Anterior and posterior ratio of corneal surface areas: A novel index for detecting early stage keratoconus

Association Between Family History and the Corneal Characteristics of Keratoconus in Japan

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine the association between family history and corneal characteristics of keratoconus in Japan.

METHODS

The clinical records of patients with keratoconus who were interviewed regarding family history of keratoconus were retrospectively reviewed. Corneal indices derived from anterior segment optical coherence tomography were compared between the positive and negative family history groups using multiple linear regression analysis adjusted with age, sex, and history of atopy and eye rubbing.

RESULTS

A total of 2,701 eyes, including 122 eyes with positive family history, were enrolled. Based on the adjusted multiple linear regression analysis, no significant differences were found between groups with and without a family history except for paracentral and mid-peripheral corneal thickness. The adjusted mean differences in paracentral and mid-peripheral corneal thicknesses between the two groups were -10.33 (95% confidence interval -20.29 to -0.37 P-value <0.05) and -9.78 (95% confidence interval -16.70 to -2.85, P-value <0.01), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant association between family history and corneal indices in Japanese patients with keratoconus, except for paracentral and mid-peripheral corneal thicknesses. A Japanese patient with keratoconus who had a family history showed significantly lower paracentral and mid-peripheral corneal thicknesses than those with no family history.

Multi-modal imaging for the detection of early keratoconus: a narrative review

Keratoconus is a common progressive corneal disorder that can be associated with significant ocular morbidity. Various corneal imaging techniques have been used for the diagnosis of established cases. However, in the early stages of the disease, which include subclinical keratoconus and forme fruste keratoconus, detection of such cases can be challenging. The importance of detecting such cases is very important because early intervention can halt disease progression, improve visual outcomes and prevent postrefractive surgery ectasia associated with performing corneal refractive procedures in such patients. This narrative review aimed to examine several established and evolving imaging techniques for the detection of early cases of keratoconus. The utilization of combinations of these techniques may further increase their diagnostic ability.

Parameters of a basic ophthalmic examination that can ensure proper timing of corneal crosslinking in patients with keratoconus

BACKGROUND

By the time patients with keratoconus are referred to specialists for treatment, the disease-related thinning of their corneas has already made them ineligible (< 400 μm) for corneal crosslinking (CXL).

PURPOSE

To find basic ophthalmic examination parameters that can ensure proper timing of referral for CXL.

METHODS

We reviewed cases referred to Toyama University Hospital for the treatment of keratoconus from August 2011 to May 2021 to identify the frequency of contraindication due to minimal corneal thickness (MCT) < 400 μm at first visit. We performed a receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis of basic exam parameters (uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity with hard contact lens, sphericity, cylindricity, and/or corneal astigmatism) potentially predicting eligibility for CXL. For those with an area under the curve (AUC) > 0.8, we determined cut-off values and calculated sensitivity and specificity.

RESULTS

Analyses included 66 eyes of 38 Japanese patients aged 25.0 ± 7.1 yrs (range 12-38 yrs) (56 male eyes and 10 female eyes). Thirty percent of the patients had an MCT < 400 μm. The AUC for uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCDVA) was 0.85. A cut-off value of 1.22 (converted to decimal visual acuity: ≥ 0.06) yielded 87% sensitivity and 75% specificity. The AUC for corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was 0.90. A cut-off of 0.52 (converted to decimal visual acuity: ≥ 0.3) yielded 89% sensitivity and 75% specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

It is advisable to refer patients with keratoconus to a specialized facility for CXL when either of the following conditions is present: (i) UCDVA (decimal visual acuity) ≥ 0.06 or (ii) CDVA (decimal visual acuity) ≥ 0.3.

Progress of corneal morphological examination combined with biomechanical examination in preoperative screening for keratorefractive surgery

Although corneal refractive surgery has been proven to be excellent in terms of safety and effectiveness, the reduction of postoperative corneal ectasia remains one of the most concerned topics for surgeons. Forme fruste keratoconus (FFKC) is the most important factor that leads to postoperative corneal ectasia, and common preoperative screenings of the condition include corneal morphology examination and corneal biomechanical examination. However, there are limitations to the single morphological examination or biomechanical examination, and the advantages of the combination of the two have been gradually emerging. The combined examination is more accurate in the diagnosis of FFKC and can provide a basis for determining suspected keratoconus. It allows one to measure the true intraocular pressure (IOP) before and after surgery and is recommended for older patients and those with allergic conjunctivitis. This article aims to discuss the application, advantages, and disadvantages of single examination and combined examination in the preoperative screening of refractive surgery, so as to provide a certain reference value for choosing suitable patients for surgery, improving surgical safety, and reducing the risk of postoperative ectasia.

Anterior segment characteristics in normal and keratoconus eyes evaluated with a new type of swept-source optical coherence tomography

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate and compare the discriminating ability of corneal elevation maps generated using a swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) (SS-OCT ANTERION, Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany), which was estimated with different reference surfaces, to distinguish normal corneas from those with keratoconus and keratoconus suspect.

Methods

A total of 126 eyes of patients, which comprised 43, 37, and 46 keratoconus, keratoconus suspects, and normal controls, respectively, were included in this study. The anterior and posterior elevations at the thinnest point under the best-fit sphere (BFS) and toric-ellipsoid (BFT), respectively, and other corneal parameters were measured using the SS-OCT. In addition, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and cut-off value were calculated to evaluate the diagnostic ability of the corneal elevation values in differentiating keratoconus and keratoconus suspects from normal eyes.

Results

The mean total keratometric and corneal elevation values were significantly higher in the keratoconus group than in the other groups. Pachymetric parameters exhibited the lowest values for keratoconus. In addition, ROC curve analyses showed a high accuracy of the thinnest point anterior and posterior BFT for both keratoconus and keratoconus suspects and normal controls (area under the ROC were 0.969 and 0.961, respectively). Furthermore, the optimal cut-off point of the posterior elevation at the thinnest point under BFT was 16.44 μm (sensitivity and specificity of 86% and 98%, respectively) for differentiating keratoconus from normal and keratoconus suspect eyes.

Conclusions

The elevation map using the BFS and BFT references measured with the anterior segment SS-OCT is considered an effective indicator for keratoconus diagnosis. Therefore, the anterior segment SS-OCT can effectively differentiate keratoconus from suspected keratoconus and normal corneas by measuring parameters such as posterior and anterior elevations, pachymetry, and keratometry.

Fourier analysis on irregular corneal astigmatism using optical coherence tomography in various severity stages of keratoconus

PURPOSE

To investigate the diagnostic capability of Fourier indices in detecting clinical or subclinical keratoconus (KC).

DESIGN

Prospective cross-sectional study METHODS: : The study included 126 eyes with clinical KC (50 KC without any corneal scar, 50 KC with anterior corneal scar, and 26 KC with posterior scar having a history of acute corneal hydrops), 50 with topographic KC (without clinical signs), 50 with pre-topographic KC (normal topography without clinical signs), and 50 controls. Corneal tomographic data were obtained using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (OCT). Fourier analysis decomposed dioptric data from both anterior and posterior corneal surface into spherical, regular astigmatism, asymmetry, and higher-order irregularity components. The discriminating ability of the Fourier indices of pre-topographic KC, topographic KC, and clinical KC from controls were assessed after quantitative Fourier analysis of irregular corneal astigmatism.

RESULTS

Posterior asymmetry and higher-order irregularity components were significantly greater in pre-topographic KC eyes than those in controls (p<0.001 for both), with the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.778 and 0.709, respectively. The same was true for anterior asymmetry, posterior asymmetry, and posterior higher-order irregularity components in topographic KC (AUROC of 0.945, 0.941, and 0.893, respectively), whereas it was >0.948 for all Fourier components in clinical KC.

CONCLUSIONS

Fourier analysis using OCT can evaluate anterior and posterior corneal irregular astigmatism of various KC stages, from very mild to advanced, including severe cases with corneal scar. Irregular astigmatism indices from the posterior corneal surface showed the highest AUROC values in discriminating early KC stages.

Quantitative interocular comparison of total corneal surface area and corneal diameter in patients with highly asymmetric keratoconus

Keratoconus is a progressive corneal disorder which is frequently asymmetric. The aetiology of keratoconus remains unclear, and the concept of keratoconus as an ectatic disorder has been challenged recently. We carried out a retrospective study in 160 eyes of 80 patients, to evaluate and compare interocular differences in corneal diameter and surface area in patients with unilateral or highly asymmetric keratoconus (UHAKC). Calculations were performed using raw topographic elevation data derived from topographic measurements using Orbscan II, and we extrapolated surface areas up to measured corneal diameter. We also evaluated inter-eye correlation, and correlation between corneal surface area, corneal diameter and keratoconus severity. Our results showed a statistically significant but not clinically important greater corneal diameter (12.14 mm and 12.17 mm; p = 0.04), and corneal surface area (paired t-test, p < 0.0001; p = 0.0009 respectively) in more affected eyes. Inter-eye comparison revealed corneal diameter, anterior chamber depth, and corneal surface area were strongly correlated between eyes. Corneal surface area remained strongly correlated, and Bland–Altman analysis also showed strong inter-ocular agreement. Our results show that in patients with UHAKC the interocular difference in corneal diameter and corneal surface area is clinically insignificant, and are consistent with a redistribution, rather than increase, of corneal surface area with keratoconus progression.

Keratoconus: An updated review

Keratoconus is a bilateral and asymmetric disease which results in progressive thinning and steeping of the cornea leading to irregular astigmatism and decreased visual acuity. Traditionally, the condition has been described as a noninflammatory disease; however, more recently it has been associated with ocular inflammation. Keratoconus normally develops in the second and third decades of life and progresses until the fourth decade. The condition affects all ethnicities and both sexes. The prevalence and incidence rates of keratoconus have been estimated to be between 0.2 and 4,790 per 100,000 persons and 1.5 and 25 cases per 100,000 persons/year, respectively, with highest rates typically occurring in 20- to 30-year-olds and Middle Eastern and Asian ethnicities. Progressive stromal thinning, rupture of the anterior limiting membrane, and subsequent ectasia of the central/paracentral cornea are the most commonly observed histopathological findings. A family history of keratoconus, eye rubbing, eczema, asthma, and allergy are risk factors for developing keratoconus. Detecting keratoconus in its earliest stages remains a challenge. Corneal topography is the primary diagnostic tool for keratoconus detection. In incipient cases, however, the use of a single parameter to diagnose keratoconus is insufficient, and in addition to corneal topography, corneal pachymetry and higher order aberration data are now commonly used. Keratoconus severity and progression may be classified based on morphological features and disease evolution, ocular signs, and index-based systems. Keratoconus treatment varies depending on disease severity and progression. Mild cases are typically treated with spectacles, moderate cases with contact lenses, while severe cases that cannot be managed with scleral contact lenses may require corneal surgery. Mild to moderate cases of progressive keratoconus may also be treated surgically, most commonly with corneal cross-linking. This article provides an updated review on the definition, epidemiology, histopathology, aetiology and pathogenesis, clinical features, detection, classification, and management and treatment strategies for keratoconus.

Sensitivity and specificity of Sirius indices in diagnosis of keratoconus and suspect keratoconus

AIM

To estimate the sensitivity and specificity of topographic and tomographic corneal parameters as determined by Sirius (CSO, Florence, Italy) in discriminating keratoconus (KC) and suspect keratoconus from normal cornea.

METHOD

In this retrospective case-series study, keratoconus screening indices were measured using Sirius tomographer. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were used to determine the test's overall predictive accuracy (area under the curve) and to identify optimal cut-off points to maximize sensitivity and specificity in differentiating keratoconus and suspect keratoconus from normal corneas.

RESULTS

Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analyses showed high predictive accuracy for Symmetry Index back (SIb), Keratoconus Vertex front (KVf), Symmetry Index front (SIf), Keratoconus Vertex back (KVb), Apex Keratometry (Curve-Apex) and Minimum corneal Thickness (ThkMin) to distinguish keratoconus from normal (area under the curve > 0.9, all). Symmetry Index back was identified as the best diagnostic parameter for detecting suspect keratoconus with AUC of 0.86. Highest specificity to detect keratoconus and suspect keratoconus was seen for SIb, 99.87% and 84.66%, respectively. These values were associated with optimal cut-off points of 0.46 D for keratoconus and 0.12 D for suspect keratoconus.

CONCLUSION

Sirius parameters evaluated in the study were effective to differentiate keratoconus from normal corneas. However, Symmetry Index back was the index with the highest ability to detect suspect keratoconus.

Quantitative comparison of corneal surface areas in keratoconus and normal eyes

Keratoconus is a highly prevalent corneal disorder characterized by progressive corneal thinning, steepening and irregular astigmatism. To date, pathophysiology of keratoconus development and progression remains debated. In this study, we retrospectively analysed topographic elevation maps from 3227 eyes of 3227 patients (969 keratoconus and 2258 normal eyes) to calculate anterior and posterior corneal surface area. We compared results from normal eyes and keratoconus eyes using the Mann–Whitney U test. The Kruskal–Wallis test was used to compare keratoconus stages according to the Amsler–Krumeich classification. Keratoconus eyes were shown to have statistically significantly larger corneal surface areas, measured at the central 4.0 mm and 8.0 mm, and total corneal diameter. However, no significant increase in corneal surface area was seen with increasing severity of keratoconus. We suggest that these results indicate redistribution, rather than increase, of the corneal surface area with keratoconus severity.

Accuracy of new Corvis ST parameters for detecting subclinical and clinical keratoconus eyes in a Chinese population

This study aimed to compare the values of new corneal visualization Scheimpflug technology (Corvis ST) parameters in normal, subclinical keratoconus (SKC) and keratoconus (KC) eyes, and evaluate the diagnostic ability to distinguish SKC and KC eyes from normal eyes. One-hundred normal, 100 SKC and 100 KC eyes were included in the study. Corvis ST parameters containing dynamic corneal response parameters were measured by one ophthalmologist. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic ability of new Corvis ST parameters. The new Corvis ST parameters in KC eyes were different from those in the control and SKC eyes after adjusting for IOP and CCT, and stiffness parameter at the first applanation (SP-A1) and Corvis biomechanical index (CBI) were significantly different between the control and SKC eyes (all P < 0.05). The parameter with the highest diagnostic efficiency was SP-A1 (Youden index = 0.40, AUC = 0.753), followed by CBI (Youden index = 0.38, AUC = 0.703), and Integrated Radius (Youden index = 0.33, AUC = 0.668) in diagnosing SKC from control eyes. New Corvis ST parameters in SKC eyes were significantly different from normal control and KC eyes, and could be considered to distinguish SKC and KC eyes from normal eyes.