Modeling the trophic impacts of invasive zooplankton in a highly invaded river

The global social-economic dimension of biological invasions by plankton: Grossly underestimated costs but a rising concern for water quality benefits?

Planktonic invasive species cause adverse effects on aquatic biodiversity and ecosystem services. However, these impacts are often underestimated because of unresolved taxonomic issues and limited biogeographic knowledge. Thus, it is pivotal to start a rigorous quantification of impacts undertaken by planktonic invasive species on global economies. We used the InvaCost database, the most up-to-date database of economic cost estimates of biological invasions worldwide, to produce the first critical assessment of the economic dimension of biological invasions caused by planktonic taxa. We found that in period spanning from 1960 to 2021, the cumulative global cost of plankton invasions was US$ 5.8 billion for permanent plankton (holoplankton) of which viruses encompassed nearly 93%. Apart from viruses, we found more costs related to zooplankton (US$ 297 million) than to the other groups summed, including myco- (US$ 73 million), phyto- (43 million), and bacterioplankton (US$ 0.7 million). Strikingly, harmful and potentially toxic cyanobacteria and dinoflagellates are completely absent from the database. Furthermore, the data base showed a decrease in costs over time, which is probably an artifact as a sharp rise of novel planktonic alien species has gained international attention. Also, assessments of the costs of larval meroplanktonic stages of littoral and benthic invasive invertebrates are lacking whereas cumulative global cost of their adults stages is high up to US$ 98 billion billion and increasing. Considering the challenges and perspectives of increasing but unnoticed or neglected impacts by plankton invasions, the assessment of their ecological and economic impacts should be of high priority.

Nutrient Control of Phytoplankton Abundance and Biomass, and Microplankton Assemblage Structure in the Lower Columbia River (Vancouver, Washington, USA)

Nutrient limitation of phytoplankton is common but by no means universal in large temperate rivers. Previous field studies in the Columbia River, USA, are suggestive of nutrient limitations of phytoplankton, especially during summer, but this has never been tested experimentally. We therefore undertook monthly 5-day nutrient amendment incubation experiments from May–September 2018 using Columbia River water collected at Vancouver, Washington, USA. We compared replicate treatment bottles containing natural microplankton assemblages and amended nutrients (NO3, PO4 and SiO4 in combination) with replicate control bottles containing natural microplankton assemblages and ambient nutrients. Phytoplankton abundance and biomass were compared between treatments and controls on each day of each experiment, and microplankton assemblage structure was evaluated using Permutational Multivariate Analysis of Variance and Non-Metric Multi-Dimensional Scaling ordination on Day 0 (ambient) and Day 5 of each experiment. Nutrient amendment significantly affected phytoplankton abundance and biomass, particularly in June–August, although this varied between taxa (e.g., cyanobacteria, dinoflagellates, flagellates and ciliates showed more frequent positive responses than chlorophytes and diatoms did). Abundance-based microplankton assemblage structure was significantly correlated with PO4, SiO4 and NO3 concentrations, and BIOENV procedure in R revealed that the best subset of explanatory variables included SiO4 and NO3 concentrations. Biomass-based assemblage structure was significantly correlated with SiO4 and NO3, although BIOENV explanatory variables included only SiO4. These results are suggestive of summertime nutrient control of phytoplankton abundance and biomass, as well as microplankton composition, in the lower Columbia River, at least during some months. Since eutrophication is increasing in the watershed, this could have important implications for higher level consumers (e.g., zooplankton and out-migrating juvenile salmon).