An exclusive human milk diet for very low birth weight newborns-A cost-effectiveness and EVPI study for Germany

Exclusive Human Milk Diets and the Reduction of Necrotizing Enterocolitis

BACKGROUND

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is common in preterm infants, especially infants less than 32 weeks gestation. Mortality from NEC is 7% and occurs in 1 out of 1000 preterm infants. Studies have shown the efficacy of an exclusive milk from mother diet in decreasing rates of NEC and associated mortality.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness of an existing exclusive human milk diet (EHMD) protocol on the incidence of NEC in extremely premature infants. EHMD, for the purposes of this project is defined as breast milk of mother, with or without human milk-based fortifier.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective quasi-experimental study. The sample included 201 infants born less than 32 weeks gestation, weighing less than 1250 grams, small for gestational age (SGA) and with low Apgar scores. Outcomes measured included incidences of NEC, mortality, and co-morbidities in infants pre- and postinitiation of an EHMD protocol.

RESULTS

Just 4.8% of the EHMD group had a NEC diagnosis compared to 10.5% of the bovine-based (BOV) group. There was a 1% mortality rate of the EHMD group as compared to 6% in the BOV group. The EHMD group had a statistically significant greater weight gain during hospitalization as compared to infants fed BOV ( P = < .05).

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE AND RESEARCH

Neonatal intensive care units should consider EHMDs for use in this infant population. Future research is needed to support dissemination of the use of EHMD as standard of practice.

Costs and cost-effectiveness of treatment setting for children with wasting, oedema and growth failure/faltering: A systematic review

This systematic review aimed to address the existing evidence gaps, and guide policy decisions on the settings within which to treat infants <12 months of age with growth faltering/failure, and infants and children aged <60 months with moderate wasting or severe wasting and/or bilateral pitting oedema. Twelve electronic databases were searched for studies published before 10 December 2021. The searches yielded 16,709 records from which 31 studies were eligible and included in the review. Three studies were judged as low quality, whilst 14 were moderate and the remaining 14 were high quality. We identified very few cost and cost-effectiveness analyses for most of the models of care with the certainty of evidence being judged at very low or low. However, there were 17 cost and 6 cost-effectiveness analyses for the initiation of treatment in outpatient settings for severe wasting and/or bilateral pitting oedema in infants and children <60 months of age. From this evidence, the costs appear lowest for initiating treatment in community settings, followed by initiating treatment in community and transferring to outpatient settings, initiating treatment in outpatients then transferring to community settings, initiating treatment in outpatient settings, and lastly initiating treatment in inpatient settings. In addition, the evidence suggested that initiation of treatment in outpatient settings is highly cost-effective when compared to doing nothing or no programme implementation scenarios, using country-specific WHO GDP per capita thresholds. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios ranged from $20 to $145 per DALY averted from a provider perspective, and $68 to $161 per DALY averted from a societal perspective. However, the certainty of the evidence was judged as moderate because of comparisons to do nothing/ no programme scenarios which potentially limits the applicability of the evidence in real-world settings. There is therefore a need for evidence that compare the different available alternatives.

LioNeo project: a randomised double-blind clinical trial for nutrition of very-low-birth-weight infants

We assessed the effectiveness of lyophilised banked human milk (HM) as a fortifier to feed very-low-birth-weight infants (VLBWI). This study aimed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of HM with HM lyophilisate as an additive compared with the standard additive (cows' milk protein). In this phase I double-blind randomised controlled clinical trial, set in the intensive and intermediate care units of a tertiary hospital, forty VLBWI were enrolled and allocated into two groups: HM plus HM lyophilisate (LioNeo) or HM plus commercial additive (HMCA). The inclusion criteria were preterm infants, birth weight 750-1500 g, small or adequate for gestational age, exclusively receiving donor HM, volume ≥ 100 ml/kg per d and haemodynamically stable. Participants were followed up for 21 consecutive days. The primary outcome measures were necrotising enterocolitis (NEC), late-onset sepsis (LOS), death, gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding or perforation, diarrhoea, regurgitation, vomiting and abdominal distension. The LioNeo and HMCA groups had similar weights at baseline. The regression models showed no differences between the groups in terms of the primary outcomes. Diarrhoea, GI perforation, NEC and LOS were absent in the LioNeo group (one LOS and one NEC in the HMCA group). Multiple regression analysis with the total volume of milk as a covariate did not show significant differences. The lyophilisation of donor HM was considered safe and tolerable for use in stable haemodynamically VLBWI.

Impact of a Standardized Nutrition Bundle Including Donor Human Milk on Hospital Outcomes in Very Low Birth-Weight (VLBW) Infants in a Safety-Net Hospital

BACKGROUND

Standardized protocols have been shown to reduce clinical practice variation and improve patient outcomes.

PURPOSE

To measure the impact of a standardized nutrition bundle inclusive of donor human milk (DHM) on hospital outcomes of very low birth-weight (VLBW) infants in a safety-net hospital.

METHODS

The study used the Model for Improvement methodology to drive improvement in practice. Outcome measures consisted of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), mortality, growth at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age and discharge, as well as volume and type of milk consumption during hospitalization.

FINDINGS

NEC rate decreased from 16.67% in the control group to 6.78% in the standardized nutrition bundle group (P = .07). Similarly, there was significant reduction in mortality with the bundled intervention (15.6% in the control group vs 1.6% in the nutrition bundle group; P = .006). Time to first (15 vs 27.5 hours of life; P < .001) and full-volume enteral feeding (8.5 vs 10 days; P = .086) were reduced in the standardized nutrition bundle group compared with the control group. The human milk volume almost doubled with the intervention.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Our standardized nutrition bundle protocol inclusive of DHM resulted in lower NEC rates and reduced mortality. The implementation of the DHM program proved to be cost-effective and saved lives. Our findings may help guide development of a structured approach to nutrition protocols inclusive of DHM that can be adapted by other units located in safety-net hospitals.

IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH

Future research on ethnic and racial barriers to access and affordability of DHM is warranted and much needed.

An economic analysis of the cost of survival of micro preemies: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to systematically review the current literature on the economic costs of micro preemie as well as evidence on the cost-effectiveness of interventions to improve outcomes for micro preemie babies with a birth weight of ≤500 g.

METHOD

We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, ECONLIT, Business Source Premier and Cochrane Library for studies reporting costs of micro preemie from January 2000. Costs were inflated to 2019 United States dollars (US$). All full-text articles were assessed for eligibility and a quality assessment of included articles was conducted using the Drummond and the Larg and Moss checklists.

RESULTS

The search identified three studies that met the inclusion criteria; two cost-of-illness studies and one cost-effectiveness study. Across studies, the mean healthcare spending per micro preemie survivor (in 2019 US$) ranged from US$61,310 (birth admission) to US$263,958 (inpatient and outpatient for the first six months of life). One modelling study reported exclusive human milk diet for micro preemies at birth was more cost-effective compared to the standard approach with cow milk diet from the third-party payer and societal perspectives.

CONCLUSION

Despite significant advances in perinatal care and expanded access to life-saving equipment to improve survival outcomes of micro preemie, there remains a paucity of research on economic costs associated with these babies. No study has utilised quality-adjusted life-years as an outcome measure. Given the chronic conditions and long-term neurologic disability associated with micro preemie survivors, an estimate of the lifetime cost to the individual, healthcare providers and society would provide a benchmark of the potential cost-savings that could accrue from cost-effective interventions to improve the survival rate of micro preemies.

The infant microbiome and implications for central nervous system development

Neurodevelopmental impairment remains a significant morbidity in former very low birth weight premature infants. There is increasing evidence the microbiome affects neurodevelopment but mechanistic causes are largely unknown. There are many factors which affect the developing microbiome in infants including mode of delivery, feeding, medications, and environmental exposures. The overall impact of these factors may differ between premature and term infants. The microbiome and brain have well recognized bidirectional communication pathways via neural, hormonal, and immunologic mechanisms. Understanding the interplay between these different pathways has been possible with the use of animal models, particularly germ-free mice. The intricate relationship between the microbiome and the brain remains a research priority not only to improve the care, but to also improve the long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes in this vulnerable population.