1
|
Crozier I, Britson KA, Wolfe DN, Klena JD, Hensley LE, Lee JS, Wolfraim LA, Taylor KL, Higgs ES, Montgomery JM, Martins KA. The Evolution of Medical Countermeasures for Ebola Virus Disease: Lessons Learned and Next Steps. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:1213. [PMID: 36016101 PMCID: PMC9415766 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10081213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Revised: 07/27/2022] [Accepted: 07/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The Ebola virus disease outbreak that occurred in Western Africa from 2013-2016, and subsequent smaller but increasingly frequent outbreaks of Ebola virus disease in recent years, spurred an unprecedented effort to develop and deploy effective vaccines, therapeutics, and diagnostics. This effort led to the U.S. regulatory approval of a diagnostic test, two vaccines, and two therapeutics for Ebola virus disease indications. Moreover, the establishment of fieldable diagnostic tests improved the speed with which patients can be diagnosed and public health resources mobilized. The United States government has played and continues to play a key role in funding and coordinating these medical countermeasure efforts. Here, we describe the coordinated U.S. government response to develop medical countermeasures for Ebola virus disease and we identify lessons learned that may improve future efforts to develop and deploy effective countermeasures against other filoviruses, such as Sudan virus and Marburg virus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian Crozier
- Clinical Monitoring Research Program Directorate, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD 21702, USA;
| | - Kyla A. Britson
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR), Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), Washington, DC 20201, USA; (K.A.B.); (D.N.W.); (J.S.L.)
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR), Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) Postdoctoral Fellow, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA
| | - Daniel N. Wolfe
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR), Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), Washington, DC 20201, USA; (K.A.B.); (D.N.W.); (J.S.L.)
| | - John D. Klena
- Viral Special Pathogens Branch, Division of High Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA; (J.D.K.); (J.M.M.)
| | - Lisa E. Hensley
- Integrated Research Facility, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, MD 12116, USA;
| | - John S. Lee
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR), Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), Washington, DC 20201, USA; (K.A.B.); (D.N.W.); (J.S.L.)
| | - Larry A. Wolfraim
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Rockville, MD 20852, USA; (L.A.W.); (K.L.T.); (E.S.H.)
| | - Kimberly L. Taylor
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Rockville, MD 20852, USA; (L.A.W.); (K.L.T.); (E.S.H.)
| | - Elizabeth S. Higgs
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Rockville, MD 20852, USA; (L.A.W.); (K.L.T.); (E.S.H.)
| | - Joel M. Montgomery
- Viral Special Pathogens Branch, Division of High Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA; (J.D.K.); (J.M.M.)
| | - Karen A. Martins
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR), Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), Washington, DC 20201, USA; (K.A.B.); (D.N.W.); (J.S.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Niemuth NA, Rudge TL, Sankovich KA, Anderson MS, Skomrock ND, Badorrek CS, Sabourin CL. Method feasibility for cross-species testing, qualification, and validation of the Filovirus Animal Nonclinical Group anti-Ebola virus glycoprotein immunoglobulin G enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for non-human primate serum samples. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0241016. [PMID: 33119638 PMCID: PMC7595334 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2020] [Accepted: 10/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
An anti-Zaire Ebola virus (EBOV) glycoprotein (GP) immunoglobulin G (IgG) enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was developed to quantify the serum levels of anti-EBOV IgG in human and non-human primate (NHP) serum following vaccination and/or exposure to EBOV. This method was validated for testing human serum samples as previously reported. However, for direct immunobridging comparability between humans and NHPs, additional testing was warranted. First, method feasibility experiments were performed to assess cross-species reactivity and parallelism between human and NHP serum samples. During these preliminary assessments, the goat anti-human IgG secondary antibody conjugate used in the previous human validation was found to be favorably cross-reactive with NHP samples when tested at the same concentrations previously used in the validated assay for human sample testing. Further, NHP serum samples diluted in parallel with human serum when tested side-by-side in the ELISA. A subsequent NHP matrix qualification and partial validation in the anti-GP IgG ELISA were performed based on ICH and FDA guidance, to characterize assay performance for NHP test samples and supplement the previous validation for human sample testing. Based on our assessments, the anti-EBOV GP IgG ELISA method is considered suitable for the intended use of testing with both human and NHP serum samples in the same assay for immunobridging purposes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy A. Niemuth
- Battelle Biomedical Research Center, West Jefferson, Ohio, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Thomas L. Rudge
- Battelle Biomedical Research Center, West Jefferson, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Karen A. Sankovich
- Battelle Biomedical Research Center, West Jefferson, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Michael S. Anderson
- Battelle Biomedical Research Center, West Jefferson, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Nicholas D. Skomrock
- Battelle Biomedical Research Center, West Jefferson, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Christopher S. Badorrek
- Contract Support for the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) Joint Program Executive Office for Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Defense (JPEO-CBRND) Joint Project Manager for Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Medical (JPM CBRN Medical), Fort Detrick, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Carol L. Sabourin
- Battelle Biomedical Research Center, West Jefferson, Ohio, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|