Motamedian SR, Najary S, Nikakhtar H, Rezvani M, Safavi SM. Comparison of pleasant and unpleasant smile characteristics in the perception of the laypeople in an Iranian population.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2023;
164:766-773. [PMID:
37565945 DOI:
10.1016/j.ajodo.2023.04.022]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Revised: 04/01/2023] [Accepted: 04/01/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
This study aimed to compare the characteristics of pleasant and unpleasant smiles from the perception of laypeople.
METHODS
Two-hundred posed smile photographs were obtained from adult participants with no anomaly, restoration, or severe crowding and spacing in anterior teeth. Photographs were shown to 26 judges to give each photograph a score for attractiveness. Upper and lower quartiles for the most and least rated smiles were determined, and variables including gingival display, smile arc, midline deviation, buccal corridor, smile width, tooth rotation or malposition, diastema, upper and lower vermilion show, and tooth form were measured. Independent-sample t test and Pearson chi-square analysis were used to determine the differences between the pleasant and unpleasant groups for quantitative and qualitative variables, respectively. The linear regression model revealed variables with the most significant impact on the mean score.
RESULTS
All quantitative and qualitative variables except tooth form significantly differed between pleasant and unpleasant smile groups (P <0.05). The consonant smile arc was associated with an increase of 12.59% in mean scores compared with the inconsonant smile arc. Each tooth reported with malposition was correlated with a decrease of 9.37% in the scores. In the same way, each 1-mm increase in midline diastema and occlusal cant coincided with a drop of 8.73% and 3.59% in scores, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
The results of this study suggested that smile arc, tooth malposition, midline diastema, and occlusal plane canting had the most impact on smile esthetics and should be given priority by orthodontists in the treatment plan of choice.
Collapse