1
|
Franciosini G, Carlotti D, Cattani F, De Gregorio A, De Liso V, De Rosa F, Di Francesco M, Di Martino F, Felici G, Pensavalle JH, Leonardi MC, Marafini M, Muscato A, Paiar F, Patera V, Poortmans P, Sciubba A, Schiavi A, Toppi M, Traini G, Trigilio A, Sarti A. IOeRT conventional and FLASH treatment planning system implementation exploiting fast GPU Monte Carlo: The case of breast cancer. Phys Med 2024; 121:103346. [PMID: 38608421 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.103346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2024] [Revised: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Partial breast irradiation for the treatment of early-stage breast cancer patients can be performed by means of Intra Operative electron Radiation Therapy (IOeRT). One of the main limitations of this technique is the absence of a treatment planning system (TPS) that could greatly help in ensuring a proper coverage of the target volume during irradiation. An IOeRT TPS has been developed using a fast Monte Carlo (MC) and an ultrasound imaging system to provide the best irradiation strategy (electron beam energy, applicator position and bevel angle) and to facilitate the optimisation of dose prescription and delivery to the target volume while maximising the organs at risk sparing. The study has been performed in silico, exploiting MC simulations of a breast cancer treatment. Ultrasound-based input has been used to compute the absorbed dose maps in different irradiation strategies and a quantitative comparison between the different options was carried out using Dose Volume Histograms. The system was capable of exploring different beam energies and applicator positions in few minutes, identifying the best strategy with an overall computation time that was found to be completely compatible with clinical implementation. The systematic uncertainty related to tissue deformation during treatment delivery with respect to imaging acquisition was taken into account. The potential and feasibility of a GPU based full MC TPS implementation of IOeRT breast cancer treatments has been demonstrated in-silico. This long awaited tool will greatly improve the treatment safety and efficacy, overcoming the limits identified within the clinical trials carried out so far.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Franciosini
- Sapienza, University of Rome, Department of Scienze di Base e Applicate all'Ingegneria, Rome, Italy; National Institute of Nuclear Physics, INFN, Section of Rome I, Rome, Italy
| | - D Carlotti
- Operative Research Unit of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitatio Campus-Bio Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - F Cattani
- Unit of Medical Physics, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - A De Gregorio
- National Institute of Nuclear Physics, INFN, Section of Rome I, Rome, Italy; Sapienza, University of Rome, Department of Physics, Rome, Italy
| | - V De Liso
- S.I.T. Sordina IORT Technologies S.p.A, Aprilia, Italy
| | - F De Rosa
- Sapienza, University of Rome, Department of Scienze di Base e Applicate all'Ingegneria, Rome, Italy
| | | | - F Di Martino
- Centro Pisano Multidisciplinare sulla Ricerca e Implementazione Clinica della Flash Radiotherapy (CPFR), Pisa, Italy; University of Pisa, Department of Physics, Pisa, Italy; Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisa (AOUP), Fisica Sanitaria, Pisa, Italy; National Institute of Nuclear Physics, INFN, Section of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - G Felici
- S.I.T. Sordina IORT Technologies S.p.A, Aprilia, Italy
| | - J Harold Pensavalle
- S.I.T. Sordina IORT Technologies S.p.A, Aprilia, Italy; Centro Pisano Multidisciplinare sulla Ricerca e Implementazione Clinica della Flash Radiotherapy (CPFR), Pisa, Italy; National Institute of Nuclear Physics, INFN, Section of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - M C Leonardi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - M Marafini
- National Institute of Nuclear Physics, INFN, Section of Rome I, Rome, Italy; Museo Storico della Fisica e Centro Studi e Ricerche "E. Fermi", Rome, Italy
| | - A Muscato
- National Institute of Nuclear Physics, INFN, Section of Rome I, Rome, Italy; Specialty School of Medical Physics, La Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - F Paiar
- Centro Pisano Multidisciplinare sulla Ricerca e Implementazione Clinica della Flash Radiotherapy (CPFR), Pisa, Italy; Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisa (AOUP), Fisica Sanitaria, Pisa, Italy
| | - V Patera
- Sapienza, University of Rome, Department of Scienze di Base e Applicate all'Ingegneria, Rome, Italy; National Institute of Nuclear Physics, INFN, Section of Rome I, Rome, Italy
| | - P Poortmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Antwerp, Belgium; University of Antwerp, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - A Sciubba
- Sapienza, University of Rome, Department of Scienze di Base e Applicate all'Ingegneria, Rome, Italy; National Institute of Nuclear Physics, INFN, Frascati National Laboratories (LNF), Rome, Italy
| | - A Schiavi
- Sapienza, University of Rome, Department of Scienze di Base e Applicate all'Ingegneria, Rome, Italy; National Institute of Nuclear Physics, INFN, Section of Rome I, Rome, Italy
| | - M Toppi
- Sapienza, University of Rome, Department of Scienze di Base e Applicate all'Ingegneria, Rome, Italy; National Institute of Nuclear Physics, INFN, Section of Rome I, Rome, Italy
| | - G Traini
- National Institute of Nuclear Physics, INFN, Section of Rome I, Rome, Italy
| | - A Trigilio
- Sapienza, University of Rome, Department of Physics, Rome, Italy; National Institute of Nuclear Physics, INFN, Frascati National Laboratories (LNF), Rome, Italy
| | - A Sarti
- Sapienza, University of Rome, Department of Scienze di Base e Applicate all'Ingegneria, Rome, Italy; National Institute of Nuclear Physics, INFN, Section of Rome I, Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Roeder F, Fastner G, Fussl C, Sedlmayer F, Stana M, Berchtold J, Jäger T, Presl J, Schredl P, Emmanuel K, Colleselli D, Kotolacsi G, Scherer P, Steininger P, Gaisberger C. First clinical application of image-guided intraoperative electron radiation therapy with real time intraoperative dose calculation in recurrent rectal cancer: technical procedure. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:186. [PMID: 37950314 PMCID: PMC10638784 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02374-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 11/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) is a radiation technique applying a single fraction with a high dose during surgery. We report the first abdomino-pelvic application of an image-guided intraoperative electron radiation therapy with intraoperative real time dose calculation based on the individual intraoperative patient anatomy. A patient suffering from locoregionally recurrent rectal cancer after treatment with neoadjuvant re-chemoradiation was chosen for this approach. After surgical removal of the recurrence, an adequate IORT applicator was placed as usual. A novel mobile imaging device (ImagingRing, MedPhoton) was positioned around the patient covering the region to be treated with the IORT-applicator in place. It allowed the acquisition of three-dimensional intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography images suitable for dose calculation using an automated scaling (heuristic object and head scatter as well as hardening corrections) of Hounsfield units. After image acquisition confirmed the correct applicator position, the images were transferred to our treatment planning system for intraoperative dose calculation. Treatment could be accomplished using the calculated dose distribution. We herein describe the details of the procedure including necessary adjustments in the typically used IORT equipment and work flow. We further discuss the pros and cons of this new approach generally overcoming a decade long limitation of IORT procedures as well as future perspectives regarding IORT treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Falk Roeder
- Department of Radiation Therapy and Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, Müllner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
| | - Gerd Fastner
- Department of Radiation Therapy and Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, Müllner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Christoph Fussl
- Department of Radiation Therapy and Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, Müllner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Felix Sedlmayer
- Department of Radiation Therapy and Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, Müllner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
- Institute of Research and Development of Advanced Radiation Technologies (radART), Paracelsus Medical University, Müllner Hauptstrasse 48, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Markus Stana
- Department of Radiation Therapy and Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, Müllner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Johannes Berchtold
- Department of Radiation Therapy and Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, Müllner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Tarkan Jäger
- Department of Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University, Müllner Hauptstrasse 48, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Jaroslav Presl
- Department of Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University, Müllner Hauptstrasse 48, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Philipp Schredl
- Department of Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University, Müllner Hauptstrasse 48, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Klaus Emmanuel
- Department of Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University, Müllner Hauptstrasse 48, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Daniela Colleselli
- Department of Urology, Paracelsus Medical University, Müllner Hauptstrasse 48, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Gabriel Kotolacsi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Paracelsus Medical University, Müllner Hauptstrasse 48, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Philipp Scherer
- Department of Radiation Therapy and Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, Müllner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Philipp Steininger
- Institute of Research and Development of Advanced Radiation Technologies (radART), Paracelsus Medical University, Müllner Hauptstrasse 48, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Christoph Gaisberger
- Department of Radiation Therapy and Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, Müllner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
- Institute of Research and Development of Advanced Radiation Technologies (radART), Paracelsus Medical University, Müllner Hauptstrasse 48, Salzburg, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lozares-Cordero S, Bermejo-Barbanoj C, Badías-Herbera A, Ibáñez-Carreras R, Ligorred-Padilla L, Ponce-Ortega JM, González-Pérez V, Gandía-Martínez A, Font-Gómez JA, Blas-Borroy O, González-Ibáñez D. An open-source development based on photogrammetry for a real-time IORT treatment planning system. Phys Med 2023; 112:102622. [PMID: 37331081 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.102622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2023] [Revised: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study presents a treatment planning system for intraoperative low-energy photon radiotherapy based on photogrammetry from real images of the surgical site taken in the operating room. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study population comprised 15 patients with soft-tissue sarcoma. The system obtains the images of the area to be irradiated with a smartphone or tablet, so that the absorbed doses in the tissue can be calculated from the reconstruction without the need for computed tomography. The system was commissioned using 3D printing of the reconstructions of the tumor beds. The absorbed doses at various points were verified using radiochromic films that were suitably calibrated for the corresponding energy and beam quality. RESULTS The average reconstruction time of the 3D model from the video sequence in the 15 patients was 229,6±7,0 s. The entire procedure, including video capture, reconstruction, planning, and dose calculation was 520,6±39,9 s. Absorbed doses were measured on the 3D printed model with radiochromic film, the differences between these measurements and those calculated by the treatment planning system were 1.4% at the applicator surface, 2.6% at 1 cm, 3.9% at 2 cm and 6.2% at 3 cm. CONCLUSIONS The study shows a photogrammetry-based low-energy photon IORT planning system, capable of obtaining real-time images inside the operating room, immediately after removal of the tumor and immediately before irradiation. The system was commissioned with radiochromic films measurements in 3D-printed model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergio Lozares-Cordero
- Physics and Radiation Protection Department, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain.
| | | | - Alberto Badías-Herbera
- Higher Technical School of Industrial Engineering, Polytechnic University of Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Luis Ligorred-Padilla
- Esophagogastric Surgery and Sarcoma Unit (Department of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery), Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | | | | | | | - José Antonio Font-Gómez
- Physics and Radiation Protection Department, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Olga Blas-Borroy
- Engineering and Maintenance Service, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ma P, Tian Y, Li M, Niu C, Song Y, Dai J. Delivery of intensity-modulated electron therapy by mechanical scanning: An algorithm study. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1063577. [PMID: 36505866 PMCID: PMC9730234 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1063577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose In principle, intensity-modulated electron therapy (IMET) can be delivered through mechanical scanning, with a robotic arm mounting a linac. Materials and methods Here is a scanning algorithm to identify the back-and-forth, top-to-bottom (zigzag) pattern scan sequence. The algorithm includes generating beam positions with a uniform resolution according to the applicator size; adopting discrete energies to achieve the depth of 90% dose by compositing energies; selecting energy by locating the target's distal edge; and employing the energy-by-energy scan strategy for step-and-shoot discrete scanning. After a zigzag scan sequence is obtained, the delivery order of the scan spots is optimized by fast simulated annealing (FSA) to minimize the path length. For algorithm evaluation, scan sequences were generated using the computed tomography data of 10 patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing intraoperative radiotherapy, and the results were compared between the zigzag path and an optimized path. A simple calculation of the treatment delivery time, which comprises the irradiation time, the total robotic arm moving time, the time for energy switch, and the time to stop and restart the beam, was also made. Results In these clinical cases, FSA optimization shortened the path lengths by 12%-43%. Assuming the prescribed dose was 15 Gy, machine dose rate was 15 Gy/s, energy switch time was 2 s, stop and restart beam time was 20 ms, and robotic arm move speed was 50 mm/s, the average delivery time was 124±38 s. The largest reduction in path length yielded an approximately 10% reduction in the delivery time, which can be further reduced by increasing the machine dose rate and the robotic arm speed, decreasing the time for energy switch, and/or developing more efficient algorithms. Conclusion Mechanically scanning IMET is potentially feasible and worthy of further exploration.
Collapse
|
5
|
Treatment Planning in Intraoperative Radiation Therapy (IORT): Where Should We Go? Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14143532. [PMID: 35884591 PMCID: PMC9319593 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14143532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Revised: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
As opposed to external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), treatment planning systems (TPS) dedicated to intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) were not subject to radical modifications in the last two decades. However, new treatment regimens such as ultrahigh dose rates and combination with multiple treatment modalities, as well as the prospected availability of dedicated in-room imaging, call for important new features in the next generation of treatment planning systems in IORT. Dosimetric accuracy should be guaranteed by means of advanced dose calculation algorithms, capable of modelling complex scattering phenomena and accounting for the non-tissue equivalent materials used to shape and compensate electron beams. Kilovoltage X-ray based IORT also presents special needs, including the correct description of extremely steep dose gradients and the accurate simulation of applicators. TPSs dedicated to IORT should also allow real-time imaging to be used for treatment adaptation at the time of irradiation. Other features implemented in TPSs should include deformable registration and capability of radiobiological planning, especially if unconventional irradiation schemes are used. Finally, patient safety requires that the multiple features be integrated in a comprehensive system in order to facilitate control of the whole process.
Collapse
|
6
|
Unnikrishnan S, Brenin DR, Suralik G, Showalter TN, Shami V, Libby B, Watkins WT, Showalter SL, Zhao F, Govinahallisathyanarayana S, Hossack JA. Use of an ultrasound imaging device within the applicator to evaluate placement and support treatment planning for breast brachytherapy and intraoperative radiation therapy. Brachytherapy 2020; 20:200-206. [PMID: 33041231 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2020.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2020] [Revised: 08/13/2020] [Accepted: 08/14/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We evaluated the use of ultrasound imaging within a brachytherapy applicator as a method for applicator positioning, evaluation, and treatment planning in a series of in vitro, cadaver, and human studies. METHODS AND MATERIALS We evaluated the performance of a prototype system comprising a small ultrasound imaging catheter inserted within the lumen of a balloon brachytherapy catheter. We tested the device in an ultrasound phantom, in human breast tissue, and in an endoscopic ultrasound catheter in cadaveric breast tissue. We evaluated the visualization of adjacent tissue to consider future development of a similar system for use in brachytherapy and intraoperative radiation therapy. RESULTS Based on the ultrasound images obtained in an ultrasound phantom, cadaveric breast, and human participants, we observed that an ultrasound imaging catheter placed within the lumen of a brachytherapy applicator can effectively image adjacent tissue, ribs, and air voids, with appropriate quality to support clinical use. We observed high correlation in clinically useful information detected on ultrasound and comparative CT, with ultrasound spatial resolution near 1 mm (spatially variant). CONCLUSIONS The findings from our pilot work suggest that real-time ultrasound imaging, operated from within the applicator, is a promising technique for image guidance and treatment planning during brachytherapy and intraoperative radiation therapy. Further expansion of this technology for clinical use will require development of a cohesive system of components to suit specific clinical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Unnikrishnan
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | - D R Brenin
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA
| | - G Suralik
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA
| | - T N Showalter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA
| | - V Shami
- Department of Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA
| | - B Libby
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA
| | - W T Watkins
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA
| | - S L Showalter
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA
| | - F Zhao
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | | | - J A Hossack
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ma P, Li M, Chen X, Tian Y, Niu C, Feng Q, Dai J. Ultrasound-guided intraoperative electron beam radiation therapy: A phantom study. Phys Med 2020; 78:1-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.06.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2020] [Revised: 06/16/2020] [Accepted: 06/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
|