Ability of individuals with chronic hemiparetic stroke to locate their forearms during single-arm and between-arms tasks

Impaired proprioception and magnified scaling of proprioceptive error responses in chronic stroke

BACKGROUND

Previous work has shown that ~ 50-60% of individuals have impaired proprioception after stroke. Typically, these studies have identified proprioceptive impairments using a narrow range of reference movements. While this has been important for identifying the prevalence of proprioceptive impairments, it is unknown whether these error responses are consistent for a broad range of reference movements. The objective of this study was to characterize proprioceptive accuracy as function of movement speed and distance in stroke.

METHODS

Stroke (N = 25) and controls (N = 21) completed a robotic proprioception test that varied movement speed and distance. Participants mirror-matched various reference movement speeds (0.1-0.4 m/s) and distances (7.5-17.5 cm). Spatial and temporal parameters known to quantify proprioception were used to determine group differences in proprioceptive accuracy, and whether patterns of proprioceptive error were consistent across testing conditions within and across groups.

RESULTS

Overall, we found that stroke participants had impaired proprioception compared to controls. Proprioceptive errors related to tested reference movement scaled similarly to controls, but some errors showed amplified scaling (e.g., significantly overshooting or undershooting reference speed). Further, interaction effects were present for speed and distance reference combinations at the extremes of the testing distribution.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that stroke participants have impaired proprioception and that some proprioceptive errors were dependent on characteristics of the movement (e.g., speed) and that reference movements at the extremes of the testing distribution resulted in significantly larger proprioceptive errors for the stroke group. Understanding how sensory information is utilized across a broad spectrum of movements after stroke may aid design of rehabilitation programs.

360° immersive virtual reality-based mirror therapy for upper extremity function and satisfaction among stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Stroke is a leading cause of long-term disability worldwide; therefore, an effective rehabilitation strategy is fundamental. Mirror therapy (MT) has been a popular approach for upper extremity rehabilitation, but it presents some limitations. Recent advancements in virtual reality (VR) technology have introduced immersive VR-based MT, potentially overcoming these limitations and enhancing rehabilitation outcomes.

AIM

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel 360° immersive virtual reality-based MT (360MT) in upper extremity rehabilitation for stroke patients, comparing it to traditional MT (TMT) and conventional physical therapy control group (CG).

DESIGN

A prospective, active control, assessor blinded, parallel groups, randomized controlled trial.

POPULATION

Forty-five participants with chronic stroke within six months of onset.

METHODS

The participants were randomly allocated to 360MT, TMT, or CG groups. Outcome measures included Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE), Box and Block Test (BBT), and Manual Function Test (MFT). Additionally, patient experience and satisfaction in the groups of 360MT and TMT were assessed through questionnaires and interviews.

RESULTS

Results revealed that the 360MT group showed significantly greater improvements in FMA-UE, MFT and BBT compared to TMT (P<0.05) and CG (P<0.001) groups. Patient experience and satisfaction were more favorable in the 360MT group, with participants reporting higher engagement and motivation.

CONCLUSIONS

360MT appears to be a promising approach for upper extremity rehabilitation in stroke patients, providing better outcomes and higher patient satisfaction. However, further research is needed to confirm these findings and strengthen the evidence base for 360MT in stroke rehabilitation.

CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT

360MT demonstrated notably enhanced upper extremity rehabilitation outcomes as well as better patient satisfaction among chronic stroke patients within six months of onset compared to traditional MT and conventional physical therapy. This novel approach not only fostered functional improvements but also elevated levels of engagement and motivation among participants, suggesting a promising future application in stroke rehabilitation framework.

Test-retest reliability of joint position sense in the elbow among healthy adults

BACKGROUND

Proprioception of the elbow is necessary for daily activities. Proprioception can be impaired with injury or pathology, and rehabilitation efforts seek to improve proprioception for improved upper extremity functioning. In clinical practice, joint position sense (JPS) testing is often utilized to assess conscious proprioception; however, varying methods exist with little evidence of psychometric properties, especially for the elbow.

PURPOSE

The primary aim of this study was to create a standardized elbow JPS test protocol using goniometry measurement to determine the most reliable testing position. The secondary aim was to determine if the elbow JPS test had acceptable test-retest reliability in healthy adults.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a cross-sectional study using a convenience sample of healthy adults.

METHODS

Three elbow positions (45°, 60°, and 75° of elbow flexion) were measured twice on the same day by a single rater using a universal goniometer. We calculated the absolute error in degrees between each position and reposition and the intraclass correlation coefficient (3,1) for relative reliability. We also calculated the standard error of the measurement and visually inspected Bland-Altman plots for absolute reliability.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight healthy adults (mean age 27.9 years, standard deviation 8.59) were assessed. The mean absolute error for all positions for test and retest was 5.7°. The intraclass correlation coefficients were moderate to good (0.57-0.75), and the standard error of the measurement was 2° (rounded) for all positions. The limits of agreement were moderately narrow, and the Bland-Altman plots showed a random distribution of errors for each position, indicating clinically acceptable measurement error.

CONCLUSIONS

The joint position reproduction test for JPS using goniometry demonstrated moderate to good test-retest reliability and acceptable measurement error in healthy adults. The elbow joint angle of 60° flexion was the most reliable for JPS testing, providing insight for JPS assessment in clinical practice.

Aging increases proprioceptive error for a broad range of movement speed and distance estimates in the upper limb

Previous work has identified age-related declines in proprioception within a narrow range of limb movements. It is unclear whether these declines are consistent across a broad range of movement characteristics that more closely represent daily living. Here we aim to characterize upper limb error in younger and older adults across a range of movement speeds and distances. The objective of this study was to determine how proprioceptive matching accuracy changes as a function of movement speed and distance, as well as understand the effects of aging on these accuracies. We used an upper limb robotic test of proprioception to vary the speed and distance of movement in two groups: younger (n = 20, 24.25 ± 3.34 years) and older adults (n = 21, 63 ± 10.74 years). The robot moved one arm and the participant was instructed to mirror-match the movement with their opposite arm. Participants matched seven different movement speeds (0.1-0.4 m/s) and five distances (7.5-17.5 cm) over 350 trials. Spatial (e.g., End Point Error) and temporal (e.g., Peak Speed Ratio) outcomes were used to quantify proprioceptive accuracy. Regardless of the speed or distance of movement, we found that older controls had significantly reduced proprioceptive matching accuracy compared to younger control participants (p ≤ 0.05). When movement speed was varied, we observed that errors in proprioceptive matching estimates of spatial and temporal measures were significantly higher for older adults for all but the slowest tested speed (0.1 m/s) for the majority of parameters. When movement distance was varied, we observed that errors in proprioceptive matching estimates were significantly higher for all distances, except for the longest distance (17.5 cm) for older adults compared to younger adults. We found that the magnitude of proprioceptive matching errors was dependent on the characteristics of the reference movement, and that these errors scaled increasingly with age. Our results suggest that aging significantly negatively impacts proprioceptive matching accuracy and that proprioceptive matching errors made by both groups lies along a continuum that depends on movement characteristics and that these errors are amplified due to the typical aging process.

Two senses of human limb position: methods of measurement and roles in proprioception

The sense of position of the body and its limbs is a proprioceptive sense. Proprioceptors are concerned with monitoring the body's own actions. Position sense is important because it is believed to contribute to our self-awareness. This review discusses recent developments in the debate about the sources of peripheral afferent signals contributing to position sense and describes different methods of measurement of position sense under conditions where vision does not participate. These include pointing to or verbal reporting of the perceived position of a hidden body part, alignment of one body part with the perceived position of another, or using memory-based repositioning tasks. The evidence suggests that there are at least two different mechanisms involved in the generation of position sense, mechanisms using different central processing pathways. The principal sensory receptor responsible for position sense is believed to be the muscle spindle. One criterion for identifying mechanism is whether position sense can be manipulated by controlled changes in spindle discharge rates. Position sense measured in two-limb matching is altered in a predictable way by such changes, while values for pointing and verbal reporting remain unresponsive. It is proposed that in two-limb matching the sensation generated is limb position in postural space. In pointing or verbal reporting, information is provided about limb position in extrapersonal space. Here vision is believed to play a role. The evidence suggests that we are aware, at the same time, of sensations of limb position in postural space as well as in extrapersonal space.

Investigation of how accurately individuals with hemiparetic stroke can mirror their forearm positions

Current literature suggests that greater than 50% of survivors of a stroke cannot accurately perceive where their upper extremity is positioned. Our recent work demonstrates that the extent to which this perception is affected can depend on how the task is performed. For example, individuals with stroke who have a deficit in mirroring the position of their passively-placed paretic forearm during a between-arms task may accurately reproduce the position of their actively-controlled paretic forearm during a single-arm task. Moreover, the ability of individuals with various types of unilateral lesions to locate their thumb can depend on whether they reach for their paretic thumb or non-paretic thumb. Consequently, we investigated to what extent the accuracy of individuals post-hemiparetic stroke in mirroring forearm positions on a between-arms task is influenced by various conditions. Eighteen participants with hemiparetic stroke rotated their reference forearm to a target position, and then rotated their opposite forearm to concurrently mirror the position of their reference forearm. This task was performed when participants referenced each forearm (paretic, non-paretic) at two target positions (extension, flexion) for two modes of limb control (passive, active). We quantified for every testing scenario of each participant their position-mirroring error. The number of times for which participants were classified as having a deficit was least when mirroring forearm positions at the flexed position when referencing their non-paretic forearm. Additionally, the difference in the magnitude of errors when participants referenced each arm was greater during active than passive movements. Findings from this study provide further evidence that the accuracy with which individuals post stroke perceive the position of their limbs can depend on how a task is performed. Factors to consider include whether movements are active versus passive, which limb is referenced, and where the limb is positioned.