Efficient estimation of stereo thresholds: What slope should be assumed for the psychometric function?

Temporal mechanisms in frontoparallel stereomotion revealed by individual differences analysis

Masking experiments, using vertical and horizontal sinusoidal depth corrugations, have suggested the existence of more than two spatial-frequency disparity mechanisms. This result was confirmed through an individual differences approach. Here, using factor analytic techniques, we want to investigate the existence of independent temporal mechanisms in frontoparallel stereoscopic (cyclopean) motion. To construct stereomotion, we used sinusoidal depth corrugations obtained with dynamic random-dot stereograms. Thus, no luminance motion was present monocularly. We measured disparity thresholds for drifting vertical (up-down) and horizontal (left-right) sinusoidal corrugations of 0.4 cyc/deg at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 Hz. In total, we tested 34 participants. Results showed a small orientation anisotropy with lower thresholds for horizontal corrugations. Disparity thresholds as a function of temporal frequency were almost constant from 0.25 up to 1 Hz, and then they increased monotonically. Principal component analysis uncovered two significant factors for vertical and two for horizontal corrugations. Varimax rotation showed that one factor loaded from 0.25 to 1-2 Hz and a second factor from 2 to 4 to 8 Hz. Direct Oblimin rotation indicated a moderate intercorrelation of both factors. Our results suggest the possible existence of two somewhat interdependent temporal mechanisms involved in frontoparallel stereomotion.

Visual motion discrimination experiments reveal small differences between males and females

Recent results have shown that males have lower duration thresholds for motion direction discrimination than females. Measuring contrast thresholds, a previous study has shown that males have a greater sensitivity to fine details and fast flickering stimuli than females, and that females have a higher sensitivity to low spatial frequencies modulated at low temporal frequencies. Here, we present the data of a contrast-detection motion discrimination experiment and a reanalysis of four different motion discrimination experiments where we compare duration thresholds for males and females using different spatial frequencies, stimulus sizes, contrasts, and temporal frequencies (in two experiments, motion surround suppression was measured). Results from the main experiment and the reanalysis show that, in general, the association between sex and contrast and duration thresholds for motion discrimination is not significant, with males and females showing similar data patterns. Only the reanalysis of one out of four studies revealed different duration thresholds between males and females paired with a strong effect size supporting previous results in the literature, although motion surround suppression was identical between groups. Importantly, most of our results do not show significant differences between males and females in contrast and duration thresholds, suggesting that the sex variable may not be as relevant as previously claimed when testing visual motion discrimination.

ASTEROID stereotest v1.0: lower stereo thresholds using smaller, denser and faster dots

PURPOSE

In 2019, we described ASTEROID, a new stereotest run on a 3D tablet computer which involves a four-alternative disparity detection task on a dynamic random-dot stereogram. Stereo thresholds measured with ASTEROID were well correlated with, but systematically higher than (by a factor of around 1.5), thresholds measured with previous laboratory stereotests or the Randot Preschool clinical stereotest. We speculated that this might be due to the relatively large, sparse dots used in ASTEROID v0.9. Here, we introduce and test the stereo thresholds and test-repeatability of the new ASTEROID v1.0, which uses precomputed images to allow stereograms made up of much smaller, denser dots.

METHODS

Stereo thresholds and test/retest repeatability were tested and compared between the old and new versions of ASTEROID (n = 75) and the Randot Circles (n = 31) stereotest, in healthy young adults.

RESULTS

Thresholds on ASTEROID v1.0 are lower (better) than on ASTEROID v0.9 by a factor of 1.4, and do not differ significantly from thresholds on the Randot Circles. Thresholds were roughly log-normally distributed with a mean of 1.54 log₁₀ arcsec (35 arcsec) on ASTEROID v1.0 compared to 1.70 log₁₀ arcsec (50 arcsec) on ASTEROID v0.9. The standard deviation between observers was the same for both versions, 0.32 log₁₀ arcsec, corresponding to a factor of 2 above and below the mean. There was no difference between the versions in their test/retest repeatability, with 95% coefficient of repeatability = 0.46 log₁₀ arcsec (a factor of 2.9 or 1.5 octaves) and a Pearson correlation of 0.8 (comparable to other clinical stereotests).

CONCLUSION

The poorer stereo thresholds previously reported with ASTEROID v0.9 appear to have been due to the relatively large, coarse dots and low density used, rather than to some other aspect of the technology. Employing the small dots and high density used in ASTEROID v1.0, thresholds and test/retest repeatability are similar to other clinical stereotests.

Evidence for different spatiotemporal mechanisms using duration thresholds: An individual differences approach

The study of motion perception through classical psychophysical methods has suggested that independent spatiotemporal filters acting over specific locations in retinal images carry out early motion processing. On the other hand, individual differences approaches have been able to identify a structure of spatiotemporal filters too. In this same fashion-through an individual differences approach-the present study aims to uncover a structure of spatiotemporal frequency selective motion mechanisms. This is done, for the first time, using supra-threshold contrast stimuli in a motion direction discrimination task. Two experiments were performed measuring duration thresholds for drifting 2D Gabor gratings of 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3 and 6 c/deg. They moved with a speed of 2 deg/sec, with Michelson contrasts of 0.1 or 0.9 (Experiment 1) or had a contrast of 0.9 drifting with a temporal frequency of 2 Hz or 8 Hz (Experiment 2). Principal component analyses uncover three factors in each of four conditions. When Varimax-rotated, these are seen to be selective to spatial frequencies lower than 0.5 c/deg, intermediate ones from 0.5 to 1-1.5 c/deg, and frequencies greater than 1-1.5 c/deg. Direct Oblimin rotations indicate that factors are moderately correlated. Further analyses show very slight differences in the correlational structures between contrast conditions (0.1 vs. 0.9), and no differences between temporal frequency conditions (2 Hz vs. 8 Hz). To conclude, the idea of a three-factor structure in motion processing for low, intermediate, and high spatial frequencies is supported.