1
|
Jin J, Al-Shamali HF, McWeeny R, Sawalha J, Shalaby R, Marshall T, Greenshaw AJ, Cao B, Zhang Y, Demas M, Dursun SM, Dennett L, Suleman R. Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Cognitive Deficits in Depression: A Systematic Review. PSYCHIAT CLIN PSYCH 2023; 33:330-343. [PMID: 38765850 PMCID: PMC11037476 DOI: 10.5152/pcp.2023.22583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 04/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Major depressive disorder is the leading cause of mental health-related burden globally and up to one-third of major depressive disorder patients never achieve remission. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation is a non-invasive intervention used to treat individuals diagnosed with major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder. Since the last transcranial direct current stimulation review specifically focusing on cognitive symptoms in major depressive disorder, twice as many papers have been published. Methods A systematic review was conducted with 5 electronic databases from database inception until March 21, 2022. Randomized controlled trials with at least 1 arm evaluating transcranial direct current stimulation in adults (diagnosed with major depressive disorder or bipolar disorder using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders or International Classification of Diseases criteria) aged 18 or older were included. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were adopted. Results : A total of 972 participants were included across 14 studies (60.5% female; mean age of 47.0 years [SD = 16.8]). Nine studies focused on participants with major depressive disorder and all studies used the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders to diagnose the participants. Seven out of the 14 studies showed significant improvements in at least 1 cognitive outcome measure in the active transcranial direct current stimulation group compared to the sham group. Several cognitive measures were used across studies, and 12 of the 14 studies reported mild-to-moderate side effects from treatment. Conclusion : Current transcranial direct current stimulation literature has shown limited evidence for the treatment of cognitive impairments in major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder. Future research that applies machine learning algorithms may enable us to distinguish responders from non-responders, increasing clinical benefits of transcranial direct current stimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Jin
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | | | - Robert McWeeny
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Jeff Sawalha
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Reham Shalaby
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Tyler Marshall
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | | | - Bo Cao
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Yanbo Zhang
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Michael Demas
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Serdar M. Dursun
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Liz Dennett
- Scott Health Sciences Library, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Raheem Suleman
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Imperio CM, Chua EF. HD-tDCS over the left DLPFC increases cued recall and subjective question familiarity rather than other aspects of memory and metamemory. Brain Res 2023; 1819:148538. [PMID: 37595661 PMCID: PMC10548440 DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2023.148538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Revised: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 08/20/2023]
Abstract
When retrieving information from memory there is an interplay between memory and metamemory processes, and the prefrontal cortex has been implicated in both memory and metamemory. Previous work shown that High Definition transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (HD-tDCS) over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) can lead to improvements in memory and metamemory monitoring, but findings are mixed. Our original design targeted metamemory, but because the prefrontal cortex plays a role in both memory and metamemory, we tested for effects of HD-tDCS on multiple memory tasks (e.g., recall, cued recall, and recognition) and multiple aspects of metamemory (e.g., once-knew-it ratings, feeling-of-knowing ratings, metamemory accuracy, and metamemory control). There were HD-tDCS-related improvements in cued recall performance, but not other memory tasks. For metamemory, there were HD-tDCS-related increases in subjective once-knew-it ratings, but not other aspects of metamemory. These results highlight the need to consider the effects of HD-tDCS on memory and metamemory at different timepoints during retrieval, as well as specific conditions that show benefits from HD-tDCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Casey M Imperio
- The Graduate Center of the City University of New York, Department of Psychology, 365 5th Ave., New York, NY 10016, USA; Brooklyn College of the City University of New York, Department of Psychology, 2900 Bedford Ave., Brooklyn, NY 11210, USA.
| | - Elizabeth F Chua
- The Graduate Center of the City University of New York, Department of Psychology, 365 5th Ave., New York, NY 10016, USA; Brooklyn College of the City University of New York, Department of Psychology, 2900 Bedford Ave., Brooklyn, NY 11210, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Petrovskaya A, Tverskoi A, Medvedeva A, Nazarova M. Is blood-brain barrier a probable mediator of non-invasive brain stimulation effects on Alzheimer's disease? Commun Biol 2023; 6:416. [PMID: 37059824 PMCID: PMC10104838 DOI: 10.1038/s42003-023-04717-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 04/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a complex neurodegenerative disease with no existing treatment leading to full recovery. The blood-brain barrier (BBB) breakdown usually precedes the advent of first symptoms in AD and accompanies the progression of the disease. At the same time deliberate BBB opening may be beneficial for drug delivery in AD. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques, primarily transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), have shown multiple evidence of being able to alleviate symptoms of AD. Currently, TMS/tDCS mechanisms are mostly investigated in terms of their neuronal effects, while their possible non-neuronal effects, including mitigation of the BBB disruption, are less studied. We argue that studies of TMS/tDCS effects on the BBB in AD are necessary to boost the effectiveness of neuromodulation in AD. Moreover, such studies are important considering the safety issues of TMS/tDCS use in the advanced AD stages when the BBB is usually dramatically deteriorated. Here, we elucidate the evidence of NIBS-induced BBB opening and closing in various models from in vitro to humans, and highlight its importance in AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleksandra Petrovskaya
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 119991, Russia.
| | - Artem Tverskoi
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 119991, Russia
| | - Angela Medvedeva
- Department of Chemistry, Rice University, Houston, TX, 77005, US
| | - Maria Nazarova
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA
- Center for Cognition and Decision Making, Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, 101000, Russian Federation
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yan J, Chen L, Yu Y, Xu H, Xu Z, Sheng Y, Chen J. Neuroimaging-ITM: A Text Mining Pipeline Combining Deep Adversarial Learning with Interaction Based Topic Modeling for Enabling the FAIR Neuroimaging Study. Neuroinformatics 2022; 20:701-726. [PMID: 35235184 DOI: 10.1007/s12021-022-09571-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Sharing various neuroimaging digital resources have received widespread attention in FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable) neuroscience. In order to support a comprehensive understanding of brain cognition, neuroimaging provenance should be constructed to characterize both research processes and results, and integrates various digital resources for quick replication and open cooperation. This brings new challenges to neuroimaging text mining, including fragmented information, lack of labelled corpora, and vague topics. This paper proposes a text mining pipeline for enabling the FAIR neuroimaging study. In order to avoid fragmented information, the Brain Informatics provenance model is redesigned based on NIDM (Neuroimaging Data Model) and FAIR facets. It can systematically capture the provenance requests from the FAIR neuroimaging study and then transform them into a group of text mining tasks. A neuroimaging text mining pipeline combining deep adversarial learning with interaction based topic modeling, called neuroimaging interaction topic model (Neuroimaging-ITM), is proposed to automatically extract neuroimaging provenance and identify research topics in the few-shot scenario. Finally, a group of experiments is completed by using real data from the journal PloS One. The experimental results show that Neuroimaging-ITM can systematically and accurately extract provenance information and obtain high-quality research topics from the full text of neuroimaging articles. Most of the mean F1 values of provenance extraction exceed 0.9. The topic coherence and KL (Kullback-Leibler) divergence reach 9.95 and 0.96 respectively. The results are obviously better than baseline methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianzhuo Yan
- Faculty of Information Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China.,Engineering Research Center of Digital Community, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China
| | - Lihong Chen
- Faculty of Information Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China.,Engineering Research Center of Digital Community, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China
| | - Yongchuan Yu
- Faculty of Information Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China.,Engineering Research Center of Digital Community, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China
| | - Hongxia Xu
- Faculty of Information Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China.,Engineering Research Center of Digital Community, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China
| | - Zhe Xu
- Faculty of Information Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China
| | - Ying Sheng
- Faculty of Information Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China
| | - Jianhui Chen
- Faculty of Information Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China. .,Beijing International Collaboration Base On Brain Informatics and Wisdom Services, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China. .,Beijing Key Laboratory of MRI and Brain Informatics, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
A novel application of generalizability theory to evaluate the reliability of the recognition memory test. CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s12144-022-02886-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|