Plant immunity in natural populations and agricultural fields: Low presence of pathogenesis-related proteins in Solanum leaves

Comparative proteomic analyses of potato leaves from field-grown plants grown under extremely long days

There are limited molecular data and few biomarkers available for studies of field-grown plants, especially for plants grown during extremely long days. In this study we present quantitative proteomics data from 3 years of field trials on potato, conducted in northern and southern Sweden and analyze over 3000 proteins per year of the study and complement the proteomic analysis with metabolomic and transcriptomic analyses. Small but consistent differences linked to the longer days (an average of four more hours of light per day) in northern Sweden (20 h light/day) compared to southern Sweden can be observed, with a high correlation between the mRNA determined by RNA-seq and protein abundances. The majority of the proteins with differential abundances between northern and southern Sweden could be divided into three groups: metabolic enzymes (especially GABA metabolism), proteins involved in redox metabolism, and hydrolytic enzymes. The observed differences in metabolic enzyme abundances corresponded well with untargeted metabolite data determined by GC and LC mass-spectrometry. We also analyzed differences in protein abundance between potato varieties that performed relatively well in northern Sweden in terms of yield with those that performed relatively less well. This comparison indicates that the proteins with higher abundance in the high-yield quotient group are more anabolic in their character, whereas the proteins with lower abundance are more catabolic. Our results create a base of information about potato "field-omics" for improved understanding of physiological and molecular processes in field-grown plants, and our data indicate that the potato plant is not generally stressed by extremely long days.

Leaf Apoplast of Field-Grown Potato Analyzed by Quantitative Proteomics and Activity-Based Protein Profiling

Multiple biotic and abiotic stresses challenge plants growing in agricultural fields. Most molecular studies have aimed to understand plant responses to challenges under controlled conditions. However, studies on field-grown plants are scarce, limiting application of the findings in agricultural conditions. In this study, we investigated the composition of apoplastic proteomes of potato cultivar Bintje grown under field conditions, i.e., two field sites in June-August across two years and fungicide treated and untreated, using quantitative proteomics, as well as its activity using activity-based protein profiling (ABPP). Samples were clustered and some proteins showed significant intensity and activity differences, based on their field site and sampling time (June-August), indicating differential regulation of certain proteins in response to environmental or developmental factors. Peroxidases, class II chitinases, pectinesterases, and osmotins were among the proteins more abundant later in the growing season (July-August) as compared to early in the season (June). We did not detect significant differences between fungicide Shirlan treated and untreated field samples in two growing seasons. Using ABPP, we showed differential activity of serine hydrolases and β-glycosidases under greenhouse and field conditions and across a growing season. Furthermore, the activity of serine hydrolases and β-glycosidases, including proteins related to biotic stress tolerance, decreased as the season progressed. The generated proteomics data would facilitate further studies aiming at understanding mechanisms of molecular plant physiology in agricultural fields and help applying effective strategies to mitigate biotic and abiotic stresses.

Comprehensive Time-Series Analysis of the Gene Expression Profile in a Susceptible Cultivar of Tree Tomato (Solanum betaceum) During the Infection of Phytophthora betacei

Solanum betaceum is a tree from the Andean region bearing edible fruits, considered an exotic export. Although there has been renewed interest in its commercialization, sustainability, and disease management have been limiting factors. Phytophthora betacei is a recently described species that causes late blight in S. betaceum. There is no general study of the response of S. betaceum, particularly, in the changes in expression of pathogenesis-related genes. In this manuscript we present a comprehensive RNA-seq time-series study of the plant response to the infection of P. betacei. Following six time points of infection, the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) involved in the defense by the plant were contextualized in a sequential manner. We documented 5,628 DEGs across all time-points. From 6 to 24 h post-inoculation, we highlighted DEGs involved in the recognition of the pathogen by the likely activation of pattern-triggered immunity (PTI) genes. We also describe the possible effect of the pathogen effectors in the host during the effector-triggered response. Finally, we reveal genes related to the susceptible outcome of the interaction caused by the onset of necrotrophy and the sharp transcriptional changes as a response to the pathogen. This is the first report of the transcriptome of the tree tomato in response to the newly described pathogen P. betacei.

What Is New in (Plant) Proteomics Methods and Protocols: The 2015-2019 Quinquennium

The third edition of "Plant Proteomics Methods and Protocols," with the title "Advances in Proteomics Techniques, Data Validation, and Integration with Other Classic and -Omics Approaches in the Systems Biology Direction," was conceived as being based on the success of the previous editions, and the continuous advances and improvements in proteomic techniques, equipment, and bioinformatics tools, and their uses in basic and translational plant biology research that has occurred in the past 5 years (in round figures, of around 22,000 publications referenced in WoS, 2000 were devoted to plants).The monograph contains 29 chapters with detailed proteomics protocols commonly employed in plant biology research. They present recent advances at all workflow stages, starting from the laboratory (tissue and cell fractionation, protein extraction, depletion, purification, separation, MS analysis, quantification) and ending on the computer (algorithms for protein identification and quantification, bioinformatics tools for data analysis, databases and repositories). At the end of each chapter there are enough explanatory notes and comments to make the protocols easily applicable to other biological systems and/or studies, discussing limitations, artifacts, or pitfalls. For that reason, as with the previous editions, it would be especially useful for beginners or novices.Out of the 29 chapters, six are devoted to descriptive proteomics, with a special emphasis on subcellular protein profiling (Chapters 5 - 10 ), six to PTMs (Chapters 11 , and 14 - 18 ), three to protein interactions (Chapters 19 - 21 ), and two to specific proteins, peroxidases (Chapter 24 ) and proteases and protease inhibitors (Chapter 26 ). The book reflects the new trajectory in MS-based protein identification and quantification, moving from the classic gel-based approaches to the most recent labeling (Chapters 10 , 11 , 29 ), shotgun (Chapters 5 , 7 , 12 , 15 ), parallel reaction monitoring (Chapter 16 ), and targeted data acquisition (Chapter 13 ). MS imaging (Chapter 25 ), the only in vivo MS-based proteomics strategy, is far from being fully optimized and exploited in plant biology research. A confident protein identification and quantitation, especially in orphan species, of low-abundance proteins, is still a challenging task (Chapters 4 , 28 ).What is really new is the use of different techniques for proteomics data validation and their integration into other classic and -omics approaches in the systems biology direction. Chapter 2 reports on multiple extractions in a single experiment of the different biomolecules, nucleic acids, proteins, and metabolites. Chapter 27 describes how metabolic pathways can be reconstructed from multiple -omics data, and Chapter 3 network building. Finally, Chapters 22 and 23 deal with, respectively, the search for allele-specific proteins and proteogenomics.Around 200 groups were, almost 1 year ago, invited to take part in this edition. Unfortunately, only 10% of them kindly accepted. My gratitude to those who accepted our invitation but also to those who did not, as all of them have contributed to the plant proteomics field. I will enlist, in this introductory chapter, following my own judgment, some of the relevant papers published in the past 5 years, those that have shown us how to enhance and exploit the potential of proteomics in plant biology research, without aiming at giving a too exhaustive list.