity in the poor Mexican population. Methods We conducted a pooled cross-sectional analysis using eleven waves of the National Household Income and Expenditure Survey (2002-2020). We identified the effect of SP by selecting households without social security (with SP or without health insurance (n = 169 766)) and matched them by propensity score to reduce bias in the decision to enrol in SP. We estimated horizontal and vertical equity metrics and assessed their evolution across subpopulations. Results The program's entry years (2003-2010) show a positive redistributive effect associated with a focalised stage of the program, while oversaturation could have diluted these effects during 2010-2014, with adverse results in terms of vertical equity and re-ranking among insured families. SP is more horizontally inequitable than for those uninsured. Within SP, the redistributive effect could improve up to 13% if all families with similar expenditures were spending equal OOPHE and horizontal equity was eliminated. Regarding vertical equity, SP outperforms the insured population with middle-range coverage some years after the implementation, but this progress disappears. Conclusions To achieve universal health coverage, health authorities need to create and execute financial protection mechanisms that effectively address structural inequalities. This involves implementing a more comprehensive risk-pooling mechanism that makes social insurance sustainable in the long-run by increasing the social-economic influx of resources. It is essential to monitor oversaturation and financial sustainability to achieve optimal results. The replacement of the SP with INSABI highlights the complexity of maintaining a social insurance program where the ideology of different governments can influence the program structure, regulation, financing, and even its existence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rocío Garcia-Diaz
- Tecnologico de Monterrey, School of Social Science and Government, Monterrey, N.L., México
| | - Sandra G Sosa-Rubí
- Center for Health Systems Research, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico
| | - Rafael Lozano
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
- School of Medicine, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Edson Serván-Mori
- Center for Health Systems Research, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sumankuuro J, Griffiths F, Koon AD, Mapanga W, Maritim B, Mosam A, Goudge J. The Experiences of Strategic Purchasing of Healthcare in Nine Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Qualitative Review. Int J Health Policy Manag 2023; 12:7352. [PMID: 38618795 PMCID: PMC10699827 DOI: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 04/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Efforts to move towards universal health coverage (UHC) aim to rebalance health financing in ways that increase efficiency, equity, and quality. Resource constraints require a shift from passive to strategic purchasing (SP). In this paper, we report on the experiences of SP in public sector health insurance schemes in nine middle-income countries to understand what extent SP has been established, the challenges and facilitators, and how it is helping countries achieve their UHC goals. METHODS We conducted a systematic search to identify papers on SP. Nine countries were selected for case study analysis. We extracted data from 129 articles. We used a common framework to compare the purchasing arrangements and key features in the different schemes. The evidence was synthesised qualitatively. RESULTS Five countries had health technology assessment (HTA) units to research what services to buy. Most schemes had reimbursement mechanisms that enabled some degree of cost control. However, we found evidenced-based changes to the reimbursement mechanisms only in Thailand and China. All countries have some form of mechanism for accreditation of health facilities, although there was considerable variation in what is done. All countries had some strategy for monitoring claims, but they vary in complexity and the extent of implementation; three countries have implemented e-claim processing enabling a greater level of monitoring. Only four countries had independent governance structures to provide oversight. We found delayed reimbursement (six countries), failure to provide services in the benefits package (four countries), and high out-of-pocket (OOP) payments in all countries except Thailand and Indonesia, suggesting the schemes were failing their members. CONCLUSION We recommend investment in purchaser and research capacity and a focus on strong governance, including regular engagement between the purchaser, provider and citizens, to build trusting relationships to leverage the potential of SP more fully, and expand financial protection and progress towards UHC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua Sumankuuro
- Centre for Health Policy, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Department of Public Policy and Management, SD Dombo University of Business and Integrated Development Studies, Wa, Ghana
- School of Community Health, Charles Sturt University, Orange, NSW, Australia
| | - Frances Griffiths
- Centre for Health Policy, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Adam D. Koon
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Witness Mapanga
- Centre for Health Policy, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
- School of Health Systems and Public Health, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Beryl Maritim
- Centre for Health Policy, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Consortium for Advanced Research Training in Africa (CARTA), Nairobi, Kenya
- School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Atiya Mosam
- School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Jane Goudge
- Centre for Health Policy, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Serván-Mori E, Gómez-Dantés O, Contreras D, Flamand L, Cerecero-García D, Arreola-Ornelas H, Knaul FM. Increase of catastrophic and impoverishing health expenditures in Mexico associated to policy changes and the COVID-19 pandemic. J Glob Health 2023; 13:06044. [PMID: 37883200 PMCID: PMC10602209 DOI: 10.7189/jogh.13.06044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In 2003, the Mexican Congress approved a major reform to provide health care services to the poor population through the public insurance scheme Seguro Popular. This program was dismantled in 2019 as part of a set of health system reforms and substituted with the Health Institute for Welfare (INSABI). These changes were implemented during the initial phases of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. We aimed to examine the impact of these reforms and the COVID-19 pandemic on financial risk protection in Mexico between 2018 and 2020. Methods We performed a population-based analysis using cross-sectional data from the 2018 and 2020 rounds of the National Household Income and Expenditures Survey. We used a pooled fixed-effects multivariable two-stage probit model to determine the likelihood of catastrophic health expenditure (CHE), impoverishing health expenditure (IHE), and excessive health expenditure (EHE) among Mexican households. We also mapped the quintiles of changes in EHE in households without health insurance by state. Results The percentage of households without health insurance almost doubled from 8.8% (three million households) in 2018 to 16.5% (5.8 million households) in 2020. We also found large increases in the proportion of households incurring in CHE (18.4%; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 6.1, 30.7) and EHE (18.7%; 95% CI = 7.9, 29.5). Significant increases in CHE, IHE, and EHE were only observed among households without health insurance (CHE: 90.7%; 95% CI = 31.6, 149.7, EHE: 73.5%; 95% CI = 25.3, 121.8). Virtually all Mexican states (n/N = 31/32) registered an increase in EHE among households without health insurance. This increase has a systematic territorial component affecting mostly central and southern states (range = -1.0% to 194.4%). Conclusions The discontinuation of the Seguro Popular Program and its substitution with INSABI during the first stages of the COVID-19 pandemic reduced the levels of health care coverage in Mexico. This reduction and the pandemic increased out-of-pocket expenditure in health and the portion of CHE and EHE in the 2018-2020 period. The effect was higher in households without health insurance and households in central and southern states of the country. Further studies are needed to determine the specific effect both of recent policy changes and of the COVID-19 pandemic on the levels of financial protection in health in Mexico.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edson Serván-Mori
- Center for Health Systems Research, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico
| | - Octavio Gómez-Dantés
- Center for Health Systems Research, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico
| | - David Contreras
- Institute for Obesity Research, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico
- School Government and Public Transformation, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico
| | - Laura Flamand
- Center for International Studies, El Colegio de Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Diego Cerecero-García
- Center for Health Systems Research, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico
- Public Health Policy Evaluation Unit, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Héctor Arreola-Ornelas
- Institute for Obesity Research, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico
- School Government and Public Transformation, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico
- Mexican Health Foundation (FUNSALUD), Mexico
- Tomatelo a Pecho, A.C., Mexico
| | - Felicia M Knaul
- Mexican Health Foundation (FUNSALUD), Mexico
- Tomatelo a Pecho, A.C., Mexico
- The University of Miami Institute for Advanced Study of the Americas, USA
- Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
van Gameren E, Enciso N. The Impact of Seguro Popular on the Progression of Disabilities Among Older Adults With Chronic Degenerative Diseases in Mexico. Res Aging 2023; 45:599-608. [PMID: 36515312 PMCID: PMC10597644 DOI: 10.1177/01640275221146283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
In a context of population aging, poverty, and inequalities including in the access to healthcare services, in 2004 Mexico initiated Seguro Popular (SP), a non-contributory health insurance providing coverage for informal sector workers excluded from social security. We analyze the impact of SP on the progression of functional limitations among adults aged over 50 with chronic degenerative diseases previously without stable health insurance. Panel data from the Mexican Health and Aging Study (MHAS) permit a difference-in-difference propensity score matching approach, comparing respondents before (2003) and after (2015) the implementation of SP. Findings suggest that SP affiliation in (or shortly before) 2012 has (weakly) slowed the progression of mobility, IADL, and ADL limitations, with a clearer effect in large urban centers. Reforms in the healthcare sector should address underlying structural barriers, reduce existing inequities, and provide effective access to high-quality services. with increased attention for long-term care needs, to guarantee healthy aging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edwin van Gameren
- El Colegio de México, Centro de Estudios Económicos. Carretera Picacho Ajusco 20, Col. Ampliación Fuentes del Pedregal, C.P. 14110 Tlalpan, CDMX, Mexico
| | - Níobe Enciso
- El Colegio de México, Centro de Estudios Económicos. Carretera Picacho Ajusco 20, Col. Ampliación Fuentes del Pedregal, C.P. 14110 Tlalpan, CDMX, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Colchero MA, Gómez R, Bautista-Arredondo S. A systematic review of the literature on the impact of the Seguro Popular. Health Res Policy Syst 2022; 20:42. [PMID: 35436938 PMCID: PMC9014564 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-022-00839-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 09/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Seguro Popular (SP) was launched in 2004 to increase access to healthcare and reduce catastrophic expenditures among the Mexican population. To document the evidence on its effectiveness, we conducted a systematic review of impact evaluations of the SP. METHODS We included papers using rigorous quasi-experimental designs to assess the effectiveness of the SP. We evaluated the quality of each study and presented the statistical significance of the effects by outcome category. RESULTS We identified 26 papers that met the inclusion criteria. Sixteen studies that evaluated the impact of SP on financial protection found consistent and statistically significant positive effects in 55% of the 65 outcomes analyzed. Nine studies evaluating utilization of health services for the general and infant populations found effectiveness on 40% of 30 outcomes analyzed. Concerning screening services for hypertension, diabetes, and cervical and prostate cancer, we found three studies evaluating 14 outcomes and finding significant effects on 50% of them. Studies looking at the impact of SP on diabetes, hypertension, and general health care and treatment evaluated 19 outcomes and found effects on 21% of them. One study assessed five diabetes monitoring services and found positive effects on four of them. The only study on morbidity and mortality found positive results on three of the four outcomes of interest. CONCLUSION We found mixed evidence on the impact of SP on financial protection, healthcare utilization, morbidity and mortality. In the 26 studies included in this review, researchers found positive effects in roughly half of the outcomes and null results on the rest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M A Colchero
- Center for Health Systems Research, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Universidad No. 655 Colonia Santa María Ahuacatitlán, Cerrada Los Pinos y Caminera, C.P. 62100, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico
| | - R Gómez
- Center for Health Systems Research, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Universidad No. 655 Colonia Santa María Ahuacatitlán, Cerrada Los Pinos y Caminera, C.P. 62100, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico
| | - S Bautista-Arredondo
- Center for Health Systems Research, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Universidad No. 655 Colonia Santa María Ahuacatitlán, Cerrada Los Pinos y Caminera, C.P. 62100, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Health care utilization for patients with stroke: a 3-year cross-sectional study of China's two urban health insurance schemes across four cities. BMC Public Health 2021; 21:531. [PMID: 33736618 PMCID: PMC7977157 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-10456-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Stroke is a devastating disease and a major cause of death and disability in China. While existing studies focused mainly on differences in stroke patients’ health care utilization by insurance type, this study assesses whether health utilization and medical costs differed by insurance type across four cities in China. Methods A 5% random sample from the 2014–2016 China Urban Employees’ Basic Medical Insurance (UEBMI) and Urban Residents’ Basic Medical Insurance (URBMI) claims data were collected across four cities, Beijing, Shanghai, Tianjin, and Chongqing. Descriptive statistics and ordinary least squares regression were employed to analyze the data. Results We found that differences in healthcare utilization and inpatient and outpatient medical expenses varied more by city-specific insurance type than they did between the UEBMI and URBMI schemes. For example, the median UEBMI medical outpatient costs in Beijing (RMB500.2) were significantly higher than UEBMI patients in Shanghai (RMB260.8), Tianjin (RMB240.8), and Chongqing (RMB293.0), and Beijing URBMI patients had significantly higher outpatient medical costs (RMB356.9) than URBMI patients in Shanghai (RMB233.4) and Chongqing (RMB211.0), which were significantly higher than Tianjin (RMB156.2). Patients in Chongqing had 66.4% (95% CI: − 0.672, − 0.649) fewer outpatient visits, 13.0% (95% CI: − 0.144, − 0.115) fewer inpatient visits, and 34.2% (95% CI: − 0.366, − 0.318) shorter length of stay than patients in Beijing. The divergence of average length of stay and out-of-pocket (OOP) expenses by insurance type was also greater between cities than the UEMBI-URBMI mean difference. Conclusions Significant city-specific differences in stroke patients’ healthcare utilization and medical costs reflected inequalities in health care access. The fragmented social health insurance schemes in China should be consolidated to provide patients in different cities equal financial protection and benefit packages and to improve the equity of stroke patient access to health care.
Collapse
|
7
|
Fenny AP, Yates R, Thompson R. Strategies for financing social health insurance schemes for providing universal health care: a comparative analysis of five countries. Glob Health Action 2021; 14:1868054. [PMID: 33472557 PMCID: PMC7833020 DOI: 10.1080/16549716.2020.1868054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2020] [Accepted: 12/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Universal Health Coverage has become a political priority for many African countries yet there are clear challenges in achieving this goal. Though social health insurance is considered a mechanism for providing financial protection, less well documented in the literature is evidence from countries in Africa who are at various stages of adopting this financing strategy as a way to improve health insurance coverage for their populations. Objectives: The study investigates whether social health insurance schemes are effectively and efficiently covering all groups. The objective is to provide evidence of how these schemes have been implemented and whether the fundamental goals are met. The selected countries are Ghana, Rwanda, Tanzania, Kenya and Ethiopia. The study draws lessons from the literature about how policy tools can be used to reduce financial barriers whilst ensuring a broad geographic coverage in Africa. Methods: The study relies primarily on a review of literature, both documented and grey matter, which include key documents such as government health policy documents, strategic plans, health financing policy documents, Universal Health Coverage policy documents, published literature, unpublished documents, media reports and National Health Accounts reports. Results: The results show that each of the selected countries relies on a plurality of health insurance schemes with each targeting different groups. Additionally, many of the Social Health Insurance programs start by covering the formal sector first, with the hope of covering other groups in the informal sector at a later stage. Health insurance coverage for poor groups is very low, with targeting mechanisms to cover the poor in the form of exemptions and waivers achieving no desirable results. Conclusions: The ability for Social Health Insurance programs to cover all groups has been limited in the selected countries. Hence, relying solely on social health insurance schemes to achieve Universal Health Coverage may not be plausible in Africa. Also, highly fragmented risk pools impede efforts to widen the insurance pools and promote cross-subsidies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ama P. Fenny
- Institute of Statistical, Social and Economic Research (ISSER), University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana
| | - Robert Yates
- Centre for Global Health Security, Chatham House, The Royal Institute of International Affairs, London, UK
| | - Rachel Thompson
- Centre for Global Health Security, Chatham House, The Royal Institute of International Affairs, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Serván-Mori E, Cerecero-García D, Heredia-Pi IB, Pineda-Antúnez C, Sosa-Rubí SG, Nigenda G. Improving the effective maternal-child health care coverage through synergies between supply and demand-side interventions: evidence from Mexico. J Glob Health 2020; 9:020433. [PMID: 32257178 PMCID: PMC7101510 DOI: 10.7189/jogh.09.020433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Over the last two decades, the Mexican government has released several efforts to achieve universal health coverage (UHC), based on the principles of fairness and social protection, to reduce the inequities in utilization, access, and quality of care existing in the health system. Two of the most important social public policies that have targeted the population without access to social security include the 1997 conditional cash transfers (CCT) program known as Prospera (formerly Oportunidades or Progresa) and the Seguro Popular de Salud (SPS by its Spanish initials), launched in 2003. These two programs, so far, have survived changes in the federal administrations being the most longstanding social programs targeting poor (or unprotected) populations ever in the history of modern Mexico. We tested the existence of positive synergies between demand-side (or CCT-Prospera) and supply-side (or Seguro Popular de Salud, SPS) social programs in the achievement of effective coverage (EC) of maternal-child health interventions in Mexico. Methods We performed a retrospective-cohort analysis to 6413 women aged 12-49 years who participated in a probabilistic survey conducted in 2012. We calculated EC as the product of three indexes: need, utilization and quality of health care. Correlates of EC were identified estimating a logistic regression model. We also presented adjusted EC by specific women groups. Results EC among beneficiaries of both programs was similar to estimates in Social Security affiliates (54%). For those not affiliated to any of the programs or those who received benefits for only one of them, the EC was 47.6% and 45.5% respectively. Adjusted estimates of EC suggest that overall, having both programs (Prospera + SPS) has a positive effect on maternal and child care coverage, which makes the observed differences in EC not statistically significant between those affiliated to both programs in comparison with the observed in the population with social security. Conclusions Results support positive synergies between Prospera and SPS in the reduction of the gaps in EC. The most vulnerable population groups need to be reached by the combination of these programs so that public health efforts translate into greater EC of maternal health services and better maternal-child outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edson Serván-Mori
- Center for Health Systems Research. National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico
| | - Diego Cerecero-García
- Center for Health Systems Research. National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico
| | - Ileana B Heredia-Pi
- Center for Health Systems Research. National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico
| | - Carlos Pineda-Antúnez
- Center for Health Systems Research. National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico
| | - Sandra G Sosa-Rubí
- Center for Health Systems Research. National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico
| | - Gustavo Nigenda
- National School of Nursing and Obstetrics. National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Celhay P, Martinez S, Muñoz M, Perez M, Perez-Cuevas R. Long-term effects of public health insurance on the health of children in Mexico: a retrospective study. LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH 2019; 7:e1448-e1457. [DOI: 10.1016/s2214-109x(19)30326-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2018] [Revised: 05/18/2019] [Accepted: 06/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
10
|
Serván-Mori E, Wirtz VJ. Monetary and nonmonetary household consumption of health services and the role of insurance benefits: An analysis of the Mexico's National Household Income and Expenditure Survey. Int J Health Plann Manage 2018; 33:847-859. [PMID: 29790595 DOI: 10.1002/hpm.2536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2018] [Accepted: 03/23/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To study the monetary and nonmonetary consumption of healthcare services at household level in Mexico and the magnitude of the contribution of public programs. METHODS By using the National Household Income and Expenditure Survey 2012, we performed a cross-sectional and observational analysis of actual household consumption of health services by insurance type (no insurance, social security, Seguro Popular (SP)). Household consumption was divided into 2 categories: consumption related to "monetary" expenditure in health care and "nonmonetary" consumption in health care by the household. Nonmonetary included self-consumption or gifts received from other households and institutional contributions such as government payments or private organization transfers. RESULTS In SP households, monetary and nonmonetary consumption of health services represented the highest proportion of available household expenditure (11.2%) compared to uninsured (8.4%) and social security (5.9%) households. The prevalence of outpatient consultation and medicine use is the highest among the health service consumption categories regardless of insurance status. Distribution of nonmonetary versus monetary consumption of health services was pro-poor: The poorer the households, the larger the proportion of nonmonetary consumption. CONCLUSIONS The higher probability of receiving nonmonetary resources as a component of health service consumption in SP households is likely to increase the affordability to health services and likely to reduce healthcare expenditures. Future research should focus on the type of nonmonetary consumption of health services at household level to better understand financial protection and access to health care in Mexico.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edson Serván-Mori
- Center for Health Systems Research, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico
| | - Veronika J Wirtz
- Department of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|