Vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling versus nonsurgical treatment for diabetic macular edema with massive hard exudates

Refining vitrectomy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy

Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) is the main treatment modality for patients with severe diabetic retinopathy. With the development of systems for microincision, wide-angle viewing, digitally assisted visualization, and intraoperative optical coherence tomography, contemporary PPV for diabetic retinopathy has been performed on a wider range of indications than previously considered. In this article, we reviewed, in conjunction with our collective experiences with Asian patients, the applications of new technologies for PPV in eyes with diabetic retinopathy and highlighted several important procedures and entities not generally reiterated in the literature, in order for vitreoretinal surgeons to optimize their approaches when facing the challenges imposed by the complications in diabetic eyes.

Diabetic Macular Oedema Guidelines: An Australian Perspective

The number of people living with diabetes is expected to rise to 578 million by 2030 and to 700 million by 2045, exacting a severe socioeconomic burden on healthcare systems around the globe. This is also reflected in the increasing numbers of people with ocular complications of diabetes (namely, diabetic macular oedema (DMO) and diabetic retinopathy (DR)). In one study examining the global prevalence of DR, 35% of people with diabetes had some form of DR, 7% had PDR, 7% had DMO, and 10% were affected by these vision-threatening stages. In many regions of the world (Australia included), DR is one of the top three leading causes of vision loss amongst working age adults (20-74 years). In the management of DMO, the landmark ETDRS study demonstrated that moderate visual loss, defined as doubling of the visual angle, can be reduced by 50% or more by focal/grid laser photocoagulation. However, over the last 20 years, antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and corticosteroid therapies have emerged as alternative options for the management of DMO and provided patients with choices that have higher chances of improving vision than laser alone. In Australia, since the 2008 NHMRC guidelines, there have been significant developments in both the treatment options and treatment schedules for DMO. This working group was therefore assembled to review and address the current management options available in Australia.

Inner limiting membrane peeling prevents secondary epiretinal membrane after vitrectomy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy

AIM

To evaluate the role of internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling in preventing secondary epiretinal membrane (ERM) formation in pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR).

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed the medical records of patients who underwent PPV for PDR and were followed up for minimum 3mo. ILM peeling was performed based on the intraoperative surgeons' judgments. ERM was assessed by optical coherence tomography photography. The relationship between ILM peeling and postoperative ERM was analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 212 eyes from 197 patients were included in this study. The incidence of secondary ERM in the ILM non-peeling group was significantly higher than that in the ILM peeling group (37.0% vs 14.0%; P<0.001). Multivariate logistical regression revealed that ILM peeling was highly associated with the prevention of secondary ERM development [odds ratio 0.38; 95% confidence interval 0.17-0.86; P<0.05].

CONCLUSION

ILM peeling during PPV for PDRs can effectively reduce the incidence of secondary ERM development and is worth consideration by vitreoretinal surgeons.

Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling versus Nonpeeling to Prevent Epiretinal Membrane Formation following Vitrectomy for Posterior Segment Open-Globe Injury

Purpose

Approximately 30% of patients with an open-globe injury (OGI) develop a secondary epiretinal membrane (ERM). This study was performed to assess whether internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling in the treatment of posterior segment OGI prevents ERM formation.

Methods

The medical records of 33 patients who underwent vitrectomy for posterior segment OGI from 2016 to 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Of these patients, 17 underwent ILM peeling during the vitrectomy and 16 did not. The patients' demographic and surgical data were collected. The associations of ILM peeling with the preoperative findings of posterior segment OGI and development of a postoperative ERM were analyzed. Student's t-test was used to evaluate differences in continuous variables, and the chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test was used for categorical variables. Time-to-event curves were calculated from postestimation Cox proportional hazards models.

Results

An ERM developed in three eyes (17.6%) in the ILM peeling group and in eight eyes (50.0%) in the nonpeeling group (p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in visual acuity at baseline (1.68 vs. 1.58 logMAR, p=0.68) or at final follow-up (0.72 vs. 0.78 logMAR, p=0.66). Median visual acuity significantly improved in both groups (p < 0.001). In the multivariable models, ILM peeling (odds ratio, 0.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.04–0.91; p=0.04) and worse preoperative vision (odds ratio, 0.29; 95% confidence interval, 0.10–0.80; p=0.02) were associated with lower likelihood of ERM formation.

Conclusion

Preventative treatment with ILM peeling contributed to decreased development of an ERM in patients with OGI involving areas near the fovea.