Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties' evaluation of the modern standard Arabic version of Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) in professional athletes

Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Sinhala version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool: an instrument for measuring chronic ankle instability in Sri Lanka

PURPOSE

To develop the Sinhala version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT-Sin) and evaluate its validity and reliability in native Sinhala speakers.

METHODS

The CAIT was translated and cross-culturally adapted into Sinhala, using a forward-backward translation method. CAIT-Sin, Karlsson score, and visual analog scale (VAS) were filled out by 156 university athletes and students with and without ankle instabilities, in order to test internal consistency, test-retest reliability, criterion validity, floor and ceiling effect, and discriminative ability of the CAIT-Sin. Furthermore, ROC analysis was used to identify the presence of chronic ankle instability (CAI).

RESULTS

The CAIT-Sin was with a high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.88) and excellent test-retest reliability (ICC2,1 = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.93-0.96). The CAIT-Sin exhibited strong and positive correlations with the Karlsson score (r = 0.832, p < 0.001) and VAS (r = 0.876, p < 0.001). No ceiling or floor effect was observed in individuals with CAI. A CAIT-Sin score of 26 or lower indicated the presence of CAI.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinicians and researchers in Sri Lanka can use the CAIT-Sin for assessing and measuring CAI because its validity and reliability are confirmed.Implications for RehabilitationFunctional ankle instability is an ongoing chronic condition which presents for rehabilitation therapist.Outcome measurements are crucial in the rehabilitation of ankle sprains and it is important to administer these subjective outcome measures in their native language.The CAIT-Sin was found to have high internal consistency and excellent test-retest reliability.

Reliability and validation of the Thai version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT-THA)

PURPOSE

This study aimed to provide a version of Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) for the Thai younger adult population and examine psychometric properties and determine the cut-off score.

METHODS

CAIT-Youth Thai version was modified to CAIT Thai version (CAIT-THA). To validate the CAIT-THA psychometric properties, 72 with chronic ankle instability (CAI) and 72 without (age 23.45 ± 4.45 years) were recruited. The validation was carried out by using internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha), concurrent validity (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient), discriminative validity (Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve), and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient; ICC). A cut-off score was determined via Youden's index.

RESULTS

Validation showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.837), and concurrent validity (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient = 0.762 and 0.731 for right ankle and left ankle, respectively). Test-retest reliability was excellent with ICC (2,1) of 0.945 (95% CI = 0.93-0.96). A cut-off score of ≤ 25, determined by ROC curve and Youden's index, was distinguished between participants with and without CAI. CAIT-THA obtained 97.2% sensitivity, 94.4% specificity, 0.03 negative, and 17.5 positive likelihood ratios.

CONCLUSION

CAIT-THA is a validated tool that can be used in Thai younger adults. Clinicians and researchers can confidently use a score of ≤ 25 to determine the presence of CAI.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool Thai version (CAIT-THA) questionnaire is available for Thai young adults.The CAIT-THA had high sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood cut-off ratio scores for discrimination between chronic ankle instability (CAI) and non-CAI.The CAIT-THA questionnaire may be used in rehabilitation and research settings for the identification and management of CAI conditions.

Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool

OBJECTIVES

The objective of the study was to cross-culturally adapt and assess the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the CAIT (CAIT-TR).

METHODS

The CAIT was translated and adapted into Turkish according to accepted cross-cultural adaptation guidelines of self-reported measures. A total of 130 individuals, including healthy participants (n = 40) and with chronic ankle instability (CAI) (n = 90), were recruited in this study. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the CAIT-TR were assessed using Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), respectively. To assess convergent validity, hypotheses were tested regarding expected correlations between CAIT-TR, Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) subscales, and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Discriminative validity was evaluated with the hypothesis that the CAIT-TR can distinguish between subjects with and without CAI and also calculated a cut-off score for CAI. The dimensional structure of the CAIT-TR was investigated with confirmatory factor analysis. Additionally, minimal detectable change (MDC), floor/ceiling effects, and measurement error values were determined.

RESULTS

The CAIT-TR demonstrated high Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.854) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.919). Regarding convergent validity, the CAIT-TR exhibited a moderate-strong correlation with both the FAOS and VAS. The confirmatory factor analysis supported the unidimensional structure of the questionnaire. The identified cut-off value for the CAIT-TR was 25, and the MDC for individual-level CAIT-TR scores was determined to be 1.87. No floor or ceiling effects were observed.

CONCLUSION

The CAIT-TR is a valid and reliable questionnaire for the assessment of ankle instability within the Turkish population.

Italian version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT-I)

STUDY DESIGN

Evaluation of the psychometric properties of a translated, culturally adapted questionnaire.

OBJECTIVE

Translating, culturally adapting, and validating the Italian version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT-I).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Ankle sprains are one of the most common musculoskeletal injuries and can lead to chronic ankle instability (CAI). The International Ankle Consortium recommends the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) as a valid and reliable self-report questionnaire assessing the presence and severity of CAI. At this moment, there is no validated Italian version of CAIT.

METHODS

The Italian version of the CAIT (CAIT-I) was developed by an expert committee. Test-retest reliability of the CAIT-I was measured in 286 healthy and injured participants within a 4-9-day period, by using Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC2,1). Construct validity, exploratory factor analysis, internal consistency and sensitivity were examined in a sample of 548 adults. Instrument responsiveness over 4 time points was determined in a subgroup of 37 participants.

RESULTS

The CAIT-I demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability (ICC≥0.92) and good internal consistency (α = .84). Construct validity was confirmed. Identified cut-off for the presence of CAI was 24.75, with sensitivity= 0.77 and specificity= 0.65. There were significant differences across time for CAIT-I scores (P < .001), demonstrating responsiveness to change, but no floor or ceiling effects.

CONCLUSION

The CAIT-I demonstrates acceptable psychometric performance as a screening and outcome measure. The CAIT-I is a useful tool to assess the presence and severity of CAI.

Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Cantonese-Chinese Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT-HK)

Acute lateral ankle sprains are common amongst athletes, and screening is essential in preventing these long-term sequelae. Self-reported questionnaires, such as the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT), may help identify individuals with chronic ankle instability. To date, a Cantonese-Chinese version of the CAIT does not exist. A cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the CAIT were carried out: 46 individuals who were native in Cantonese completed the Cantonese-Chinese version of the CAIT and Chinese Foot and Ankle Outcome Score. For the test-retest analysis, the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.874. Internal consistency showed a Cronbach's ɑ value of 0.726. Construct validity against the FAOS was fair but statistically significant with a Spearman's correlation coefficient of 0.353, 0.460, 0.303, 0.369 and 0.493 for the categories of symptoms, pain, daily function, sports function, and quality of life, respectively. A cutoff score of 20.5 was determined to differentiate healthy individuals from those with chronic ankle instability for this study population. The original English CAIT was successfully translated, cross-culturally adapted and validated into Cantonese-Chinese.

Urdu translation and cross-cultural validation of Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT)

Background

The Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) is a self-assessment tool for people with chronic ankle instability (CAI). This tool had been translated and validated in many languages but there is no Urdu version of CAIT available.

Objective

The aim was to translate the CAIT into the Urdu Language and determine its validity and reliability.

Methods

A standardized step-wise forward and backward translation process was followed. Content, construct, convergent validity, internal consistency, and test–retest reliability were determined. A pilot study was done on 10 patients with CAI. The final version was investigated in 120 patients (mean age 26.6 ± 4.8 yrs) with CAI for validity and test–retest reliability in which 105 participants filled the questionnaire in the second week. Internal consistency was calculated by Cronbach’s alpha. Intraclass correlation (ICC_2,1) was calculated to assess test–retest reliability between two weeks. Standard error of measurement (SEM) and smallest detectable change (SDC) were calculated. Convergent validity was determined by correlating Urdu CAIT with the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) using Spearman’s correlation co-efficient. Factor analysis describes the structure of underlying factors.

Results

Content validity index was > 0.80 of each question. Internal consistency was acceptable (Cronbach’s alpha > 0.75). Convergent validity with FAOS total score showed a moderate negative correlation (r = -0.68) with U-CAIT and negatively correlated with subscales of FAOS. Test–retest reliability was excellent ICC_2,1 > 0.80. Scree plot showed 3 factors > 1eigen value.

Conclusion

The Urdu version of CAIT is a valid and reliable assessment tool for patients with chronic ankle instability. It has good content validity, construct validity and reliability.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05408-4.

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Arabic version of the foot function index in patients with chronic lateral ankle instability

Background

The English version of the Foot Function Index (FFI) is a reliable and valid tool for measuring pain and functional instability due to chronic lateral ankle instability (CLAI). However, its use among Arabic speakers with CLAI is limited because of the unavailability of the Arabic version of the FFI (FFI-Arb). This study aimed to translate, cross-culturally adapt and validate the FFI from the original English version into Arabic.

Methods

The FFI questionnaire was translated using the Beaton guidelines. Two-hundred-and-thirty native Arabic-speaking participants with CLAI were recruited from different physiotherapy clinics in Saudi Arabia. The convergent validity of the FFI-Arb was tested using the Spearman correlation with the Arabic version Cumberland ankle instability tool (CAIT-Arab). Test-retest reliability was tested among 92 participants who completed the form again after seven days.

Results

Two-hundred-and-thirty participants were enrolled (mean age = 32.09, Standard deviation (SD) = 8.64 years old). There was excellent internal consistency for the three subscales of FFI: pain (0.95), disability (0.97), and activity limitation (0.86), as for the total score (0.98). Convergent validity was analyzed by Spearman rank correlation between the new translated versions of FFI-Arb and CAIT-Arab. The total FFI-Arb and CAIT-Arab scores were moderately correlated (rho = − 0.569; p < 0.001). Subscales of FFI-Arb, such as pain, disability, and activity limitation, were also moderately correlated with CAIT-Arab (rho = − 0.565, rho = − 0.561, rho = − 0.512; p < 0.001). The construct validity was confirmed by principal component analysis (factor analysis) showing a three-factor structure (eigenvalue 1) of FFI-Arb with a total variance of 77.3%. Test-retest reliability was excellent for the total score of the FFI-Arb and all its subscales (interclass correlation coefficient = 0.984–0.999).

Conclusions

The FFI-Arb is a reliable and valid tool for Arabic-speaking patients with CLAI. The FFI-Arb can be utilized in hospitals and clinics in Arabic speaking countries.

Cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Neck OutcOme Score (NOOS-Ar) among the Saudi Arabian populace

BACKGROUND

To date the Neck OutcOme Score (NOOS) was not cross-culturally adapted, validated or available in the Arabic language, although it was available in other languages.

OBJECTIVE

To translate and cross-culturally adapt the Arabic version of the Neck OutcOme Score (NOOS-Ar) and study its psychometric properties.

METHODS

A sample of 146 subjects with chronic neck pain filled in the NOOS-Ar questionnaire to determine the Cronbach's alpha (α) for internal consistency, test-retest reliability by intraclass correlation coefficients(2,1) [ICC(2,1)], inter-item correlation, measurement error by coefficient of variance and minimal detectable change, ceiling and floor effects, convergent construct validity with visual analog scale (VAS) by Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (ρ) and factor analysis to calculate and determine its psychometric properties.

RESULTS

Excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α> 0.9) and test-retest reliability [ICC(2,1)> 0.9] were observed in NOOS-Ar. None of the five subscales of the NOOS-Ar showed a floor or ceiling effect. The coefficient of variance was generally high, but the minimal detectable change was within the acceptable range (< 30%). The 'everyday activity and pain' and 'symptoms' subscales of the NOOS-Ar, showed a moderate correlation with VAS.

CONCLUSION

The NOOS-Ar is highly reliable and has a moderate to good degree of convergent construct validity with VAS with no floor or ceiling effects.

Ankle Stability and Movement Coordination Impairments: Lateral Ankle Ligament Sprains Revision 2021

This revised clinical practice guideline (CPG) addresses the distinct but related lower extremity impairments of those with a first-time lateral ankle sprain (LAS) and those with chronic ankle instability (CAI). Depending on many factors, impairments may continue following injury. While most individuals experience resolution of symptoms, complaints of instability may continue and are defined as CAI. The aims of the revision were to provide a concise summary of the contemporary evidence since publication of the original guideline and to develop new recommendations or revise previously published recommendations to support evidence-based practice. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2021;51(4):CPG1-CPG80. doi:10.2519/jospt.2021.0302.

Applicability of cutoff scores of Chinese Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure as inclusion criteria for study of chronic ankle instability in Chinese individuals

OBJECTIVE

To examine the applicability of Chinese Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT-C) and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM-C) as inclusion criteria recommended by the International Ankle Consortium (IAC) for study of chronic ankle instability in the Chinese individuals.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional comparative design with known groups.

SETTING

Research laboratory.

PARTICIPANTS

145 participants with chronic ankle instability (CAI) and 66 participants without injury.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

CAIT-C and FAAM-C Activities of Daily Living (FAAM-C-ADL) and FAAM-C Sports (FAAM-C-Sports).

RESULTS

The CAIT-C scores (18.2 ± 5.6), FAAM-C-ADL scores (97.0 ± 4.3) and FAAM-C-Sports scores (92.2 ± 10.3) of the CAI group were all lower than the CAIT-C scores (27.4 ± 3.1), FAAM-ADL scores (99.0 ± 2.1) and FAAM-Sports scores (98.4 ± 3.1) (P < 0.01) of the uninjured group. The recommended cutoff score of CAIT-C<24 by the IAC for identifying CAI had a sensitivity of 80.7% and a specificity of 84.9%. If the recommended cutoff scores of FAAM-ADL<90，FAAM-Sports<80 by the IAC as inclusion criteria for the study of CAI were applied, 97% of participants with CAI in this sample would be excluded.

CONCLUSION

The results support the recommended cutoff score of CAIT-C<24 by the IAC to identify Chinese individuals with CAI for study. However, the recommended cutoff scores of FAAM-ADL<90 and FAAM-Sports<80 will exclude most Chinese individuals with CAI having only mild functional impairments.

Transcultural adaptation and validation of the Spanish version of the Identification of Functional Ankle Instability questionnaire (IdFAI-Sp)

OBJECTIVE

The study aim was to cross-culturally adapt the Identification of Functional Ankle Instability (IdFAI) into a Spanish-language version (IdFAI-Sp), which would then be validated and its psychometric properties evaluated for use in possible cases of ankle instability.

METHODS

The cross-cultural adaptation was performed following the guidelines of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research. Pearson correlations were calculated to assess the convergent validity between IdFAI and the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool. Cronbach's alpha and test re-test reliability values were calculated and floor/ceiling effects analysed. Construct validity was assessed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).

RESULTS

The study population was composed of 110 participants, with a mean age of 40.49 years (10.43) and of whom 62 (56.36%) were female. Good test-retest results were obtained, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.85 (ICC₂,₁: 95% CI: 0.82 - 0.88). The structure matrix was examined by CFA, which revealed a three-factor solution that accounted for 79.89% of the variance. The IdFAI-Sp obtained an excellent fit (RMSEA 0.068, GFI 0.94, CFI 0.98 and NFI 0.97).

CONCLUSIONS

This study validates the IdFAI-Sp questionnaire, corroborating its value to researchers and medical professionals as a self-reported outcomes measure for use with a Spanish-speaking population.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe Spanish-language version of the Identification of Functional Ankle Instability questionnaire (IdFAI-Sp) is a valid and reliable tool.The IdFAI-Sp enables researchers and healthcare professionals to identify and classify chronic ankle instability among Spanish-speaking patients.Accordingly, it can be considered a useful clinical instrument.Aapplication of the questionnaire before and after treatment can reveal the patient's degree of recovery over time.