Utility of including BRAF mutation analysis with ultrasonographic and cytological diagnoses in ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration of thyroid nodules

Malignancy in Thyroid Nodules with Bethesda III Category on Repeat Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy

Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate the risk of malignancy for nodules repeatedly classified as Bethesda category III on fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB).

Methodology

A chart review on a series of 59 patients seen with thyroid nodules who underwent both initial and repeat FNAB at the Diabetes, Thyroid and Endocrine Center of St. Luke's Medical Center, Quezon City was conducted. The Thyroid Registry was utilized to collect each patient's demographic and clinical characteristics, ultrasonographic features of thyroid nodules along with the cytopathologic and histopathologic results. The subclassification of atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) were retrieved from the cytopathology reports using the institution's electronic Healthcare-Results Management System.

Results

A total of 59 adult patients with thyroid nodules were included. Nodules which were initially AUS/FLUS turned out to be malignant on repeat FNAB in 38 patients with a prevalence of 64.41% (95% CI: 50.87-76.45%). There was no significant difference with regards to clinical, ultrasonographic and cytopathologic features of malignancy between benign and malignant nodules.

Conclusion

Findings of this study support surgical intervention as a reasonable option after a repeat Bethesda III classification on FNAB. However, the small sample size warrants confirmation in future studies with a representative sample of patients.

Advances in Molecular Profiling and Their Potential Influence on the Extent of Surgery in Well-Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma (WDTC)

Thyroid cancer surgery has evolved dramatically with advances in our understanding of the biological behaviour of WDTC. Molecular profiling is shedding light on the subset that may behave aggressively. In an era when thyroid cancer management is becoming increasingly conservative, decision making regarding the extent of surgery must be objectively guided by molecular markers. The aim of the present article is to summarise the current published literature and provide possible practice recommendations. An online search for relevant published articles was performed using several databases. Title, abstract, and full-text screening, along with data extraction, was performed by two independent reviewers after the inclusion and exclusion criteria were defined. A total of 1241 articles were identified, and 82 relevant articles were extracted and scrutinised. BRAF V600E and TERT promoter mutations were found to be associated with an increased risk of disease recurrence and distant metastases. Several other mutations have been identified that enhance disease aggressiveness (such as RET/PTC, PTEN, and TP53). One of the most important determinants of the outcome in WDTC is the extent of surgical resection. The evolution of molecular testing has reached a stage of personalised incorporation into surgical practice. Guidelines for molecular testing and surgery in WDTC will need to be clearly defined, arguably representing the next chapter in the management of the disease.

Molecular Tests for Risk-Stratifying Cytologically Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules: An Overview of Commercially Available Testing Platforms in the United States

The past decade has witnessed significant advances in the application of molecular diagnostics for the pre-operative risk-stratification of cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules. The tests that are currently marketed in the United States for this purpose combine aspects of tumor genotyping with gene and/or microRNA expression profiling. This review compares the general methodology and clinical validation studies for the three tests currently offered in the United States: ThyroSeq v3, Afirma GSC and Xpression Atlas, and ThyGeNEXT/ThyraMIR.

Preoperative molecular testing in thyroid nodules with Bethesda VI cytology: Clinical experience and review of the literature

Risk assessment is critical to determine the timing of elective surgeries and preserve valuable resources in time of pandemic. This study was undertaken to better understand the potential value of molecular testing to risk‐stratify thyroid nodules with malignant cytology (Bethesda VI). Systematic review of the literature contributed 21 studies representing 2036 preoperative specimens. The BRAF p.V600E substitution was detected in 46% to 90% of cases with a pooled positivity rate of 70% (95% confidence intervals: 64%‐76%). None of the studies used comprehensive oncogene panels. Retrospective analysis of 531 clinical specimens evaluated with the next‐generation sequencing ThyGeNEXT Thyroid Oncogene Panel identified a total of 436 gene alterations. BRAF mutation rate was 64% in specimens tested as part of standard clinical care and 75% in specimens from cross‐sectional research studies (P = .022). Testing for additional actionable gene alterations such as TERT promoter mutations or RET and NTRK gene rearrangements further increased the diagnostic yield to 78%‐85% and up to 95% when including the ThyraMIR Thyroid miRNA Classifier. These data support the role of molecular cytopathology in surgical and therapeutic decision‐making and warrant additional studies.

Molecular markers for the classification of cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of indeterminate lesions of the thyroid is a challenge in cytopathology practice. Indeed, up to 30% of cases lack the morphological features needed to provide definitive classification. Molecular tests have been developed to assist in the diagnosis of these indeterminate cases. The first studies dealing with the preoperative molecular evaluation of FNA samples focused on the analysis of BRAF^V600E or on the combined evaluation of two or three genetic alterations. The sensitivity of molecular testing was then improved through the introduction of gene panels, which became available for clinical use in the late 2000s. Two different categories of molecular tests have been developed, the 'rule-out' methods, which aim to reduce the avoidable treatment of benign nodules, and the 'rule-in' tests that have the purpose to optimize surgical management. The genetic evaluation of indeterminate thyroid nodules is predicted to improve patient care, particularly if molecular tests are used appropriately and with the awareness of their advantages and weaknesses. The main disadvantage of these tests is the cost, which makes them rarely used in Europe. To overcome this limitation, customized panels have been set up, which are able to detect the most frequent genetic alterations of thyroid cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

In the present review, the most recent available versions of commercial molecular tests and of custom, non-commercial panels are described. Their characteristics and accuracy in the differential diagnosis of indeterminate nodules, namely Bethesda classes III (Atypical follicular lesion of undetermined significance, AUS/FLUS) and IV (Suspicious for follicular neoplasm, FN/SFN) are fully analyzed and discussed.

Molecular Variants and Their Risks for Malignancy in Cytologically Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules

Background: Gene panels are routinely used to assess predisposition to hereditary cancers by simultaneously testing multiple susceptibility genes and/or variants. More recently, genetic panels have been implemented as part of solid tumor malignancy testing assessing somatic alterations. One example is targeted variant panels for thyroid nodules that are not conclusively malignant or benign upon fine-needle aspiration (FNA). We systematically reviewed published studies from 2009 to 2018 that contained genetic data from preoperative FNA specimens on cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules (ITNs) that subsequently underwent surgical resection. Pooled prevalence estimates per gene and variant, along with their respective positive predictive values (PPVs) for malignancy, were calculated. Summary: Our systematic search identified 540 studies that were supplemented by 18 studies from bibliographies or personal files. Sixty-one studies met all inclusion criteria and included >4600 ITNs. Overall, 26% of nodules contained at least 1 variant or fusion. However, half of them did not include details on the specific gene, variant, and/or complete fusion pair reported for inclusion toward PPV calculations. The PPVs of genomic alterations reported at least 10 times were limited to BRAF^V600E (98%, 95% confidence interval [CI 96-99%]), PAX8/PPARG (55% [CI 34-78%]), HRAS^Q61R (45% [CI 22-72%]), BRAF^K601E (42% [CI 19-68%]), and NRAS^Q61R (38% [CI 23-55%]). Excluding BRAF^V600E, the pooled PPV for all other specified variants and fusions was 47%. Multiple variants within the same nodule were identified in ∼1% of ITN and carried a cumulative PPV of 77%. Conclusions: The chance that a genomic alteration predicts malignancy depends on the individual variant or fusion detected. Only five alterations were reported at least 10 times; BRAF^V600E had a PPV of 98%, while the remaining four had individual PPVs ranging from 38% to 55%. The small sample size of most variants and fusion pairs found among ITNs, however, limits confidence in their individual PPV point estimates. Better specific reporting of genomic alterations with cytological category, histological subtype, and cancer staging would facilitate better understanding of cancer prediction, and the independent contribution of the genomic profile to prognosis.

High BRAFV600E mutation frequency in Chinese patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma increases diagnostic efficacy in cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules

To estimate the BRAFV600E mutation frequency in Chinese patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), and the diagnostic value of BRAFV600E mutation status in thyroid nodules with indeterminate TBSRTC categories.A total of 4875 consecutive samples for thyroid ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and BRAF mutation analysis were collected from patients at Jiangsu Province Hospital on Integration of Chinese and Western Medicine. Among all the cases, 314 underwent thyroidectomy. According to TBSRTC categories, FNAC was performed for a preoperative diagnosis. ROC of the subject was constructed to evaluate the diagnostic value of these 2 methods and their combination.BRAF mutation in FNAC of thyroid nodules occurred in 2796 samples (57.35%). Of 353 nodule samples from 314 patients with thyroid operation, 333 were pathologically diagnosed as PTC. Of these PTC patients, 292 (87.69%) were found to have BRAF mutation in their preoperative FNAC. In 175 cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules, BRAF mutation identified 88% of PTC. According to ROC data, BRAF mutation testing had an obviously higher sensitivity (87.69%) and specificity (100.00%) than TBSRTC. Combining BRAF mutation testing and TBSRTC achieved the largest AUC (0.954). For 41 PTC with a negative BRAF mutation in preoperative evaluation, the repeated BRAF mutation testing found out 12 samples with BRAF mutation. The true BRAF mutation rate of Chinese PTC patients was 91.29%.Chinese patients with PTC have a higher frequency of BRAF mutation. The BRAF mutation testing affords a high diagnostic value in thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology.