Feasibility, safety, and reliability of exercise testing using the combined arm-leg (Cruiser) ergometer in subjects with a lower limb amputation

Functional outcomes and associated factors of individuals with unilateral traumatic lower limb amputation in Sri Lanka: An observational study

BACKGROUND

Rehabilitation is important after an amputation surgery. This study was conducted to find the level of functional outcomes of individuals with unilateral traumatic lower limb amputation and the impact of sociodemographic, amputation, and rehabilitation characteristics on functional outcomes.

METHODS

An observational cross-sectional study was conducted with 48 participants (aged 20-60 years) who visited the Center for Handicapped from across the country. Functional outcomes were measured using the Locomotor Capabilities Index, Amputee Mobility Predictor with Prosthesis, 6-minute walk distance, and spirometry test and sociodemographic, amputation, and rehabilitation characteristics using a self-constructed questionnaire.

RESULTS

Amputee Mobility Predictor with Prosthesis K levels showed 65% had the ability to ambulate in the community and could master environmental barriers. Locomotor Capabilities Index scores showed 96% could independently perform basic daily activities with or without using assistive devices and 83% could perform advanced daily activities. None of the individuals had achieved their predicted 6-minute walk distance, but 52% had "good and above" level of maximum oxygen consumption; restrictive respiratory pattern was indicated among 31%. Amputee Mobility Predictor with Prosthesis and Locomotor Capabilities Index scores were significantly ( p < 0.005) affected by mobility hours/day, amputation level, prosthesis usage, and satisfaction. Six-minute walk distance was significantly ( p < 0.005) related to income, time since amputation, duration of rehabilitation, mobility hours/day, sex, job engagement, previous job, amputation level, K levels, and satisfaction with prosthesis.

CONCLUSION

Rehabilitation in Sri Lanka mainly focuses on basic walking training, not on long-term survival, distance walking, and cardiorespiratory endurance, which can lead to future comorbidities. Raising awareness in the society about rehabilitation services and more effective rehabilitation programs are recommended.

Clinimetrics of performance-based functional outcome measures for vascular amputees: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Objective physical performance-based outcome measures (PerBOMs) are essential tools for the holistic management of people who have had an amputation due to vascular disease. These people are often non-ambulatory, however it is currently unclear which PerBOMs are high quality and appropriate for those who are either ambulatory or non-ambulatory.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Which PerBOMs have appropriate clinimetric properties to be recommended for those who have had amputations due to vascular disease ('vascular amputee')?

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, EMCARE, the Cochrane Library, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and Scopus databases were searched for the terms: "physical performance" or "function", "clinimetric properties", "reliability", "validity", "amputee" and "peripheral vascular disease" or "diabetes".

REVIEW METHODS

A systematic review of PerBOMs for vascular amputees was performed following COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology and PRISMA guidelines. The quality of studies and individual PerBOMs was assessed using COSMIN risk of bias and good measurement properties. Overall PerBOM quality was evaluated with a modified GRADE rating. Key clinimetric properties evaluated were reliability, validity, predictive validity and responsiveness.

RESULTS

A total of 15,259 records were screened. Forty-eight studies (2650 participants) were included: 7 exclusively included vascular amputees only, 35 investigated validity, 20 studied predictive validity, 23 investigated reliability or internal consistency and 7 assessed responsiveness. Meta-analysis was neither possible nor appropriate for this systematic review in accordance with COSMIN guidelines, due to heterogeneity of the data. Thirty-four different PerBOMs were identified of which only 4 are suitable for non-ambulatory vascular amputees. The Amputee Mobility Predictor no Prosthesis (AMPnoPro) and Transfemoral Fitting Predictor (TFP) predict prosthesis use only. PerBOMs available for assessing physical performance are the One-Leg Balance Test (OLBT) and Basic Amputee Mobility Score (BAMS).

CONCLUSION

At present, few PerBOMs can be recommended for vascular amputees. Only 4 are available for non-ambulatory individuals: AMPnoPro, TFP, OLBT and BAMS.

Interobserver and intraobserver reliabilities of determining the ventilatory thresholds in subjects with a lower limb amputation and able-bodied subjects during a peak exercise test on the combined arm-leg (Cruiser) ergometer

The first (VT1) and second ventilator (VT2) (anaerobic) thresholds are used to individually prescribe exercise training programs. The purpose of this research was to analyze inter- and intraobserver reliabilities of determining VT1 and VT2 in subjects with lower limb amputation (LLA) and able-bodied (AB) subjects during a peak exercise test on the arm-leg (Cruiser) ergometer. Previously published data of exercise tests on the Cruiser ergometer of subjects with LLA ( n = 17) and AB subjects ( n = 30) were analyzed twice by two observers. The VT1 and VT2 were determined based on ventilation plots. Differences in determining the VT1 and VT2 between the observers for the first and second analyses were analyzed. To quantify variation in measurement a variance component analysis was performed. Bland-Altmann plots were made, and limits of agreement were calculated. The number of observations in which thresholds could not be determined differed significantly between observers and analysis. Variation in VT1 between and within observers was small (0-1.6%) compared with the total variation, for both the subjects with an LLA and AB subjects. The reliability coefficient for VT1 was more than 0.75, and the limits of agreement were good. In conclusion, based on the results of this study on a population level, VT1 can be used to prescribe exercise training programs after an LLA. In the current study, the determination of VT2 was less reliable than VT1. More research is needed into the clinical application of VT1 and VT2 during a peak exercise test on the Cruiser ergometer.

Metabolic Cost and Performance of Athletes With Lower Limb Amputation and Nonamputee Matched Controls During Running: A Systematic Review

ABSTRACT

The elastic function of running-specific prostheses likely contributes to a lower metabolic cost of running. However, it remains unclear whether running-specific prostheses provide advantages concerning the metabolic cost of running in relationship with nonamputee runners. This study aimed to systematically review the scientific literature to examine the peak performance (peak oxygen consumption-VO2peak and peak speed) and the metabolic cost between paired amputees and nonamputees during running and between amputee runners with traditional prostheses and running-specific prostheses. A literature search on three databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) was conducted using the following key words: (amputation OR amputee) AND (run OR running OR runner) AND (prosthesis OR prosthetics), resulting in 2060 records and 4 studies within the inclusion criteria. A methodological quality assessment was carried out using a modified version of the Downs and Black checklist. VO2peak of the amputees athletes (54 ± 2 mL kg-1 min-1) is similar (mean difference = -0.80 mL kg-1 min-1, confidence interval = -4.63 to 3.03) to nonamputees athletes (55 ± 2 mL kg-1 min-1). The average metabolic cost of the paired amputee athletes (4.94 ± 1.19 J kg-1 m-1) also does not differ (mean difference = 0.73 J kg-1 m-1, confidence interval = -0.74 to 2.20) from nonamputee runners (4.21 ± 0.16 J kg-1 m-1). The research on running in amputee and nonamputee athletes is limited. The few existing studies have limited methodological quality. The metabolic cost data from amputee athletes running with running-specific prostheses are within the range of nonamputee data.