Feasibility and preliminary validity evidence for remote video-based assessment of clinicians in a global health setting

Development of pediatric simulation-based education - a systematic review

BACKGROUND

This systematic literature review explored the general characteristics, validation, and reliability of pediatric simulation-based education (P-SBE).

METHODS

A literature search was conducted between May 23 and 28 using the PRISMA guidelines, which covered databases such as MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library. In the third selection process, the original texts of 142 studies were selected, and 98 documents were included in the final content analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 109 papers have been published in the ten years since 2011. Most of the study designs were experimental studies, including RCT with 76 articles. Among the typologies of simulation, advanced patient simulation was the most common (92), and high-fidelity simulation was the second most common (75). There were 29 compatibility levels and professional levels, with 59 scenarios related to emergency interventions and 19 scenarios related to communication feasibility and decision making. Regarding the effect variable, 65 studies confirmed that skills were the most common. However, validity of the scenarios and effect variables was not verified in 56.1% and 67.3% of studies, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Based on these findings, simulation based-education (SBE) is an effective educational method that can improve the proficiency and competence of medical professionals dealing with child. Learning through simulation provides an immersive environment in which learners interact with the presented patient scenario and make decisions, actively learning the attitudes, knowledge, and skills necessary for medical providers. In the future, it is expected that such research on SBE will be actively followed up and verified for its validity and reliability.

Development, validation and feasibility study of a remote basic skills assessment for wheelchair service providers

AIM

The purpose of this study was to develop, validate and conduct a feasibility study of three remote basic skills assessment modalities for wheelchair service providers (WSP) including an online case study quiz (m1), an in-person skills assessment (m2) and a video conference skills assessment (m3).

METHODS

We conducted a literature review; developed and validated 3 basic skills assessments; and conducted a feasibility study of each modality.

RESULTS

The literature review revealed that a validated remote basic skills assessment for WSP that reflects all World Health Organization (WHO) 8 wheelchair service provision steps did not exist. We recruited a total of 12 participants for the feasibility study. Two participants dropped out of the study prior to completing a second testing modality. Related to test performance, the results show that our first hypothesis was rejected because only m1 mean score was comparable to the International Society of Wheelchair Professionals (ISWP) Basic Knowledge Test (SD = 0.44). This is in contrast with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test results that show a statistically significant difference between these two modalities. We are therefore not confident that the knowledge test was an appropriate comparison to m1 skills assessment. Hypothesis two was not rejected. The feasibility results reveal 86% success.

CONCLUSION

M1, 2 and 3 have the potential to serve as remote basic skills assessments. However, according to both test performance and feasibility criteria, we believe that m2 has the highest potential to be included in certification processes for basic wheelchair service providers, like the one offered by ISWP.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONA universal remote basic skills assessment that can be accessed across the globe, especially in remote locations where a skilled and experienced provider is not available, is needed.Such test can be an asset to training or professional organisations like ISWP as a way to test WSP competency or to warrant certification.WSP clinical knowledge and skills are essential for the prescription of an appropriate wheelchair to avoid physical harm, abandonment of the device and unnecessary expenses.Properly prescribed wheelchairs allow people with impaired mobility to gain increased ability to perform ADLs, participate in communities, and reduce secondary medical complications such as upper limb repetitive strain injuries, pain, and/or pressure sores.