1
|
Sinonquel P, Jans A, Bisschops R. Painless colonoscopy: fact or fiction? Clin Endosc 2024; 57:581-587. [PMID: 38932703 DOI: 10.5946/ce.2024.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Although colonoscopy is a routinely performed procedure, it is not devoid of challenges, such as the potential for perforation and considerable patient discomfort, leading to patients postponing the procedure with several healthcare risks. This review delves into preprocedural and procedural solutions, and emerging technologies aimed at addressing the drawbacks of colonoscopies. Insufflation and sedation techniques, together with various other methods, have been explored to increase patient satisfaction, and thereby, the quality of endoscopy. Recent advances in this field include the prevention of loop formation, encompassing the use of variable-stiffness endoscopes, computer-guided scopes, magnetic endoscopic imaging, robotics, and capsule endoscopy. An autonomous endoscope that relies on self-propulsion to completely avoid looping is a potentially groundbreaking technology for the next generation of endoscopes. Nevertheless, critical techniques need to be refined to ensure the development of effective and efficient endoscopes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pieter Sinonquel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Translational Research in Gastrointestinal Disorders, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Alexander Jans
- Department of Translational Research in Gastrointestinal Disorders, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Internal Medicine, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Raf Bisschops
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Translational Research in Gastrointestinal Disorders, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pokharel R, Lin YS, McFerran E, O'Mahony JF. A Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Europe: Have Studies Included Optimal Screening Intensities? APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2023; 21:701-717. [PMID: 37380865 PMCID: PMC10403417 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-023-00819-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the range of strategies analysed in European cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening with respect to the screening intervals, age ranges and test cut-offs used to define positivity, to examine how this might influence what strategies are found to be optimal, and compare them with the current screening policies with a focus on the screening interval. METHODS We searched PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus for peer-reviewed, model-based CEAs of CRC screening. We included studies on average-risk European populations using the guaiac faecal occult blood test (gFOBT) or faecal immunochemical test (FIT). We adapted Drummond's ten-point checklist to appraise study quality. RESULTS We included 39 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Biennial screening was the most frequently used interval which was analysed in 37 studies. Annual screening was assessed in 13 studies, all of which found it optimally cost-effective. Despite this, 25 of 26 European stool-based programmes use biennial screening. Many CEAs did not vary the age range, but the 14 that did generally found broader ranges optimal. Only 11 studies considered alternative FIT cut-offs, 9 of which found lower cut-offs superior. Conflicts between current policy and CEA evidence are less clear regarding age ranges and cut-offs. CONCLUSIONS The existing CEA evidence indicates that the widely adopted biennial frequency of stool-based testing in Europe is suboptimal. It is likely that many more lives could be saved throughout Europe if programmes could be offered with more intensive annual screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajani Pokharel
- Centre for Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Yi-Shu Lin
- Centre for Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ethna McFerran
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - James F O'Mahony
- Centre for Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Diedrich L, Brinkmann M, Dreier M, Rossol S, Schramm W, Krauth C. Is there a place for sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening? A systematic review and critical appraisal of cost-effectiveness models. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0290353. [PMID: 37594967 PMCID: PMC10438011 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 08/05/2023] [Indexed: 08/20/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) is effective in reducing both incidence and mortality. Colonoscopy and stool tests are most frequently used for this purpose. Sigmoidoscopy is an alternative screening measure with a strong evidence base. Due to its distinct characteristics, it might be preferred by subgroups. The aim of this systematic review is to analyze the cost-effectiveness of sigmoidoscopy for CRC screening compared to other screening methods and to identify influencing parameters. METHODS A systematic literature search for the time frame 01/2010-01/2023 was conducted using the databases MEDLINE, Embase, EconLit, Web of Science, NHS EED, as well as the Cost-Effectiveness Registry. Full economic analyses examining sigmoidoscopy as a screening measure for the general population at average risk for CRC were included. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated. All included studies were critically assessed based on a questionnaire for modelling studies. RESULTS Twenty-five studies are included in the review. Compared to no screening, sigmoidoscopy is a cost-effective screening strategy for CRC. When modelled as a single measure strategy, sigmoidoscopy is mostly dominated by colonoscopy or modern stool tests. When combined with annual stool testing, sigmoidoscopy in 5-year intervals is more effective and less costly than the respective strategies alone. The results of the studies are influenced by varying assumptions on adherence, costs, and test characteristics. CONCLUSION The combination of sigmoidoscopy and stool testing represents a cost-effective screening strategy that has not received much attention in current guidelines. Further research is needed that goes beyond a narrow focus on screening technology and models different, preference-based participation behavior in subgroups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonie Diedrich
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Melanie Brinkmann
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Maren Dreier
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Siegbert Rossol
- Department of Internal Medicine, Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt/M, Germany
| | - Wendelin Schramm
- GECKO Institute for Medicine, Informatics and Economics, Heilbronn University, Heilbronn, Germany
| | - Christian Krauth
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tumino E, Visaggi P, Bolognesi V, Ceccarelli L, Lambiase C, Coda S, Premchand P, Bellini M, de Bortoli N, Marciano E. Robotic Colonoscopy and Beyond: Insights into Modern Lower Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:2452. [PMID: 37510196 PMCID: PMC10378494 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13142452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Revised: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Lower gastrointestinal endoscopy is considered the gold standard for the diagnosis and removal of colonic polyps. Delays in colonoscopy following a positive fecal immunochemical test increase the likelihood of advanced adenomas and colorectal cancer (CRC) occurrence. However, patients may refuse to undergo conventional colonoscopy (CC) due to fear of possible risks and pain or discomfort. In this regard, patients undergoing CC frequently require sedation to better tolerate the procedure, increasing the risk of deep sedation or other complications related to sedation. Accordingly, the use of CC as a first-line screening strategy for CRC is hampered by patients' reluctance due to its invasiveness and anxiety about possible discomfort. To overcome the limitations of CC and improve patients' compliance, several studies have investigated the use of robotic colonoscopy (RC) both in experimental models and in vivo. Self-propelling robotic colonoscopes have proven to be promising thanks to their peculiar dexterity and adaptability to the shape of the lower gastrointestinal tract, allowing a virtually painless examination of the colon. In some instances, when alternatives to CC and RC are required, barium enema (BE), computed tomographic colonography (CTC), and colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) may be options. However, BE and CTC are limited by the need for subsequent investigations whenever suspicious lesions are found. In this narrative review, we discussed the current clinical applications of RC, CTC, and CCE, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of different endoscopic procedures, with a particular focus on RC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emanuele Tumino
- Endoscopy Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, 56125 Pisa, Italy
| | - Pierfrancesco Visaggi
- Endoscopy Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, 56125 Pisa, Italy
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56100 Pisa, Italy
| | - Valeria Bolognesi
- Endoscopy Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, 56125 Pisa, Italy
| | - Linda Ceccarelli
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56100 Pisa, Italy
| | - Christian Lambiase
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56100 Pisa, Italy
| | - Sergio Coda
- Digestive Disease Centre, Division of Surgery, Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Romford RM70AG, UK
| | - Purushothaman Premchand
- Digestive Disease Centre, Division of Surgery, Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Romford RM70AG, UK
| | - Massimo Bellini
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56100 Pisa, Italy
| | - Nicola de Bortoli
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56100 Pisa, Italy
| | - Emanuele Marciano
- Endoscopy Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, 56125 Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zacharakis G, Almasoud A, Arahmaner O, Aldossary K, Alzahrani J, Al-Ghamdi S, AlShehri A, Nikolaidis P, Bawazir A, Alfayez T, Daadour M, Alslimah F, Altamimi M, Alshalawi S. A 5-year evaluation of early-and late-onset sporadic colorectal cancer screening in central Saudi Arabia. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2023; 29:95-101. [PMID: 36254929 PMCID: PMC10270470 DOI: 10.4103/sjg.sjg_333_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Revised: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 09/02/2022] [Indexed: 02/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The Al-Kharj colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program was implemented for five years (2017-2022) in a central urban area of Riyadh Province, Saudi Arabia, to assess the participation and impact of the program in average-risk individuals. Methods The high sensitivity-guaiac based-fecal occult blood test (HSgFOBT) was used as a first-line investigation to identify asymptomatic patients, aged 45-75 years, requiring CRC screening using colonoscopy. The program was run in three tertiary hospitals in the area. Results The five-year participation rate was 73% (35,640/48,897). The average age was 53 years (range 45-75), 49% were female (17,464/35,640), all were asymptomatic, and 77% had adequate bowel preparation. The HSgFOBT (+) rate was 6.3% (n = 2245), and 76% (n = 1701) of these underwent colonoscopy. The prevalence of findings were as follows: CRC, 4.8% (81/1701); advanced adenoma, 9.5% (162/1701); adenoma, 15.9% (270/1701); non-adenomatous polyps, 7.9% (135/1701); and no polyps or tumors, 25.4% (432/1701). Among participants aged 45-50 years, early onset-CRC had female predominance, while those ≥50 years with late onset-CRC were predominantly male. CRC was more prevalent in the left colon (P < 0.005). Conclusions Approximately one-third of the participants diagnosed with CRC had early-onset CRC. Screening participation was desirable for the defined target population. Public education is necessary along with expanded colonoscopy resources to continue further citizen participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgios Zacharakis
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, College of Medicine, Prince Sattam Bin, Abdulaziz University, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University Hospital, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdulaziz Almasoud
- Department of Gastroenterology, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Endoscopy Unit, Al-Kharj Military Hospital, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia
| | - Omar Arahmaner
- Endoscopy Unit, King Khaled Hospital and Prince Sultan Centre for Health Care, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia
| | - Khaled Aldossary
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia
| | - Jamaan Alzahrani
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sameer Al-Ghamdi
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdullah AlShehri
- Department of Family Medicine, Al-Kharj Military Hospital, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia
| | - Pavlos Nikolaidis
- College of Computer and Information Sciences, Al-Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdullah Bawazir
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, College of Medicine, Prince Sattam Bin, Abdulaziz University, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University Hospital, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia
| | - Talal Alfayez
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, College of Medicine, Prince Sattam Bin, Abdulaziz University, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University Hospital, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia
| | - Moataz Daadour
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, College of Medicine, Prince Sattam Bin, Abdulaziz University, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University Hospital, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia
| | - Faisal Alslimah
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, College of Medicine, Prince Sattam Bin, Abdulaziz University, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University Hospital, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammed Altamimi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, College of Medicine, Prince Sattam Bin, Abdulaziz University, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University Hospital, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sami Alshalawi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, College of Medicine, Prince Sattam Bin, Abdulaziz University, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University Hospital, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Amini M, Rezasoltani S, Pourhoseingholi MA, Asadzadeh Aghdaei H, Zali MR. Evaluating the predictive performance of gut microbiota for the early-stage colorectal cancer. BMC Gastroenterol 2022; 22:514. [PMID: 36510191 PMCID: PMC9743636 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-022-02599-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) has been regarded as one of the most frequently diagnosed malignancies among the leading causes of cancer-related morbidity and mortality globally. Diagnosis of CRC at the early-stages of tumour might improve the survival rate of patients. The current study sought to determine the performance of fecal Fusobacterium nucleatum (F. nucleatum) and Streptococcus bovis (S. bovis) for timely predicting CRC. METHODS Through a case-control study, the fecal sample information of 83 individuals (38 females, 45 males) referring to a hospital in Tehran, Iran was used. All patients underwent a complete colonoscopy, regarded as a gold standard test. Bacterial species including S. bovis and F. nucleatum were measured by absolute quantitative real-time PCR. The Bayesian univariate and bivariate latent class models (LCMs) were applied to estimate the ability of the candidate bacterial markers in order to early detection of patients with CRC. RESULTS Bayesian univariate LCMs demonstrated that the sensitivities of S. bovis and F. nucleatum were estimated to be 86% [95% credible interval (CrI) 0.82-0.91] and 82% (95% CrI 0.75-0.88); while specificities were 84% (95% CrI 0.78-0.89) and 80% (95% CrI 0.73-0.87), respectively. Moreover, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were 0.88 (95% CrI 0.83-0.94) and 0.80 (95% CrI 0.73-0.85) respectively for S. bovis and F. nucleatum. Based on the Bayesian bivariate LCMs, the sensitivities of S. bovis and F. nucleatum were calculated as 93% (95% CrI 0.84-0.98) and 90% (95% CrI 0.85-0.97), the specificities were 88% (95% CrI 0.78-0.93) and 87% (95% CrI 0.79-0.94); and the AUCs were 0.91 (95% CrI 0.83-0.99) and 0.88(95% CrI 0.81-0.96), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Our data has identified that according to the Bayesian bivariate LCM, S. bovis and F. nucleatum had a more significant predictive accuracy compared with the univariate model. In summary, these intestinal bacteria have been highlighted as novel tools for early-stage CRC diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maedeh Amini
- grid.411600.2Basic and Molecular Epidemiology of Gastrointestinal Disorders Research Center, Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Sama Rezasoltani
- grid.13648.380000 0001 2180 3484Section Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Mohamad Amin Pourhoseingholi
- grid.411600.2Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases Research Center, Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hamid Asadzadeh Aghdaei
- grid.411600.2Basic and Molecular Epidemiology of Gastrointestinal Disorders Research Center, Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Reza Zali
- grid.411600.2Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases Research Center, Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abu-Freha N, Gouldner R, Cohen B, Gordon M, Sagi O, Taha G, Ben Shoshan L, Levi Z. Comorbidities and Risk Factors of Patients Diagnosed with CRC after Positive Fecal Test in Real Life. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14225557. [PMID: 36428650 PMCID: PMC9688580 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14225557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Revised: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Fecal occult blood test (FOBT) is the modality of choice in most countries for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. We aimed to investigate the risk factors for CRC among patients with a positive FOBT in real life. (2) Methods: This was a retrospective study that included patients who tested positive for FOBT. Data regarding the comorbidities and laboratories were collected and compared between CRC and non-CRC groups. (3) Results: Positive FOBT was found among 45,500 (5.36%) subjects and CRC was found in 1502 (3.3%). CRC patients were older, age 62.7 ± 7.15 years compared with 59.33 ± 7.3 years (p < 0.001), and had significantly higher rates of hypertension (48.4% vs. 44.7%, p = 0.002), iron-deficiency anemia (20.6% vs. 16.4, p < 0.001), family history of CRC (7.3% vs. 5.1%, p < 0.001), and previous CRC (6.5% vs. 0.3%, p < 0.001). Lower levels of hemoglobin, iron, and ferritin were found in the CRC group. Age, family history of CRC, and previous CRC were found to be significant risk factors for diagnosis of CRC after positive FOBT with OR of 1.057, 1.4, and 15.9, respectively. (4) Conclusions: Iron-deficiency anemia, family history of CRC, previous colorectal cancer, and low hemoglobin, iron, and ferritin levels should direct physicians to give high priority to colonoscopy scheduling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naim Abu-Freha
- The Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Soroka University Medical Center, Beer-Sheva 84105, Israel
- The Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva 84105, Israel
- Correspondence: or ; Tel.: +972-8-640-2251; Fax: +972-8-623-3083
| | - Rachel Gouldner
- Medical School for International Health, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva 84101, Israel
| | - Bracha Cohen
- Soroka Clinical Research Center, Soroka University Medical Center, Beer-Sheva 84101, Israel
| | - Michal Gordon
- Soroka Clinical Research Center, Soroka University Medical Center, Beer-Sheva 84101, Israel
| | - Orly Sagi
- Bacteriology Laboratory, Soroka University Medical Center, Beer-Sheva 84101, Israel
| | - Gadeer Taha
- Department of Gastroenterology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa 31096, Israel
| | - Liza Ben Shoshan
- The Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Soroka University Medical Center, Beer-Sheva 84105, Israel
| | - Zohar Levi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beilinson Medical Center, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 39100, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Babela R, Orsagh A, Ricova J, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Csanadi M, De Koning H, Reckova M. Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening in Slovakia. Eur J Cancer Prev 2022; 31:415-421. [PMID: 34789653 DOI: 10.1097/cej.0000000000000727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) is an ideal disease for screening due to known and detectable precursor lesions and slow progression from benign adenoma to invasive cancer. The introduction of organized population-based screening programs reduces the burden of colorectal cancer and increases the quality of the screening process with a more favorable harm to benefit ratio compared to opportunistic screening. METHODS The study used the microsimulation screening analysis-colon simulation model for the estimation of the effect of various factors on cancer incidence and mortality. The model simulated the Slovakian population from 2018 to 2050. Study includes the analysis of two screening strategies the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) every 2 years and annual FIT. Cost-effectiveness parameters were evaluated comparing each simulated screening scenario with no screening. RESULTS Compared to no screening, the biennial FIT would detect 29 600 CRC cases and annual FIT 37 800 CRC cases. Mortality due to CRC showed benefits for both strategies with 17,38% reduction in biennial FIT and 24,67% reduction in annual FIT approach. Both screening programs were more costly as well as more effective compared to no screening. The ICER for biennial FIT strategy was 1776 EUR per 1 QALY and for the annual FIT 3991 EUR per 1 QALY. CONCLUSIONS In summary, this is the first cost-effectiveness analysis focusing on multiple national CRC screening strategies in Slovakia. Both strategies demonstrated cost-effectiveness compared to no screening. However, for optimal population-based programmatic screening strategy, the policymakers should also consider human resources availability, acceptability of screening test among the population or additional resources including the screening funding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Babela
- National Oncology Institute, Bratislava & Biomedical Research Centre for the Slovak Academy of Sciences
| | - Andrej Orsagh
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Oncology Institute, Bratislava & National Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Jana Ricova
- National Oncology Institute, Bratislava & Biomedical Research Centre for the Slovak Academy of Sciences
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Harry De Koning
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maria Reckova
- National Oncology Institute, Bratislava & Biomedical Research Centre for the Slovak Academy of Sciences
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Davidoff AJ, Akif K, Halpern MT. Research on the Economics of Cancer-Related Health Care: An Overview of the Review Literature. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2022; 2022:12-20. [PMID: 35788372 DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgac011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2021] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
We reviewed current literature reviews regarding economics of cancer-related health care to identify focus areas and gaps. We searched PubMed for systematic and other reviews with the Medical Subject Headings "neoplasms" and "economics" published between January 1, 2010, and April 1, 2020, identifying 164 reviews. Review characteristics were abstracted and described. The majority (70.7%) of reviews focused on cost-effectiveness or cost-utility analyses. Few reviews addressed other types of cancer health economic studies. More than two-thirds of the reviews examined cancer treatments, followed by screening (15.9%) and survivorship or end-of-life (13.4%). The plurality of reviews (28.7%) cut across cancer site, followed by breast (20.7%), colorectal (11.6%), and gynecologic (8.5%) cancers. Specific topics addressed cancer screening modalities, novel therapies, pain management, or exercise interventions during survivorship. The results indicate that reviews do not regularly cover other phases of care or topics including financial hardship, policy, and measurement and methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy J Davidoff
- Healthcare Assessment Research Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Kaitlin Akif
- Office of the Associate Director, Surveillance Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Michael T Halpern
- Healthcare Assessment Research Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
|
11
|
Cost-Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Genetic Testing. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph18168330. [PMID: 34444091 PMCID: PMC8394708 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18168330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Revised: 07/30/2021] [Accepted: 08/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Approximately 3–5% of CRCs are associated with hereditary cancer syndromes. Individuals who harbor germline mutations are at an increased risk of developing early onset CRC, as well as extracolonic tumors. Genetic testing can identify genes that cause these syndromes. Early detection could facilitate the initiation of targeted prevention strategies and surveillance for CRC patients and their families. The aim of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of CRC genetic testing. We utilized a cross-sectional design to determine the cost-effectiveness of CRC genetic testing as compared to the usual screening method (iFOBT) from the provider’s perspective. Data on costs and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of 200 CRC patients from three specialist general hospitals were collected. A mixed-methods approach of activity-based costing, top-down costing, and extracted information from a clinical pathway was used to estimate provider costs. Patients and family members’ HRQoL were measured using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. Data from the Malaysian Study on Cancer Survival (MySCan) were used to calculate patient survival. Cost-effectiveness was measured as cost per life-year (LY) and cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). The provider cost for CRC genetic testing was high as compared to that for the current screening method. The current practice for screening is cost-saving as compared to genetic testing. Using a 10-year survival analysis, the estimated number of LYs gained for CRC patients through genetic testing was 0.92 years, and the number of QALYs gained was 1.53 years. The cost per LY gained and cost per QALY gained were calculated. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) showed that genetic testing dominates iFOBT testing. CRC genetic testing is cost-effective and could be considered as routine CRC screening for clinical practice.
Collapse
|
12
|
Manfredi L. Endorobots for Colonoscopy: Design Challenges and Available Technologies. Front Robot AI 2021; 8:705454. [PMID: 34336938 PMCID: PMC8317132 DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2021.705454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cause of cancer death worldwide, after lung cancer (Sung et al., 2021). Early stage detection is key to increase the survival rate. Colonoscopy remains to be the gold standard procedure due to its dual capability to optically inspect the entire colonic mucosa and to perform interventional procedures at the same time. However, this causes pain and discomfort, whereby it requires sedation or anaesthesia of the patient. It is a difficult procedure to perform that can cause damage to the colonic wall in some cases. Development of new technologies aims to overcome the current limitations on colonoscopy by using advancements in endorobotics research. The design of these advanced medical devices is challenging because of the limited space of the lumen, the contorted shape, and the long tract of the large bowel. The force applied to the colonic wall needs to be controlled to avoid collateral effects such as injuries to the colonic mucosa and pain during the procedure. This article discusses the current challenges in the colonoscopy procedure, the available locomotion technologies for endorobots used in colonoscopy at a prototype level and the commercial products available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Manfredi
- Division of Imaging Science and Technology, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bonert M, Collins A, Xenodemetropoulos T, Dmetrichuk JM, Al-Haddad S, Major P, Naqvi A. Application of Next Generation Quality/Statistical Process Control and Expert-Led Case Review to Increase the Consistency of Diagnostic Rates in Precancerous Colorectal Polyps. Qual Manag Health Care 2021; 30:176-183. [PMID: 33405466 PMCID: PMC8219089 DOI: 10.1097/qmh.0000000000000299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prior work suggests high interrater variability in the pathologist diagnostic rate (PDR) of the precancerous polyp sessile serrated adenoma (SSA). OBJECTIVES To improve the diagnostic consistency in the pathological evaluation of colorectal polyp specimens with diagnostic rate awareness, using funnel plots (FPs)/control charts (CCs), and a focused group case review. METHODS All colorectal polyp specimen (CRPS) reports September 2015 to August 2017 were analyzed at one institution. PDRs were extracted using a hierarchical free-text string matching algorithm and visualized using FPs, showing pathologist specimen volume versus PDR, and CCs, showing pathologist versus normed PDR. The FPs/CCs were centered on the group median diagnostic rate (GMDR). Pathologists were shown their baseline SSA diagnostic rate in relation to the practice, and in January 2017, there was a focused group case review/open discussion of approximately 40 sequential cases signed as SSA with a gastrointestinal pathology expert. RESULTS Nine pathologists interpreted more than 250 CRPSs per year. FPs/CCs for the first and second years showed 6/4 and 3/1 P < .05/P < .001 pathologist outliers, respectively, in relation to the GMDR for SSA and 0/0 and 0/0 P < .05/P < .001 pathologist outliers, respectively, in relation to the GMDR for tubular adenoma (TA). An in silico kappa (ISK) for SSA improved from 0.52 to 0.62. CONCLUSION Diagnostic rate awareness facilitated by FPs/CCs coupled with focused expert-led reviews may help calibrate PDR. Variation in SSA PDRs still remains high in relation to TA. ISK represents an intuitive, useful metric and Next Generation Quality/Statistical Process Control a promising approach for objectively increasing diagnostic consistency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Bonert
- Departments of Pathology and Molecular Medicine (Drs Bonert, Dmetrichuk, Al-Haddad, and Naqvi), Medicine (Dr Collins), and Oncology (Dr Major), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (Drs Bonert and Naqvi); Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute/Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (Dr Xenodemetropoulos); and Juravinski Hospital/Hamilton Health Sciences Centre/Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (Ms Al-Haddad and Dr Major)
| | - Andrew Collins
- Departments of Pathology and Molecular Medicine (Drs Bonert, Dmetrichuk, Al-Haddad, and Naqvi), Medicine (Dr Collins), and Oncology (Dr Major), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (Drs Bonert and Naqvi); Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute/Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (Dr Xenodemetropoulos); and Juravinski Hospital/Hamilton Health Sciences Centre/Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (Ms Al-Haddad and Dr Major)
| | - Ted Xenodemetropoulos
- Departments of Pathology and Molecular Medicine (Drs Bonert, Dmetrichuk, Al-Haddad, and Naqvi), Medicine (Dr Collins), and Oncology (Dr Major), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (Drs Bonert and Naqvi); Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute/Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (Dr Xenodemetropoulos); and Juravinski Hospital/Hamilton Health Sciences Centre/Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (Ms Al-Haddad and Dr Major)
| | - Jennifer M. Dmetrichuk
- Departments of Pathology and Molecular Medicine (Drs Bonert, Dmetrichuk, Al-Haddad, and Naqvi), Medicine (Dr Collins), and Oncology (Dr Major), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (Drs Bonert and Naqvi); Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute/Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (Dr Xenodemetropoulos); and Juravinski Hospital/Hamilton Health Sciences Centre/Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (Ms Al-Haddad and Dr Major)
| | - Sahar Al-Haddad
- Departments of Pathology and Molecular Medicine (Drs Bonert, Dmetrichuk, Al-Haddad, and Naqvi), Medicine (Dr Collins), and Oncology (Dr Major), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (Drs Bonert and Naqvi); Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute/Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (Dr Xenodemetropoulos); and Juravinski Hospital/Hamilton Health Sciences Centre/Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (Ms Al-Haddad and Dr Major)
| | - Pierre Major
- Departments of Pathology and Molecular Medicine (Drs Bonert, Dmetrichuk, Al-Haddad, and Naqvi), Medicine (Dr Collins), and Oncology (Dr Major), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (Drs Bonert and Naqvi); Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute/Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (Dr Xenodemetropoulos); and Juravinski Hospital/Hamilton Health Sciences Centre/Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (Ms Al-Haddad and Dr Major)
| | - Asghar Naqvi
- Departments of Pathology and Molecular Medicine (Drs Bonert, Dmetrichuk, Al-Haddad, and Naqvi), Medicine (Dr Collins), and Oncology (Dr Major), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (Drs Bonert and Naqvi); Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute/Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (Dr Xenodemetropoulos); and Juravinski Hospital/Hamilton Health Sciences Centre/Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (Ms Al-Haddad and Dr Major)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tran BT, Choi KS, Sohn DK, Kim SY, Suh JK, Tran TH, Nguyen TTB, Oh JK. Estimating cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in Vietnam. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2021; 21:1-10. [PMID: 34129408 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2021.1940963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Background:Presently, there are no national screening programs for cancer in Vietnam. This study aimed to analyze the cost-effectiveness of an annual colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program from the healthcare service provider's perspective for the Vietnamese population.Methods:The economic model consisted of adecision tree and aMarkov model. Adecision tree was constructed for comparing two strategies, including ascreening group with aguaiac-based fecal occult blood test (gFOBT) and ano-screening group in general populations, aged 50 years and above. The Markov model projected outcomes over a25-year horizon. The cost-effectiveness outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) represented by costs per quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs).Results:When compared with no screening, ICER was $1,388per QALY with an increased cost of $ 43.98 and again of 0.032 QALY (Willingness to pay $2,590). The uptake rate of gFOBT, cost of colonoscopy, and the total cost of screening contributed to the largest impact on the ICER. PSA showed that results were robust to variation in parameter estimates, with annual screening remaining cost-effective compared with no screening.Conclusion:Our screening strategy could be considered cost-effective compared to ano screening strategy. Our findings could be potentially used to develop aCRC national screening program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Binh Thang Tran
- Department of Cancer Control and Population Health, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
- Faculty of Public Health, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue City, Vietnam
| | - Kui Son Choi
- Department of Cancer Control and Population Health, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
- National Cancer Control Institute; National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Dae Kyung Sohn
- Department of Cancer Control and Population Health, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea
| | - Sun-Young Kim
- Department of Cancer Control and Population Health, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Kyung Suh
- National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea
| | - Thanh Huong Tran
- National Cancer Institute, National Oncology Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Thi Thanh Binh Nguyen
- Department of Pediatrics, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue City, Vietnam
| | - Jin-Kyoung Oh
- Department of Cancer Control and Population Health, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
- Division of Cancer Prevention & Early Detection, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Smith HA, Scarffe AD, Brunet N, Champion C, Kandola K, Tessier A, Boushey R, Kuziemsky C. Impact of colorectal cancer screening participation in remote northern Canada: A retrospective cohort study. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26:7652-7663. [PMID: 33505142 PMCID: PMC7789056 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i48.7652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2020] [Revised: 10/15/2020] [Accepted: 11/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Screening provides earlier colorectal cancer (CRC) detection and improves outcomes. It remains poorly understood if these benefits are realized with screening guidelines in remote northern populations of Canada where CRC rates are nearly twice the national average and access to colonoscopy is limited.
AIM To evaluate the participation and impact of CRC screening guidelines in a remote northern population.
METHODS This retrospective cohort study included residents of the Northwest Territories, a northern region of Canada, age 50-74 who underwent CRC screening by a fecal immunohistochemical test (FIT) between January 1, 2014 to March 30, 2019. To assess impact, individuals with a screen-detected CRC were compared to clinically-detected CRC cases for stage and location of CRC between 2014-2016. To assess participation, we conducted subgroup analyses of FIT positive individuals exploring the relationships between signs and symptoms of CRC at the time of screening, wait-times for colonoscopy, and screening outcomes. Two sample Welch t-test was used for normally distributed continuous variables, Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon Tests for data without normal distribution, and Chi-square goodness of fit test for categorical variables. A P value of < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
RESULTS 6817 fecal tests were completed, meaning an annual average screening rate of 25.04%, 843 (12.37%) were positive, 629 individuals underwent a follow-up colonoscopy, of which, 24.48% had advanced neoplasia (AN), 5.41% had CRC. There were no significant differences in stage, pathology, or location between screen-detected cancers and clinically-detected cancers. In assessing participation and screening outcomes, we observed 49.51% of individuals referred for colonoscopy after FIT were ineligible for CRC screening, most often due to signs and symptoms of CRC. Individuals were more likely to have AN if they had signs and symptoms of cancer at the time of screening, waited over 180 d for colonoscopy, or were indigenous [respectively, estimated RR 1.18 95%CI of RR (0.89-1.59)]; RR 1.523 (CI: 1.035, 2.240); RR 1.722 (CI: 1.165, 2.547)].
CONCLUSION Screening did not facilitate early cancer detection but facilitated higher than anticipated AN detection. Signs and symptoms of CRC at screening, and long colonoscopy wait-times appear contributory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather A Smith
- Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa K1Y4E9, Ontario, Canada
- Telfer School of Management, University of Ottawa, Ottawa K1N6N5, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrew D Scarffe
- Telfer School of Management, University of Ottawa, Ottawa K1N6N5, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nicole Brunet
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa K1Y4E9, Ontario, Canada
| | - Cait Champion
- Department of Surgery, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Sudbury P3E2C6, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kami Kandola
- Department of Health and Social Services, Government of the Northwest Territories, Yellowknife X1A1P5, Northwest Territories, Canada
| | - Alisha Tessier
- Department of Surgery, Stanton Territorial Health Authority, Yellowknife X1A0H1, Northwest Territories, Canada
| | - Robin Boushey
- Division of General Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa K1H 8L6, Ontario, Canada
| | - Craig Kuziemsky
- Office of Research Services, MacEwan University, Edmonton T5J4S2, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Csanádi M, Gini A, Koning HD, Széles G, Pitter JG, Oroszi B, Pataki P, Fadgyas-Freyler P, Korponai G, Vokó Z, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I. Modeling costs and benefits of the organized colorectal cancer screening programme and its potential future improvements in Hungary. J Med Screen 2020; 28:268-276. [PMID: 33153369 DOI: 10.1177/0969141320968598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The national population-based colorectal cancer screening programme in Hungary was initiated in December 2018. We aimed to evaluate the current programme and investigate the costs and benefits of potential future changes to overcome the low coverage of the target population. METHODS We performed an economic evaluation from a healthcare payer perspective using an established micro-simulation model (Microsimulation Screening Analysis-Colon). We simulated costs and benefits of screening with fecal immunochemical test in the Hungarian population aged 50-100, investigating also the impact of potential future scenarios which were assumed to increase invitation coverage: improvement of the IT platform currently used by GPs or distributing the tests through pharmacies instead of GPs. RESULTS The model predicted that the current screening programme could lead to 6.2% colorectal cancer mortality reduction between 2018 and 2050 compared to no screening. Even higher reductions, up to 16.6%, were estimated when tests were distributed through pharmacies and higher coverage was assumed. This change in the programme was estimated to require up to 26 million performed fecal immunochemical tests and 1 million colonoscopies for the simulated period. These future scenarios have acceptable cost-benefit ratios of €8000-€8700 per life-years gained depending on the assumed adherence of invited individuals. CONCLUSIONS With its limitations, the current colorectal cancer screening programme in Hungary will have a modest impact on colorectal cancer mortality. Significant improvements in mortality reduction could be made at acceptable costs, if the tests were to be distributed by pharmacies allowing the entire target population to be invited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrea Gini
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Harry de Koning
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Gyula Korponai
- National Health Insurance Fund of Hungary, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Zoltán Vokó
- Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary.,Center for Health Technology Assessment, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
O'Mahony JF. Does Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Really Need to Abandon the Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio to Embrace Net Benefit? PHARMACOECONOMICS 2020; 38:777-779. [PMID: 32537681 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-020-00931-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- James F O'Mahony
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Trinity College Dublin, 2-4 Foster Place, Dublin, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|