Age at menarche does not correlate with the endometriosis phenotype

Cervical Anatomical Characteristics in Women with Endometriosis: A Diagnostic Approach

Background

Endometriosis is a gynecologic disorder which causes dysmenorrhea and infertility. Early diagnosis of endometriosis can help prevent the necessity for invasive diagnostic procedures. Medical imaging has been widely utilized to diagnose various diseases without the need for invasive procedures. The purpose of this study was to investigate the cervical length in women with endometriosis.

Methods

In this case-control study, the case group consisted of nulliparous women with endometriosis, while the control group comprised nulliparous women without endometriosis. A total of 42 individuals were included in each group. Cervical length was measured using transvaginal ultrasound from the external os to the internal os. The patients in the case group underwent laparoscopy to confirm the diagnosis. Pearson chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were employed to compare categorical variables with a p<0.05 considered statistically significant.

Results

In both groups, there were no notable variations in any of the demographic characteristics. However, the severity of dysmenorrhea was significantly different between the two groups (p=0.01). The average diameter of the mediolateral cervix (29.48±6.2 and 27.14±3.8) was statistically significant between the patient group and control group, respectively (p=0.04). The mediolateral width may have a positive predictive effect on the presence of endometriosis, while cervical length appears to have a protective effect against endometriosis.

Conclusion

Demographic data do not predict endometriosis. This study suggests that mediolateral width in transvaginal sonography can serve as a minimally invasive diagnostic tool for endometriosis, showing correlation with endometriosis symptoms like dysmenorrhea and dyspareunia.

Impact of family history for endometriosis, migraine, depression and early menopause on endometriosis symptoms, localization and stage: A case control study

INTRODUCTION

Endometriosis is a common disabling pain condition in women of childbearing age, frequently showing familial clustering. Nevertheless, little is known about whether familial predispositions influence its severity or presentation. In this study, we investigate disease characteristics in endometriosis patients with a family history (FH) for endometriosis or the comorbidities migraine, depression and early menopause (EMP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed an observational case-control study enrolling women with histologically confirmed endometriosis in a tertiary center. Based on surgical findings, patient records and phone interviews, we examined the relations between a FH for endometriosis, migraine, depression or EMP and endometriotic signs and symptoms, such as response to combined hormonal contraceptives (CHC) and analgesics, disease localization, infiltration depth, Enzian- and rASRM-scores.

RESULTS

A positive FH for endometriosis, migraine, depression or EMP was reported by 10.2 %, 33.4 %, 32.6 % and 9.9 % of the 344 patients. A positive FH of endometriosis was associated with an increased risk for high rASRM-scores (rASRM 3 + 4: OR 2.74 (95 % CI 1.16-6.49), p = 0.017) and the presence of endometriomas (OR 2.70 (1.22-5.95), p = 0.011). A positive FH for migraine was associated with less response of endometriosis symptoms to CHC (OR 0.469 (0.27-0.82) p = 0.025). Depression in the family was linked to less severe rASRM-scores (rASRM 3 + 4: OR 0.63 (0.39-0.99), p = 0.046) and less endometriomas (OR 0.58 (0.67-0.92), p = 0.02), but increased the risk of both migraine (OR 1.66 (1.01-2.73), p = 0.043) and depression (OR 3.04 (1.89-4.89), p < 0.001) while showing a better response to CHC (OR 2.0 (1.15-3.48, p < 0.001). Patients with EMP in their family reported more current endometriosis symptoms at present (OR 3.72 (1.67-8.30), p = 0.001), more dysmenorrhea (OR 2.13 (1.04-4.35), p = 0.037), more frequent severe dysmenorrhea (OR 2.32 (1.14-4.74), p = 0.019) and suffered significantly more often > 5 days of non-cyclic pain (OR 3.58 (1.72-7.44), p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Around 30% reported a positive FH for migraine or depression. Patients with a positive FH for endometriosis, migraine, depression or EMP differ in symptoms and surgical findings when compared to controls. While a FH for endometriosis is associated with higher rASRM scores and more endometriomas, women with a FH for depression had lower rASRM scores and less endometriomas while responding better to CHC. In contrast, women with a FH for migraine showed less response to CHC.

Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis in Adolescence: Early Diagnosis and Possible Prevention of Disease Progression

Endometriosis has a prevalence of 10% worldwide in premenopausal women. Probably, endometriosis begins early in the life of young girls, and it is commonly diagnosed later in life. The prevalence of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) in adolescence is currently unknown due to diagnostic limits and underestimation of clinical symptoms. Dysmenorrhea is a common symptom in adolescents affected by DIE, often accompanied by dyspareunia and chronic acyclic pelvic pain. Ultrasonography-either performed transabdominal, transvaginal or transrectal-should be considered the first-line imaging technique despite the potential for missed diagnosis due to early-stage disease. Magnetic resonance imaging should be preferred in the case of virgo patients or when ultrasonographic exam is not accepted. Diagnostic laparoscopy is deemed acceptable in the case of suspected DIE not responding to conventional hormonal therapy. An early medical and/or surgical treatment may reduce disease progression with an immediate improvement in quality of life and fertility, but at the same time, painful symptoms may persist or even recur due to the surgery itself. The aim of this narrative review is to report the prevalence of DIE in adolescents, describe the pathogenetic theories and discuss the management in adolescent women, including the challenging road to diagnosis and the treatment alternatives.

Health outcomes of age at menarche in European women: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study

BACKGROUND

Observational studies have shown an association between age at menarche (AAM) and the risk of gynecological diseases. However, the causality cannot be determined due to residual confounding.

METHODS

We conducted a Mendelian randomization (MR) study to evaluate the causal effect of AAM on several gynecological diseases, including endometriosis, female infertility, pre-eclampsia or eclampsia, uterine fibroids, breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and endometrial cancer. Single nucleotide polymorphisms were used as genetic instruments. The inverse variance weighted method was used as the primary approach and several other MR models were conducted for comparison. Cochran's Q test, Egger's intercept test, and leave-one-out analysis were conducted for sensitivity analysis. Radial MR analysis was conducted when detecting the existence of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

After Bonferroni correction and thorough sensitivity analysis, we observed a robust causal effect of AAM on endometrial cancer (odds ratio: 0.80; 95% confidence interval: 0.72-0.89; P = 4.61 × 10-5) and breast cancer (odds ratio: 0.94; 95% confidence interval: 0.90-0.98; P = .003). Sensitivity analysis found little evidence of horizontal pleiotropy. The inverse variance weighted method also detected weak evidence of associations of AAM with endometriosis and pre-eclampsia or eclampsia.

CONCLUSIONS

This MR study demonstrated a causal effect of AAM on gynecological diseases, especially for breast cancer and endometrial cancer, which indicates AAM might be a promising index to use for disease screening and prevention in clinical practice. Key messages What is already known on this topic - Observational studies have reported associations between age at menarche (AAM) and a variety of gynecological diseases but the causality has not been determined. What this study adds - This Mendelian randomization study demonstrated that AAM causally affects the risk of breast cancer and endometrial cancer. How this study might affect research, practice, or policy - The findings of our study imply that AAM could be a candidate marker for early screening of populations at higher risk of breast cancer and endometrial cancer.

Saliva microRNA signature to diagnose endometriosis: A cost-effectiveness evaluation of the Endotest®

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a saliva diagnostic test (Endotest®) for endometriosis compared with the conventional algorithm.

DESIGN

A cost-effectiveness analysis with a decision-tree model based on literature data.

SETTING

France.

POPULATION

Women with chronic pelvic pain.

METHODS

Strategy I is the French algorithm, representing the comparator. For strategy II, all patients have an Endotest®. For strategy III, patients undergo ultrasonography to detect endometrioma and patients with no endometrioma detected have an Endotest®. For strategy IV, patients with no endometrioma detected on ultrasonography undergo pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to detect endometrioma and/or deep endometriosis. An Endotest® is then performed for patients with a negative result on MRI.

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES

Costs and accuracy rates and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Three analyses were performed with an Endotest® priced at €500, €750, and €1000. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was conducted with Monte Carlo simulations.

RESULTS

With an Endotest® priced at €750, the cost per correctly diagnosed case was €1542, €990, €919 and €1000, respectively, for strategies I, II, III and IV. Strategy I was dominated by all other strategies. Strategies IV, III and II were, respectively, preferred for a willingness-to-pay threshold below €473, between €473 and €4670, and beyond €4670 per correctly diagnosed case. At a price of €500 per Endotest®, strategy I was dominated by all other strategies. At €1000, the ICERs of strategies II and III were €724 and €387 per correctly diagnosed case, respectively, compared with strategy I.

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrates the value of the Endotest® from an economic perspective.

The risk of endometriosis by early menarche is recently increased: a meta-analysis of literature published from 2000 to 2020

PURPOSE

The relationship between menarche age and endometriosis has been studied extensively; however, the results were inconsistent due to differences in study dates, populations, and methodology. The goal of this meta-analysis was to see how different research populations, dates, and types affected the estimated risk of endometriosis in early menarche.

METHODS

The terms "endometriosis", "early menarche", and other pertinent terms were searched in PubMed, Medline, and Embase. This meta-analysis comprised 16 papers published between 2000 and 2020, with a start year ranging from 1989 to 2017. Random effects were used to examine endometriosis risks in these articles. Study start years, countries, types (case-control and cohort studies), and quality (Newcastle-Ottawa scale, NOS) were all taken into account in further stratified analysis and meta-regression analyses.

RESULTS

Early menarche (< 12 years) was associated with a significant pooled risk of endometriosis with high heterogeneity (OR = 1.34, 95% CI 1.16-1.54, I² = 72.0%). Stratified analysis showed that this risk was increased in studies started after 2000 (OR = 1.62, 95% CI 0.96-1.35, I² = 74.4%), compared to those before 2000 (OR = 1.13, 95% CI 1.16-1.54, I² = 40.7%); additionally, this risk was higher in low-income countries (OR = 2.11, 95% CI 1.55-2.87, I² = 0%) than in other countries (OR = 1.25, 95% CI 1.09-1.43, I² = 70.6%). These results were further confirmed by meta-regression analysis (both P values < 0.1). No significant differences were found between different study types and NOS scores.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggested an increasing risk of endometriosis with early menarche, which was more noticeable in low-income countries. Large-scale studies are warranted.

Is primary dysmenorrhea a precursor of future endometriosis development?

Primary dysmenorrhea (PD) is the most common gynecologic disorder during adolescence and it is characterized by crampy lower abdominal pain that occurs during menstruation. Secondary dysmenorrhea, in contrast, has the same clinical features but occurs in women with a disease that could account for their symptoms (endometriosis, adenomyosis, uterine fibroids, pelvic inflammatory disease). Endometriosis is the most common cause of secondary dysmenorrhea and it should be considered in patients with persistent and clinically significant dysmenorrhea despite treatment. It is often diagnosed after a long delay, increasing the likelihood of pain chronicity and fertility problems at a later age. Women who suffer from dysmenorrhea in adolescence have higher risk of endometriosis in future. The open question is if endometriosis was already present at the onset of dysmenorrhea but undiagnosed or if PD favors subsequent development of endometriosis-associated pain. Since PD is associated with higher risk for developing chronic pain state and shares some of the same pain pathways of endometriosis (prostaglandins overproduction, inflammation, peripheral sensitization, central sensitization and abnormal stress responses), a correlation between PD and endometriosis is suggested. To know whether it is a risk factor for the development of endometriosis-associated pain may provide an opportunity for early intervention and prevention. The present review aims to investigate the clinical and pathogenetic features of PD and endometriosis in order to identify a possible association between the two conditions.