"The added value of 18f-FDG PET/CT in the assessment of onset and steroid resistant polimyalgia rheumatica"

Should all patients with polymyalgia rheumatica have a vascular ultrasound assessment?

There is a growing appreciation that both giant cell arteritis (GCA) and polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) are closely interrelated conditions that have significant overlap in aetiology, clinical characteristics and treatment regimens. Subclinical GCA in PMR is becoming increasingly recognised, and there is evolving evidence that this may be a more aggressive disease phenotype than PMR. Ultrasound (US) lends itself well as a screening tool for GCA in PMR; it is inexpensive, non-invasive, widely available, lacks ionising radiation, may be performed at the bedside and is recommended by EULAR as a first-line investigation for suspected GCA. There is insufficient evidence to currently recommend that all patients with PMR should have a US assessment for vascular involvement. However, as clinical and laboratory parameters alone do not accurately diagnose patients with subclinical GCA, we suggest that vascular US will be increasingly performed by rheumatologists in practice to identify these patients with PMR, preferably as part of larger prospective outcome studies.

[18F]FDG-PET/CT in Polymyalgia Rheumatica: An Update and Future Aspects

Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is an inflammatory disorder usually diagnosed in patients older than 50 years of age. It is characterized by sudden onset pain and prolonged morning stiffness in the scapular and/or pelvic girdle, sometimes debilitating and accompanied by constitutional symptoms such as weight loss. In approximately 20% of the cases, it is linked to giant cell arteritis (GCAV) representing a disease continuum. The diagnosis is mainly clinical and noninvasive imaging such as ultrasound of joints may be helpful. In atypical PMR cases, whole body imaging using [18F]FDG-PET/CT may be useful. First, to confirm or rule out the diagnosis of PMR, secondly, to assess the coexistence of a GCA, and thirdly to establish the differential diagnosis with other types of arthritides encountered in this age group, such as elderly-onset rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthropathies, crystal-induced arthropathies or the rare remittent seronegative symmetrical synovitis with pitting edema. Relatively typical patterns of [18F]FDG-PET/CT are well known, based on the clinical distribution of the disease (eg, scapular and pelvic girdle, interspinous bursae, sterno-costoclavicular joints, entheses), especially the hypermetabolism at the interspinous lumbar bursae that has shown the best post-test likelihood ratio in a meta-analysis. This article focuses on the differential diagnosis and on the visual and semi-quantitative tools that can be used to guide to the correct diagnosis of PMR as an add-on to the clinical picture. Further, we briefly discuss the options that can improve molecular imaging in the future for inflammatory rheumatisms in elderly.

18F-FDG PET molecular imaging: A relevant tool to investigate chronic inflammatory rheumatisms in clinical practice?

18F-Labeled Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography (18F-FDG PET) is a molecular imaging tool commonly used in practice for the assessment of many cancers. Thanks to its properties, its use has been progressively extended to numerous inflammatory conditions, including chronic inflammatory rheumatism (CIR) such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), spondylarthritis (SpAs) and polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR). 18F-FDG PET is currently not recommended for the diagnostic of CIRs. However, this whole-body imaging tool has emerged in clinical practice, providing a general overview of systemic involvement occurring in CIRs. Numerous studies have highlighted the capacity of 18F-FDG PET to detect articular and extra articular involvements in RA and PMR. However, the lack of specificity of 18F-FDG limits its use for diagnosis purpose. Finally, the key question is the definition of the best way to integrate this whole-body imaging tool in the patient's management workflow.