Observing spontaneous, accelerated substrate binding in molecular dynamics simulations of glutamate transporters

Computational Chemistry in Structure-Based Solute Carrier Transporter Drug Design: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives

Solute carrier transporters (SLCs) are a class of important transmembrane proteins that are involved in the transportation of diverse solute ions and small molecules into cells. There are approximately 450 SLCs within the human body, and more than a quarter of them are emerging as attractive therapeutic targets for multiple complex diseases, e.g., depression, cancer, and diabetes. However, only 44 unique transporters (∼9.8% of the SLC superfamily) with 3D structures and specific binding sites have been reported. To design innovative and effective drugs targeting diverse SLCs, there are a number of obstacles that need to be overcome. However, computational chemistry, including physics-based molecular modeling and machine learning- and deep learning-based artificial intelligence (AI), provides an alternative and complementary way to the classical drug discovery approach. Here, we present a comprehensive overview on recent advances and existing challenges of the computational techniques in structure-based drug design of SLCs from three main aspects: (i) characterizing multiple conformations of the proteins during the functional process of transportation, (ii) identifying druggability sites especially the cryptic allosteric ones on the transporters for substrates and drugs binding, and (iii) discovering diverse small molecules or synthetic protein binders targeting the binding sites. This work is expected to provide guidelines for a deep understanding of the structure and function of the SLC superfamily to facilitate rational design of novel modulators of the transporters with the aid of state-of-the-art computational chemistry technologies including artificial intelligence.

Conserved allosteric inhibition mechanism in SLC1 transporters

Excitatory amino acid transporter 1 (EAAT1) is a glutamate transporter belonging to the SLC1 family of solute carriers. It plays a key role in the regulation of the extracellular glutamate concentration in the mammalian brain. The structure of EAAT1 was determined in complex with UCPH-101, apotent, non-competitive inhibitor of EAAT1. Alanine serine cysteine transporter 2 (ASCT2) is a neutral amino acid transporter, which regulates pools of amino acids such as glutamine between intracellular and extracellular compartments . ASCT2 also belongs to the SLC1 family and shares 58% sequence similarity with EAAT1. However, allosteric modulation of ASCT2 via non-competitive inhibitors is unknown. Here, we explore the UCPH-101 inhibitory mechanisms of EAAT1 and ASCT2 by using rapid kinetic experiments. Our results show that UCPH-101 slows substrate translocation rather than substrate or Na+ binding, confirming a non-competitive inhibitory mechanism, but only partially inhibits wild-type ASCT2. Guided by computational modeling using ligand docking and molecular dynamics simulations, we selected two residues involved in UCPH-101/EAAT1 interaction, which were mutated in ASCT2 (F136Y, I237M, F136Y/I237M) in the corresponding positions. We show that in the F136Y/I237M double-mutant transporter, 100% of the inhibitory effect of UCPH-101 could be restored, and the apparent affinity was increased (Ki = 4.3 μM), much closer to the EAAT1 value of 0.6 μM. Finally, we identify a novel non-competitive ASCT2 inhibitor, through virtual screening and experimental testing against the allosteric site, further supporting its localization. Together, these data indicate that the mechanism of allosteric modulation is conserved between EAAT1 and ASCT2. Due to the difference in binding site residues between ASCT2 and EAAT1, these results raise the possibility that more potent, and potentially selective ASCT2 allosteric inhibitors can be designed .

Functional and Kinetic Comparison of Alanine Cysteine Serine Transporters ASCT1 and ASCT2

Neutral amino acid transporters ASCT1 and ASCT2 are two SLC1 (solute carrier 1) family subtypes, which are specific for neutral amino acids. The other members of the SLC1 family are acidic amino acid transporters (EAATs 1–5). While the functional similarities and differences between the EAATs have been well studied, less is known about how the subtypes ASCT1 and 2 differ in kinetics and function. Here, by performing comprehensive electrophysiological analysis, we identified similarities and differences between these subtypes, as well as novel functional properties, such as apparent substrate affinities of the inward-facing conformation (in the range of 70 μM for L-serine as the substrate). Key findings were: ASCT1 has a higher apparent affinity for Na⁺, as well as a larger [Na⁺] dependence of substrate affinity compared to ASCT2. However, the general sequential Na⁺/substrate binding mechanism with at least one Na⁺ binding first, followed by amino acid substrate, followed by at least one more Na⁺ ion, appears to be conserved between the two subtypes. In addition, the first Na⁺ binding step, presumably to the Na3 site, occurs with high apparent affinity (<1 mM) in both transporters. In addition, ASCT1 and 2 show different substrate selectivities, where ASCT1 does not respond to extracellular glutamine. Finally, in both transporters, we measured rapid, capacitive charge movements upon application and removal of amino acid, due to rearrangement of the translocation equilibrium. This charge movement decays rapidly, with a time constant of 4–5 ms and recovers with a time constant in the 15 ms range after substrate removal. This places a lower limit on the turnover rate of amino acid exchange by these two transporters of 60–80 s⁻¹.