1
|
Dunn CC, Zwolan TA, Balkany TJ, Strader HL, Biever A, Gifford RH, Hall MW, Holcomb MA, Hill H, King ER, Larky J, Presley R, Reed M, Shapiro WH, Sydlowski SA, Wolfe J. A Consensus to Revise the Minimum Speech Test Battery-Version 3. Am J Audiol 2024:1-24. [PMID: 38980836 DOI: 10.1044/2024_aja-24-00008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/11/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The Minimum Speech Test Battery (MSTB) for adults was introduced in 1996 (Nilsson et al., 1996) and subsequently updated in 2011 (Advanced-Bionics et al., 2011). The MSTB has been widely used by clinicians as a guide for cochlear implant (CI) candidacy evaluations and to document post-operative speech recognition performance. Due to changes in candidacy over the past 10 years, a revision to the MSTB was needed. METHOD In 2022, the Institute for Cochlear Implant Training (ICIT) recruited a panel of expert CI audiologists to update and revise the MSTB. This panel utilized a modified Delphi consensus process to revise the test battery and to improve its applicability considering recent changes in CI care. RESULTS This resulted in the MTSB-Version 3 (MSTB-3), which includes test protocols for identifying not only traditional CI candidates but also possible candidates for electric-acoustic stimulation and patients with single-sided deafness and asymmetric hearing loss. The MSTB-3 provides information that supplements the earlier versions of the MSTB, such as recommendations of when to refer patients for a CI, recommended patient-reported outcome measures, considerations regarding the use of cognitive screeners, and sample report templates for clinical documentation of pre- and post-operative care. Electronic versions of test stimuli, along with all the materials described above, will be available to clinicians via the ICIT website (https://www.cochlearimplanttraining.com). CONCLUSION The goal of the MSTB-3 is to be an evidence-based test battery that will facilitate a streamlined standard of care for adult CI candidates and recipients that will be widely used by CI clinicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camille C Dunn
- Institute for Cochlear Implant Training, Miami, FL
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Iowa, Iowa City
| | - Teresa A Zwolan
- Institute for Cochlear Implant Training, Miami, FL
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
- Cochlear Corporation, Denver, CO
| | | | | | - Allison Biever
- Institute for Cochlear Implant Training, Miami, FL
- Rocky Mountain Ear Clinic, Englewood, CO
| | - René H Gifford
- Institute for Cochlear Implant Training, Miami, FL
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Melissa W Hall
- Institute for Cochlear Implant Training, Miami, FL
- Department of Audiology, University of Florida Health, Gainesville
| | - Meredith A Holcomb
- Institute for Cochlear Implant Training, Miami, FL
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Miami, FL
| | - Heidi Hill
- Institute for Cochlear Implant Training, Miami, FL
- Hearing Health Clinic, Osseo, MN
| | - English R King
- Institute for Cochlear Implant Training, Miami, FL
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Jannine Larky
- Institute for Cochlear Implant Training, Miami, FL
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA
| | - Regina Presley
- Institute for Cochlear Implant Training, Miami, FL
- Presbyterian Board of Governors Cochlear Implant Center, Greater Baltimore Medical Center, MD
| | - Meaghan Reed
- Institute for Cochlear Implant Training, Miami, FL
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Department of Audiology, Mass Eye and Ear, Boston, MA
| | - William H Shapiro
- Institute for Cochlear Implant Training, Miami, FL
- Department of Otolaryngology, New York University, NY
| | - Sarah A Sydlowski
- Institute for Cochlear Implant Training, Miami, FL
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH
| | - Jace Wolfe
- Institute for Cochlear Implant Training, Miami, FL
- Hearts for Hearing Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK
- Hearing First, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bennink C, de Mul M, van der Klift M, Broijl A, Tick L, de Jongh E, Garvelink M, Lobbezoo D, Sonneveld P, Hazelzet J. Improving Outcome-Driven Care in Multiple Myeloma Using Patient-Reported Outcomes: A Qualitative Evaluation Study. THE PATIENT 2023; 16:255-264. [PMID: 36790557 PMCID: PMC9930010 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-023-00616-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Multiple myeloma is an incurable disease with a considerable illness and treatment burden, which negatively impacts patients' quality of life. This study aimed to evaluate the implementation of multiple myeloma care in five Dutch hospitals, related to the three objectives of outcome-driven care, which are defined as (1) providing information for shared decision making in individual patient care, (2) supporting the learning capacity of healthcare professionals and healthcare institutions through benchmarking and (3) developing outcome-driven and patient-centred contracting by health insurers. METHODS In this qualitative study, semi-structured interviews about experiences with patient-reported outcomes were conducted with patients, healthcare professionals and other stakeholders 2 years after implementation. Data were thematically analysed, and emerging topics were clustered around the three objectives of outcome-driven care. RESULTS A total of 46 interviews were held (15 with patients, 16 with professionals and 15 with other stakeholders) that showed patients with multiple myeloma were willing to complete patient-reported outcomes, although integration of patient-reported outcomes in shared decision making fell short in clinical practice. Aggregated patient-reported outcomes were considered important for improving quality of care; however, data collection and data exchange are hindered by privacy legislation, limitations of IT systems and a lack of data standards. Patient-reported outcomes were expected to contribute to cost-effective multiple myeloma treatment, yet outcome-driven reimbursement is still lacking. CONCLUSIONS Outcome-driven multiple myeloma care using patient-reported outcomes is feasible, provided that (1) patient-reported outcomes and shared decision making are integrated into clinical practice, (2) legal and technical obstacles hindering data collection are removed and (3) health insurers adjust their reimbursement plans to facilitate outcome-driven care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Bennink
- Department of Haematology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
- Department of Haematology, Amphia, Breda, The Netherlands.
| | - Marleen de Mul
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Annemiek Broijl
- Department of Haematology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lidwine Tick
- Department of Haematology, Maxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Eva de Jongh
- Department of Haematology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Mirjam Garvelink
- Department of Haematology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Dorien Lobbezoo
- Department of Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter Sonneveld
- Department of Haematology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Hazelzet
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Brito Fernandes Ó, Bos V, Klazinga N, Kringos D. Citizen engagement in healthcare procurement decision-making by healthcare insurers: recent experiences in the Netherlands. Health Res Policy Syst 2022; 20:137. [PMID: 36550520 PMCID: PMC9773595 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-022-00939-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In insurance-based healthcare systems, healthcare insurers are interested in engaging citizens in care procurement to contract healthcare services that matter to people. In the Netherlands, an amendment to the Health Insurance Act was set forth in 2021 to formalize and strengthen the engagement of the insured population with healthcare insurers' procurement cycles. This study explores the role of Dutch healthcare insurers in operationalizing citizen engagement in procurement cycles before changes occur linked to the amendment to the Health Insurance Act. METHODS A phenomenological qualitative design was employed in two phases: (1) we consulted academics and policy experts on the role of healthcare insurers regarding citizen engagement; (2) we conducted focus groups with representatives of healthcare insurers to understand how citizens' engagement is being operationalized. Transcripts of the interviews with experts and detailed notes of focus group meetings were analysed using a qualitative inductive approach. Selected excerpts were analysed on discourse and content and organized by a coding scheme following a rigorous and accelerated data reduction technique. RESULTS We identified four strategies used by healthcare insurers to operationalize citizen engagement: (1) broadening their population health orientation; (2) developing and improving mechanisms for engaging citizens; (3) strengthening features of data governance for effective use of value-driven data; (4) implementing financial and incentive mechanisms among healthcare providers in support of value-based healthcare. However, regulated market mechanisms and low institutional trust in healthcare insurers undermine their transition from merely funding healthcare towards becoming people-centred value-based healthcare purchasers. CONCLUSION Dutch healthcare insurers seem to be strengthening the community orientation of their functioning while enhancing the end-to-end experience of the insured. The expected practical effects of the amendment to the Health Insurance Act include broadening the role of the council of insurees in decision-making processes and systematically documenting the efforts set forth by healthcare insurers in engaging citizens. Further research is needed to better understand how the regulated competitive market could be hampering the engagement of citizens in healthcare procurement decision-making and value creation from the citizens' perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Óscar Brito Fernandes
- grid.17127.320000 0000 9234 5858Department of Health Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, Fővám tér 8, Budapest, 1093 Hungary ,grid.509540.d0000 0004 6880 3010Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Public and Occupational Health, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ,Public Health research institute, Quality of Care, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Véronique Bos
- grid.509540.d0000 0004 6880 3010Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Public and Occupational Health, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ,Public Health research institute, Quality of Care, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Niek Klazinga
- grid.509540.d0000 0004 6880 3010Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Public and Occupational Health, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ,Public Health research institute, Quality of Care, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dionne Kringos
- grid.509540.d0000 0004 6880 3010Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Public and Occupational Health, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ,Public Health research institute, Quality of Care, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Assessing the care of doctors, nurses, and nursing technicians for people in situations of sexual violence in Brazil. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0249598. [PMID: 34780481 PMCID: PMC8592427 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the quality of care for people in situations of sexual violence in health services, identifying positive and negative indicators, and suggest solutions. This is a cross-sectional study with a quantitative approach and convenience sampling. The sample consisted of 134 professionals (doctors, nurses, and nursing technicians) working in public health services. Three instruments were used, namely, a structure evaluation form, a questionnaire, and a process evaluation form. The results revealed eight positive indicators (adequate infrastructure; rooms for patient assistance; gynecological bed; visual and auditory privacy; waiting rooms; a professional team comprising physicians, nurses, nursing technicians, and receptionists; adequate training of staff to provide health services to people in situations of sexual violence; and most healthcare professionals asking their patients about possible sexual violence situations) and nine negative indicators (reduced number of rooms for patient assistance with toilets; absence of protocols to identify and assist people in situations of sexual violence; absence of leaflets, posters, and other materials on sexual violence; absence of a referral flow chart (specific for people in situations of sexual violence) to specialized services; reduced number of consultations with suspected and/or confirmed cases of sexual violence; non-use of specific protocols; not referral of these patients to the specialized care network; most professionals consider the health unit where they work as unable to help people in situations of sexual violence; a decrease in attendance at health facilities that do not have a protocol for assisting people in situations of sexual violence), making clear the interventions necessary to promote the provision of quality health services that meet the specific needs of people in situations of sexual violence. These indicators are expected to provide subsidies for the improvement of public policies aimed at listening, welcoming, identifying, and treating people in situations of sexual violence.
Collapse
|