Endpoint PCR coupled with capillary electrophoresis (celPCR) provides sensitive and quantitative measures of environmental DNA in singleplex and multiplex reactions

Laboratory protocol is important to improve the correlation between target copies and metabarcoding read numbers of seed DNA in ground beetle regurgitates

DNA metabarcoding is increasingly important for studying feeding interactions, yet it remains unresolved whether reporting read counts or occurrences is to be preferred. To address this issue for gut content samples, basic experimental data on the relationship between read numbers and initial prey DNA amounts and how both change over digestion time is needed. Using regurgitates of the carabid Pseudoophonus rufipes the digestion of Taraxacum officinale seeds was documented for 128 h post-feeding to determine how the number of (1) seed DNA copies and (2) metabarcoding reads change over digestion time, and (3) how they correlate to each other. Additionally, we tested (4) whether PCR cycle-numbers during library preparation affect this correlation. The number of copies and reads both decreased with digestion time, but variation between samples was high. Read and copy numbers correlated when using a library preparation protocol with 35 cycles (R² = 42.0%), yet a reduction to 30 cycles might significantly improve this correlation, as indicated by additional PCR testing. Our findings show that protocol optimization is important to reduce technical distortions of read numbers in metabarcoding analysis. However, high inter-sample variation, likely due to variable digestive efficiency of individual consumers, can blur the relationship between the amount of food consumed and metabarcoding read numbers.

RNA allows identifying the consumption of carrion prey

Facultative scavenging by predatory carnivores is a prevalent but frequently underestimated feeding strategy. DNA‐based methods for diet analysis, however, do not allow to distinguish between scavenging and predation, thus, the significance of scavenging on population dynamics and resource partitioning is widely unknown. Here, we present a methodological innovation to differentiate between scavenging and fresh prey consumption using prey RNA as a target molecule. We hypothesized that the rapid post‐mortem breakdown of RNA in prey tissue should lead to a significantly lower detection probability of prey RNA than DNA when carrion rather than fresh prey is consumed. To test this hypothesis, ground beetles (Pseudoophonus rufipes [De Geer]) were offered either fresh or 1‐day‐old dead Drosophila melanogaster fruit flies (carrion). The detectability of prey RNA and DNA in the beetles' regurgitates was assessed with diagnostic Drosophila‐specific RT‐PCR and PCR assays at 0, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h post‐feeding. After fresh fly consumption, prey RNA and DNA were detectable equally well at all times. When carrion prey was consumed, the detection strength of prey RNA immediately after feeding was significantly lower than that of prey DNA and reached zero in most samples within 6 h of digestion. Our findings provide evidence that prey RNA allows distinguishing between the consumption of fresh and scavenged prey, thereby overcoming a long‐known weakness of molecular diet analysis. The assessment of prey RNA offers a generally applicable approach for examining the importance of scavenging in food webs to unravel its functional consequences for populations, communities, and ecosystems.