Quality of postoperative pain management in Ethiopia: A prospective longitudinal study

Outcomes of Pain Management Among Postoperative Patients: A Cross-sectional Study

PURPOSE

Postoperative pain management has always been a significant challenge for both hospital staff and surgical patients. Determination of pain management outcomes among surgically treated patients may help develop pain management strategies, improve health services that would yield better outcomes, and increase patient satisfaction. This study aimed to assess the outcomes of pain management among postoperative patients.

DESIGN

The study was a descriptive cross-sectional study.

METHODS

The research was performed on postoperative patients at two university hospitals in North Cyprus from July to September 2019. The study sample consisted of 90 patients from both hospitals. The Turkish Version of the revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R-TR) was used for data collection. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist was used to report the present study.

FINDINGS

This study showed that the overall mean for pain severity and the worst pain experienced by patients after 24 hours was slightly higher than medium. Examination of interference of the pain with functions demonstrated that patients experienced problems with physical activities and sleeping. The most experienced side effects were nausea and drowsiness, and the most common emotions were anxiety and helplessness during the postsurgery period. The satisfaction rate of the patients with postoperative pain management was relatively high.

CONCLUSIONS

A holistic approach with evidence-based practices is crucial for adequate postoperative pain management. The recommendations include the development of individual pain outcome strategies to improve overall satisfaction with pain management among postoperative patients.

Acute Pain Services and pain-related patient-reported outcomes in Hungarian hospitals

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pain management is an important part of surgical care, where Acute Pain Service offers added value in terms of patient outcomes and costs. The technology, however, has hardly been adopted in Hungary, with only two hospitals operating Acute Pain Service and whose performance has not been evaluated yet. This research compared pain management outcomes of surgical, orthopedic, and traumatology patients in Hungarian hospitals with and without Acute Pain Service.

METHODS

We recruited 348 patients, 120 in the APS group and 228 in the control group, whose experience was surveyed with an adapted version of the American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire. The questionnaire covered pain intensity, pain interference with physical and emotional functions, side effects, patient satisfaction, information received, and participation in treatment decisions. The differences were analyzed by Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

The APS group showed better results with lower pain intensity scores regarding worst postoperative pain (χ2 = 18.919, p = 0.0043). They reported less pain interference with activities in bed (χ2 = 21.978, p = 0.0006) and out of bed (χ2 = 14.341, p = 0.0129). Furthermore, patients in the APS group experienced fewer pain-management-related side effects, like nausea (χ2 = 15.240, p = 0.0101), drowsiness (χ2 = 26.965, p = 0.0001), and dizziness (χ2 = 13.980, p = 0.0124). However, patient information (χ2 = 3.480, p = 0.0945) and patient satisfaction (χ2 = 5.781, p = 0.2127) did not differ significantly between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings confirm earlier international evidence on the benefits of Acute Pain Service in postoperative pain management and support the wider adoption of the technology in Hungarian hospitals. Nevertheless, close attention should be paid to patient information and involvement as better outcomes alone do not necessarily increase patient satisfaction.

A Cross-Sectional Study of Anesthesia Safety in Wad Medani, Sudan: A Pre-war Status Indicating a Post-war Crisis

BACKGROUND

As the surgical burden grows, increasing patient safety during anesthesia and surgery becomes a major global public health priority. Anesthesia can be safely administered in higher-income countries, yet it is more challenging in third-world countries. This study focuses on Sudan, a third-world country, and its unmet anesthetic needs before the current war and how these needs might compromise the post-war status.

AIM

The aim of this study is to compare Sudan's outstanding anesthesia requirements to the World Health Organization's safe anesthesia practice standards in terms of workforce, medications, equipment, and anesthesia conduct.

METHODS

This study was carried out in four hospitals (Wad Medani Teaching Hospital, Wad Medani Maternity Hospital, Gezira Centre for Renal and Urological Surgeries, and the National Centre for Pediatric Surgeries) in Wad Medani, two of which were referral and two were state-run. Each hospital from every category was identified using a convenience sampling technique. The World Health Organization-World Federation of Societies of Anesthesiologists International Standard and earlier regional African publications were used to determine the minimum predicted safe anesthesia needs.

RESULTS

The results of our study demonstrate that overall, the hospitals surveyed fulfilled the minimum standards set by the World Health Organization and the World Federation of Societies of Anesthesiologists (WHO-WFSA) for safe anesthesia practice by 73% with no significant difference in the safety of anesthesia practice between state and referral hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

The state of safe anesthesia care in Wad Medani hospitals surveyed fell well short of the expected minimal criteria due to important requirements such as patient monitoring indicators, the inaccessibility of life-saving facilities such as defibrillators, and difficult intubation instruments. More importantly, the conduct of anesthesia was far below the standard.

Acute postoperative pain prevalence and intensity in the first 72 hour in Dessie Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Ethiopia: a prospective single center observational study

Background

Postoperative pain is poorly studied in developing countries. Severe pain after surgery remains a major problem, occurring in 50-70% of the patients. Differences exist across countries. Despite numerous published studies, the degree of pain following many types of surgery in everyday clinical practice is unknown. To improve postoperative pain-treatment and develop procedure-specific, optimized pain-treatment protocols, the prevalence and severity of postoperative pain must first be identified.

Objective

This study aimed to determine the prevalence and intensity of acute postoperative pain and the practice of postoperative pain management.

Methods

A total of 180 patients were enrolled in the study, with 160 calculated using a single population proportion formula and a 10% attrition rate added, with proportionate stratification according to the size of each ward to obtain the number of participants from each specialty ward. A multistage sampling with stratified proportionate at the initial stages and a simple random sampling technique at the final stage was used. The patients completed a numerical pain rating scale for pain immediately after surgery for the first 72 h after surgery. The prevalence of mild, moderate, or severe pain was calculated. The evaluation was performed at eight time points including immediately after surgery: T2, T4, T8, T12, T24, T48, and T72.

Result

The prevalence of severe pain in patients who underwent elective surgery in the study period measured by numeric rating scale was 21.6, 43.9, 45.6, 28.9, 39.4, 10.5, and 13.4% at 2nd, 4th, 8th, 12th, 24th, 48th and 72 h, respectively.

Conclusion

The prevalence of moderate-to-severe pain within 72 h postoperatively was slightly lower than that other studies conducted in Ethiopia reported. This was still high, indicating better pain management in the postoperative period. Involvement of the anesthetist in pain management is crucial for better patient management.

Pain-free hospital implementation: a multidimensional intervention to improve pain management at Wallaga University Referral Hospital, Nekemte, Ethiopia

OBJECTIVE

This quality improvement project is aimed to increase pain free hospital implementation from 21.7 to 80% at Wallaga University Referral Hospital (WURH) from January 1, 2023 to June 30, 2023.

METHODS

Hospital based interventional study was conducted at WURH. The Plan- Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle was used to test change ideas. A fishbone diagram and a driver diagram were used to identify root causes and address them. Major interventions included training of health professionals, initiation of pain as fifth vital sign, policy and protocol development, and conducting regular supportive supervision.

RESULTS

Upon completion of the project, overall pain-free hospital implementation increased from baseline 21.7-88.7%. Implementation of pain as 5th the vital sign was increased from 15.4 to 92.3%. Regular audits of pain assessment and management increased from 27.3 to 81.8%. Two standardized treatment protocols or chronic and acute pains were developed from baseline zero. A focal person for Pain-free hospital implementation was assigned. More than 85% of healthcare providers were trained in pain assessment and management.

CONCLUSION

Compliance with pain-free hospital implementations was significantly improved in the study area. This was achieved through the application of multidimensional change ideas related to health professionals, standardized guidelines and protocols, supplies, and leadership. Therefore, we recommend providing regular technical updates & conducting a frequent clinical audit on pain management.

Patients' preferences for delivering bad news in palliative care in Ethiopia: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

One of the major challenges for healthcare professionals relates to awareness of patients' preferences relative to how and when to break bad news and how much information should be disclosed in the eventuality of a serious medical diagnosis or prognosis. On occasions, a serious medical diagnosis or prognosis is withheld from the patient. There is a scarcity of evidence about cultural preferences regarding breaking bad news in the palliative care setting in Ethiopia. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the surrounding cultural issues to properly convey bad news. The purpose of the study was to explore Ethiopian patients' cultural preferences for receiving bad news in a palliative care setting.

METHODS

A qualitative research approach and nonprobability, purposive sampling method were applied. In-depth interviews were employed to collect data from eight patients who were diagnosed with cancer and cancer with HIV/AIDS during the time of data collection. Thematic analysis was applied to identify themes and subthemes. The data were transcribed verbatim and analysed using ATLAS.ti 22 computer software.

RESULTS

The following three themes emerged and are reported in this study: (1) Perceptions about life-threatening illness: religious values and rituals are essential for establishing perspectives on life-threatening illnesses and preferences in receiving bad news. (2) Experiences with life-threatening illness: study participants' experience with the method of breaking bad news was sad, and they were not provided with sufficient details about their medical condition. Making appropriate decisions, fulfilling the ordinance of religious faith, and avoiding unnecessary costs were outlined as benefits of receiving bad news. (3) Preferred ways of breaking bad news; the findings revealed that incremental, amiable and empathic methods for delivering bad news were preferred. It was suggested that the presence of family members is crucial when receiving bad news.

CONCLUSION

Patients choose to be told about their medical conditions in the presence of their family. However, the patient's needs for receiving bad news were unmet. Patients should be involved in the treatment decision process. Delivery of bad news needs to tailor the preferred methods, cultural values, and religious beliefs. Delivering bad news according to the patients' preferences helps to fulfil their wishes in palliative care.

Incidence and predictors of postoperative severe acute pain within 24 hours after cesarean section performed under spinal anesthesia at public hospitals in West Shoa, Ethiopia, 2022 prospective cohort study

Background

Acute postoperative pain is common after a caesarean section; the mother suffers severe pain in the first 24 h after the caesarean section compared to spontaneous birth. Failure to discover predictors of pain leads to maternal dissatisfaction, increased expenses, and restricted movement; it increases the risk of deep vein thrombosis, lengthens hospital stays, and decreases social intimacy.

Methods and materials

An institution-based prospective cohort study was conducted among 422 women who went to undergo caesarean sections under spinal anaesthesia at public hospitals in West Shoa from 30 July to 30 October. Participants were selected by systematic random sampling. Data were collected by a structured questionnaire, and the collected data were entered into SPSS version 20 and exported into STATA 64 for analysis. The results were presented in tables and figures. Risk factors were assessed by Poisson regression with a robust standard error.

Results

The overall incidence of severe postoperative pain after a caesarean section performed under spinal anaesthesia within 24 h of follow-up was 50.4% [95% confidence interval (CI): 40.7, 60.1]. Preoperative anxiety risk ratio 1.7 (95% CI: 1.4-2.0), preoperative pain risk ratio 1.3 (95% CI: 1.0-1.48), type of incision risk ratio 11.3 (95% CI: 1.1-1.6), spinal anaesthesia without adjuvants risk ratio 4.1 (95% CI: 1.5-10.9), and duration of surgery risk ratio 1.5 (95% CI: 1.3-1.8) were found to be predictors for postoperative severe acute pain after caesarean section performed under spinal anaesthesia.

Conclusion

In this study, the overall incidence of severe acute pain after a caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia was high. Preoperative fear, duration of the operation, preparatory pain, spinal anaesthesia without the use of adjuvants, and the type of incision were risk factors for severe acute postoperative pain after a caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia.

Assessment of adequacy and appropriateness of pain management practice among trauma patients at the Ethiopian Aabet Hospital: A prospective observational study

INTRODUCTION

Pain is unpleasant sensory and emotional experiences associated with actual and/or potential tissue damage. It is the most common and prevalent reason for emergency departments (ED) visits with prevalence over 70% in the world.

AIM OF THE STUDY

The study aimed to assess the adequacy and appropriateness of pain management at Aabet Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

METHODS

A hospital-based prospective cross-sectional study was conducted at Aabet hospital from December 1, 2020 to March 30, 2021. Adult trauma patients having pain (at least score 1 on Numeric Rating Scale) with Glasgow Coma Scale score > 13 were eligible to participate in the study. The pain intensity was evaluated at the time of admission (o minute) and then at 60, 120, 180, and 240 minutes. The time of the first analgesics was registered. The adequacy and the appropriateness of the pain management were calculated through pain management index (PMI).

RESULTS

Two hundred thirty-two (232) participants were included in this study of which 126 (54.3%) were admitted due to road traffic accident followed by fall 44(19%). Only 21 (9.1%) study participants received the first analgesic treatment within 30 minutes while 27(11.6%) participants had no treatment at all within 240 minutes. The mean pain intensity score at admission was 5.55 ± 2.32 and reduced to 4.09 ± 2.69. Nearly half 110 (47.4%) of the study participants were treated inadequately (PMI (-) score). There was a weak and negative correlation between PMI and time to analgesia (r = - .159, p = 0.0001). The type of analgesia used, the time to analgesia, and the degree of pain may predict 65% of the variance in PMI score (R2 = 0.65, P = .001).

CONCLUSION

From the results of this study, it can be concluded that acute pain in trauma patients was under and inappropriately treated.

Review of the Current Situation of Postoperative Pain and Causes of Inadequate Pain Management in Africa

Postoperative pain is one of the most prevalent complications following surgery, and more than 47% of surgical patients endure postoperative discomfort worldwide. In Africa, due to resource shortages and other issues, postoperative pain is substantially more common when compared to developed countries. Severe postoperative pain has many negative effects, including possibly death, which can burden both individuals and society as a whole. Therefore, effectively controlling postoperative pain is becoming increasingly important. To enhance the effectiveness of future pain management, a thorough analysis of the current reasons for inadequate postoperative pain management is necessary. In this article, the present situations of occurring postoperative pain, children's postoperative pain, and pain management in Africa are reviewed, based on relevant and recent literature. In particular, the reasons for inadequate postoperative pain management in Africa are detailed in this article from five perspectives: the inadequate assessment of postoperative pain, the knowledge gap among medical professionals, the patients' misconceptions, the scarcity of resources, and the lack of medications. Additionally, we offer appropriate solutions following various factors.

Modifiable factors associated with a consistently high acute pain trajectory after surgical treatment of traumatic fractures in Ethiopia: a multi-center prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

In Ethiopia, little is known about postoperative pain trajectories and possible predictive factors associated with them in patients undergoing surgery following traumatic fractures.

METHODS

This multi-center prospective observational cohort study included surgical candidates for traumatic fractures (n = 218). Worst pain intensity was measured with an 11-point numeric rating scale on the first 4 postoperative days and day of hospital discharge. Growth mixture modeling was used to identify subgroups of patients based on their pain trajectories, and logistic regression models to quantify associations between pain trajectories and demographic, clinical, psychological, and life style factors.

RESULTS

Two postoperative pain trajectory subgroups were identified: rapid pain relief (48% of included individuals) and consistently high pain (52% of included individuals). Sub-analysis stratified by cause of injury demonstrated that higher preoperative pain was an independent risk factor for consistently high postoperative pain regardless of the patient's injury type: traffic accident (OR = 1.48, 95% CI 1.23-1.79), machine/tool injury or conflict (OR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.11-2.26), or fall (OR = 1.47, 95% CI 1.08-1.99). Moreover, longer surgical time was a risk factor for consistently high postoperative pain among patients who had a fall-related injury (OR = 1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.03). In contrast, among patients with a traffic-related injury, receiving a nerve block was a protective factor (OR = 0.19, 95% CI 0.04-0.87) compared with general anesthesia.

CONCLUSION

Higher preoperative pain and longer surgical time were associated with a consistently high acute postoperative pain trajectory. Clinicians may use these potentially modifiable factors to identify patients at risk for consistently high pain during the early postoperative period.

Postoperative Pain Management Outcomes at a Chinese Hospital: A Cross-Sectional Survey

PURPOSE

Postoperative pain is one of the most common postoperative complications, and improper management not only adds to patient suffering but also affects patients' recovery. In this study, we measured patients' postoperative pain to understand the status of patients after surgery and to identify factors influencing postoperative pain.

DESIGN

A descriptive and cross-sectional study METHODS: This survey was conducted at a large tertiary hospital in Chengdu, Sichuan Province. A total of 655 postoperative inpatients were included. The survey was conducted using the Chinese version of the Houston Pain Outcome Instrument. General patient data, pain management-related factors, and the pain management index were used to survey risk factors. We used t-tests and ANOVA for univariate analysis of each pain outcome category to explore the association with the predictor variables. Then, those variables with a significance level of 0.05 on univariate analysis were entered into multivariable regression analysis to identify parsimonious subsets of independent risk factors.

FINDINGS

In this survey, 58.7% of patients experienced moderate to severe pain in the 24-hour postoperative period, and 33.6% of patients had moderate to severe average pain over the 24-hour postoperative period. The postoperative pain impact scores on patient mood, somatic function, patient satisfaction with postoperative pain management, and pain education were 3.5 ± 2.1, 4.3 ± 3.1, 8.9 ± 1.4 and 8.2 ± 1.8, respectively. The pain management index, surgery type, insurance, and pain assessment of nurse were influential factors of postoperative pain intensity. Age, ethnicity, insurance, surgery type, patents' knowledge of pain, and pain assessment of the nurse affected the patients' postoperative physiological function (F = 3.822, R² = 0.065, P = .000). In addition, area of residence and physician attitudes affected the outcomes of patient satisfaction with pain management (F = 26.652, R² = 0.259, P = .000).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of moderate to severe pain in post-surgical patients remains high, and postoperative pain affects patients physically and psychologically. Special attention should be given to patients with lower income and literacy levels.

Incidence and associated factors of acute postoperative pain within the first 24 h in women undergoing cesarean delivery at a resource-limited setting in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A prospective observational study

Objective:

This study aimed to assess the incidence and associated factors of acute postoperative pain after cesarean section within the first 24 h of postoperative period.

Methods:

An institutional-based prospective observational study was conducted on parturients who had undergone cesarean section in Gandhi Memorial Hospital from 1 December 2019 to 28 February 2020. A numerical rating scale was used to evaluate the incidence of acute postoperative pain. Patients having a pain score of >4 were considered having moderate-to-severe pain on numerical rating scale. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 20. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression were used to assess the association of variables. A p value of less than 0.05 was taken as significant association with dependent variables.

Result:

In total, 290 parturients participated in the study with a response rate of 98%. Moderate-to-severe acute postoperative pain after cesarean section was 76.2% (95% confidence interval: 71%, 81%) in the first 24 h postoperatively. On multivariable analysis, previous cesarean section history (adjusted odds ratio: 2.80, 95% confidence interval: 1.40, 5.55; p = 0.003), preoperative anxiety (adjusted odds ratio: 2.70, 95% confidence interval: 1.45, 5.05; p = 0.003), transverse incision type (adjusted odds ratio: 3.35, 95% confidence interval: 1.67, 6.72; p = 0.002), and incision length (adjusted odds ratio: 2.46, 95% confidence interval: 1.24, 4.85; p = 0.009) were identified as risk factors for postoperative moderate-to-severe acute pain.

Conclusion:

The incidence of moderate-to-severe postoperative pain was high in the first 24-h postoperative period; this indicates that pain management after cesarean section was treated inadequately. History of previous cesarean section, preoperative anxiety, transverse incision, and incision length >10 cm were the factors of postoperative acute pain after cesarean section. Therefore, we suggest the study institution develop a protocol for pain management.

Assessment of patients' satisfaction with the postanesthesia care unit service at University Hospital in Al Khobar, KSA

Objectives

The quality of health care is individually and subjectively reflected through patients' level of satisfaction, as well as the optimality and effectiveness of the provided postoperative pain management. The provision of postanesthesia care unit (PACU) service in hospitals has led to overall positive outcomes, in addition to the enhancement of patients' satisfaction with the provided pain management service. This study assessed patients' level of satisfaction with PACU service at a university hospital and discussed different factors that might have contributed to the level of satisfaction.

Methods

A prospective cross-sectional study was carried out among patients after being discharged from PACU. The study took place at King Fahad Hospital of the University in Al Khobar, KSA between November 2021 and February 2022. The data were collected using a three-section predesigned questionnaire.

Results

Two hundred patients were included in this study. Nearly all patients (95.5%) were satisfied with the provided pain management service. Almost all patients (99.5%) indicated that the PACU staff was courteous and professional during the entire pain management service. More patients complained about pain before using analgesia and this difference was statistically significant (Z = 8.642; p < 0.001). The satisfaction rate was significantly higher in the older age group (>45 years) (Z = 2.114; p = 0.035), in patients with American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) 3 physical status (H = 13.130; p = 0.001), and those with a previous surgical history (Z = 2.139; p = 0.032).

Conclusion

This study concluded that the level of patients' satisfaction with PACU service was high, and established a statistically significant association with age, ASA score, and previous surgical history. Healthcare providers should consider patient education and effective communication to increase patients' satisfaction level and improve the overall quality of care.

The magnitude and associated factors of post-operative pain among adult patients

Background

Postoperative pain continues to be a serious consequence of surgical intervention. Several factors may contribute to the development of postoperative pain; these could be preoperative factors, demographic factors, anesthetic factors, and surgical factors.

Objective

The aim of this study was to assess the magnitude and factors associated with postoperative pain among surgical patients.

Methods

An institutional-based prospective longitudinal study included 265 postoperative patients from the surgical wards of Gambella General Hospital from April 15, 2021, to June 30, 2021. A consecutive sampling technique was used to recruit study participants. The patients were followed up for 24 h postoperatively. A numerical rating scale (NRS-11) is used for the assessment of pain. Data analysis was done using the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) 25. Logistic regression analysis was used to calculate the association between dependent and independent variables with a 95% confidence interval and a p-value<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 270 data points were collected. Of these, a total of 265 with a 98.1% response rate were analyzed. The incidence of postoperative pain was 69%, 74%, and 77.0% at 2 h, 12 h, and 24 h, respectively. The following factors were strongly associated with the dependent variable: patient age, 18–45 years old [AOR = 2.8; (95%CI: 1.13, 6.74, p = 0.026)], skin incision length, 10 cm [AOR = 2.5; (95%CI: 1.30, 5.13, p = 0.007)], preoperative pain [AOR = 2.4, (95%CI: 1.02, 5.60, p = 0.045)], and surgeon experience [AOR = 2.1, (95%CI:

Conclusion

and Recommendation: In the current study the magnitude of postoperative pain was high, 220 patients were complaining POP (83%). Age of the patient, length of skin incision, preoperative pain, and experience of surgeons were the independent associated factors for the experience of postoperative pain. Preoperative pain management should exercise among adult surgical patients in order to reduce the incidence of postoperative pain, and the length of surgical skin incisions should be minimized.

•

The overall prevalence rate of post-operative pain (POP) was high (83%).

•

The magnitude of POP was 69%, 74% and 77.0% at 2hr, 12hr and 24hr respectively.

•

Age of the patient, length of skin incision and significantly associated with POP.

•

Preoperative pain and work experience of surgeons were also associated with POP.

The perceptions and practices of parents and children on acute pain management among hospitalized children in two Botswana referral hospitals

BACKGROUND

Perceptions and practices of parties in pediatric pain are critical in children's access to adequate acute pain management. The personal factors of the child and parents have been shown to be central to pediatric pain management by the Symptom Management Theory.

AIM

To describe children and parents/guardians' perceptions (knowledge, attitudes and beliefs) and practices regarding pediatric acute pain management and explain the influence of socio-cultural and environmental factors on those perceptions and practices.

METHODS

Descriptive cross-sectional survey using modified versions of the American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire-Revised among parents/guardians and children.

RESULTS

A convenience sample of 275 parents/guardians and 42 children aged 8 to 13 years admitted between date November 2018 and February 2019 to two Botswana tertiary hospitals completed the surveys. Forty-seven percent (n = 129) of parents/guardians reported the child to be in moderate-severe pain, while 38% (n = 16) of children reported pain as moderate-severe at the time of the survey. The children mean scores for cm-APS-POQ-R were 113(33) while parents/guardian's guardians for m-APS-POQ-R were 123(26). The subscales except for the parents/'guardians' pain interference (p = .96) were statistically significant (p = .000), showing adequate knowledge, positive attitudes and high pain intensity for both parents/guardians and children.

CONCLUSION

Parent/guardians and children reported a high incidence of acute pain, were content with pain management services, and showed adequate knowledge of pediatric pain and its management. The incongruence between the intensity of pain, satisfaction on the adequacy of pain management and knowledge and attitudes demonstrated in this study need further inquiry.

Ilioinguinal and Iliohypogastric Nerve Block for Acute and Chronic Pain Relief After Caesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

There is an increasing cesarean section (CS) rate in Egypt. Multiple methods are used to manage pain after CS.

Objectives

This study aimed to assess the effect of ultrasound-guided bilateral ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve block on pain reduction after CS.

Methods

We classified 64 cases of elective CS into two equal groups. The block group underwent the nerve block, and the control group did not. Postoperative pain, morphine consumption, time to analgesic request, and complications were compared between the two groups.

Results

No significant difference was detected between the two groups regarding patient characteristics or operation duration. However, pain scores during rest and movement were significantly lower in the block group than in controls, especially within the first 12 hours following the operation. Morphine consumption was significantly lower in the block group (4.53 ± 1.456) in group B vs. (8.87 ± 2.013) in group C with P-value < 0.001. Time to the first rescue analgesia was significantly longer in the intervention group than in the other group (12.25 vs. 3.81 hours). Pruritis and nausea incidence was significantly higher in controls than in the block group. The incidence of chronic postoperative pain was significantly lower in the block group.

Conclusions

The ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve block is efficient and safe for managing postoperative pain following CS. It is associated with significant improvement of acute and chronic pain after such operations.

Knowledge, attitudes and practices of health professionals towards postoperative pain management at a referral hospital in Ethiopia

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pain (POP) is a form of acute pain following surgery. It results from tissue injury during surgical procedure like skin incision, tissue dissection, manipulation and traction. It is one of the immediate postoperative complications. Despite new standards, guidelines and different strategies the practice of postoperative pain management is found to be inadequate. We aimed to assess knowledge, attitude and practice on postoperative pain management practice among Health professionals working at XX Referral Hospital.

METHOD

Institution based cross-sectional study was conducted to assess Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Health professionals regarding to Post-operative pain management at XX Referral Hospital 2020 from 118 health professionals. Data was collected using structured self-administered questionnaire and was verified, coded and entered to Epi Info Software version 3.5.4 and then it was exported and analyzed by SPSS version 20 Software. After analysis frequency and percentages was used to summarize the finding.

RESULT

The overall finding of the study revealed that health professionals had good knowledge (58.4%), unfavorable attitude (44.9%), and poor practice (24.58%) towards post-operative pain management.

CONCLUSION

Non physician anesthetists have good knowledge, attitude and practice towards post-operative pain management. But the overall attitude and practice of health professionals' towards post-operative pain management is poor.

Patient Satisfaction With a Nurse-Led Pain Management Program: A Quasi-Experimental Study in Ethiopia

Introduction

Patient satisfaction is one of the important indicators of quality care.

Objective

To examine patient ratings of pain management satisfaction before and after introducing a nurse-led management program.

Methods

A quasi-experimental design with three cross-sectional surveys between October 1, 2016 and June 15, 2017. A total of 845 patients admitted to the four inpatient departments (medicine, surgery, maternity, and gynecology) of Jimma University Medical Centre were invited to participate in the study. A questionnaire adapted from the American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire, Pain Treatment Satisfaction Scale, and related literature was used for the survey. Data were analyzed using the chi-square test (categorical variables), t-tests for continuous variables, and robust regression to determine the effect of nurse-led management program on patient satisfaction. For all tests, p-values <.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Of the 845 patients invited, 782 (92.5%) participated in the surveys—Survey 1: N = 256; Survey 2: N = 259; Survey 3: N = 267. The proportion of patients who perceived that staff responded within 30 min increased from 67.8% in Survey 1 to 71.1% in Survey 2 and 74.2% in Survey 3. On a scale of 1 to 5 (1 = strongly dissatisfied and 5 = strongly satisfied), the overall mean patient satisfaction with pain management was 3.61 (SD 0.80) in Survey 1, 3.81 (SD 0.86) in Survey 2, and 4.10 (SD 0.64) in Survey 3. Moreover, the patients scored significantly higher on all satisfaction items in Survey 2 (B ranged between 0.12 and 0.41) and Survey 3 (B ranged between 0.24 and 0.74) compared to Survey 1.

Conclusion

The patients’ ratings of their satisfaction and staff nurse responsiveness following the nurse-led pain management program have increased compared to the levels before the intervention. However, further studies, including those with a control group, are warranted to confirm the results.

Experience of Pain and Satisfaction with Pain Management in Patients After a Lumbar Disc Herniation Surgery

PURPOSE

The descriptive study was performed to assess patients' pain experienced in the early postoperative period of a lumbar disc herniation surgery and their satisfaction with the pain management administered.

DESIGN

This was a descriptive and cross-sectional study conducted from May 8 to November 8, 2017.

METHODS

Data collection was performed during interviews through the Patient Information Form (20 questions), Turkish version of clinical quality indicators in the Postoperative Pain Management questionnaire (19 questions). The questionnaire included 14 items and 3 subdimensions named nursing interventions, pain management, and the environment. The remaining 5 questions were related to pain management satisfaction and pain severity. Questionnaire items scored on a 1 to 5 Likert scale. The higher the total score obtained from the questionnaire is the satisfaction with pain management increases.

FINDINGS

The mean score obtained from the total questionnaire was 51.4 (standard deviation: 6.6).Characteristics of patients with lumbar disc herniation did not influence the total score obtained from the instrument and its sub-dimensions (P > .05). Overall satisfaction with pain management was high (mean: 8.3; standard deviation: 1.6) on the 0 to 10 visual analog scale. There was a statistically significant difference between the length of hospital stay, the type of anesthesia used, having more pain than expected, and the satisfaction score of patients (P < .05). As the length of procedure increases, the average and current pain scores increase as well (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Results of this study indicate that despite pain experienced after the lumbar disc herniation surgery, patients' satisfaction with pain management was high. Encouraging nurses to implement systematic and evidence-based practices in pain management may help alleviate patients' pain after surgery and reduce variety of pain management practices among nurses.

The effect of the prospective information-based nursing quality management model on the improvement of management quality in emergency medicine nursing management

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore the clinical effectiveness of applying a prospective information-based nursing quality management model in emergency medicine nursing management and its impact on the management quality.

METHODS

170 inpatients treated in the emergency department of our hospital from April 2018 to March 2019 were recruited as the study cohort and randomly divided into a control group and a study group, with 85 patients in each group. In the study, the patients in the control group were treated using the routine nursing mode, and the patients in the study group were treated using the prospective information-based nursing quality management model to compare the nursing management quality, the nursing satisfaction, the occurrence of adverse events, the nursing compliance, the emergency response times, and the survival rates between the two groups.

RESULTS

We found that the overall nursing management quality in the study group was better than it was in the control group. The nursing satisfaction rate in the study group (96.47%) was higher than the nursing satisfaction rate in the control group (83.53%) The rate of adverse events in the study group (5.88%) was lower than it was in the control group (16.47%), the nursing compliance rate in the study group (89.41%) was higher than it was in the control group (63.53%), the emergency response times in the study group were shorter than they were in the control group, and the postoperative survival rate in the study group was higher than it was in the control group, all with statistically significant differences (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

The prospective information-based nursing quality management model has a significant influence on emergency medicine nursing management. It can significantly improve the nursing management quality, the patients' satisfaction with the nursing process, and the nursing compliance, and it can effectively avoid adverse events, so it is worthy of promotion.

The current state of anesthesia safety in a third world country: a cross-sectional survey among anesthesia providers in Ethiopia

BACKGROUND

Improving patient safety during anesthesia and surgery becomes a major global public health issue due to the increasing in surgical burden. Anesthesia is delivered safely in developed countries, but its safety is hampered by complex problems in third world countries. This survey assesses the unmet anesthesia needs of one of a third world country, Ethiopia.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Amhara region of Ethiopia from 15/12/2019 to 30/1/2020. All 81 hospitals of the region were stratified by their level as district, general, and referral hospital. The study was conducted in 66 hospitals. The number of hospitals from each strata were calculated by proportional sampling technique resulting; five referral, three general, and fifty eight primary hospitals. Each hospital from each strata was selected by convenience. Each anesthesia provider for the survey was selected randomly from each hospital and questionnaires were distributed. The minimum expected safe anesthesia requirements were taken from World Health Organization-World Federation of Societies of Anesthesiologists International Standard and Ethiopian Hospitals Standard. Anesthesia practice was expected safe if the minimum requirements were practiced always (100%) in each hospital. P < 0.05 with 95% confidence interval were used to compare the safety of anesthesia between higher and lower level hospitals.

RESULTS

Seventy eight (88.6%) anesthesia providers working in 62 hospitals responded to the survey. On aggregate, 36 (58%) hospitals from the total 62 hospitals have met the minimum expected safe anesthesia requirements. Among the different variables assessed; professional aspects 32 (52.45%), medication and intravenous fluid 33 (53.36%), equipment and facilities 33 (52.56%), patient monitoring 43(68.88%), and anesthesia conduct 38 (62.1%) of surveyed hospitals have met the minimum requirements. Anesthesia safety is relatively higher in higher level hospitals (general and referral) 6 (75%) when compared to district hospitals 30 (55.5%), P < 0.001.

CONCLUSION

Anesthesia safety in Ethiopia appears challenged by substandard continuous medical education and continuous professional development practice, and limited availability of some essential equipment and medications. Patient monitoring and anesthesia conduct are relatively good, but World Health Organization surgical safety checklist application and postoperative pain management are very low, affecting the delivery of safe anesthesia conduct.

Caudal block with rectal diclofenac and paracetamol for pediatrics infra umbilical surgery at a comprehensive specialized teaching hospital in Ethiopia

Background

Caudal block is a common regional technique performed for infra umbilical surgery in pediatrics. Its limited duration of analgesia remains a gap in routine clinical practice. This study aimed to assess the analgesic effectiveness of caudal block with rectal diclofenac or rectal paracetamol among pediatric patients who underwent infra umbilical surgery.

Methods

A prospective cohort study was conducted on patients aged 1–10 years that underwent elective infra umbilical surgery. Patients were allocated into the Caudal block with rectal Diclofenac, Caudal block with rectal Paracetamol, and Caudal block alone groups based on a postoperative pain management plan. Analysis of variance was used for normally distributed data and the Kruskal Wallis H test was used for non-normally distributed. The Tukey for post hoc test was used to compare the difference between groups one with the others. Categorical data were analyzed by using Pearson Chi-squared or Fisher's exact test as appropriate. A p-value < 0.05 considered as statistically significant.

Results

The postoperative median pain score was lower in CD compared to CP and CA group (p-value < 0.001) at the 4th and 8th hour. Time to first analgesic request was significantly longer within CD 735 (540–1200 min) compared to CP 445 (240–840 min p = 0.029) and CA 315 (240–720 min p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The pain score and total postoperative analgesic consumption were significantly reduced in addition to prolonged-time to request the first analgesia in the CD group compared to CA and CP group.

•

Caudal block with rectal diclofenac might reduce analgesic request.

•

Caudal block with rectal diclofenac might prolong analgesia duration.

•

Caudal block with rectal diclofenac might reduce pain severity score.

The effect of pain management training in workshop on the knowledge, attitude and self-efficacy of pediatric nurses

Background and Aims

Pain is the fifth vital sign, and pediatric nurses plays a key role in the process of pediatric pain management. The present study aimed to determine the effect of pain management training on the knowledge, attitude and self-efficacy of pediatric nurses.

Methods

This is a quasi-experimental study including two groups of test and control. The experimental group received a workshop method with a content including (ethical aspect, physiology, assessment tools, and pharmaceutical and non-pharmacological pain management) and was not given in the control group. The PNKAS self-efficacy questionnaires was completed by the participants before and one month after the beginning of the study. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and independent T-test, Fisher exact, and Chi-square tests using SPSS version 20 software.

Results

The mean pre-test scores of knowledge and attitude in the control and experimental groups was 50.79-47.14, and after one month was 47.46-53.09, respectively, showed that, training was significantly effective in the knowledge and attitude of the experimental group (P value = 0.01). The mean pre-test score of self-efficacy in the control and experimental groups was (17.01-18.06), and one month later was 20.36-21.03 respectively. Although the self-efficacy score increased in both groups, training significantly increased the self-efficacy of pediatric nurses in the experimental group (P value <0.001).

Conclusion

Pain management training is required due to the poor knowledge of pediatric nurses and the importance of pain management in improving the quality of nursing care and the satisfaction of patients with the In addition, feeling high self-efficacy without sufficient knowledge of pain management can disrupt pediatric pain management.

Knowledge and Attitudes of Ethiopian Nursing Staff Regarding Post-Operative Pain Management: A Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Pain management is one part of management in the postoperative period. The prevalence of moderate to severe postoperative pain and its functional interference is high in Ethiopian patients. In this study we aimed (1) to assess nurses' knowledge and attitudes regarding post-operative pain management; (2) to identify the factors of nurses' knowledge and attitudes.

METHOD

A cross-sectional multicenter study was conducted. All nurses working in Amhara region referral hospitals were involved in the study. The Nurses' Knowledge and Attitudes Survey Regarding Pain (NKASRP) was used to measure the nurses' pain management knowledge and attitudes. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with knowledge and attitude.

RESULTS

A total of 433 nurses were included. Of the total respondents, 90.6% of them had a bachelor's degree with work experience of between 1 to 5 years (58.5%). Only 76 (19.2%) participants got access to read journals and 66 (16.7%) had taken training regarding postoperative pain management. The results showed that 56.5% [95% CI= (51.6-61.3)] respondents had adequate knowledge and 8.9% [95% CI= (6.1-11.6)] of them had positive attitudes towards POP management. Higher level of education [AOR=8.2; CI= (2.51-26.83)], getting access to read journals [AOR =1.83; CI= (1.01-3.30)], and taking POP management training [AOR=8.63; CI= (3.67-20.28)] were statistically associated with adequate knowledge. Similarly, positive attitude towards postoperative pain management was associated with taking POP management training, available of pain management course in the curriculum, and getting access to read.

CONCLUSION

Although more than half of nurses in the study area had adequate knowledge towards POP management, only a small number had a positive attitude. Taking POP management training and getting access to read journals were significantly associated with good knowledge and attitude towards POP management; therefore, regular in-service training and getting accessing reading materials (such as journals or articles) are recommended to enhance quality service to patients.