Activation of GPR56, a novel adhesion GPCR, is necessary for nuclear androgen receptor signaling in prostate cells

Androgens have therapeutic potential in T2 asthma by mediating METTL3 in bronchial epithelial cells

Studies have shown that androgens can alleviate the symptoms of T2 asthma and are inversely correlated with the severity of allergic asthma. METTL3, a crucial component of m6A modification, mitigates the development of T2 asthma by inhibiting Th2 cell differentiation. However, the impact of androgens, such as dihydrotestosterone (DHT), on the progression of T2 asthma through METTL3 has yet to be investigated. At the clinical level, patients with T2 asthma exhibited reduced levels of DHT and METTL3 mRNA, along with increased levels of 17β-estradiol (E2). DHT and METTL3 were found to be negatively associated with the severity of T2 asthma, while E2 was positively associated with it. Administration of DHT and E2 in induced T2 asthma mouse models showed that DHT improved lung function, reduced airway inflammation, and inhibited Th2 cell differentiation. Interestingly, DHT reversed the damage to METTL3, whereas E2 had the opposite effect. In vitro studies of mouse bronchial epithelial cells (BECs) confirmed that METTL3-dependent m6A modification inhibited the T2 inflammatory response, and DHT inhibited Th2 cell differentiation in T2 asthma by promoting METTL3 expression in BECs. In conclusion, our study suggests that DHT has therapeutic potential for T2 asthma by regulating METTL3 in BECs.

Prostate cancer biomarkers: from early diagnosis to precision treatment

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most prevalent cancer in men. In 2020, approximately 1,414,259 new cases were reported that accounted for 3,75,324 deaths (Sung et al. in CA 71:209-249, 2021). PCa is often asymptomatic at early stages; hence, routine screening and monitoring based on reliable biomarkers is crucial for early detection and assessment of cancer progression. Early diagnosis of disease is key step in reducing PCa-induced mortality. Biomarkers such as PSA have played vital role in reducing recent PCa deaths. Recent research has identified many other biomarkers and also refined PSA-based tests for non-invasive diagnosis of PCa in patients. Despite progress in screening methods, an important issue that influences treatment is heterogeneity of the cancer in different individuals, necessitating personalized treatment. Currently, focus is to identify biomarkers that can accurately diagnose PCa at early stage, indicate the stage of the disease, metastatic nature and chances of survival based on individual patient profile (Fig. 1). Fig. 1 Graphical abstract.

G protein selectivity profile of GPR56/ADGRG1 and its effect on downstream effectors

GPR56, an adhesion G-protein coupled receptor (aGPCRs) with constitutive and ligand-promoted activity, is involved in many physiological and pathological processes. Whether the receptor's constitutive or ligand-promoted activation occur through the same molecular mechanism, and whether different activation modes lead to functional selectivity between G proteins is unknown. Here we show that GPR56 constitutively activates both G12 and G13. Unlike constitutive activation and activation with 3-a-acetoxydihydrodeoxygedunin (3αDOG), stimulation with an antibody, 10C7, directed against GPR56's extracellular domain (ECD) led to an activation that favors G13 over G12. An autoproteolytically deficient mutant, GPR56-T383A, was also activated by 10C7 indicating that the tethered agonist (TA) exposed through autocatalytic cleavage, is not required for this activation modality. In contrast, this proteolysis-resistant mutant could not be activated by 3αDOG indicating different modes of activation by the two ligands. We show that an N-terminal truncated GPR56 construct (GPR56-Δ1-385) is devoid of constitutive activity but was activated by 3αDOG. Similarly to 3αDOG, 10C7 promoted the recruitment of b-arrestin-2 but GPR56 internalization was β-arrestin independent. Despite the slow activation mode of 10C7 that favors G13 over G12, it efficiently activated the downstream Rho pathway in BT-20 breast cancer cells. These data show that different GPR56 ligands have different modes of activation yielding differential G protein selectivity but converging on the activation of the Rho pathway both in heterologous expressions system and in cancer cells endogenously expressing the receptor. 10C7 is therefore an interesting tool to study both the processes underlying GPR56 activity and its role in cancer cells.

G protein selectivity profile of GPR56/ADGRG1 and its effect on downstream effectors

GPR56, an adhesion G-protein coupled receptor (aGPCRs) with constitutive and ligand-promoted activity, is involved in many physiological and pathological processes. Whether the receptor's constitutive or ligand-promoted activation occur through the same molecular mechanism, and whether different activation modes lead to functional selectivity between G proteins is unknown. Here we show that GPR56 constitutively activates both G12 and G13. Unlike constitutive activation and activation with 3-α-acetoxydihydrodeoxygedunin (3αDOG), stimulation with an antibody, 10C7, directed against GPR56's extracellular domain (ECD) led to an activation that favors G13 over G12. An autoproteolytically deficient mutant, GPR56-T383A, was also activated by 10C7 indicating that the tethered agonist (TA) exposed through autocatalytic cleavage, is not required for this activation modality. In contrast, this proteolysis-resistant mutant could not be activated by 3αDOG indicating different modes of activation by the two ligands. We show that an N-terminal truncated GPR56 construct (GPR56-Δ1-385) is devoid of constitutive activity but was activated by 3αDOG. Similarly to 3αDOG, 10C7 promoted the recruitment of β-arrestin-2 but GPR56 internalization was β-arrestin independent. Despite the slow activation mode of 10C7 that favors G13 over G12, it efficiently activated the downstream Rho pathway in BT-20 breast cancer cells. These data show that different GPR56 ligands have different modes of activation yielding differential G protein selectivity but converging on the activation of the Rho pathway both in heterologous expressions system and in cancer cells endogenously expressing the receptor. 10C7 is therefore an interesting tool to study both the processes underlying GPR56 activity and its role in cancer cells.

Revisiting the roles of cAMP signalling in the progression of prostate cancer

Prostate cancer is one of the most common cancers in men and one of the top causes of death in men worldwide. Development and function of both normal prostate cells and early-stage prostate cancer cells are dependent on the cross-talk between androgen signalling systems and a variety of other transduction pathways which drive differentiation of these cells towards castration-resistance. One such signalling pathway is the ubiquitous cAMP signalling axis which functions to activate spatially restricted pools of cAMP effectors such as protein kinase A (PKA). The importance of both PKA and cAMP in the development of prostate cancer, and their interactions with the androgen receptor, were the focus of a review by Merkle and Hoffmann in 2010. In this updated review, we revisit this topic with analysis of current PKA-related prostate cancer literature and introduce novel information on the relevance of another cAMP effector, the exchange protein directly activated by cAMP (EPAC).

Ablation of GPR56 Causes β-Cell Dysfunction by ATP Loss through Mistargeting of Mitochondrial VDAC1 to the Plasma Membrane

The activation of G Protein-Coupled Receptor 56 (GPR56), also referred to as Adhesion G-Protein-Coupled Ceceptor G1 (ADGRG1), by Collagen Type III (Coll III) prompts cell growth, proliferation, and survival, among other attributes. We investigated the signaling cascades mediating this functional effect in relation to the mitochondrial outer membrane voltage-dependent anion Channel-1 (VDAC1) expression in pancreatic β-cells. GPR56KD attenuated the Coll III-induced suppression of P70S6K, JNK, AKT, NFκB, STAT3, and STAT5 phosphorylation/activity in INS-1 cells cultured at 20 mM glucose (glucotoxicity) for 72 h. GPR56-KD also increased Chrebp, Txnip, and Vdac1 while decreasing Vdac2 mRNA expression. In GPR56-KD islet β-cells, Vdac1 was co-localized with SNAP-25, demonstrating its plasma membrane translocation. This resulted in ATP loss, reduced cAMP production and impaired glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) in INS-1 and human EndoC βH1 cells. The latter defects were reversed by an acute inhibition of VDAC1 with an antibody or the VDAC1 inhibitor VBIT-4. We demonstrate that Coll III potentiates GSIS by increasing cAMP and preserving β-cell functionality under glucotoxic conditions in a GPR56-dependent manner by attenuating the inflammatory response. These results emphasize GPR56 and VDAC1 as drug targets in conditions with impaired β-cell function.

Loss of Adgra3 causes obstructive azoospermia with high penetrance in male mice

The adhesion receptor ADGRA3 (GPR125) is a known spermatogonial stem cell marker, but its impact on male reproduction and fertility has not been examined. Using a mouse model lacking Adgra3 (Adgra3-/- ), we show that 55% of the male mice are infertile from puberty despite having normal spermatogenesis and epididymal sperm count. Instead, male mice lacking Adgra3 exhibited decreased estrogen receptor alpha expression and transient dilation of the epididymis. Combined with an increased estradiol production, this indicates a post-pubertal hormonal imbalance and fluid retention. Dye injection revealed a blockage between the ejaculatory duct and the urethra, which is rare in mice suffering from infertility, thereby mimicking the etiologies of obstructive azoospermia found in human male infertility. To summarize, male reproductive tract development is dependent on ADGRA3 function that in concert with estrogen signaling may influence fluid handling during sperm maturation and storage.

Non-canonical androgen signaling pathways and implications in prostate cancer

Androgen signaling is a critical determinant of timely and proper development of all male organs including the prostate. Maturation of prostate and its neoplastic transformation is intricately associated with accurate androgen signaling. Ablation of androgen has therefore been the primary treatment mechanism of Prostate cancer (PCa) patients for several decades. Upon removal, the tumor recedes for a while, yet it reappears soon, in an androgen independent state, untreatable by current therapeutic regimens. Studies reveal that apart from the classical androgen signaling pathway known and targeted for almost a century, there exist several non-canonical pathways, with marked impact on classical androgen signaling and PCa growth. These include non-genomic signaling by androgens via alternate membrane GPCRs, signaling by non-androgens that ultimately impact the androgen signaling pathway, or an integration of non-genomic and genomic response as seen in case of protein kinase A activation. Accurate understanding of these various non-canonical androgen signaling pathways and their influence on the typical androgen signaling pathway can help design important interventions for PCa patients. This review analyses in detail the various non-classical androgen signaling pathways and their impact, if any, on classical mode of androgen action and PCa.

Structures of the ADGRG2-Gs complex in apo and ligand-bound forms

Adhesion G protein-coupled receptors are elusive in terms of their structural information and ligands. Here, we solved the cryogenic-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structure of apo-ADGRG2, an essential membrane receptor for maintaining male fertility, in complex with a Gs trimer. Whereas the formations of two kinks were determinants of the active state, identification of a potential ligand-binding pocket in ADGRG2 facilitated the screening and identification of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate and deoxycorticosterone as potential ligands of ADGRG2. The cryo-EM structures of DHEA-ADGRG2-Gs provided interaction details for DHEA within the seven transmembrane domains of ADGRG2. Collectively, our data provide a structural basis for the activation and signaling of ADGRG2, as well as characterization of steroid hormones as ADGRG2 ligands, which might be used as useful tools for further functional studies of the orphan ADGRG2.

Functions of G protein-coupled receptor 56 in health and disease

Human G protein-coupled receptor 56 (GPR56) is encoded by gene ADGRG1 from chromosome 16q21 and is homologously encoded in mice, at chromosome 8. Both 687 and 693 splice forms are present in humans and mice. GPR56 has a 381 amino acid-long N-terminal extracellular segment and a GPCR proteolysis site upstream from the first transmembrane domain. GPR56 is mainly expressed in the heart, brain, thyroid, platelets, and peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Accumulating evidence indicates that GPR56 promotes the formation of myelin sheaths and the development of oligodendrocytes in the cerebral cortex of the central nervous system. Moreover, GPR56 contributes to the development and differentiation of hematopoietic stem cells, induces adipogenesis, and regulates the function of immune cells. The lack of GPR56 leads to nervous system dysfunction, platelet disorders, and infertility. Abnormal expression of GPR56 is related to the malignant transformation and tumor metastasis of several cancers including melanoma, neuroglioma, and gastrointestinal cancer. Metabolic disorders and cardiovascular diseases are also associated with dysregulation of GPR56 expression, and GPR56 is involved in the pharmacological resistance to some antidepressant and cancer drug treatments. In this review, the molecular structure, expression profile, and signal transduction of GPR56 are introduced, and physiological and pathological functions of GRP56 are comprehensively summarized. Attributing to its significant biological functions and its long N-terminal extracellular region that interacts with multiple ligands, GPR56 is becoming an attractive therapeutic target in treating neurological and hematopoietic diseases.

Androgen Plays a Potential Novel Hormonal Therapeutic Role in Th17 Cells Predominant Neutrophilic Severe Asthma by Attenuating BECs Regulated Th17 Cells Differentiation via MBD2 Expression

T helper 17 (Th17) cells subtype of non-T2 asthma is less responsive (resistant) to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), so also called severe asthma. Methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 2 (MBD2) regulates the differentiation of the Th17 cells, showing the possibility of a therapeutic target in severe asthma. Androgen tends to show beneficial therapeutic effects and is a “hot research topic,” but its role in the differentiation and expression of Th17 cells via MBD2 is still unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate how sex hormone interacts with MBD2 and affects the differentiation and expression of Th17 cells in severe asthma. Here, first, we measured the concentration of androgen, estrogen, and androgen estrogen ratio from subjects and correlated it with severe asthma status. Then, we established an animal model and bronchial epithelial cells (BECs) model of severe asthma to evaluate the role of MBD2 in the differentiation and expression of Th17 cells (IL-17), the therapeutic potential of sex hormones in severe asthma, and the effect of sex hormones in BECs regulated Th17 cells differentiation via MBD2 at the cellular level. Increased MBD2 expression and Th17 cells differentiation were noted in the animal and the BECs severe asthma models. Th17 cell differentiation and expression were MBD2 dependent. Androgen attenuated the differentiation of BECs regulated Th17 cells via MBD2 showing BECs as a therapeutic target of androgen, and these findings postulate the novel role of androgen in Th17 cells predominant neutrophilic severe asthma therapy through targeting MBD2.

Complex roles of cAMP-PKA-CREB signaling in cancer

Cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) is the first discovered second messenger, which plays pivotal roles in cell signaling, and regulates many physiological and pathological processes. cAMP can regulate the transcription of various target genes, mainly through protein kinase A (PKA) and its downstream effectors such as cAMP-responsive element binding protein (CREB). In addition, PKA can phosphorylate many kinases such as Raf, GSK3 and FAK. Aberrant cAMP-PKA signaling is involved in various types of human tumors. Especially, cAMP signaling may have both tumor-suppressive and tumor-promoting roles depending on the tumor types and context. cAMP-PKA signaling can regulate cancer cell growth, migration, invasion and metabolism. This review highlights the important roles of cAMP-PKA-CREB signaling in tumorigenesis. The potential strategies to target this pathway for cancer therapy are also discussed.