Diagnostic efficacy of Light-Emitting Diode (LED) Fluorescence based Microscope for the diagnosis of Tuberculous lymphadenitis

Drug Resistance in Tuberculous Lymphadenitis: Molecular Characterization

Background

Drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB) epidemic in high-TB-incidence countries, particularly Ethiopia, remains a significant challenge. As a result, we investigated the drug resistance, common gene mutation, and molecular characterization of mycobacterial isolates from patients with suspected tuberculous lymphadenitis (TBLN). Methodology. A cross-sectional study of 218 FNA samples from TBLN patients inoculated on Lowenstein-Jensen media was carried out. The culture isolates were identified as MTB by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and the difference-9 (RD9) test region. In addition, the GenoType MTBDRplus assay tested the first and second-line MTB drugs, and the spoligotyping strain-dependent polymorphism test was determined.

Results

Among the 50 culture-positive isolates, 14% (7/50) had drug resistance caused by a gene mutation. Out of these, 4 (8%) isolates were mono-resistant to isoniazid drug, which is caused by a gene mutation in katG in the region of interrogated at codon 315 in the amino acid sequence of S315T1, and 3 (6%) isolates were resistant to both rifampicin and isoniazid drugs. The mutation was observed for katG (at codon 315 with a change in the sequence of amino acid S315T) and rpoB (at codon 530-533 with a change in the sequence of amino acid S531L (S450L)) genes. The most prevalent spoligotypes were orphan and SIT53 strains.

Conclusion

The predominance of INH mono-resistance poses a critical risk for the potential development of MDR-TB, as INH mono-resistance is a typical pathway to the occurrence of MDR-TB. The orphan and SIT53 (T) strains were the most common in the study area, and a drug-resistant strain caused by a common gene mutation could indicate the transmission of clonal-resistant strains in the community.

Diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis by ultrasound-guided biopsy: A retrospective comparison study

Objective

To compare the diagnostic performance of laboratory assays on the ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy samples for diagnosis of extra-pulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) in HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients.

Methods

A total of 217 patients suspected to have EPTB underwent lesion biopsy from 2017 to 2020. Results of laboratory tests on the biopsy and non-biopsy samples were collected with clinical data for retrospective analysis of test utility. The calculated diagnostic accuracy of the tests was stratified according to the specimen types and HIV status.

Results

The cohort contained 118 patients with a final positive diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB group, 54.4%) and 99 finally diagnosed as without TB (non-EPTB group, 45.6%). The risk factor for EPTB was HIV co-infection (OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.17-4.28, p = 0.014). In biopsy samples, GeneXpert (Xpert) showed higher sensitivity (96.6% [91.6-98.7], p < 0.0001) than culture (56.1% [47.0-64.9]). Regardless of HIV status, Xpert had the highest sensitivity (>95%) and specificity (nearly 100%) of any methods. In non-biopsy samples, only T-SPOT.TB (T-SPOT) showed higher sensitivity than culture (90.9% [62.3-99.5] vs 35.3% [17.3-58.7], p = 0.0037). Furthermore, the sensitivities of Xpert were lower in non-biopsy samples (60.0% [23.1-92.9], p = 0.022) than in biopsy samples (100% [86.7-100]). Even in smear-negative biopsy samples, Xpert still had higher sensitivity than culture and retained high specificity (100% [95.7-100]).

Conclusion

Superior performance of Xpert in diagnosing EPTB was observed regardless of HIV status and specimen types. Nevertheless, the biopsy samples still substantially facilitated the accurate diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis.

Bacteriologically confirmed extrapulmonary tuberculosis and the associated risk factors among extrapulmonary tuberculosis suspected patients in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The actual burden of bacteriologically confirmed extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) and risk factors in Ethiopia is not well known due to the lack of a strong surveillance system in Ethiopia. Thus, this study was conducted to estimate the pooled prevalence of bacteriologically confirmed EPTB and the associated risk factors among persons suspected to have non-respiratory tuberculosis in Ethiopia.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies reporting the prevalence of EPTB from searched electronic databases; Science Direct, PubMed, and Google Scholar was estimated spread across the research periods, nationally, and in different areas, using a fixed-effects model. We used I2 to analyze heterogeneity in the reported prevalence of bacteriologically confirmed extrapulmonary tuberculosis.

RESULTS

After reviewing 938 research articles, 20 studies (19 cross-sectional and 1 retrospective) from 2003 to 2021 were included in the final analyses. The pooled prevalence of bacteriologically confirmed EPTB was 43% (95%CI; 0.34-0.52, I2 = 98.45%). The asymmetry of the funnel plot revealed the presence of publication bias. Specifically the pooled prevalence of bacteriologically confirmed EPTB based on smear microscopy, Xpert MTB/RIF assay, and culture were 22% (95%CI; 0.13-0.30, I2 = 98.56%), 39% (95%CI; 0.23-0.54, I2 = 98.73%) and 49% (95%CI; 0.41-0.57, I2 = 96.43%) respectively. In this study, a history of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) contact with PTB patients, contact with live animals, consumption of raw milk, HIV-positive, male, and lower monthly income, were found to be independently associated with bacteriologically confirmed EPTB.

CONCLUSION

Ethiopia has a high rate of bacteriologically confirmed EPTB. A history of previous PTB, being HIV-positive and having contact with PTB patients were the most reported risk factors for EPTB in the majority of studies. Strengthening laboratory services for EPTB diagnosis should be given priority to diagnose EPTB cases as early as possible.

Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) Tests for Identifying Protozoan and Bacterial Pathogens in Infectious Diseases

Diagnosing and treating many infectious diseases depends on correctly identifying the causative pathogen. Characterization of pathogen-specific nucleic acid sequences by PCR is the most sensitive and specific method available for this purpose, although it is restricted to laboratories that have the necessary infrastructure and finance. Microscopy, rapid immunochromatographic tests for antigens, and immunoassays for detecting pathogen-specific antibodies are alternative and useful diagnostic methods with different advantages and disadvantages. Detection of ribosomal RNA molecules in the cytoplasm of bacterial and protozoan pathogens by fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) using sequence-specific fluorescently labelled DNA probes, is cheaper than PCR and requires minimal equipment and infrastructure. A LED light source attached to most laboratory light microscopes can be used in place of a fluorescence microscope with a UV lamp for FISH. A FISH test hybridization can be completed in 30 min at 37 °C and the whole test in less than two hours. FISH tests can therefore be rapidly performed in both well-equipped and poorly-resourced laboratories. Highly sensitive and specific FISH tests for identifying many bacterial and protozoan pathogens that cause disease in humans, livestock and pets are reviewed, with particular reference to parasites causing malaria and babesiosis, and mycobacteria responsible for tuberculosis.