1
|
Gram P, Andersen CG, Petersen KS, Frederiksen MS, Thomsen LLH, Overgaard C. Identifying psychosocial vulnerabilities in pregnancy: A mixed-method systematic review of the knowledge base of antenatal conversational psychosocial assessment tools. Midwifery 2024; 136:104066. [PMID: 38905861 DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2024.104066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Revised: 06/03/2024] [Accepted: 06/11/2024] [Indexed: 06/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early identification of psychosocial vulnerability among expectant parents through psychosocial assessment is increasingly recommended within maternity care. For routine antenatal assessment, a strong recognition exists regarding conversational assessment tools. However, the knowledge base of conversational tools is limited, inhibiting their clinical use. OBJECTIVE Synthesising existing knowledge pertaining to antenatal conversational psychosocial assessment tools, including identifying characteristics, acceptability, performance, effectiveness and unintended consequences. DESIGN Mixed-method systematic review based on searches in CINAHL, PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane and Scopus. 20 out of 5394 studies were included and synthesised with a convergent integrated approach using a thematic analysis strategy. FINDINGS We identified seven antenatal psychosocial assessment tools that partially or completely utilised a conversational approach. Women's acceptability was high, and tools were generally found to support person-centred communication and the parent-health care professional relationship. Evidence regarding effectiveness and performance of conversational tools was limited. Unintended consequences were found, including some women having negative experiences related to assessment of intimate partner violence, lack of preparation and lack of relevance. High acceptability was reported by health care professionals who considered the tools as valuable and enhancing of identification of vulnerability. Unintended consequences, including lack of time and competencies as well as discomfort when assessment is very sensitive, were reported. CONCLUSIONS Evidence regarding conversational tools' effectiveness and performance is limited. More is known about the acceptability of conversational tools, which is generally highly acceptable among women and health care professionals. Some unintended consequences of the use of included conversational tools were identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pernille Gram
- Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Selma Lagerløfs Vej 249, Gistrup 9260, Denmark; Center for General Practice, Aalborg University, Selma Lagerløfs Vej 249, Gistrup 9260, Denmark.
| | - Clara Graugaard Andersen
- Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Selma Lagerløfs Vej 249, Gistrup 9260, Denmark; Research Team of Women, Children, Youth and Families Health, Unit of Health Promotion, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg Ø 6705, Denmark
| | - Kirsten Schultz Petersen
- Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Selma Lagerløfs Vej 249, Gistrup 9260, Denmark
| | - Marianne Stistrup Frederiksen
- Research Team of Women, Children, Youth and Families Health, Unit of Health Promotion, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg Ø 6705, Denmark
| | - Louise Lund Holm Thomsen
- Research Team of Women, Children, Youth and Families Health, Unit of Health Promotion, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg Ø 6705, Denmark
| | - Charlotte Overgaard
- Research Team of Women, Children, Youth and Families Health, Unit of Health Promotion, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg Ø 6705, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Meldrum K, Andersson E, Wallace V, Webb T, Quigley R, Strivens E, Russell S. Approaches to the development of new screening tools that assess distress in Indigenous peoples: A systematic mixed studies review. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0291141. [PMID: 37682832 PMCID: PMC10490875 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
This mixed studies review assessed the extent of the literature related to approaches used to develop new tools that screen for distress in Indigenous adults globally. It answered the research question: What qualitative and quantitative approaches are used to develop new screening tools that assess distress in Indigenous peoples globally? CINAHL, Embase, Emcare, Medline, PsychInfo and Scopus databases were systematically searched to identify relevant articles published between January 2000 and February 2023. Articles describing the development of a new screening tool for Indigenous peoples, globally, published in English since 2000 and constituted a full publication of primary research, met the inclusion criteria. Studies underwent quality appraisal using the Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool. A sequential exploratory design guided data analysis. Synthesis occurred using a two-phase sequential method. Nineteen articles constituted the data set. Articles described the use of qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods in approximately equal numbers. Overall, qualitative methods were used in early stages of tool development, with mixed and quantitative methods used to pilot and validate them. However, most studies did not follow the theoretical guidelines for tool development, and while validation studies took place in over half of the data set, none adequately assessed construct validity. Sixty percent of the articles were located using citation searches, which suggests database searches were ineffective. Valid tools that screen for distress in Indigenous populations support equitable access to health care. This review found that most screening tools were developed in Australia. However, additional evidence of their validity is needed in addition to a valid diagnostic tool that supports the determination of criterion validity. These needs present important future research opportunities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn Meldrum
- College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia
| | | | - Valda Wallace
- College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia
| | - Torres Webb
- College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia
| | - Rachel Quigley
- College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia
| | - Edward Strivens
- College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia
- Queensland Health, Cairns and Hinterland Hospital and Health Service, Cairns, Queensland, Australia
| | - Sarah Russell
- College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cull J, Thomson G, Downe S, Fine M, Topalidou A. Views from women and maternity care professionals on routine discussion of previous trauma in the perinatal period: A qualitative evidence synthesis. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0284119. [PMID: 37195971 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Over a third of pregnant women (around 250,000) each year in the United Kingdom have experienced trauma such as domestic abuse, childhood trauma or sexual assault. These experiences can have a long-term impact on women's mental and physical health. This global qualitative evidence synthesis explores the views of women and maternity care professionals on routine discussion of previous trauma in the perinatal period. METHODS Systematic database searches (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL Plus, APA PsycINFO and Global Index Medicus) were conducted in July 2021 and updated in April 2022. The quality of each study was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. We thematically synthesised the data and assessed confidence in findings using GRADE-CERQual. RESULTS We included 25 papers, from five countries, published between 2001 and 2022. All the studies were conducted in high-income countries; therefore findings cannot be applied to low- or middle-income countries. Confidence in most of the review findings was moderate or high. The findings are presented in six themes. These themes described how women and clinicians felt trauma discussions were valuable and worthwhile, provided there was adequate time and appropriate referral pathways. However, women often found being asked about previous trauma to be unexpected and intrusive, and women with limited English faced additional challenges. Many pregnant women were unaware of the extent of the trauma they have suffered, or its impact on their lives. Before disclosing trauma, women needed to have a trusting relationship with a clinician; even so, some women chose not to share their histories. Hearing trauma disclosures could be distressing for clinicians. CONCLUSION Discussions of previous trauma should be undertaken when women want to have the discussion, when there is time to understand and respond to the needs and concerns of each individual, and when there are effective resources available for follow up if needed. Continuity of carer should be considered a key feature of routine trauma discussion, as many women will not disclose their histories to a stranger. All women should be provided with information about the impact of trauma and how to independently access support in the event of non-disclosures. Care providers need support to carry out these discussions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Cull
- School of Community Health and Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, England
| | - Gill Thomson
- School of Community Health and Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, England
| | - Soo Downe
- School of Community Health and Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, England
| | - Michelle Fine
- Public Science Project, The Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Anastasia Topalidou
- School of Community Health and Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, England
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Carlin E, Ferrari K, Spry EP, Williams M, Atkinson D, Marley JV. Implementation of the ‘Kimberley Mum’s Mood Scale’ across primary health care services in the Kimberley region of Western Australia: A mixed methods assessment. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0273689. [PMID: 36054104 PMCID: PMC9439224 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Accepted: 08/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The Kimberley Mum’s Mood Scale (KMMS) was co-designed with Aboriginal women and healthcare professionals to improve culturally appropriate screening practices for perinatal depression and anxiety. This paper describes the implementation of the KMMS across the remote Kimberley region of Western Australia from January 2018 to December 2021. We used the Dynamic Sustainability Framework to progress the implementation and assess at the intervention, practice setting and ecological system level using a mixed methods approach to analyse implementation. Rates of administration and results of screening were described using a retrospective audit of electronic medical records. Analyses of KMMS training registry, stakeholder engagement and sustainability initiatives were descriptive. KMMS acceptability was assessed using qualitative descriptive approaches to analyse patient feedback forms (n = 39), healthcare professional surveys (n = 15) and qualitative interviews with healthcare professionals (n = 6). We found a significant increase in overall recorded perinatal screening (pre-implementation: 30.4% v Year 3: 46.5%, P < 0.001) and use of the KMMS (pre-implementation: 16.4% v Year 3: 46.4%, P < 0.001). There was improved fidelity in completing the KMMS (from 2.3% to 61.8%, P < 0.001), with 23.6% of women screened recorded as being at increased risk of depression and anxiety. Most healthcare professionals noted the high levels of perinatal mental health concerns, stress, and trauma that their patients experienced, and identified the KMMS as the most appropriate perinatal screening tool. Aboriginal women reported that it was important for clinics to ask about mood and feelings during the perinatal period, and that the KMMS was appropriate. Aboriginal women consistently reported that it was good to have someone to talk to. This study demonstrates that innovation in perinatal depression and anxiety screening for Aboriginal women is possible and can be implemented into routine clinical care with the support of a sustained multi-year investment and strong partnerships.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Carlin
- The Rural Clinical School of Western Australia, The University of Western Australia, Broome, Western Australia, Australia
- Kimberley Aboriginal Medical Services, Broome, Western Australia, Australia
- * E-mail:
| | - Katherine Ferrari
- Kimberley Aboriginal Medical Services, Broome, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Erica P. Spry
- The Rural Clinical School of Western Australia, The University of Western Australia, Broome, Western Australia, Australia
- Kimberley Aboriginal Medical Services, Broome, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Melissa Williams
- Kimberley Population Health Unit, Western Australian Country Health Service, Broome, Western Australia, Australia
| | - David Atkinson
- The Rural Clinical School of Western Australia, The University of Western Australia, Broome, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Julia V. Marley
- The Rural Clinical School of Western Australia, The University of Western Australia, Broome, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gardiner F, Middleton J, Perera S, Gunner M, Churilov L, Coleman M, Poole L. Cohort study comparison of Mental Health and Wellbeing Services delivered by The Royal Flying Doctor Service, across Far North and Central West Queensland. THE LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH. WESTERN PACIFIC 2022; 21:100385. [PMID: 35540562 PMCID: PMC9079348 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Background Understanding cultural differences between geographical regions is essential in delivering culturally appropriate healthcare. We aimed to describe the characteristics and outcomes of diverse clients using the Far North Mental Health and Wellbeing Service (FNS) and the Central West Health and Wellbeing Service (CWS). Methods We conducted a cohort study within Queensland, Australia, on all clients who received a mental health therapy session at either the FNS or the CWS. Patient data was prospective data collected form July 2019 to December 2020. Findings There were1202 clients, with a median number of individual contacts per-client of 3.0 (IQR 2.0-6.0). There was 428 (35.6% 95% CI 32.90-38.39) males and 772 (64.2% 95% CI 61.44-66.94) females with a median age across the genders of 38.0 (IQR 28.0-51.0). There was 505 (42.0% 95% CI 39.20-44.86) identifying as Indigenous and 697 (58.0% 95% CI 55.14-60.80) as non-Indigenous Australians. The FNS had a significantly higher proportion of Indigenous clients (n=484; 54.8% 95% CI 51.46-58.13) as compared to the CWS (n=21; 6.6% 95% CI 4.12-9.89). Of the 1202 clients, 946 (78.7% 95% CI 76.28-80.99) had a socio-economic classification of ‘most disadvantaged’, consisting of 740 (83.8%) clients from the FNS and 206 (64.6%) clients from the CWS. The majority of presentations were for neurotic, stress-related and somatoform disorders (n=568; 47.3%), followed by mood affective disorders (n=310; 25.8%). The overall number of treatments strategies employed was 10798, equalling a median of 6.0 (IQR 4.0-9.0) strategies per-client, with the leading strategies being counselling/psychosocial (n=1394; 12.9%), reflective listening (n=1191; 11.0%), and strengths based reasoning (n=1116; 10.3%). There were 511 (42.5%) clients who completed the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10/K5), with 493 (41.0%) clients not offered as deemed not culturally appropriate by the treating team. The mean initial K10/K5 score was 23.7 (SD 9.4) which significantly decreased (p<0.001) to 18.0 (SD 10.0) at final consultation. Interpretation This study highlighted client socioeconomic differences between two geographically remote mental health services. It is essential that services are regionally co-designed to ensure cultural appropriateness. Funding No funding to declare.
Collapse
|
6
|
Carlin E, Cox Z, Orazi K, Derry KL, Dudgeon P. Exploring Mental Health Presentations in Remote Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services in the Kimberley Region of Western Australia Using an Audit and File Reviews. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:1743. [PMID: 35162765 PMCID: PMC8835535 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19031743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2021] [Revised: 01/25/2022] [Accepted: 01/29/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
The study aims to explore the role of mental health care in remote Aboriginal health services in the Kimberley region of Western Australia and provide a more nuanced understanding of the patients presenting for care, their needs, and the clinical response. Little is currently known about primary health care presentations for mental health, suicide, and self-harm for remote dwelling Aboriginal residents of the Kimberley region, despite high rates of psychological distress, self-harm, and suicide across the area. This study was progressed through a retrospective, cross-sectional audit of the electronic medical records system used by three remote clinics to explore the interactions recorded by the clinics about a patient's mental health. In addition, an in-depth file review was conducted on a stratified purposive sample of 30 patients identified through the audit. Mental ill-health and psychological distress were found to be prominent within clinical presentations. Psychosocial factors were frequently identified in relation to a patient's mental health presentation. Optimizing patients' recovery and wellness through service improvements, including an enhanced mental health model of care, is an important next step.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Carlin
- Kimberley Aboriginal Medical Services, Broome, WA 6725, Australia;
- The Rural Clinical School of Western Australia, The University of Western Australia, Broome, WA 6725, Australia;
| | - Zaccariah Cox
- Kimberley Aboriginal Medical Services, Broome, WA 6725, Australia;
| | - Kristen Orazi
- The Rural Clinical School of Western Australia, The University of Western Australia, Broome, WA 6725, Australia;
| | - Kate L. Derry
- School of Indigenous Studies, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia; (K.L.D.); (P.D.)
| | - Pat Dudgeon
- School of Indigenous Studies, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia; (K.L.D.); (P.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Risk and resilience: a mixed methods investigation of Aboriginal Australian women's perinatal mental health screening assessments. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2021; 56:547-557. [PMID: 33226453 PMCID: PMC8053144 DOI: 10.1007/s00127-020-01986-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2020] [Accepted: 11/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe the psychosocial protective and risk factors for perinatal mental health identified in a sample of Aboriginal women's Kimberley Mum's Mood Scale (KMMS) assessments and explore the role of these factors in their screening assessment and diagnostic outcome. METHODS We used a mixed methods approach to retrospectively analyse a cross-sectional study dataset of 91 completed KMMS assessments. This included: categorising the clinical notes from the KMMS psychosocial yarn into 'risk' and 'protective' factors and describing these categories, describing the number and type of risk and protective factors associated with different KMMS risk assessment categories (no, low, medium, high), and exploring relationships between these risk and protective factors and diagnosis of perinatal depression and/or anxiety. RESULTS Protective factors were recorded for the vast majority of the women; the most prominent was positive family relationships. When protective and risk factors were stratified by KMMS risk category, women in the higher risk group less commonly had specific protective factors (11-33% high vs 61-100% no risk) and more commonly had risk factors (22-67% high vs 6-28% no risk) than women with lower KMMS assessed risk. The average number of protective factors decreased with increasing KMMS risk category (4.9 ± 1.1 to 1.6 ± 1.3), with the inverse pattern for risk factors (1.1 ± 1.1 to 3.8 ± 1.0). Having protective factors also appeared to reduce the risk of developing clinical depression or anxiety. CONCLUSION Assessing protective factors in mental health screening for perinatal Aboriginal women increases the effectiveness of screening and provides a foundation for the delivery of local structured psychosocial care.
Collapse
|