Musical expertise generalizes to superior temporal scaling in a Morse code tapping task

Generalization of auditory expertise in audio engineers and instrumental musicians

From auditory perception to general cognition, the ability to play a musical instrument has been associated with skills both related and unrelated to music. However, it is unclear if these effects are bound to the specific characteristics of musical instrument training, as little attention has been paid to other populations such as audio engineers and designers whose auditory expertise may match or surpass that of musicians in specific auditory tasks or more naturalistic acoustic scenarios. We explored this possibility by comparing students of audio engineering (n = 20) to matched conservatory-trained instrumentalists (n = 24) and to naive controls (n = 20) on measures of auditory discrimination, auditory scene analysis, and speech in noise perception. We found that audio engineers and performing musicians had generally lower psychophysical thresholds than controls, with pitch perception showing the largest effect size. Compared to controls, audio engineers could better memorise and recall auditory scenes composed of non-musical sounds, whereas instrumental musicians performed best in a sustained selective attention task with two competing streams of tones. Finally, in a diotic speech-in-babble task, musicians showed lower signal-to-noise-ratio thresholds than both controls and engineers; however, a follow-up online study did not replicate this musician advantage. We also observed differences in personality that might account for group-based self-selection biases. Overall, we showed that investigating a wider range of forms of auditory expertise can help us corroborate (or challenge) the specificity of the advantages previously associated with musical instrument training.

Neural Sequences and the Encoding of Time

Converging experimental and computational evidence indicate that on the scale of seconds the brain encodes time through changing patterns of neural activity. Experimentally, two general forms of neural dynamic regimes that can encode time have been observed: neural population clocks and ramping activity. Neural population clocks provide a high-dimensional code to generate complex spatiotemporal output patterns, in which each neuron exhibits a nonlinear temporal profile. A prototypical example of neural population clocks are neural sequences, which have been observed across species, brain areas, and behavioral paradigms. Additionally, neural sequences emerge in artificial neural networks trained to solve time-dependent tasks. Here, we examine the role of neural sequences in the encoding of time, and how they may emerge in a biologically plausible manner. We conclude that neural sequences may represent a canonical computational regime to perform temporal computations.

Neural population clocks: Encoding time in dynamic patterns of neural activity

The ability to predict and prepare for near- and far-future events is among the most fundamental computations the brain performs. Because of the importance of time for prediction and sensorimotor processing, the brain has evolved multiple mechanisms to tell and encode time across scales ranging from microseconds to days and beyond. Converging experimental and computational data indicate that, on the scale of seconds, timing relies on diverse neural mechanisms distributed across different brain areas. Among the different encoding mechanisms on the scale of seconds, we distinguish between neural population clocks and ramping activity as distinct strategies to encode time. One instance of neural population clocks, neural sequences, represents in some ways an optimal and flexible dynamic regime for the encoding of time. Specifically, neural sequences comprise a high-dimensional representation that can be used by downstream areas to flexibly generate arbitrarily simple and complex output patterns using biologically plausible learning rules. We propose that high-level integration areas may use high-dimensional dynamics such as neural sequences to encode time, providing downstream areas information to build low-dimensional ramp-like activity that can drive movements and temporal expectation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Encoding time in neural dynamic regimes with distinct computational tradeoffs

Converging evidence suggests the brain encodes time in dynamic patterns of neural activity, including neural sequences, ramping activity, and complex dynamics. Most temporal tasks, however, require more than just encoding time, and can have distinct computational requirements including the need to exhibit temporal scaling, generalize to novel contexts, or robustness to noise. It is not known how neural circuits can encode time and satisfy distinct computational requirements, nor is it known whether similar patterns of neural activity at the population level can exhibit dramatically different computational or generalization properties. To begin to answer these questions, we trained RNNs on two timing tasks based on behavioral studies. The tasks had different input structures but required producing identically timed output patterns. Using a novel framework we quantified whether RNNs encoded two intervals using either of three different timing strategies: scaling, absolute, or stimulus-specific dynamics. We found that similar neural dynamic patterns at the level of single intervals, could exhibit fundamentally different properties, including, generalization, the connectivity structure of the trained networks, and the contribution of excitatory and inhibitory neurons. Critically, depending on the task structure RNNs were better suited for generalization or robustness to noise. Further analysis revealed different connection patterns underlying the different regimes. Our results predict that apparently similar neural dynamic patterns at the population level (e.g., neural sequences) can exhibit fundamentally different computational properties in regards to their ability to generalize to novel stimuli and their robustness to noise—and that these differences are associated with differences in network connectivity and distinct contributions of excitatory and inhibitory neurons. We also predict that the task structure used in different experimental studies accounts for some of the experimentally observed variability in how networks encode time.

The ability to tell time and anticipate when external events will occur are among the most fundamental computations the brain performs. Converging evidence suggests the brain encodes time through changing patterns of neural activity. Different temporal tasks, however, have distinct computational requirements, such as the need to flexibly scale temporal patterns or generalize to novel inputs. To understand how networks can encode time and satisfy different computational requirements we trained recurrent neural networks (RNNs) on two timing tasks that have previously been used in behavioral studies. Both tasks required producing identically timed output patterns. Using a novel framework to quantify how networks encode different intervals, we found that similar patterns of neural activity—neural sequences—were associated with fundamentally different underlying mechanisms, including the connectivity patterns of the RNNs. Critically, depending on the task the RNNs were trained on, they were better suited for generalization or robustness to noise. Our results predict that similar patterns of neural activity can be produced by distinct RNN configurations, which in turn have fundamentally different computational tradeoffs. Our results also predict that differences in task structure account for some of the experimentally observed variability in how networks encode time.

The orbitofrontal cortex in temporal cognition

One of the most important factors in decision-making is estimating the value of available options. Subregions of the prefrontal cortex, including the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), have been deemed essential for this process. Value computations require a complex integration across numerous dimensions, including, reward magnitude, effort, internal state, and time. The importance of the temporal dimension is well illustrated by temporal discounting tasks, in which subjects select between smaller-sooner versus larger-later rewards. The specific role of OFC in telling time and integrating temporal information into decision-making remains unclear. Based on the current literature, in this review we reevaluate current theories of OFC function, accounting for the influence of time. Incorporating temporal information into value estimation and decision-making requires distinct, yet interrelated, forms of temporal information including the ability to tell time, represent time, create temporal expectations, and the ability to use this information for optimal decision-making in a wide range of tasks, including temporal discounting and wagering. We use the term "temporal cognition" to refer to the integrated use of these different aspects of temporal information. We suggest that the OFC may be a critical site for the integration of reward magnitude and delay, and thus important for temporal cognition. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).