Using hospital network-based surveillance for antimicrobial resistance as a more robust alternative to self-reporting

Modelling pathogen spread in a healthcare network: Indirect patient movements

Inter-hospital patient transfers (direct transfers) between healthcare facilities have been shown to contribute to the spread of pathogens in a healthcare network. However, the impact of indirect transfers (patients re-admitted from the community to the same or different hospital) is not well studied. This work aims to study the contribution of indirect transfers to the spread of pathogens in a healthcare network. To address this aim, a hybrid network–deterministic model to simulate the spread of multiresistant pathogens in a healthcare system was developed for the region of Lower Saxony (Germany). The model accounts for both, direct and indirect transfers of patients. Intra-hospital pathogen transmission is governed by a SIS model expressed by a system of ordinary differential equations. Our results show that the proposed model reproduces the basic properties of healthcare-associated pathogen spread. They also show the importance of indirect transfers: restricting the pathogen spread to direct transfers only leads to 4.2% system wide prevalence. However, adding indirect transfers leads to an increase in the overall prevalence by a factor of 4 (18%). In addition, we demonstrated that the final prevalence in the individual healthcare facilities depends on average length of stay in a way described by a non-linear concave function. Moreover, we demonstrate that the network parameters of the model may be derived from administrative admission/discharge records. In particular, they are sufficient to obtain inter-hospital transfer probabilities, and to express the patients’ transfers as a Markov process. Using the proposed model, we show that indirect transfers of patients are equally or even more important as direct transfers for the spread of pathogens in a healthcare network.

Direct patient transfers between hospitals have been shown to play an important role in the spread of pathogens in a healthcare network. However, readmission of patients from the community (indirect transfers) to the same or a different hospital is not well studied, and its role for the spread of pathogens in a healthcare network is not quantified. In this work, we developed a network model of a healthcare system to study the impact of indirect transfers on the prevalence in the individual hospitals as well as in the overall healthcare system. The model includes both, direct and indirect transfers of patients between the healthcare facilities due to transferring as well as readmission of infectious (colonized or infected) patients. Our results show that the readmission of patients (indirect transfers), either to the same or different facility, is an important potential channel of pathogen transmission. Such indirect transfers are of no less importance than direct patient transfers in controlling the spread of pathogens in a healthcare network.

Spread of Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in Hub and Spoke Connected Health-Care Networks: A Case Study from Italy

The study describes the spread of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) in a regional healthcare network in Italy. The project included several stages: (1) Establishment of a laboratory-based regional surveillance network, including all the acute care hospitals of the Marches Region (n = 20). (2) Adoption of a shared protocol for the surveillance of Multi-Drug Resistant Organisms (MDROs). Only the first CRKP isolate for each patient has been included in the surveillance in each hospital. The anonymous tracking of patients, and their subsequent microbial records within the hospital network, allowed detection of networks of inter-hospital exchange of CRKP and its comparison with transfer of patients within the hospital network. Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis has been used to study selected isolates belonging to different hospitals. 371,037 admitted patients have been included in the surveillance system. CRKP has shown an overall incidence rate of 41.0 per 100,000 days of stay (95% confidence interval, CI 38.5–43.5/100,000 DOS), a CRKP incidence rate of isolation in blood of 2.46/100,000 days of stay (95% CI 1.89–3.17/100,000 days of stay (DOS) has been registered; significant variability has been registered in facilities providing different levels of care. The network of CRKP patients’ exchange was correlated to that of the healthcare organization, with some inequalities and the identification of bridges in CRKP transfers. More than 73% of isolates were closely related. Patients’ exchange was an important route of spread of antimicrobial resistance, highlighting the pivotal role played by the hub, and selected institution to be used in prioritizing infection control efforts.