Local DRLs and automated risk estimation in paediatric interventional cardiology

Standardized diagnostic reference levels for paediatric interventional cardiology: Data from an Italian referral centre

PURPOSE

To provide data on radiation exposure in paediatric interventional cardiology procedures, addressing the scarcity of valuable Local Diagnostic Reference Levels (LDRLs),established according to the standardized approach proposed by the Radiation Protection 185 report (RP185).

METHODS

Paediatric catheterization procedures conducted at the University-Hospital of Padua from September 2019 to December 2022 were stratified by body weight (BW) classes and procedure type. LDRLs were calculated for groups with at least 20 patients as the 75th percentile of Kerma-Area Product (PKA) and Air Kerma at reference point (Ka,r) values. Kruskal-Wallis test was applied to evaluate differences in the dose-related quantities among BW groups for a selected procedure and among procedures for the same BW class. Results were compared with recent literature.

RESULTS

A total of 838 procedures were analysed. LDRL were provided for five therapeutic procedures. The 75th percentile of PKA and Ka,r increases with weight, regardless procedure type. PKA and Ka,r are generally statistically different between BW groups, for both diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, and between different procedures at fixed weight group. Angioplasty and Right Ventricular Outflow Tract treatments (PVR) showed exposure values approximately doubled then other procedures. PKA/(BW·FT) is not statistically different among procedures except for Atrial Septal Defect (ASD) closures. LDRL values from this study are generally lower than the published ones.

CONCLUSIONS

The study stands out as one of the few that presents a considerable number of LDRLs for weight categories and procedure types with a sample size of at least 20 patients per group, in agreement with RP185. PKA shows strong correlation with the product BW·FT.

X-ray Doses in Relation to Body Mass, Indication, and Substrate During Pediatric Electrophysiological Procedures on the Heart

The main goal of this study is to determine typical values of dose area product (DAP) and difference in the effective dose (ED) for pediatric electrophysiological procedures on the heart in relation to patient body mass. This paper also shows DAP and ED in relation to the indication, the arrhythmia substrate determined during the procedure, and in relation to the reason for using radiation. Organ doses are described as well. The subjects were children who have had an electrophysiological study done with a 3D mapping system and X-rays in two healthcare institutions. Children with congenital heart defects were excluded. There were 347 children included. Significant difference was noted between mass groups, while heavier children had higher values of DAP and ED. Median DAP in different mass groups was between 4.00 (IQR 1.00-14.00) to 26.33 (IQR 8.77-140.84) cGycm2. ED median was between 23.18 (IQR 5.21-67.70) to 60.96 (IQR 20.64-394.04) µSv. The highest DAP and ED in relation to indication were noted for premature ventricular contractions and ventricular tachycardia-27.65 (IQR 12.91-75.0) cGycm2 and 100.73 (IQR 53.31-258.10) µSv, respectively. In arrhythmia substrate groups, results were similar, and the highest doses were in ventricular substrates with DAP 29.62 (IQR 13.81-76.0) cGycm2 and ED 103.15 (IQR 60.78-266.99) µSv. Pediatric electrophysiology can be done with very low doses of X-rays when using 3D mapping systems compared to X-rays-based electrophysiology, or when compared to pediatric interventional cardiology or adult electrophysiology.

Multimodality 3D image fusion with live fluoroscopy reduces radiation dose during catheterization of congenital heart defects

Introduction

Imaging fusion technology is promising as it is radiation and contrast sparing. Herein, we compare conventional biplane angiography to multimodality image fusion with live fluoroscopy using two-dimensional (2D)-three-dimensional (3D) registration (MMIF2D-3D) and assess MMIF2D-3D impact on radiation exposure and contrast volume during cardiac catheterization of patients with congenital heart disease (CHD).

Methods

We matched institutional MMIF2D-3D procedures and controls according to patient characteristics (body mass index, age, and gender) and the seven procedure-type subgroups. Then, we matched the number of tests and controls per subgroup using chronological ordering or propensity score matching. Subsequently, we combined the matched subgroups into larger subgroups of similar procedure type, keeping subgroups with at least 10 test and 10 control cases. Air kerma (AK) and dose area product (DAP) were normalized by body weight (BW), product of body weight and fluoroscopy time (BW × FT), or product of body weight and number of frames (BW × FR), and stratified by acquisition plane and irradiation event type (fluoroscopy or acquisition). Three senior interventionists evaluated the relevance of MMIF2D-3D (5-point Likert scale).

Results

The Overall group consisted of 54 MMIF2D-3D cases. The combined and matched subgroups were pulmonary artery stenting (StentPUL), aorta angioplasty (PlastyAO), pulmonary artery angioplasty (PlastyPUL), or a combination of the latter two (Plasty). The FT of the lateral plane reduced significantly by 69.6% for the Overall MMIF2D-3D population. AKBW and DAPBW decreased, respectively, by 43.9% and 39.3% (Overall group), 49.3% and 54.9% (PlastyAO), and 36.7% and 44.4% for the Plasty subgroup. All the aforementioned reductions were statistically significant except for DAPBW in the Overall and Plasty (sub)groups. The decrease of AKBW and DAPBW in the StentPUL and PlastyPUL subgroups was not statistically significant. The decrease in the median values of the weight-normalized contrast volume (CMCBW) in all five subgroups was not significant. Cardiologists considered MMIF2D-3D very useful with a median score of 4.

Conclusion

In our institution, MMIF2D-3D overall enabled significant AKBW reduction during the catheterization of CHD patients and was mainly driven by reduced FT in the lateral plane. We observed significant AKBW reduction in the Plasty and PlastyAO subgroups and DAPBW reduction in the PlastyAO subgroup. However, the decrease in CMCBW was not significant.

Local Diagnostic Reference Levels for Pediatric Interventional Cardiology Procedures in Argentina

The aim of this work was to propose a preliminary local diagnostic reference levels (DRL) for pediatric interventional cardiology (PIC) procedures in Argentina, for different ranges of age and weight. This work has been conducted in the framework of the "Optimization of Protection in Pediatric Interventional Radiology in Latin America and the Caribbean" (OPRIPALC) program coordinated by the World Health Organization and the Pan American Health Organization in cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency to ensuring that radiation exposures of pediatric patients are the minimum necessary during fluoroscopy-guided interventional procedures. The local DRL values presented in this paper by weight group and age group were 7.1 Gy·cm2 (<5 kg), 10.7 Gy·cm2 (5-15 kg), 18.0 Gy·cm2 (15-30 kg), 15.9 Gy·cm2 (30-50 kg), and 28.2 Gy·cm2 (50-80 kg) and 5.3 Gy·cm2 (<1), 11.2 Gy·cm2 (1 to 5<), 19.6 Gy·cm2 (5 to 10<), and 21.4 Gy·cm2 (10 to 16<), respectively. Our dose results are among the values found in other international studies; however, there is great potential for dose optimization.

Optimization of Radiation Protection in Pediatric Interventional Radiology in Latin America and the Caribbean: Development, Advancements, Challenges and Achievements of the OPRIPALC Program

This article presents the development, advancements, challenges and achievements of the "Optimization of Protection in Pediatric Interventional Radiology in Latin America and the Caribbean" (OPRIPALC) program. This international initiative is led by the World Health Organization, the Pan American Health Organization and the International Atomic Energy Agency. The main objectives of OPRIPALC are to foster a culture of radiological protection in pediatric interventions, enhance these procedures' quality, and define optimization strategies such as the use of diagnostic reference levels (DRLs). Currently, 33 centers from 12 countries participate actively in the program. Significant progress has been made towards the proposed objectives, overcoming the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic. Through many virtual meetings for coordination, planning, training and follow-up, a comprehensive set of DRLs for both diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, categorized by weight and age, have been established and are in use. A consensus document on good practices is in the final stage of development. The program's continuation into at least a second phase is essential to address pending issues, including the integration of automatic dose management systems, the levels of occupational radiation doses, their correlation with pediatric patient doses, and strategies to reduce them.

Diagnostic Reference Levels in Interventional Pediatric Cardiology: Two-Year Experience in a Tertiary Referral Hospital in Latin America

The goal of the present study was to propose the first local diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for interventional pediatric cardiology procedures in a large hospital in Colombia. The data collection period was from April 2020 to July 2022. The local DRLs were calculated as the 3rd quartile of patient-dose distributions for the kerma-area product (Pka) values. The sample of collected clinical procedures (255) was divided into diagnostic and therapeutic procedures and grouped into five weight and five age bands. The Pka differences found between diagnostic and therapeutic procedures were statistically significant in all weight and age bands, except for the 1-5-year age group. The local DRLs for weight bands were 3.82 Gy·cm2 (<5 kg), 7.39 Gy·cm2 (5-<15 kg), 19.72 Gy·cm2 (15-<30 kg), 28.99 Gy·cm2 (30-<50 kg), and 81.71 Gy·cm2 (50-<80 kg), respectively. For age bands, the DRLs were 3.97 Gy·cm2 (<1 y), 9.94 Gy·cm2 (1-<5 y), 20.82 Gy·cm2 (5-<10 y), 58.00 Gy·cm2 (10-<16 y), and 31.56 Gy·cm2 (<16 y), respectively. In conclusion, when comparing our results with other existing DRL values, we found that they are similar to other centers and thus there is scope to continue optimizing the radiation dose values. This will contribute to establishing national DRLs for Colombia in the near future.

Current status of diagnostic reference levels in interventional cardiology

Interventional cardiology provides indisputable benefits for patients but uses a substantial amount of ionising radiation. The diagnostic reference level (DRL) is the tool recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection to optimise imaging procedures. In this work, a review of studies dealing with radiation dose or recommending DRL values for interventional cardiology since 2010 is presented, providing quantitative and qualitative results. There are many published papers on coronary angiography (CA) and percutaneous coronary intervention. The DRL values compiled for different continental regions are different: the DRL for CA is about 35 Gy cm²for Europe and 83 Gy cm²for North America. These differences emphasise the need to establish national DRLs considering different social and/or economic factors and the harmonisation of the survey methodology. Surveys with a large amount of data collected with the help of dose management systems provide more reliable information with less chance of statistical bias than those with a small amount of data. The complexity of procedures and improvements in technology are important factors that affect the radiation dose delivered to patients. There is a need for additional data on structural and electrophysiological procedures. The analysis of paediatric procedures is especially difficult because some studies present results split into age bands and others into weight bands. Diagnostic procedures are better described, but there is a great variety of therapeutic procedures with different DRL values (up to a factor of nine) and these require a dedicated review.

Setting up regional diagnostic reference levels for pediatric interventional cardiology in Latin America and the Caribbean countries: preliminary results and identified challenges

The goal of the present study was to propose a set of preliminary regional diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for pediatric interventional cardiology (IC) procedures in Latin America and the Caribbean countries, classified by age and weight groups. The study was conducted in the framework of the Optimization of Protection in Pediatric Interventional Radiology in Latin America and the Caribbean program coordinated by the World Health Organization and the Pan American Health Organization in cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency. The first step of the program was focused on pediatric IC. Dose data from diagnostic and therapeutic procedures were collected between December 2020 and December 2021. Regional DRLs were set as the third quartile of patient dose data (kerma area product) collected in 18 hospitals from 10 countries in an initial sample of 968 procedures. DRLs were set for four age bands and five weight ranges. The values obtained for the four age bands (<1 yr, 1 to <5 yr, 5 to <10 yr and 10 to <16 yr) were 2.9, 6.1, 8.8 and 14.4 Gy cm²for diagnostic procedures, and 4.0, 5.0, 10.0 and 38.1 Gy cm²for therapeutic procedures, respectively. The values obtained for the five weight bands (<5 kg, 5 to <15 kg, 15 to <30 kg, 30 to <50 kg and 50 to <80 kg) were 3.0, 4.5, 8.1, 9.2 and 26.8 Gy cm²for diagnostic procedures and 3.7, 4,3, 7.3, 16.1 and 53.4 Gy cm²for therapeutic procedures, respectively. While initial data were collected manually as patient dose management systems (DMSs) were not available in most of the hospitals involved in the program, a centralized automatic DMS for the collection and management of patient dose indicators has now been introduced and is envisaged to increase the sample size. The possibility of alerting on high dose values and introducing corrective actions will help in optimization.

A systematic review of conversion factors between kerma-area product and effective/organ dose for cardiac interventional fluoroscopy procedures performed in adult and paediatric patients

The aim of this systematic review is to undertake a critical appraisal of the evidence in the published literature concerning the conversion factors between kerma-area product (P KA) and effective/organ dose (DCED_PKA, DCHT_PKA) for cardiac interventional fluoroscopy procedures performed in adults and paediatric patients and to propose reference conversion factors to help standardize dose calculations. A search strategy utilizing MeSH headings in three databases identified 59 (adult) and 37 (paediatric) papers deemed eligible for the review. Exclusion criteria were adopted to select data only from publications which established DCED_PKA in patients using the ICRP 103 tissue weighting factors. A time restriction from January 2007 was introduced in the search to capture the evolving trends of utilization of fluoroscopy-guided intervention technologies only in recent years. The suggested DCED_PKA and DCHT_PKA were synthesized by calculating the weighted averages of the values reported by the authors with weights corresponding to the study sample size. Eighteen studies for both adult (9) and paediatric (9) patients matching the search terms fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The suggested value for DCED_PKA in adult patients amounts to 0.24 mSv Gy−1cm−2. The suggested values for DCHT_PKA ranged from a minimum of 0.15 mSv Gy−1cm−2 for the female breast to a maximum of 0.97 mSv Gy−1cm−2 for the lungs. The suggested values for DCED_PKA in paediatric patients ranged from 3.45 mSv Gy−1cm−2 for the new-born to 0.49 mSv Gy−1cm−2 in the 15 years age class. The suggested values for DCHT_PKA ranged from a minimum of 0.33 mSv Gy−1cm−2 for bone marrow in the 15 years age class to a maximum of 11.49 mSv Gy−1cm−2 for the heart in the new-born. To conclude, values of DCED_PKA/DCHT_PKA were provided for calculating effective/organ doses in cardiac interventional procedures. They can be useful for standardizing dose calculations, hence for comparison of the radiation detriment from different imaging procedures and in the framework of epidemiologic studies.

DOSE EVALUATION AND PROPOSAL OF LOCAL DIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE LEVELS FOR PAEDIATRIC CARDIAC CATHETERIZATIONS PERFORMED ON A HIGH-SENSITIVITY ANGIOGRAPHIC SYSTEM ALLOWING LOW-DOSE IMAGING

Radiation doses from paediatric cardiac catheterizations were analysed based on procedure type and patient weight, and local diagnostic reference levels (LDRLs) were proposed. The procedures were performed on a Siemens Artis Q.zen biplane system with high-sensitivity detectors allowing low-dose imaging. Good radiological practice, e.g. adapting dose level and frame rate continuously and minimizing the x-ray field with collimators, was routine during procedures. The median total dose-area-product (DAP) value was 58 μGym2 for diagnostic catheterizations, 48 μGym2 for interventional catheterizations and 33 μGym2 for myocardial biopsies. The median DAP per body weight was 4.0 μGym2 kg-1. The median total fluoroscopy time varied from 6.0 min for myocardial biopsies, to 9.7 and 10.5 min, respectively, for diagnostic and interventional catheterizations. The third quartile of the DAP values in each weight group was proposed as LDRL. LDRLs for fluoroscopy time were determined solely based on procedure type, due to the absence of weight dependence.

Radiation Exposure in Pediatric Interventional Procedures

The article is part of the series of articles on radiation protection. You can find further articles in the special section of the CVIR issue. The expanding applications of interventional procedures coupled with the potential harmful effects of ionizing radiation highlight the need to assess the delivered radiation dose and establish an effective radiation protection program, particularly in the radiosensitive pediatric population. Given the complexity and heterogeneity of interventional procedures as well as the unique characteristics of children, the management of radiation dose is proving to be quite challenging. The aim of the current article is to provide an overview of the radiation exposure in pediatric patients during interventional procedures focusing on the importance of radiation protection in the pediatric population, the reported radiation doses and the techniques of minimizing radiation dose.

Patient radiation dose from x-ray guided endovascular aneurysm repair: a Monte Carlo approach using voxel phantoms and detailed exposure information

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is a well-established minimally invasive technique that relies on x-ray guidance to introduce a stent through the femoral artery and manipulate it into place. The aim of this study was to estimate patient organ and effective doses from EVAR procedures using anatomically realistic computational phantoms and detailed exposure information from radiation dose structured reports (RDSR). Methods: Lookup tables of conversion factors relating kerma area product (P_KA) to organ doses for 49 different beam angles were produced using Monte Carlo simulations (MCNPX2.7) with International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) adult male and female voxel phantoms for EVAR procedures of varying complexity (infra-renal, fenestrated/branched and thoracic EVAR). Beam angle specific correction factors were calculated to adjust doses according to x-ray energy. A MATLAB function was written to find the appropriate conversion factor in the lookup table for each exposure described in the RDSR, perform energy corrections and multiply by the respective exposure P_KA. Using this approach, organ doses were estimated for 183 EVAR procedures in which RDSRs were available. A number of simplified dose estimation methodologies were also investigated for situations in which RDSR data are not available. Results: Mean estimated bone marrow doses were 57 (range: 2-247), 86 (2-328) and 54 (8-250) mGy for infra-renal, fenestrated/branched and thoracic EVAR, respectively. Respective effective doses were 27 (1-208), 54 (1-180) and 37 (5-167) mSv. Dose estimates using non-individualised, average conversion factors, along with those produced using the alternative Monte Carlo code PCXMC, yielded reasonably similar results overall, though variation for individual procedures could exceed 100% for some organs. In conclusion, radiation doses from x-ray guided endovascular aneurysm repairs are potentially high, though this must be placed in the context of the life sparing nature and high success rate for this procedure.

Estimation of radiation exposure of children undergoing superselective intra-arterial chemotherapy for retinoblastoma treatment: assessment of local diagnostic reference levels as a function of age, sex, and interventional success

PURPOSE

This study aims to determine local diagnostic reference levels (LDRLs) of intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) procedures of pediatric patients with retinoblastoma (RB) to provide data for establishing diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in pediatric interventional radiology (IR).

METHODS

In a retrospective study design, LDRLs and achievable dose (AD) were assessed for children undergoing superselective IAC for RB treatment. All procedures were performed at the flat-panel angiography systems (I) ArtisQ biplane (Siemens Healthineers) and (II) Allura Xper (Philips Healthcare). Patients were differentiated according to age (A1: 1-3 months; A2: 4-12 months; A3: 13-72 months; A4: 73 months-10 years; A5: > 10 years), sex, conducted or not-conducted chemotherapy.

RESULTS

248 neurointerventional procedures of 130 pediatric patients (median age 14.5 months, range 5-127 months) with RB (68 unilateral, 62 bilateral) could be included between January 2010 and March 2020. The following diagnostic reference values, AD, and mean values could be determined: (A2) DRL 3.9 Gy cm², AD 2.9 Gy cm², mean 3.5 Gy cm²; (A3) DRL 7.0 Gy cm², AD 4.3 Gy cm², mean 6.0 Gy cm²; (A4) DRL 14.5 Gy cm², AD 10.7 Gy cm², mean 10.8 Gy cm²; (A5) AD 8.8 Gy cm², mean 8.8 Gy cm². Kruskal-Wallis-test confirmed a significant dose difference between the examined age groups (A2-A5) (p < 0.001). There was no statistical difference considering sex (p = 0.076) and conducted or not-conducted chemotherapy (p = 0.627). A successful procedure was achieved in 207/248 cases.

CONCLUSION

We report on radiation exposure during superselective IAC of a pediatric cohort at the German Retinoblastoma Referral Centre. Although an IAC formally represents a therapeutic procedure, our results confirm that radiation exposure lies within the exposure of a diagnostic interventional procedure. DRLs for superselective IAC are substantially lower compared with DRLs of more complex endovascular interventions.