Phenotypic and lifestyle determinants of HbA1c in the general population-The Hoorn Study

The Semmelweis Study: a longitudinal occupational cohort study within the framework of the Semmelweis Caring University Model Program for supporting healthy aging

The Semmelweis Study is a prospective occupational cohort study that seeks to enroll all employees of Semmelweis University (Budapest, Hungary) aged 25 years and older, with a population of 8866 people, 70.5% of whom are women. The study builds on the successful experiences of the Whitehall II study and aims to investigate the complex relationships between lifestyle, environmental, and occupational risk factors, and the development and progression of chronic age-associated diseases. An important goal of the Semmelweis Study is to identify groups of people who are aging unsuccessfully and therefore have an increased risk of developing age-associated diseases. To achieve this, the study takes a multidisciplinary approach, collecting economic, social, psychological, cognitive, health, and biological data. The Semmelweis Study comprises a baseline data collection with open healthcare data linkage, followed by repeated data collection waves every 5 years. Data are collected through computer-assisted self-completed questionnaires, followed by a physical health examination, physiological measurements, and the assessment of biomarkers. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the Semmelweis Study, including its origin, context, objectives, design, relevance, and expected contributions.

Effect of liraglutide combined with metformin or acarbose on glucose control in type 2 diabetes mellitus and risk factors of gastrointestinal adverse reactions

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of liraglutide combined with metformin or acarbose on glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and to analyze the risk factors of gastrointestinal adverse reactions.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted on 88 T2DM patients who were treated in our hospital from February 2019 to August 2021. The patients were divided into Group A (n=40) and Group B (n=48) according to different treatment methods. Group A was treated with liraglutide and metformin, while Group B was given liraglutide and acarbose. The effects of glucose control (FPG, 2hPG, HbA1c), inflammatory indexes (IL-6, CRP, SAA), fasting C-peptide, 2-h postprandial C-peptide levels and adverse reactions were compared. Afterwards, The risk factors of gastrointestinal adverse reactions were assessed via logistics regression.

RESULTS

It was found that the FPG, 2hPG and HbA1c levels after treatment were lower than those before treatment (P<0.05), and the levels in group A were lower than those in group B (P<0.05). The serum IL-6, CRP and SAA levels after treatment were lower than those before treatment (P<0.05), but there was no marked difference between the two groups after treatment (P>0.05). The fasting C-peptide and 2-h postprandial C-peptide levels in group A after treatment were higher than those in group B (P<0.05). Logistics regression analysis revealed that complicated digestive system diseases and combined use of acarbose were independent risk factors.

CONCLUSION

Compared with liraglutide and acarbose, liraglutide and metformin has better glucose control effect in T2DM. Although there is no obvious difference in eliminating inflammation, liraglutide combined with acarbose will increase the incidence of gastrointestinal adverse reactions in patients. So, liraglutide combined with metformin is recommended for T2DM treatment.