Adherence to evidence-based recommendations for surgical site infection prevention: Results among Italian surgical ward nurses

Healthcare professionals' knowledge and attitudes towards surgical site infection and surveillance: A quasi-experimental study

AIM

SSI is one of the most prevalent healthcare-associated infections and is associated with extended hospital stays, increased need for reoperation and higher hospital readmission rates. Implementing systematic SSI surveillance can reduce these adverse outcomes. Implementing a surveillance system into a hospital is a complex intervention requiring that staff involved in a patient's perioperative journey have the knowledge of SSI prevention, the data required for surveillance, an understanding of how data informs quality improvement initiatives and their role in surveillance. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a complex intervention on the knowledge and attitudes of healthcare professionals towards surgical site infection (SSI), SSI prevention and surveillance in a university hospital setting.

DESIGN

The study used a quasi-experimental pre-test-post-test design.

METHOD

The impact of a complex intervention was evaluated by measuring healthcare professionals' (n = 74) knowledge of and attitudes towards SSI and surveillance. Normalisation process theory (NPT) guided the study and the development of the intervention.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant increase in scores on the knowledge of SSI and prevention from pre-intervention to post-test. The knowledge of risk factors scores at post-test was significantly higher than that at pre-intervention. Overall attitudes to SSI prevention and surveillance were good both pre-intervention and post-test but there was a significant change in the attitude of participants. The findings reveal an overall positive impact of the complex intervention on the knowledge and attitude of healthcare professionals relating to SSI, SSI prevention and surveillance; however, the extent of the change varied across items measured.

Healthcare professionals' knowledge and attitudes of surgical site infection and surveillance: A narrative systematic review

AIM

This systematic review reports on healthcare professionals' knowledge and attitudes of surgical site infection and surgical site infection surveillance as well as interventions aimed at enhancing healthcare professionals' knowledge and attitudes.

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infection is a serious adverse outcome following surgery. Despite the presence of international guidelines, the prevention of surgical site infections remains a challenge for patients and hospitals. It is critical that healthcare professionals have sufficient knowledge on surgical site infection and on their role in implementing evidence-based prevention strategies.

DESIGN

This review is reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines.

METHODS

A search was undertaken in the following databases: Academic Search Complete, CINAHL, ERIC, MEDLINE, PsycARTICLES, PsycINFO and Web of Science for studies published between January 2010 and March 2022. Studies that examined healthcare professionals' knowledge and attitudes in relation to surgical site infection, surgical site infection surveillance and risk factors for their development were included. We also included studies that examined interventions that aimed to enhance healthcare professionals' knowledge and attitude in relation to surgical site infection, surveillance, and risk factors. We also described the impact of such interventions on the incidence of surgical site infections.

RESULTS

A total of 26 studies were included. Results were synthesised narratively according to the review objectives. Findings from this review show that knowledge of what surgical site infection is and its prevention was poor amongst healthcare professionals, while attitudes were positive particularly in relation to healthcare professionals' role in prevention. Only three studies examined the effects of interventions on healthcare professionals' knowledge of surgical site infection and surgical site infection prevention. Of those, two used multimodal educational interventions and found statistically significant improvement in knowledge.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall knowledge of surgical site infection and its prevention is poor amongst healthcare professionals, while attitudes were positive particularly in relation to healthcare professionals' role in prevention. There is a need for more experimental research to evaluate interventions which aim to address healthcare professionals' knowledge and attitudes towards surgical site infection prevention and surveillance. Such studies should include all healthcare professionals involved in the care of a surgical patient.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Knowledge and attitudes of surgical site infection prevention amongst healthcare professionals.

The Factors Impacting Nurses Awareness on Prevention Healthcare-Associated Infections: A Systematic Review

Background: Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs) are significant causes of illness and mortality, and nurses are healthcare professionals with the most consistent contact with patients, therefore nurses need to possess adequate knowledge, and awareness. Aim: this study aim to analyze factors impacting nurses' awareness of the prevention of HAIs, such as their knowledge, attitude, and practice compliance. Methods: A systematic review was conducted from the sources of data collection, namely Proquest, Science Direct, Pubmed, and Google Scholar from 2011-2020, with English guidelines used to review the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Results: Data were obtained through a questionnaire survey, direct observation, and self-report from 4329 nurses with a total of 12 inclusion criteria. The result showed that a significant number of nurses do not possess an acceptable level of knowledge and practice, although nurses have a positive attitude. Hand hygiene and the other protective personal equipment need to be used by nurses and other health personal to prevent Urinary Tract Infection, respiratory, and Surgical Site Infection in the hospital.   Conclusion: nurses need to possess the right knowledge, attitude, and guidelines. Standard precaution is important for patient safety management, nurses need to be adequately trained to increase awareness.  

Skin and mucous membranes colonisation with Staphylococcus aureus or MRSA as a risk factor for surgical site infections in elective Caesarean Section

The purpose of this study was to determine if skin and mucous membrane colonisation with Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) increases the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) post-elective Caesarean Sections. A prospective study was conducted at a major centre in Jordan, involving 127 patients who underwent elective Caesarean Section surgeries during 2019. Participants were screened for skin and mucous membranes colonisation for S. aureus preoperatively and were followed for 90 days for any signs of SSI. The screening sites were on three parts of the patients' bodies; nose, throat, and groyne. The total SSI incidence was 18.9%. Among participants with SSI; 66.7% had a superficial infection and 33.3% had deep tissue infection. Skin and mucous membrane colonisation was positive in 42 participants (33.1%) in one of the three screening sites. Participants with positive skin and mucous membrane colonisation were found to have SSI incidence 2.43 times more than the non-colonised participants (Fisher's Exact test = 3.832, p = .05, CI: 0.098-6.02). Participants with S. aureus skin and mucous membranes colonisation were significantly 2.94 times with more SSI incidence than those who were not colonised (Fisher's Exact test = 5.485, p = .02, CI: 1.164-7.439). Skin and mucous membrane colonisation was found to increase the incidence of SSI. More attention should be performed to screen for skin and mucous membranes colonisation and subsequent selective skin decolonisation to decrease SSI incidence.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? Surgical site infection (SSI) is a challenge that increases the costs of health care. Surgical site infection is associated with high costs mainly due to the increase in the length of hospital stay. Skin screening for S. aureus or MRSA colonisation was found to be important for selective skin decolonisation using appropriate antiseptic preparation and preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis.What do the results of this study add? The incidence of SSI in the colonised group was found to be 2.43 times higher than in the non-colonised group.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Screening for colonisation and subsequent selective skin decolonisation should be a part of SSI prevention policies.

Prevention of Prosthetic Joint Infection: From Traditional Approaches towards Quality Improvement and Data Mining

A projected increased use of total joint arthroplasties will naturally result in a related increase in the number of prosthetic joint infections (PJIs). Suppression of the local peri-implant immune response counters efforts to eradicate bacteria, allowing the formation of biofilms and compromising preventive measures taken in the operating room. For these reasons, the prevention of PJI should focus concurrently on the following targets: (i) identifying at-risk patients; (ii) reducing “bacterial load” perioperatively; (iii) creating an antibacterial/antibiofilm environment at the site of surgery; and (iv) stimulating the local immune response. Despite considerable recent progress made in experimental and clinical research, a large discrepancy persists between proposed and clinically implemented preventative strategies. The ultimate anti-infective strategy lies in an optimal combination of all preventative approaches into a single “clinical pack”, applied rigorously in all settings involving prosthetic joint implantation. In addition, “anti-infective” implants might be a choice in patients who have an increased risk for PJI. However, further progress in the prevention of PJI is not imaginable without a close commitment to using quality improvement tools in combination with continual data mining, reflecting the efficacy of the preventative strategy in a particular clinical setting.