A novel strategy for interpreting the T-SPOT.TB test results read by an ELISPOT plate imager

Evaluation of a New Chemiluminescent Immunoassay-Based Interferon-Gamma Release Assay for Detection of Latent Tuberculosis Infection

Background and Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of a new chemiluminescent immunoassay-based tuberculosis (TB) interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA), AdvanSureI3 TB-IGRA (LG Chem Ltd., Seoul, Republic of Korea), for detecting latent tuberculosis infection in comparison with T-SPOT.TB (Oxford Immunotec, Oxford, UK). Materials and Methods: Between June 2021 and December 2021, 125 non-duplicate blood specimens were collected from adult volunteers; each subject received both tests concurrently. Total agreement and Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ) were used to calculate concordance. The Jonckheere-Terpstra test was used to examine the correlation between interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) levels in AdvanSureI3 TB-IGRA and spot counts in T-SPOT.TB. Results: The IGRA findings of the two assays revealed 90.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 84.2-94.8) total agreement with κ of 0.740 (95% CI = 0.595-0.885), showing substantial agreement between the two tests. Additionally, the amount of IFN-γ in AdvanSureI3 TB-IGRA increased with the spot counts in T-SPOT.TB (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Our research revealed that the results of the AdvanSureI3 TB-IGRA were comparable to those of T-SPOT.TB.

The diagnostic value of T cell spot test and adenosine deaminase in pleural effusion for tuberculous pleurisy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Tuberculous infection of T cell spot test (T-SPOT.TB) and adenosine deaminase (ADA) have a high diagnostic value in pleural effusion for tuberculous pleurisy. However, there were major differences in existing research in regard to the clinical application of the two trials. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to systematically evaluate the diagnostic value of T-SPOT.TB and ADA.

METHODS

Pubmed, Web of Science and Embase databases were searched to compare diagnosis of tuberculous pleurisy by T-SPOT.TB and ADA. The search period was from inception to August 31, 2021. Statistical analyses were performed using Meta-disc 1.4, Revman 5.4 and Stata 16.0. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were determined. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to summarize overall diagnostic performance.

RESULTS

10 qualified original research studies were included, with a total of 2075 patients, of which were 1391 tuberculous pleurisy and 684 non-tuberculous pleurisy. The pooled estimates of diagnostic accuracy of T-SPOT.TB were as follows: sensitivity, 0.88 (95% CI: 0.86-0.90; I² = 92.7%); specificity, 0.79 (95% CI: 0.76-0.82; I² = 93.7%); PLR, 4.49 (95% CI: 2.29-8.80; I² = 94.9%); NLR, 0.15 (95% CI: 0.08-0.30; I² = 94.3%), DOR, 35.72 (95% CI: 11.15-114.47; I² = 91.5%). The AUC for SROC was 0.9283 (95% CI: 0.8912-0.9654). The pooled estimates of diagnostic accuracy of ADA were as follows: sensitivity, 0.65 (95% CI: 0.62-0.67; I² = 98.2%); specificity, 0.90 (95% CI: 0.88-0.92; I² = 69.4%); PLR, 6.12 (95% CI: 4.71-7.96; I² = 11.9%); NLR, 0.33 (95% CI: 0.12-0.89; I² = 99.5%), DOR, 23.18 (95% CI: 12.75-42.14; I² = 66.7%). The AUC for SROC was 0.9208 (95% CI: 0.9029-0.9387).

CONCLUSION

Both T-SPOT.TB and ADA had high value in the diagnosis of tuberculous pleurisy. The sensitivity of T-SPOT.TB was higher than ADA, but the specificity of ADA was higher than T-SPOT.TB. On the whole, T-SPOT. TB had similar diagnostic accuracy to ADA.

Use of T Cell Mediated Immune Functional Assays for Adjustment of Immunosuppressive or Anti-infective Agents in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review

Background: Defining the optimal dosage of the immunosuppressive or duration of anti-infective agents is a challenge in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. We aimed to systematically review the literature regarding the use of T cell mediated immune functional assays (IFAs) for adjustment of the immunosuppressive or anti-infective agents in SOT recipients. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science (WOS), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov to find human interventional studies or study protocols that used either in-house or commercially available IFAs for adjustment of the immunosuppressive or anti-infective agents in SOT recipients. Results: We included six clinical trials and six study protocols. Four out of the six clinical trials used interferon-γ release assays for cytomegalovirus (IGRA-CMV), and five out of the six registered study protocols planned to use IGRA-CMV for adjustment of anti-CMV antiviral (Valganciclovir) prophylaxis or preemptive therapy in SOT recipients. Primary or secondary anti-CMV prophylaxes were discontinued in SOT recipients who had positive IGRA-CMV results without an increase in the rate of CMV infection or reactivation. Among other IFAs, one clinical trial used interferon-γ release assays for tuberculosis (IGRA-TB), and one study used ImmuKnow for adjustment of the duration and dosage of isoniazid and tacrolimus, respectively. Conclusion: Our systematic review supports a promising role for the IGRA-CMVs for adjustment of the duration of anti-CMV antiviral prophylaxis in SOT recipients. There are limited data to support the use of IFAs other than IGRA-CMVs for adjustment of immunosuppressive or anti-infective agents. Further multicenter randomized clinical trials using IFAs other than IGRA-CMVs may help in personalized immunosuppressive or prophylactic anti-infective therapy in SOT recipients.