High quality process of care increases one-year survival after acute myocardial infarction (AMI): A cohort study in Italy

Improving Knowledge of Audit and Feedback among Health Care Professionals in Sicily

Audit and Feedback (A&F) is considered one of the most significant tools for implementing continuous Quality Improvement (QI) in the healthcare field. The audit process is a structured inspection of professional practice against known standards or targets. The results of this inspection are subsequently feedback from professionals in order to implement an improvement process. The Italian Ministry of Health has recently funded the network project EASY-NET, with the main objective of evaluating the effectiveness of A&F strategies to improve healthcare practice and equity in various clinical and organizational settings in seven Italian regions. The Sicily region is represented within the EASY-NET project by the IRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino-Pulejo of Messina as the Work Package 7 (WP7). One of the objectives of the WP7 is to assess mechanisms and tools to enhance the effectiveness of A&F strategies. The purpose of this study is to investigate the influence that training interventions can have on improving knowledge of A&F strategies among healthcare professionals. The study employed a quasi-experimental design with a pretest-posttest evaluation strategy. The participants' initial knowledge of A&F strategies was evaluated through a baseline survey. Subsequently, the participants attended an online training workshop led by A&F experts, and a follow-up survey consisting of the same set of questions was conducted at the end of the process. Results showed statistically significant positive changes in the level of knowledge of A&F among participants following the training intervention. Furthermore, dividing the participants into two subgroups based on their professional background revealed significant differences in the level of knowledge of A&F methodologies between the observed categories of healthcare professionals. In conclusion, the study revealed that training interventions can be facilitators to implementing effective A&F programs.

Audit and feedback in cardio- and cerebrovascular setting: Toward a path of high reliability in Italian healthcare

Adopting audit and feedback (A&F) strategies could be a suitable healthcare intervention to fulfill the challenge of monitoring and improving clinical guidelines in evidence-based medicine. Indeed, A&F is used to encourage professionals to better adhere to standard guidelines to improve healthcare performance. Briefly, an audit is an inspection of professional practice in comparison to professional standards or targets whose results are subsequently communicated to professionals in a structured manner. Although A&F strategies have been adopted in several time-dependent settings, such as for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and stroke, interest of audits in rehabilitation care is also emerging. Recently, the Italian Ministry of Health has funded a national network project called EASY-NET, whose main objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of A&F strategies to improve healthcare practice and equity in various clinical and organizational settings in seven Italian regions. Last but not the least of these regions is the Sicily, represented within the project by the IRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino-Pulejo of Messina as the work package 7 (WP7). The EASY-NET WP7 is focused on the effectiveness of A&F strategies in both AMI and ischemic stroke setting, from acute to rehabilitation process of care. In this study, we described the study protocol, including the study design and methodology, providing a detailed description of the new model of A&F based on telemedicine, and discussing the possible challenges of this project.

Comparison of Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients Stratified by a Novel Acute Myocardial Infarction Risk Stratification (nARS) System

BACKGROUND

As severity of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) varies widely, several risk stratifications for AMI have been reported. We have introduced a novel AMI risk stratification system linked to a rehabilitation program (novel AMI risk stratification; nARS), which stratified AMI patients into low (L)-, intermediate (I)-, and high (H)-risk groups. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the long-term clinical outcomes in patients with AMI among L-, I-, H-risk groups.Methods and Results: This study included 773 AMI patients, and assigned them into the L-risk group (n=332), the I-risk group (n=164), and the H-risk group (n=277). The primary endpoint was major cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as the composite of all-cause death, readmission for heart failure, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization after the discharge of index admission. The median follow-up duration was 686 days. MACE was most frequently observed in the H-risk group (39.4%), followed by the I-risk group (23.2%), and least in the L-risk group (19.9%) (P<0.001). The multivariate Cox hazard analysis revealed that the H-risk was significantly associated with MACE (HR 2.166, 95% CI 1.543-3.041, P<0.001) after controlling for multiple confounding factors.

CONCLUSIONS

H-risk according to nARS was significantly associated with long-term adverse events after hospital discharge for patients with AMI. These results support the validity of nARS as a risk marker for long-term outcomes.

Effect of High-Quality Whole-Course Care on Psychological Status and Postoperative Pharyngeal Complications in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Hyperparathyroidism Secondary to Chronic Rrenal Failure

Objective

To observe the effects of high-quality whole-course care on the psychological status and postoperative pharyngeal complications in patients undergoing surgery for secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) to chronic rrenal failure (CRF).

Methods

The clinical data of 62 patients who underwent surgical treatment for CRF-SHPT from April 2018 to October 2021 in our department were retrospectively analyzed. According to the different nursing methods after admission, they were divided into two groups, of which 33 patients who received high-quality whole-course care were the high-quality group, and 29 patients who received routine nursing were the regular group. Compliance, occurrence of pharyngeal complications, improvement of preoperative and postoperative psychological status [Assessed by self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) and self-rating depression scale (SDS)], nursing satisfaction scores, and serum hormone levels [intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH), calcium (Ca), Phosphorus (P)] were compared between the two groups.

Results

The differences between the general conditions and clinical characteristics of the two groups were not significant (p > 0.05). After care, the number of cases with good compliance in the high-quality group was higher than that in the regular group, and the number of cases with non-compliance was lower than that in the regular group (p < 0.05); the difference in the number of cases with partial compliance after care between the two groups was not significant (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of pharyngeal complications such as sore throat, nausea and vomiting, dry throat and hoarseness between the two groups (p > 0.05); however, the 24-h postoperative sore throat and dry throat scores in the high-quality group were significantly lower than those in the regular group (p < 0.05). Patients in the high-quality group had higher nursing attitude, nursing skills, nursing safety, nursing quality, and overall nursing satisfaction scores than the regular group (p < 0.05). Compared with the pre-care period, SAS and SDS scores decreased in both groups after care, and SAS and SDS scores decreased more in the high-quality group than in the regular group (p < 0.05). Serum iPTH, Ca, and P levels decreased in both groups at 1 week after surgery, and iPTH, Ca, and P levels decreased more in the high-quality group than in the regular group (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Through the high-quality whole-course care, full informed participation and active cooperation of CRF-SHPT patients, close medical and nursing collaboration, attention to detail and overall level of treatment can effectively improve patient compliance, psychological status and postoperative serum indicators, promote patient recovery and improve nursing satisfaction.

Association of treatments for acute myocardial infarction and survival for seven common comorbidity states: a nationwide cohort study

BACKGROUND

Comorbidity is common and has a substantial negative impact on the prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Whilst receipt of guideline-indicated treatment for AMI is associated with improved prognosis, the extent to which comorbidities influence treatment provision its efficacy is unknown. Therefore, we investigated the association between treatment provision for AMI and survival for seven common comorbidities.

METHODS

We used data of 693,388 AMI patients recorded in the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP), 2003-2013. We investigated the association between comorbidities and receipt of optimal care for AMI (receipt of all eligible guideline-indicated treatments), and the effect of receipt of optimal care for comorbid AMI patients on long-term survival using flexible parametric survival models.

RESULTS

A total of 412,809 [59.5%] patients with AMI had at least one comorbidity, including hypertension (302,388 [48.7%]), diabetes (122,228 [19.4%]), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, 89,221 [14.9%]), cerebrovascular disease (51,883 [8.6%]), chronic heart failure (33,813 [5.6%]), chronic renal failure (31,029 [5.0%]) and peripheral vascular disease (27,627 [4.6%]). Receipt of optimal care was associated with greatest survival benefit for patients without comorbidities (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.51-0.56) followed by patients with hypertension (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.58-0.62), diabetes (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.80-0.87), peripheral vascular disease (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.79-0.91), renal failure (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.84-0.94) and COPD (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.87-0.94). For patients with heart failure and cerebrovascular disease, optimal care for AMI was not associated with improved survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, guideline-indicated care was associated with improved long-term survival. However, this was not the case in AMI patients with concomitant heart failure or cerebrovascular disease. There is therefore a need for novel treatments to improve outcomes for AMI patients with pre-existing heart failure or cerebrovascular disease.