3-year-data of combined navigated laser photocoagulation (Navilas) and intravitreal ranibizumab compared to ranibizumab monotherapy in DME patients

The Role of Laser Photocoagulation in Treating Diabetic Macular Edema in the Era of Intravitreal Drug Administration: A Descriptive Review

Background and Objectives: This study aimed to elucidate the role of laser photocoagulation therapy in the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) as an alternative to, or in conjunction with, the first-line treatment, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Materials and Methods: A comprehensive literature search to identify studies that evaluated the efficacy of laser photocoagulation therapy in the management of DME was performed. The relevant findings of the efficacy of focal/grid laser therapy from data in randomized, controlled trials were synthesized, and the potential of new laser technologies, such as navigated laser systems, pattern scan lasers, and subthreshold lasers, was explored. The usefulness of multimodal imaging-guided laser therapy was also evaluated, with a focus on the potential contribution to anti-VEGF therapy. Results: Focal laser photocoagulation targeting microaneurysms remains an effective therapeutic approach to chronic refractory edema, despite the widespread use of anti-VEGF therapy. To achieve the best possible treatment outcomes, precise identification of microaneurysms is essential. This requires the use of multimodal imaging-guided, highly accurate, minimally invasive coagulation techniques. Subthreshold laser therapy can also reduce the frequency of anti-VEGF injections and minimize treatment burden. Conclusions: Further studies are needed to determine the optimal timing and settings for laser photocoagulation therapy and the potential of new laser technologies in the management of DME. Nevertheless, laser photocoagulation therapy plays an important role in the management of DME, in conjunction with anti-VEGF therapy.

The evolving therapeutic landscape of diabetic retinopathy

INTRODUCTION

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of blindness worldwide. Recent decades have seen rapid progress in the management of diabetic eye disease, evolving from pituitary ablation to photocoagulation and intravitreal pharmacotherapy. The advent of effective intravitreal drugs inhibiting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) marked a new era in DR therapy. Sustained innovation has since produced several promising biologics targeting angiogenesis, inflammation, oxidative stress, and neurodegeneration.

AREAS COVERED

This review surveys traditional, contemporary, and emerging therapeutics for DR, with an emphasis on anti-VEGF therapies, receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, angiopoietin-Tie2 pathway inhibitors, integrin pathway inhibitors, gene therapy 'biofactory' approaches, and novel systemic therapies. Some of these investigational therapies are being delivered intravitreally via sustained release technologies for extended durability. Other investigational agents are being delivered non-invasively via topical and systemic routes. These strategies hold promise for early and long-lasting treatment of DR.

EXPERT OPINION

The evolving therapeutic landscape of DR is rapidly expanding our toolkit for the effective and durable treatment of blinding eye disease. However, further research is required to validate the efficacy of novel therapeutics and characterize real world outcomes.

Review of clinical studies and recommendation for a therapeutic flow chart for diabetic macular edema

Diabetic macular edema (DME), characterized by exudative fluid accumulation in the macula, is the most common form of sight-threatening retinopathy in patients with diabetes. The management of DME has changed considerably in recent years, especially following the development of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy which has emerged as a first-line therapy for center-involved DME. Laser treatment, intravitreal steroid therapy, and vitrectomy are also important treatment options for DME. We believe that it is important to choose the most appropriate treatment option for DME based on the clinical evidences, in addition to the careful consideration of individual patients' general or ocular condition, DME characteristics, patients' motivation, and compliance to the treatment in real-world clinical practice. In this review, we have summarized important clinical evidences for the main treatments for DME, presented an expert review for these evidences, and proposed a recommended therapeutic flow chart for DME. We hope that our review of the clinical evidences and the recommended therapeutic flow chart for DME will contribute to better treatment outcome for DME.

Aflibercept and navigated versus conventional laser in diabetic macular oedema: a 12-month randomized clinical trial

PURPOSE

To examine the efficacy of intravitreal aflibercept and navigated laser as compared to intravitreal aflibercept and conventional laser in diabetic macular oedema (DME) treatment.

METHODS

In 12-month randomized clinical trial, 48 eyes of 37 patients with centre-involved DME at Odense University Hospital were randomized 1:1 to receive three monthly injections of aflibercept followed by navigated (group A) or conventional (group B) focal/grid laser. From month four through twelve, patients were examined monthly, and additional injections were given pro re nata (PRN) (central retinal thickness [CRT]>20% from lowest measurement or loss in visual acuity [VA]>5 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] letters compared with baseline). Outcome measures; (1) percentage of eyes that needed additional injections after laser in group A and B, (2) mean number of injections in group A and B, and (3) mean change in VA and CRT in group A and B.

RESULTS

In the PRN phase, 60.5% of patients needed additional injections without differences between groups A and B (58.3 versus 63.2%, p > 0.99). The mean number of injections between baseline and month 12 was 4.4 (4.2 versus 4.6, p = 0.41). From baseline to month 12, VA improved by 8.4 ETDRS letters, and CRT was reduced by 97.4 μm (+9.4 versus +7.1 letters, p = 0.17, and -83.2 versus -115.4 μm, p = 0.21).

CONCLUSION

No difference in need for retreatment was detected between treatment arms of aflibercept and navigated versus conventional laser.

One-Year Effectiveness Study of Intravitreously Administered Conbercept® Monotherapy in Diabetic Macular Degeneration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

The evidence on efficacy of intravitreously administered Conbercept (IVC) monotherapy for diabetic macular degeneration was still limited.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted in November 2019 to summarize the current evidence on visual acuity (VA) changes with IVC monotherapy in the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) from Pubmed, ClinicalTrials.gov, EMbase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, Chin VIP Information (VIP), and Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM). Retrospective or prospective clinical studies which used IVC injection for the treatment of DME were included. Outcomes included in the analysis were change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT). A meta-regression was conducted to assess 1-year BCVA and CMT changes against numbers of injections.

RESULTS

A total of 20 studies were included in current study. At 12-month follow-up, an overall increase of 0.67 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) BCVA score [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.24-1.11; P = 0.003] and 1.03 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters (95% CI 0.69-1.38; P < 0.001) was shown with IVC injection compared to baseline. Decrease in CMT was 142.79 μm (95% CI 112.71-172.87; P < 0.001) compared to baseline. The meta-regression showed a significant increase in effect size between number of injections and 12-month logMAR BCVA scale change as well as CMT.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest improved VA and CMT outcomes during 1-year follow-up in patients with DME who underwent IVC monotherapy. Increased injection frequency demonstrates a significant trend with improved outcomes at 12 months.

Effect of Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Growth Factor Agents With or Without Macular Photocoagulation on Diabetic Macular Edema: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Diabetes is a common cause of new sight loss in populations world-wide, and diabetic macular edema (DME) is a major cause of visual deficits in the diabetic populations of developed countries. We have performed a meta-analysis to evaluate whether combined treatment with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections and macular photocoagulation (MPC) is more efficacious than primary monotherapy with anti-VEGF injections in patients with DME.

METHODS

We systematically searched the PubMed and Web of Science databases for studies providing sufficient information for a comparison of pre- and post-treatment of central macular thickness (CMT) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) between two groups of patients with DME given interventional therapies (monotherapy with an anti-VEGF agent vs. combination therapy with an anti-VEGF agent and MPC) before January 2019. A meta-analysis was performed to summarize the results of the studies included in the systematic review.

RESULTS

The results of our meta-analysis indicated that post-treatment CMT was significantly lower at 3 months in DME patients receiving combination therapy with bevacizumab, a humanized anti-VEGF antibody, and MPC than in those receiving monotherapy with bevacizumab. The results also showed that post-treatment CMT was lower in DME patients given ranibizumab, an anti-VEGF agent, in combination with MPC at 6, 9 and 12 months than in those treated with ranibizumab alone. However, no significant differences were found in post-treatment BCVA at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months between DME patients receiving combination therapy with an anti-VEGF agent (bevacizumab or ranibizumab) and MPC and those receiving monotherapy with an anti-VEGF agent.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the results of our meta-analysis demonstrate a transiently synergistic effect of MPC on CMT when this treatment is combined with anti-VEGF agents, whereas no similar synergistic effect could be detected on the BCVA. A relatively longer follow-up was essential to be able to evaluate the long-term existence of this synergistic effect.

Randomized Trial of Treat and Extend Ranibizumab With and Without Navigated Laser Versus Monthly Dosing for Diabetic Macular Edema: TREX-DME 2-Year Outcomes

PURPOSE

To prospectively evaluate a treat and extend algorithm of ranibizumab with and without navigated laser to monthly dosing for center-involving diabetic macular edema.

DESIGN

This was a multicenter, randomized, clinical trial.

METHODS

One hundred fifty eyes were randomized into 3 cohorts: monthly (n = 30), treat and extend without laser photocoagulation (TREX; n = 60), and treat and extend with angiography-guided laser photocoagulation (GILA; n = 60). Monthly cohort eyes received ranibizumab 0.3 mg every 4 weeks. TREX and GILA cohort eyes received 4 monthly injections of ranibizumab 0.3 mg followed by a treat and extend dosing strategy. GILA cohort eyes also received navigated focal laser at month 1 and again every 3 months as needed. The primary outcomes included the mean change in best-corrected visual acuity and central retinal thickness and the number of injections from baseline to 2 years.

RESULTS

At 2 years, mean best-corrected visual acuity and central retinal thickness improved by 7.5, 9.6, and 9.0 letters (P = .75) and 139, 140, and 175 μm (P = .09), in the monthly, TREX, and GILA cohorts, respectively. The mean number of injections was significantly reduced in both the TREX (18.9) and GILA (17.5) cohorts compared with the monthly cohort (24.7, P < .001). Between the TREX and GILA cohorts, there was no significant difference in the mean treatment interval, mean maximal treatment interval, or percentage of eyes extended to 12 weeks. The total 2-year incidence of Anti-Platelet Trialists' Collaboration events was 6.7%.

CONCLUSION

The treat and extend algorithm of ranibizumab in the TREX-DME trial resulted in significantly fewer injections and yielded visual and anatomic gains comparable to monthly dosing at 2 years.