Characterization of a universal screening approach for congenital CMV infection based on a highly-sensitive, quantitative, multiplex real-time PCR assay

"Congenital cytomegalovirus in Sub-Saharan Africa-a narrative review with practice recommendations"

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most common cause of congenital infection internationally, occurring in 0.67% of births, and increasingly recognised as a major public health burden due to the potential for long-term neurodevelopmental and hearing impairment. This burden includes estimates of 10% of childhood cerebral palsy and up to 25% of childhood deafness. In Sub-Saharan Africa, where CMV-seroprevalence is almost ubiquitous, prevalence of congenital CMV (cCMV) is higher than the global average, and yet there is a dearth of research and initiatives to improve recognition, diagnosis and treatment. This narrative review outlines the epidemiology and clinical presentation of cCMV, discusses issues of case identification and treatment in Sub-Saharan Africa, and recommends a framework of strategies to address these challenges. Considering the significant burden of cCMV disease in this setting, it is undoubtably time we embark upon improving diagnosis and care for these infants.

Maternal and congenital human cytomegalovirus infection: laboratory testing for detection and diagnosis

Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the leading cause of congenital infection worldwide and the most common cause of non-genetic sensorineural hearing loss. As there is no vaccine or other specific intervention to prevent congenital CMV infection, there is a need to identify maternal and congenital infections with sensitive and specific testing as early as possible. There is no widely accepted practice for screening during pregnancy or in all newborns for identification of possible cases of congenital CMV. Currently, screening during pregnancy is limited to those identified as at risk followed by fetal and/or neonatal testing when congenital infection is suspected. This review focuses primarily on the current status of laboratory testing for diagnosis of maternal and congenital CMV infections. Primary maternal infection is best diagnosed using serologic testing, including CMV IgM, IgG, and avidity testing, while fetal infection should be assessed by nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) of amniotic fluid. Urine and saliva NAATs are the mainstay for diagnosis of congenital CMV in the first 3 weeks of life. Testing of dried blood spots can be useful for diagnosis of congenital CMV outside of the newborn period. The gaps in knowledge such as the prognostic value of viral loads in various sample types are addressed.

Long-term linguistic outcome in adults with congenital cytomegalovirus infection

BACKGROUND

Congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) is the most common prenatal infection and the main infectious cause of neurodevelopmental abnormalities in developed countries. Long-term neuropsychological outcome of cCMV infection is still not well understood. This is the first study that presents linguistic follow-up data performed on adults who were infected in utero.

METHOD

All individuals from a universal newborn CMV screening study in Sweden sampled from 1977 to 1985 were invited to participate in a follow-up study. 34/71 persons (48%) with cCMV and 22/46 controls (48%) were enrolled. Participants were between 34 and 43 years. Linguistic ability was evaluated with two-word fluency tasks (FAS letter fluency and verb fluency), and a qualitative analysis of the participants' word retrieval strategies was conducted.

RESULTS

No statistically significant group differences were found in the total number of retrieved words. When related to Swedish norm data, 43% of participants with cCMV infection, all asymptomatic at birth, had adequate results on both FAS and verb fluency tasks, compared to 86% of the controls. Education level was the most important factor for word fluency ability in both groups. Adults with cCMV infection and higher education levels used less effective retrieval strategies on FAS letter fluency than controls.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that adults with cCMV infection may have deficits in the word retrieval process, even in the absence of known neurodevelopmental disorders. Long-term effects of cCMV infection may exist even in those with asymptomatic infection at birth.

Multicenter Evaluation of the DiaSorin Molecular Simplexa Congenital CMV Direct PCR Test on Neonatal Saliva and Urine Specimens

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most common virus associated with congenital infection worldwide and is a major cause of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and developmental delay. Up to 90% of infants with congenital CMV (cCMV) infection are asymptomatic at birth, making the diagnosis challenging. Postnatal diagnosis involves testing newborn saliva and/or urine collected before 21 days of life to confirm cCMV infection. This multicenter study evaluated the performance of the Simplexa Congenital CMV Direct real-time PCR assay for the qualitative detection of CMV in newborn saliva (n = 2,023) and urine (n = 1,797) specimens. Compared to two PCR/bidirectional sequencing assays, the Simplexa Congenital CMV Direct assay demonstrated positive percent agreement (PPA) and negative percent agreement (NPA) of 98.6% and 99.9%, respectively, for saliva samples and a PPA of 97.8% and an NPA of 99.9% for urine specimens. Overall concordance was κ = 0.98 or near perfect compared to the composite reference methods with both sample types. By 95% probit analysis, the limit of detection (LoD) using the AD-169 reference strain was 350 ± 12 copies/mL in urine. The LoDs of saliva swabs in either 1 mL or 3 mL of transport medium were 274 ± 12 copies/mL and 300 ± 14 copies/mL, respectively. The Simplexa Congenital CMV Direct assay can be applied to both saliva and urine specimens collected from newborns less than 21 days of age to rapidly and reliably identify CMV infection.

Internal reference genes with the potential for normalizing quantitative PCR results for oral fluid specimens

In basic research, testing of oral fluid specimens by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) has been used to evaluate changes in gene expression levels following experimental treatments. In diagnostic medicine, qPCR has been used to detect DNA/RNA transcripts indicative of bacterial or viral infections. Normalization of qPCR using endogenous and exogenous reference genes is a well-established strategy for ensuring result comparability by controlling sample-to-sample variation introduced during sampling, storage, and qPCR testing. In this review, the majority of recent publications in human (n = 136) and veterinary (n = 179) medicine did not describe the use of internal reference genes in qPCRs for oral fluid specimens (52.9% animal studies; 57.0% human studies). However, the use of endogenous reference genes has not been fully explored or validated for oral fluid specimens. The lack of valid internal reference genes inherent to the oral fluid matrix will continue to hamper the reliability, reproducibility, and generalizability of oral fluid qPCR assays until this issue is addressed.

An Overview of Cytomegalovirus Infection in Pregnancy

The objective of this review was to bring to attention cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection during pregnancy, taking into consideration all relevant aspects, such as maternal diagnosis, fetal infection and prevention, prenatal diagnosis, and postnatal prognosis. A literature review was performed regarding adult and congenital infection. General information regarding this viral infection and potential related medical conditions was provided, considering the issues of maternal infection during pregnancy, transmission to the fetus, and associated congenital infection management. Prenatal diagnosis includes maternal serum testing and the confirmation of the infection in amniotic fluid or fetal blood. Additionally, prenatal diagnosis requires imaging techniques, ultrasound, and complementary magnetic resonance to assess cortical and extracortical anomalies. Imaging findings can predict both fetal involvement and the postnatal prognosis of the newborn, but they are difficult to assess, even for highly trained physicians. In regard to fetal sequelae, the early diagnosis of a potential fetal infection is crucial, and methods to decrease fetal involvement should be considered. Postnatal evaluation is also important, because many newborns may be asymptomatic and clinical anomalies can be diagnosed when sequelae are permanent.

An Ethical Analysis of Newborn Congenital Cytomegalovirus Screening

Congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) affects approximately 1 in every 200 US infants and can be associated with long-term neurodevelopmental sequelae, including sensorineural hearing loss, cerebral palsy, and intellectual disability. As cCMV is infrequently diagnosed based on clinical suspicion alone, newborn cCMV screening programs have been gaining traction, especially hearing-targeted programs which only test infants who fail their newborn hearing screen. cCMV screening programs raise unique ethical dilemmas of both under- and over-diagnosis of cCMV. In this Ethics Rounds, we present a case in which the parents of a child with symptomatic cCMV that was not recognized until 4 years of age urge the birth hospital to implement a cCMV screening program. We then ask a parent-clinician, a medical ethicist and pediatrician, and a primary care pediatrician to comment on how they would advise the hospital administration and consider the ethical and clinical implications of a cCMV screening program. The commentaries herein arrive at differing conclusions about cCMV screening. The first highlights the developmental advantages of early cCMV detection, supporting a broad approach to treatment beyond antiviral medication alone. The second explores cCMV screening from the perspective of newborn screening as a public health program, noting shortcomings in available testing platforms, and raising concerns about overdiagnosis and overtreatment. The final commentary challenges the risks of undue parental anxiety and vulnerable child syndrome as a barrier to screening, instead considering cCMV screening as a controlled opportunity to understand and support the experiences of affected children and their families.

Newborn Hearing Screening Benefits Children, but Global Disparities Persist

There is substantial evidence that newborn hearing screening (NHS) reduces the negative sequelae of permanent childhood hearing loss (PCHL) if performed in programs that aim to screen all newborns in a region or nation (often referred to as Universal Newborn Hearing Screening or UNHS). The World Health Organization (WHO) has called in two resolutions for the implementation of such programs and for the collection of large-scale data. To assess the global status of NHS programs we surveyed individuals potentially involved with newborn and infant hearing screening (NIHS) in 196 countries/territories (in the following text referred to as countries). Replies were returned from 158 countries. The results indicated that 38% of the world's newborns and infants had no or minimal hearing screening and 33% screened at least 85% of the babies (hereafter referred to as UNHS). Hearing screening programs varied considerably in quality, data acquisition, and accessibility of services for children with PCHL. In this article, we summarize the main results of the survey in the context of several recent WHO publications, particularly the World Report on Hearing, which defined advances in the implementation of NHS programs in the Member States as one of three key indicators of worldwide progress in ear and hearing care (EHC).

Universal Newborn Screening for Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection - From Infant to Maternal Infection: A Prospective Multicenter Study

INTRODUCTION

Most infants at risk for cytomegalovirus (CMV)-associated sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) are unrecognized because of the absence of a universal neonatal CMV screening. The search of CMV-DNA by molecular methods in salivary swabs was demonstrated to be a reliable approach. This study describes the results obtained by carrying out a universal screening for congenital CMV (cCMV) infection including all live-born newborns in three Italian sites, as well as the therapeutic interventions and clinical outcome of the CMV-infected neonates. Moreover, CMV maternal infection's characteristics were evaluated.

METHODS

To confirm or exclude cCMV infection, a CMV-DNA-positive result on a first salivary swab was followed by repeated saliva and urine samples collected within 21 days of age. Breast milk samples were also collected. The search of CMV-DNA was performed with a single automated quantitative commercial real-time PCR assay, regardless of the type of samples used.

RESULTS

A total of 3,151 newborns were enrolled; 21 (0.66%) of them were congenitally infected (median saliva viral load at screening, 6.65 [range, 5.03-7.17] log₁₀ IU/ml). Very low/low viral load in screening saliva samples (median value, 1.87 [range, 1.14-2.59] log₁₀ IU/ml) was associated with false-positive results (n = 54; 1.7%). CMV-DNA was detected in almost half of the breast milk samples of mother-infant pairs with a false-positive result, suggesting that contamination from breast milk may not be the only explanation in the study population. cCMV infection confirmation with the search of CMV-DNA in a urine sample proved to be the gold standard strategy, since false-positive results were observed in 4/54 (7.5%) of the repeated saliva samples. Symptomatic cCMV infection was observed in 3/21 (14.3%) infants; notably, one (4.7%) developed moderate unilateral SNHL at 5 months after birth. Finally, two symptomatic cCMV infections were associated with primary maternal infection acquired in the first trimester of gestation; one newborn with severe cCMV symptoms was born to a mother with no CMV checkups in pregnancy.

CONCLUSION

Without universal neonatal CMV screening, some infected infants who develop late neurological sequelae may not be recognized and, consequently, they are not able to benefit early from instrumental and therapeutic interventions to limit and/or treat CMV disease.

Results of a multicenter registry for congenital cytomegalovirus infection in Flanders, Belgium: From prenatal diagnosis over neonatal management to therapy

BACKGROUND

In 2006, a consensus was made on management and follow up of children with congenital cytomegalovirus infection (cCMV) in Flanders, Belgium. Since 2007 systematic registration of those children was initiated. In this report, focus is on the perinatal data of our population.

STUDY DESIGN

Children with confirmed diagnosis of cCMV were eligible for registration. Information on prenatal/neonatal investigations, management and therapy in those children was obtained.

RESULTS

Over 14 years, 1059 children were included. Symptomatic disease was diagnosed in 319/1059 (30,5%) children. Of those 13,5% were classified as mild, 16% as moderate and 70,5% as severe infections. Clinical signs at birth were present in 9,1%, central nervous system involvement in 31,2% and hearing loss in 15,5%. Antiviral therapy was given in 63,9% of patients eligible for therapy. Some of our data seem to confirm some hypotheses regarding cCMV or support the current recommendations for counselling and management. However, some data, although sometimes acquired in small groups, add to the discussion on some topics. Neonatal/prenatal screening or not, correlation between viral load and neonatal outcome or the use of both MRI and US in every child are some of those topics.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report on perinatal characteristics of children with cCMV in Flanders, Belgium during a 14-year period, based on a large multicenter CMV dataset. Worldwide, the systematic registration and follow-up of children with cCMV infection will become increasingly important to document the impact of forthcoming preventive and therapeutic measures.

Detection of Cytomegalovirus in Urine Dried on Filter Paper

Urine is the best specimen for the diagnosis of congenital cytomegalovirus, but collection and processing of liquid urine are impractical for screening. Urine dried on filter paper was processed by the same convenient, low-cost method used by newborn screening to test blood spots and showed high sensitivity and specificity.

Universal newborn screening for congenital cytomegalovirus infection: feasibility and relevance in a French type-III maternity cohort

OBJECTIVE

Evaluation of relevance and feasibility of universal newborn congenital cytomegalovirus infection (cCMVI) screening in saliva.

DESIGN

Retrospective, population-based cohort study.

SETTING

Clamart, France, 2016-2020.

POPULATION

All neonates born consecutively in our level III maternity unit.

METHODS

CMV PCR in saliva for all neonates at birth, and, if positive, CMV PCR in urine to confirm or exclude cCMVI. Prospective and retrospective characterisation of maternal infections. ROC curve analysis to assess saliva PCR performances. Acceptability of screening among staff members evaluated by a survey.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Number of cCMVI neonates; number of expected and unexpected cCMVI.

RESULTS

Among 15 341 tested neonates, 63 had cCMVI (birth prevalence of 0.4%, 95% CI 0.3-0.5). In 50% of cases, maternal infection was a non-primary infection (NPI) during pregnancy. cCMVI was expected or suspected (maternal primary infection [PI], antenatal or neonatal signs) in 24/63 neonates (38%), and unexpected in 39/63 neonates (62%). The best CMV saliva threshold to predict cCMVI was 356 (2.55 log) copies/ml [95% CI 2.52 log-3.18 log], with an area under the ROC curve of 0.97. Over 90% of the 72 surveyed staff members reported that the screening was easy and quick. No parent refused the screening.

CONCLUSIONS

Universal screening for cCMVI with CMV PCR on saliva samples is feasible and highly acceptable to parents and healthcare providers. Over half (62%) of the cases had no prenatal/neonatal signs of cCMVI or a maternal history of CMV infection during pregnancy and would probably not have been diagnosed without universal screening.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

In 62% of congenital cytomegalovirus infection cases, only universal neonatal screening in saliva can detect infection.

Comparison of detection strategies for screening and confirming congenital cytomegalovirus infection in newborns in a highly seroprevalent population: a mother-child cohort study

Background

Universal screening of congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) infection is important for monitoring and intervention during critical stages of speech and language development. This study aimed to explore the optimal detection strategy for cCMV infection screening.

Methods

Serum samples from pregnant women and saliva and urine samples from their newborns were collected for the anti-CMV IgG and CMV DNA PCR tests, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values as well as the likelihood ratios of 12 potential screening strategies for cCMV infection, based on tests for saliva, urine, and their combination, were evaluated.

Findings

A total of 6729 pregnant women were enrolled, and the seroprevalence was 98.1%. Among 6350 newborns that were followed up, 49 were defined as having cCMV infection. In the screening test, the CMV DNA positivity rate remained similar from day 0 to day 5, increased slowly from day 6 to day 13, and became high in newborns beyond 13 days of birth. In the confirmatory testing, the positive rates increased significantly beyond day 21. For the 49 newborns with cCMV infection, the proportion of agreement between saliva and urine testing was poor. Upon evaluating alternative screening strategies, using saliva and urine screening with saliva and urine confirmation as the reference strategy, saliva screening with saliva and urine confirmation showed good diagnostic accuracy and feasibility, with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive and negative predictive values of 85.7%, 100.0%, 100.0% and 99.9%, respectively.

Interpretation

In populations with high seroprevalence, saliva screening with saliva and urine confirmation might be an alternative strategy for screening cCMV infections. The suggested timeframes for screening and confirmation are within 13 (ideally 5) and 21 (ideally 13) days of birth, respectively.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Science and Technology Major Project of China and Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, U.S.A.

Manuscript title: Maternal CMV seroprevalence rate in early gestation and congenital cytomegalovirus infection in a Chinese population

BACKGROUND

Congenital human cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains largely unrecognized and underemphasized in medical practice. This study aimed to describe the maternal CMV seroprevalence rate in early gestation and congenital CMV infection in a Chinese population.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study that was conducted in three hospitals in China from 2015 through 2018. Pregnant women were enrolled in early gestation and followed up in middle and late gestation with serological testing. CMV serostatus was determined by IgG testing in serum during early gestation. Their newborns were screened and confirmed for cCMV infection by real-time PCR testing in both saliva and urine at two time points. The cCMV prevalence, maternal seroprevalence and associated factors were analyzed.

RESULTS

In China, the CMV seroprevalence was 98.11% (6602/6729, 95% CI: 97.76%-98.41%), and the cCMV prevalence was 1.32% (84/6350, 95% CI: 1.07%-1.64%). Over 98% of cCMV-positive newborns were from pregnant women who were seropositive in early gestation in China. The prevalence of cCMV infection in newborns from seropositive and seronegative pregnant women was similar (crude prevalence: 1.33% vs 0.82%, P=1.00; estimated prevalence: 1.29% vs 1.05%, P=0.42). Pregnant women who were under 25 years old or primiparous had a lower seroprevalence. Newborns from pregnant women under 25 years old or from twin pregnancies had a higher prevalence of cCMV infection.

CONCLUSION

In China, the cCMV prevalence was high, and the rates were similar in newborns from pregnant women who were seropositive and seronegative in early gestation. The vast majority of cCMV newborns were from seropositive mothers.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02645396..

Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection Burden and Epidemiologic Risk Factors in Countries With Universal Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

IMPORTANCE

Congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) infection is the most common congenital infection and the leading acquired cause of developmental disabilities and sensorineural deafness, yet a reliable assessment of the infection burden is lacking.

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the birth prevalence of cCMV in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and high-income countries (HICs), characterize the rate by screening methods, and delineate associated risk factors of the infection.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews databases were searched from January 1, 1960, to March 1, 2021, and a total of 1322 studies were identified.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies that provided data on the prevalence of cCMV derived from universal screening of infants younger than 3 weeks were included. Targeted screening studies were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guideline was followed. Extraction was performed independently by 3 reviewers. Quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies. Random-effects meta-analysis was undertaken. Metaregression was conducted to evaluate the association of sociodemographic characteristics, maternal seroprevalence, population-level HIV prevalence, and screening methods with the prevalence of cCMV.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Birth prevalence of cCMV ascertained through universal screening of infants younger than 3 weeks for CMV from urine, saliva, or blood samples.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven studies comprising 515 646 infants met the inclusion criteria from countries representative of each World Bank income level. The estimated pooled overall prevalence of cCMV was 0.67% (95% CI, 0.54%-0.83%). The pooled birth prevalence of cCMV was 3-fold greater in LMICs (1.42%; 95% CI, 0.97%-2.08%; n = 23 studies) than in HICs (0.48%; 95% CI, 0.40%-0.59%, n = 54 studies). Screening methods with blood samples demonstrated lower rates of cCMV than urine or saliva samples (odds ratio [OR], 0.38; 95% CI, 0.23-0.66). Higher maternal CMV seroprevalence (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.11-1.28), higher population-level HIV prevalence (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.05-1.40), lower socioeconomic status (OR, 3.03; 95% CI, 2.05-4.47), and younger mean maternal age (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.78-0.92, older age was associated with lower rates) were associated with higher rates of cCMV.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this meta-analysis, LMICs appeared to incur the most significant infection burden. Lower rates of cCMV were reported by studies using only blood or serum as a screening method.

Pooled saliva CMV DNA detection: A viable laboratory technique for universal CMV screening of healthy newborns

BACKGROUND

Most infants with congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) have no overt manifestations at birth, yet may later develop CMV-related sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). With targeted screening, many asymptomatic neonates are missed and lose the opportunity for timely anti-viral treatment to ameliorate SNHL. Saliva is the preferred screening specimen given its ease of collection.

OBJECTIVES

Assess a pooled saliva CMV DNA detection technique for cCMV screening of healthy full-term neonates.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a prospective laboratory CMV PCR screening study in a secondary hospital from March-June 2019. Saliva specimens were obtained from 1000 newborns two-four hours after birth. Specimens were analyzed for CMV DNA with a real-time PCR platform (Altona) in pools of 10 and individually (40 μL and 400 μL, respectively). Neonates with positive saliva CMV DNA detection required urine CMV PCR testing to confirm cCMV diagnosis.

RESULTS

From the 1000 saliva samples, there were 6 urine-confirmed cCMV cases, yielding a prevalence rate of 0.6 %. The specificity was high for both pooled and individual saliva sampling (99.9 % and 98.1 %, respectively). The positive predictive value of the pooled sample was 85.7 %, compared to 24.0 % for a single saliva sample.

CONCLUSIONS

Pooling saliva of healthy newborns appears to be a reliable method to identify asymptomatic cCMV infection when positive results are confirmed by urine CMV DNA. Pooling in sizes appropriate to the cCMV prevalence rate may improve the laboratory workflow and decrease costs. Further studies should evaluate the clinical implications of this widespread cCMV pooled screening technique.

Sensitivity of Dried Blood Spot Testing for Detection of Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection

IMPORTANCE

The sensitivity of dried blood spots (DBS) to identify newborns with congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) infection has not been evaluated in screening studies using the current, higher-sensitivity methods for DBS processing.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the sensitivity of DBS polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for newborn screening for cCMV infection using saliva as the reference standard for screening, followed by collection of a urine sample for confirmation of congenital infection.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This population-based cohort study took place at 5 newborn nurseries and 3 neonatal intensive care units in the Minneapolis/Saint Paul area in Minnesota from April 2016 to June 2019. Newborns enrolled with parental consent were screened for cCMV using DBS obtained for routine newborn screening and saliva collected 1 to 2 days after birth. Dried blood spots were tested for CMV DNA by PCR at both the University of Minnesota (UMN) and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Saliva swabs were tested by CMV DNA PCR at the UMN laboratory only. Newborns who screened positive by saliva or DBS had a diagnostic urine sample obtained by primary care professionals, tested by PCR within 3 weeks of birth. Analysis began July 2019.

EXPOSURES

Detection of CMV from a saliva swab using a PCR assay.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Number of children with urine-confirmed cCMV and the proportion of them who were CMV positive through DBS screening.

RESULTS

Of 12 554 individuals enrolled through June 2019 (of 25 000 projected enrollment), 56 newborns were confirmed to have cCMV (4.5 per 1000 [95% CI, 3.3-5.7]). Combined DBS results from either UMN or CDC had a sensitivity of 85.7% (48 of 56; 95% CI, 74.3%-92.6%), specificity of 100.0% (95% CI, 100.0%-100.0%), positive predictive value (PPV) of 98.0% (95% CI, 89.3%-99.6%), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 99.9% (95% CI, 99.9%-100.0%). Dried blood spot results from UMN had a sensitivity of 73.2% (95% CI, 60.4%-83.0%), specificity of 100.0% (100.0%-100.0%), PPV of 100.0% (95% CI, 91.4%-100.0%), and NPV of 99.9% (95% CI, 99.8%-99.9%). Dried blood spot results from CDC had a sensitivity of 76.8% (95% CI, 64.2%-85.9%), specificity of 100.0% (95% CI, 100.0%-100.0%), PPV of 97.7% (95% CI, 88.2%-99.6%), and NPV of 99.9% (95% CI, 99.8%-99.9%). Saliva swab results had a sensitivity of 92.9% (52 of 56; 95% CI, 83.0%-97.2%), specificity of 99.9% (95% CI, 99.9%-100.0%), PPV of 86.7% (95% CI, 75.8%-93.1%), and NPV of 100.0% (95% CI, 99.9%-100.0%).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study demonstrates relatively high analytical sensitivity for DBS compared with previous studies that performed population-based screening. As more sensitive DNA extraction and PCR methods continue to emerge, DBS-based testing should remain under investigation as a potential low-cost, high-throughput option for cCMV screening.

Comparison of DNA Extracted from Pediatric Saliva, Gingival Crevicular Fluid and Site-Specific Biofilm Samples

(1) Introduction: Due to the non-invasive nature of saliva, many methods have been used to isolate and collect DNA from saliva samples for microbial screening. Many oral microbes also inhabit the oral biofilm, which may represent significantly different microbial constituents that may contribute to oral health and disease, including caries and periodontal disorders. Moreover, the biofilm may vary within the same patient at different sites. Few studies have evaluated the comparison between DNA isolated from saliva and DNA from site-specific biofilm, with virtually no studies addressing this analysis among pediatric patients. (2) Methods: An existing repository of paper point derived biofilm, gingival crevicular fluid (GCF), and unstimulated saliva samples previously collected from pediatric patients (n = 47) was identified. DNA was isolated from biofilm sites (tongue, upper buccal molar, mandibular lingual incisor), and GCF and saliva were used for quantitative DNA comparison using a phenol:chloroform extraction. A quantitative and qualitative analysis was performed using the NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer using absorbance readings at A230 nm, A260 nm and A280 nm. (3) Results: These data demonstrated the successful isolation of DNA from all of the patient samples, with the highest concentrations observed among unstimulated saliva (4264.1 ng/μL) and the lowest derived from GCF (1771.5 ng/μL). No differences were observed between males and females or minorities and non-minority patients. In addition, comparison of the overall concentrations of DNA obtained from adult samples was slightly higher than, but not significantly different from, the concentrations obtained from pediatric samples (p = 0.2827). A real-time quantitative qPCR screening revealed that all of the samples evaluated harbored bacterial and human DNA of sufficient quantity and quality for a molecular screening greater than the limit of detection (ΔRn = 0.01). (4) Conclusions: Many methods are currently available to provide the sampling and screening of saliva and specific sites within the oral cavity, but the validation and comparison of simple and low-cost methods, that include paper point sampling and unstimulated saliva collection, may suggest these methods and protocols provide sufficient DNA quality and quantity for molecular screening and other comparison applications. In addition, although heterogeneity will be a constant and consistent feature between patient samples, standardized methods that provide similar and consistent DNA from various oral sites may provide needed consistency for screening and molecular analysis.