Utility of the Global Respiratory Severity Score for predicting the need for respiratory support in infants with respiratory syncytial virus infection

Severe respiratory syncytial virus infection in children: burden, management, and emerging therapies

The global burden of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) in young children is high. The RSV prevention strategies approved in 2023 will be essential to lowering the global disease burden. In this Series paper, we describe clinical presentation, burden of disease, hospital management, emerging therapies, and targeted prevention focusing on developments and groundbreaking publications for RSV. We conducted a systematic search for literature published in the past 15 years and used a non-systematic approach to analyse the results, prioritising important papers and the most recent reviews per subtopic. Annually, 33 million episodes of RSV LRTI occur in children younger than 5 years, resulting in 3·6 million hospitalisations and 118 200 deaths. RSV LRTI is a clinical diagnosis but a clinical case definition and universal clinical tool to predict severe disease are non-existent. The advent of molecular point-of-care testing allows rapid and accurate confirmation of RSV infection and could reduce antibiotic use. There is no evidence-based treatment of RSV, only supportive care. Despite widespread use, evidence for high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy is insufficient and increased paediatric intensive care admissions and intubation indicate the need to remove HFNC therapy from standard care. RSV is now a vaccine-preventable disease in young children with a market-approved long-acting monoclonal antibody and a maternal vaccine targeting the RSV prefusion protein. To have a high impact on life-threatening RSV infection, infants at high risk, especially in low-income and middle-income countries, should be prioritised as an interim strategy towards universal immunisation. The implementation of RSV preventive strategies will clarify the full burden of RSV infection. Vaccine probe studies can address existing knowledge gaps including the effect of RSV prevention on transmission dynamics, antibiotic misuse, the respiratory microbiome composition, and long-term sequalae.

Validity of Clinical Severity Scores for Respiratory Syncytial Virus: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a widespread respiratory pathogen, and RSV-related acute lower respiratory tract infections are the most common cause of respiratory hospitalization in children <2 years of age. Over the last 2 decades, a number of severity scores have been proposed to quantify disease severity for RSV in children, yet there remains no overall consensus on the most clinically useful score.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of English-language publications in peer-reviewed journals published since January 2000 assessing the validity of severity scores for children (≤24 months of age) with RSV and/or bronchiolitis, and identified the most promising scores. For included articles, (1) validity data were extracted, (2) quality of reporting was assessed using the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis checklist (TRIPOD), and (3) quality was assessed using the Prediction Model Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST). To guide the assessment of the validity data, standardized cutoffs were employed, and an explicit definition of what we required to determine a score was sufficiently validated.

RESULTS

Our searches identified 8541 results, of which 1779 were excluded as duplicates. After title and abstract screening, 6670 references were excluded. Following full-text screening and snowballing, 32 articles, including 31 scores, were included. The most frequently assessed scores were the modified Tal score and the Wang Bronchiolitis Severity Score; none of the scores were found to be sufficiently validated according to our definition. The reporting and/or design of all the included studies was poor. The best validated score was the Bronchiolitis Score of Sant Joan de Déu, and a number of other promising scores were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

No scores were found to be sufficiently validated. Further work is warranted to validate the existing scores, ideally in much larger datasets.

RSV-CLASS -Clinical Assessment Severity Score: An easy-to-use clinical disease severity score for respiratory syncytial virus infection in hospitalized children

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the most common cause of acute respiratory tract infection in infants and young children often leading to severe disease requiring hospitalization. However, validated tools for systematic assessment of disease severity are lacking. This study aimed at creating and validating a standardized, simple-to-use disease severity score for RSV infection in children-the RSV-CLASS (Clinical Assessment Severity Score). Therefore, data from over 700 RSV-infected children over six winter seasons (2014-2020) was analyzed using univariate and multiple regression analyses for the prediction of lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) as a proxy for a severe course of the disease. Testing a broad range of respiratory symptoms, they eventually yielded seven items. Performing stepwise selection, these were reduced to the final four items: cough, tachypnea, rales, and wheezing, each receiving one point in the proposed score named RSV-CLASS. The score was calculated for children in two cohorts A and B, one for development and one for validation, with an area under the curve of 0.90 and 0.87, respectively. With a score value of 3 or 4, 97.8% and 100% of the children, respectively, were admitted with LRTI and classified correctly. The RSV-CLASS is a disease severity score based on a neutral, analytical approach using prospective data from a large study cohort. It will contribute to systematically assessing the disease severity of RSV infection and can be used for evidence-based clinical decision-making as well as for research settings.

Comparison of three clinical scoring tools for bronchiolitis to predict the need for respiratory support and length of stay in neonates and infants up to three months of age

BACKGROUND

Bronchiolitis severity can be assessed using different clinical scores. Some of the most used are the Wang Bronchiolitis Severity Score (WBSS), the Kristjansson Respiratory Score (KRS), and the Global Respiratory Severity Score (GRSS), calculated on the vital parameters and the clinical conditions.

OBJECTIVE

To assess which of the three clinical scores better predicts the need for respiratory support and length of hospital stay in neonates and infants younger than three months, admitted to neonatal units for bronchiolitis.

METHODS

Neonates and infants younger than three months admitted to neonatal units from October 2021 to March 2022 were included in this retrospective study. The scores were calculated in all patients soon after admission.

RESULTS

Ninety-six patients (of whom 61 neonates) admitted for bronchiolitis were included in the analysis. Median WBSS at admission was 4.00 (interquartile range, IQR 3.00-6.00), median KRS was 4.00 (IQR 3.00-5.00), and median GRSS 4.90 (IQR 3.89-6.10). We found significant differences in all three scores between infants who needed respiratory support (72.9%) and those who did not (27.1%) (p < 0.001). A value >3 for WBSS, > 3 for KRS, and >3.8 for GRSS were accurate in predicting the need for respiratory support, with a sensitivity of 85.71%, 75.71%, and 93.75% and a specificity of 80.77%, 92.31%, and 88.24%, respectively. The three infants who required mechanical ventilation had a median WBSS of 6.00 (IQR 5.00-6.50), a KRS of 7.00 (IQR 5.00-7.00), and a GRSS of 7.38 (IQR 5.59-7.39). The median length of stay was 5 days (IQR 4-8). All three scores were significantly correlated with the length of stay, although with a low correlation coefficient: WBSS with an r² of 0.139 (p < 0.001), KRS with an r² of 0.137 (p < 0.001), and GRSS with an r² of 0.170 (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Clinical scores WBSS, KRS, and GRSS calculated on admission accurately predict the need for respiratory support and the length of hospital stay in neonates and infants younger than three months with bronchiolitis. The GRSS score seems to better discriminate the need for respiratory support than the others.

Pranlukast treatment and the use of respiratory support in infants with respiratory syncytial virus infection

Background

In infants, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection occasionally causes severe symptoms requiring respiratory support; however, supportive care is the primary treatment. This study compared the use of respiratory support among infants with RSV infection treated with or without pranlukast.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included infants aged <10 months with RSV infection who were admitted to three secondary level hospitals in Japan between 2012 and 2019. The infants were divided into two groups depending on whether they were treated with pranlukast. The primary outcome was the receiving respiratory support (high-flow nasal cannula, nasal continuous positive airway pressure, or ventilator). The secondary outcomes were the length of hospital stay, and the Global Respiratory Severity Score (GRSS) on starting respiratory support or at the time of the worst signs during hospitalization. We performed a propensity score-matched analysis.

Results

A total of 492 infants, including 147 propensity score-matched pairs, were included in the analysis. The use of respiratory support was significantly lower in infants treated with pranlukast (3.4% [5/147]) than those treated without pranlukast (11.6% [17/147]; P = 0.01). In the propensity score-matched analysis, pranlukast use was associated with a significantly lower chance of needing respiratory support (odds ratio: 0.27, 95% confidence interval: 0.08–0.79; P = 0.01); however, the length of hospital stay (median: 4 days) and the GRSS (median: 2.804 and 2.869 for infants treated with and without pranlukast, respectively) did not differ significantly between propensity score-matched pairs.

Conclusions

Pranlukast use was associated with a reduced likelihood of requiring respiratory support in infants aged <10 months with RSV infection.