1
|
Denbeigh JM, Howard ME, Garcia DA, Debrot EK, Cole KC, Remmes NB, Beltran CJ. Characterizing Proton-Induced Biological Effects in a Mouse Spinal Cord Model: A Comparison of Bragg Peak and Entrance Beam Response in Single and Fractionated Exposures. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 119:924-935. [PMID: 38310485 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.12.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Revised: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/23/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Proton relative biological effectiveness (RBE) is a dynamic variable influenced by factors like linear energy transfer (LET), dose, tissue type, and biological endpoint. The standard fixed proton RBE of 1.1, currently used in clinical planning, may not accurately represent the true biological effects of proton therapy (PT) in all cases. This uncertainty can contribute to radiation-induced normal tissue toxicity in patients. In late-responding tissues such as the spinal cord, toxicity can cause devastating complications. This study investigated spinal cord tolerance in mice subjected to proton irradiation and characterized the influence of fractionation on proton- induced myelopathy at entrance (ENT) and Bragg peak (BP) positions. METHODS AND MATERIALS Cervical spinal cords of 8-week-old C57BL/6J female mice were irradiated with single- or multi-fractions (18x) using lateral opposed radiation fields at 1 of 2 positions along the Bragg curve: ENT (dose-mean LET = 1.2 keV/μm) and BP (LET = 6.9 keV/μm). Mice were monitored over 1 year for changes in weight, mobility, and general health, with radiation-induced myelopathy as the primary biological endpoint. Calculations of the RBE of the ENT and BP curve (RBEENT/BP) were performed. RESULTS Single-fraction RBEENT/BP for 50% effect probability (tolerance dose (TD50), grade II paresis, determined using log-logistic model fitting) was 1.10 ± 0.06 (95% CI) and for multifraction treatments it was 1.19 ± 0.05 (95% CI). Higher incidence and faster onset of paralysis were seen in mice treated at the BP compared with ENT. CONCLUSIONS The findings challenge the universally fixed RBE value in PT, indicating up to a 25% mouse spinal cord RBEENT/BP variation for multifraction treatments. These results highlight the importance of considering fractionation in determining RBE for PT. Robust characterization of proton-induced toxicity, aided by in vivo models, is paramount for refining clinical decision-making and mitigating potential patient side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janet M Denbeigh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
| | - Michelle E Howard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Darwin A Garcia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Emily K Debrot
- St George Cancer Care Centre, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kristin C Cole
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Chris J Beltran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cammarata FP, Torrisi F, Vicario N, Bravatà V, Stefano A, Salvatorelli L, D'Aprile S, Giustetto P, Forte GI, Minafra L, Calvaruso M, Richiusa S, Cirrone GAP, Petringa G, Broggi G, Cosentino S, Scopelliti F, Magro G, Porro D, Libra M, Ippolito M, Russo G, Parenti R, Cuttone G. Proton boron capture therapy (PBCT) induces cell death and mitophagy in a heterotopic glioblastoma model. Commun Biol 2023; 6:388. [PMID: 37031346 PMCID: PMC10082834 DOI: 10.1038/s42003-023-04770-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite aggressive therapeutic regimens, glioblastoma (GBM) represents a deadly brain tumor with significant aggressiveness, radioresistance and chemoresistance, leading to dismal prognosis. Hypoxic microenvironment, which characterizes GBM, is associated with reduced therapeutic effectiveness. Moreover, current irradiation approaches are limited by uncertain tumor delineation and severe side effects that comprehensively lead to unsuccessful treatment and to a worsening of the quality of life of GBM patients. Proton beam offers the opportunity of reduced side effects and a depth-dose profile, which, unfortunately, are coupled with low relative biological effectiveness (RBE). The use of radiosensitizing agents, such as boron-containing molecules, enhances proton RBE and increases the effectiveness on proton beam-hit targets. We report a first preclinical evaluation of proton boron capture therapy (PBCT) in a preclinical model of GBM analyzed via μ-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (μPET-CT) assisted live imaging, finding a significant increased therapeutic effectiveness of PBCT versus proton coupled with an increased cell death and mitophagy. Our work supports PBCT and radiosensitizing agents as a scalable strategy to treat GBM exploiting ballistic advances of proton beam and increasing therapeutic effectiveness and quality of life in GBM patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Paolo Cammarata
- Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology, National Research Council, IBFM-CNR, Cefalù, Italy
- National Institute for Nuclear Physics, Laboratori Nazionali del Sud, INFN-LNS, Catania, Italy
| | - Filippo Torrisi
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Nunzio Vicario
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
- Molecular Preclinical and Translational Imaging Research Center - IMPRonTe, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Valentina Bravatà
- Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology, National Research Council, IBFM-CNR, Cefalù, Italy
| | - Alessandro Stefano
- Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology, National Research Council, IBFM-CNR, Cefalù, Italy
| | - Lucia Salvatorelli
- Department G.F. Ingrassia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele" Anatomic Pathology, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Simona D'Aprile
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Pierangela Giustetto
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Giusi Irma Forte
- Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology, National Research Council, IBFM-CNR, Cefalù, Italy
| | - Luigi Minafra
- Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology, National Research Council, IBFM-CNR, Cefalù, Italy
| | - Marco Calvaruso
- Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology, National Research Council, IBFM-CNR, Cefalù, Italy
| | - Selene Richiusa
- Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology, National Research Council, IBFM-CNR, Cefalù, Italy
| | | | - Giada Petringa
- National Institute for Nuclear Physics, Laboratori Nazionali del Sud, INFN-LNS, Catania, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Broggi
- Department G.F. Ingrassia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele" Anatomic Pathology, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | | | - Fabrizio Scopelliti
- Radiopharmacy Laboratory Nuclear Medicine Department, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy
| | - Gaetano Magro
- Department G.F. Ingrassia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele" Anatomic Pathology, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Danilo Porro
- Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology, National Research Council, IBFM-CNR, Cefalù, Italy
| | - Massimo Libra
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Massimo Ippolito
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy
| | - Giorgio Russo
- Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology, National Research Council, IBFM-CNR, Cefalù, Italy.
- National Institute for Nuclear Physics, Laboratori Nazionali del Sud, INFN-LNS, Catania, Italy.
| | - Rosalba Parenti
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
- Molecular Preclinical and Translational Imaging Research Center - IMPRonTe, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
| | - Giacomo Cuttone
- National Institute for Nuclear Physics, Laboratori Nazionali del Sud, INFN-LNS, Catania, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nguyen CN, Urquieta E. Contemporary review of dermatologic conditions in space flight and future implications for long-duration exploration missions. LIFE SCIENCES IN SPACE RESEARCH 2023; 36:147-156. [PMID: 36682824 DOI: 10.1016/j.lssr.2022.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2022] [Revised: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Future planned exploration missions to outer space will almost surely require the longest periods of continuous space exposure by the human body yet. As the most external organ, the skin seems the most vulnerable to injury. Therefore, discussion of the dermatological implications of such extended-duration missions is critical. OBJECTIVES In order to help future missions understand the risks of spaceflight on the human skin, this review aims to consolidate data from the current literature pertaining to the space environment and its physiologic effects on skin, describe all reported dermatologic manifestations in spaceflight, and extrapolate this information to longer-duration mission. METHODS AND MATERIALS The authors searched PubMed and Google Scholar using keywords and Mesh terms. The publications that were found to be relevant to the objectives were included and described. RESULTS The space environment causes changes in the skin at the cellular level by thinning the epidermis, altering wound healing, and dysregulating the immune system. Clinically, dermatological conditions represented the most common medical issues occurring in spaceflight. We predict that as exploration missions increase in duration, astronauts will experience further physiological changes and an increased rate and severity of adverse events. CONCLUSION Maximizing astronaut safety requires a continued knowledge of the human body's response to space, as well as consideration and prediction of future events. Dermatologic effects of space missions comprise the majority of health-related issues arising on missions to outer space, and these issues are likely to become more prominent with increasing time spent in space. Improvements in hygiene may mitigate some of these conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Emmanuel Urquieta
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Center for Space Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine. Houston TX, United States; Translational Research Institute for Space Health, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Welzel T, Bendinger AL, Glowa C, Babushkina I, Jugold M, Peschke P, Debus J, Karger CP, Saager M. Longitudinal MRI study after carbon ion and photon irradiation: shorter latency time for myelopathy is not associated with differential morphological changes. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:63. [PMID: 33789720 PMCID: PMC8011205 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01792-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2020] [Accepted: 03/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiation-induced myelopathy is a severe and irreversible complication that occurs after a long symptom-free latency time if the spinal cord was exposed to a significant irradiation dose during tumor treatment. As carbon ions are increasingly investigated for tumor treatment in clinical trials, their effect on normal tissue needs further investigation to assure safety of patient treatments. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-visible morphological alterations could serve as predictive markers for medicinal interventions to avoid severe side effects. Thus, MRI-visible morphological alterations in the rat spinal cord after high dose photon and carbon ion irradiation and their latency times were investigated. METHODS Rats whose spinal cords were irradiated with iso-effective high photon (n = 8) or carbon ion (n = 8) doses as well as sham-treated control animals (n = 6) underwent frequent MRI measurements until they developed radiation-induced myelopathy (paresis II). MR images were analyzed for morphological alterations and animals were regularly tested for neurological deficits. In addition, histological analysis was performed of animals suffering from paresis II compared to controls. RESULTS For both beam modalities, first morphological alterations occurred outside the spinal cord (bone marrow conversion, contrast agent accumulation in the musculature ventral and dorsal to the spinal cord) followed by morphological alterations inside the spinal cord (edema, syrinx, contrast agent accumulation) and eventually neurological alterations (paresis I and II). Latency times were significantly shorter after carbon ions as compared to photon irradiation. CONCLUSIONS Irradiation of the rat spinal cord with photon or carbon ion doses that lead to 100% myelopathy induced a comparable fixed sequence of MRI-visible morphological alterations and neurological distortions. However, at least in the animal model used in this study, the observed MRI-visible morphological alterations in the spinal cord are not suited as predictive markers to identify animals that will develop myelopathy as the time between MRI-visible alterations and the occurrence of myelopathy is too short to intervene with protective or mitigative drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Welzel
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) and National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alina L Bendinger
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) and National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany. .,Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology (E040), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Christin Glowa
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) and National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology (E040), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Inna Babushkina
- Core Facility Small Animal Imaging Center, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Manfred Jugold
- Core Facility Small Animal Imaging Center, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Peschke
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) and National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology (E040), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Therapy, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian P Karger
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) and National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology (E040), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maria Saager
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) and National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology (E040), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kern A, Bäumer C, Kröninger K, Wulff J, Timmermann B. Impact of air gap, range shifter, and delivery technique on skin dose in proton therapy. Med Phys 2020; 48:831-840. [PMID: 33368345 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2020] [Revised: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 11/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Side effects of radiation therapy may include skin damage. The surface dose is of great interest and contains the buildup effect. In particular, the proton therapy community requires further experimental data to quantify doses in the surface region. This specification includes the skin dose, which is defined according to ICRU Report No. 39 at 70 μm water equivalent depth. The aim of this study is to gather more knowledge of the skin dose by varying key parameters defined by the patient treatment plan. This consists of clinical aspects such as the influence of the air gap, the application of a range shifter (RS), or the proton delivery technique. MATERIAL/METHODS Skin doses were determined with a PTW 23391 extrapolation chamber with three thin Kapton® entrance windows operated as a conventional ionization chamber. The impact on the skin dose for quasi-monoenergetic pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton beams was evaluated for clinical air gaps between 3.5 and 51.1 cm. The differences in skin dose were assessed by irradiating equivalent fields with an RS of 51 mm water equivalent thickness (RS51) and without. Furthermore, the delivery techniques PBS, uniform scanning (US), and double scattering (DS) were compared by defining a spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP). TOPAS (V.3.1.2) was used to model an IBA nozzle with PBS and to score dose to water at the surface of a water phantom. RESULTS For the monoenergetic fields without the application of the RS the skin dose was constant down to an air gap of 6.2 cm. A lower air gap of 3.5 cm showed a variation in skin dose by up to 2.4% compared to the results obtained with larger air gaps. With the inserted RS51 an increase in the skin dose was found for air gaps smaller than 11.3 cm. Experimentally, a dose difference of 1.4% was recorded for an air gap of 6.2 cm by inserting an RS and none. With the Monte Carlo calculations the largest dose increase was observed at the air gap of 3.5 cm with 1.7% and 4.0% relative to the skin dose results without the RS and to the largest evaluated air gap of 51.1 cm, respectively. The SOBP comparison of the beam modalities at the measuring plane at the isocenter revealed higher skin doses without RS (including RS) by up to +1.9% (+1.5%) for DS and +1.3% (+1.1%) for US compared to PBS. For all three techniques an approx. 2% rise in skin dose was observed for the largest evaluated air gap of 37.7 cm to an air gap of 6.2 cm when using an RS51. CONCLUSION The study investigated aspects of skin dose of a water equivalent phantom by varying key parameters of a proton treatment plan. Parameters like the RS, the air gap, and the delivery modality have an impact on the order of 4.0% for the skin dose at the depth of 70 μm. The increases in skin dose are the effects of the contribution of the increased electron fluence at small air gaps and the emitted hadronic particles produced by the RS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Kern
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen, 45147, Germany.,University Hospital Essen, Essen, 45147, Germany.,Faculty of Physics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, 44227, Germany.,West German Cancer Center (WTZ), Essen, 45147, Germany
| | - C Bäumer
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen, 45147, Germany.,University Hospital Essen, Essen, 45147, Germany.,West German Cancer Center (WTZ), Essen, 45147, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.,Faculty of Physics, Essen, 45147, Germany
| | - K Kröninger
- Faculty of Physics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, 44227, Germany
| | - J Wulff
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen, 45147, Germany.,University Hospital Essen, Essen, 45147, Germany.,West German Cancer Center (WTZ), Essen, 45147, Germany
| | - B Timmermann
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen, 45147, Germany.,University Hospital Essen, Essen, 45147, Germany.,West German Cancer Center (WTZ), Essen, 45147, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.,Clinic for Particle Therapy, Essen, 45147, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cammarata FP, Forte GI, Broggi G, Bravatà V, Minafra L, Pisciotta P, Calvaruso M, Tringali R, Tomasello B, Torrisi F, Petringa G, Cirrone GAP, Cuttone G, Acquaviva R, Caltabiano R, Russo G. Molecular Investigation on a Triple Negative Breast Cancer Xenograft Model Exposed to Proton Beams. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:ijms21176337. [PMID: 32882850 PMCID: PMC7503243 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21176337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2020] [Revised: 08/28/2020] [Accepted: 08/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Specific breast cancer (BC) subtypes are associated with bad prognoses due to the absence of successful treatment plans. The triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtype, with estrogen (ER), progesterone (PR) and human epidermal growth factor-2 (HER2) negative receptor status, is a clinical challenge for oncologists, because of its aggressiveness and the absence of effective therapies. In addition, proton therapy (PT) represents an effective treatment against both inaccessible area located or conventional radiotherapy (RT)-resistant cancers, becoming a promising therapeutic choice for TNBC. Our study aimed to analyze the in vivo molecular response to PT and its efficacy in a MDA-MB-231 TNBC xenograft model. TNBC xenograft models were irradiated with 2, 6 and 9 Gy of PT. Gene expression profile (GEP) analyses and immunohistochemical assay (IHC) were performed to highlight specific pathways and key molecules involved in cell response to the radiation. GEP analysis revealed in depth the molecular response to PT, showing a considerable immune response, cell cycle and stem cell process regulation. Only the dose of 9 Gy shifted the balance toward pro-death signaling as a dose escalation which can be easily performed using proton beams, which permit targeting tumors while avoiding damage to the surrounding healthy tissue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco P. Cammarata
- Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology (IBFM-CNR), 90015 Cefalù (Palermo), Italy; (F.P.C.); (G.I.F.); (L.M.); (M.C.); (G.R.)
- National Laboratory of South, National Institute for Nuclear Physics (LNS-INFN), 95123 Catania, Italy; (P.P.); (F.T.); (G.P.); (G.A.P.C.); (G.C.)
| | - Giusi I. Forte
- Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology (IBFM-CNR), 90015 Cefalù (Palermo), Italy; (F.P.C.); (G.I.F.); (L.M.); (M.C.); (G.R.)
- National Laboratory of South, National Institute for Nuclear Physics (LNS-INFN), 95123 Catania, Italy; (P.P.); (F.T.); (G.P.); (G.A.P.C.); (G.C.)
| | - Giuseppe Broggi
- Department of Medical, Surgical and Advanced Technological Sciences “Gian Filippo Ingrassia”, Section of Anatomic Pathology, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy; (G.B.); (R.C.)
| | - Valentina Bravatà
- Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology (IBFM-CNR), 90015 Cefalù (Palermo), Italy; (F.P.C.); (G.I.F.); (L.M.); (M.C.); (G.R.)
- National Laboratory of South, National Institute for Nuclear Physics (LNS-INFN), 95123 Catania, Italy; (P.P.); (F.T.); (G.P.); (G.A.P.C.); (G.C.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Luigi Minafra
- Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology (IBFM-CNR), 90015 Cefalù (Palermo), Italy; (F.P.C.); (G.I.F.); (L.M.); (M.C.); (G.R.)
- National Laboratory of South, National Institute for Nuclear Physics (LNS-INFN), 95123 Catania, Italy; (P.P.); (F.T.); (G.P.); (G.A.P.C.); (G.C.)
| | - Pietro Pisciotta
- National Laboratory of South, National Institute for Nuclear Physics (LNS-INFN), 95123 Catania, Italy; (P.P.); (F.T.); (G.P.); (G.A.P.C.); (G.C.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marco Calvaruso
- Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology (IBFM-CNR), 90015 Cefalù (Palermo), Italy; (F.P.C.); (G.I.F.); (L.M.); (M.C.); (G.R.)
- National Laboratory of South, National Institute for Nuclear Physics (LNS-INFN), 95123 Catania, Italy; (P.P.); (F.T.); (G.P.); (G.A.P.C.); (G.C.)
| | - Roberta Tringali
- Department of Drug Science, Section of Biochemistry, University of Catania, 95125 Catania, Italy; (R.T.); (B.T.); (R.A.)
| | - Barbara Tomasello
- Department of Drug Science, Section of Biochemistry, University of Catania, 95125 Catania, Italy; (R.T.); (B.T.); (R.A.)
| | - Filippo Torrisi
- National Laboratory of South, National Institute for Nuclear Physics (LNS-INFN), 95123 Catania, Italy; (P.P.); (F.T.); (G.P.); (G.A.P.C.); (G.C.)
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences (BIOMETEC), University of Catania, 95124 Catania, Italy
| | - Giada Petringa
- National Laboratory of South, National Institute for Nuclear Physics (LNS-INFN), 95123 Catania, Italy; (P.P.); (F.T.); (G.P.); (G.A.P.C.); (G.C.)
| | - Giuseppe A. P. Cirrone
- National Laboratory of South, National Institute for Nuclear Physics (LNS-INFN), 95123 Catania, Italy; (P.P.); (F.T.); (G.P.); (G.A.P.C.); (G.C.)
| | - Giacomo Cuttone
- National Laboratory of South, National Institute for Nuclear Physics (LNS-INFN), 95123 Catania, Italy; (P.P.); (F.T.); (G.P.); (G.A.P.C.); (G.C.)
| | - Rosaria Acquaviva
- Department of Drug Science, Section of Biochemistry, University of Catania, 95125 Catania, Italy; (R.T.); (B.T.); (R.A.)
| | - Rosario Caltabiano
- Department of Medical, Surgical and Advanced Technological Sciences “Gian Filippo Ingrassia”, Section of Anatomic Pathology, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy; (G.B.); (R.C.)
| | - Giorgio Russo
- Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology (IBFM-CNR), 90015 Cefalù (Palermo), Italy; (F.P.C.); (G.I.F.); (L.M.); (M.C.); (G.R.)
- National Laboratory of South, National Institute for Nuclear Physics (LNS-INFN), 95123 Catania, Italy; (P.P.); (F.T.); (G.P.); (G.A.P.C.); (G.C.)
| |
Collapse
|