A retrospective multicenter comparison of conditional cancer-specific survival between laparoscopic and open radical nephroureterectomy in locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma

Comparison of different prediction tools for the risk of intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a propensity-matched analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the predictive performance of the current clinical prediction models for predicting intravesical recurrence (IVR) after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy in our centre from January 2009 to December 2019. We used the propensity score matching (PSM) method to adjust the confounders between the IVR and non-IVR groups. Additionally, Xylinas' reduce model and full model, Zhang's model, and Ishioka's risk stratification model were used to retrospectively calculate predictions for each patient. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated, and the areas under the curves (AUCs) were compared to identify the method with the highest predictive value.

RESULTS

We included 217 patients with a median follow-up of 41 months, of which 57 had IVR. After PSM analysis, 52 pairs of well-matched patients were included in the comparative study. No significant difference was found in clinical indicators besides hydronephrosis. The model comparison showed that the AUCs of the reduced Xylinas' model for 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months were 0.69, 0.73, and 0.74, respectively, and those of the full Xylinas' model were 0.72, 0.75, and 0.74, respectively. The AUC of Zhang's model for 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months was 0.63, 0.71, and 0.71, respectively, the performance of Ishioka's model is that the AUC of 12 months, 24 months and 36 months was 0.66, 0.71, and 0.74, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The external verification results of the four models show that more comprehensive data and a larger sample size of patients are needed to strengthen the models' derivation and updating procedure, to better apply them to different populations.

Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes and Complications of Laparoscopic and Robotic Nephroureterectomy Approaches in Patients with Upper-Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

For medical institutions without robotic equipment, it remains uncertain whether laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (LNU) can achieve results similar to those of robotic surgery for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of robot-assisted radical nephroureterectomy (RANU) with that of LNU using a large sample size of patients.

METHODS

A systematic meta-analysis was performed using data (available to May 2022) acquired from multiple scientific databases. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) guidelines, according to the protocols registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021264046), were followed to perform this cumulative analysis.

RESULTS

Nine high-quality studies were included in this analysis, considering factors such as operative time (OT), estimated blood loss (EBL), length of hospital stay (LOS), positive surgical margins (PSM), and complications. Statistical indicators revealed no significant differences between the RANU and LNU groups in terms of OT (weighted mean difference [WMD] 29.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.10 to 59.92; p = 0.22), EBL (WMD -55.30, 95% CI -171.14 to 60.54; p = 0.13), LOS (WMD -0.39, 95% CI -1.03 to 0.25; p = 0.12), PSM (odds ratio [OR] 1.22, 95% CI 0.44-3.36; p = 0.17], or complications (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.49-1.69; p = 0.13).

CONCLUSION

The meta-analysis showed that the perioperative and safety indicators of both RANU and LNU were similar and both showed favorable outcomes in UTUC treatment. However, some uncertainties remain in the implementation and selection of lymph nodes for dissection.

The role of surgery for locally advanced urothelial cancers

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Extirpative surgery can play an important role in the management strategies for locally advanced urothelial carcinoma. The current review is intended to relay current information reported in the literature over the past 12 months regarding the usage of surgical resection in advanced urothelial cancers of the bladder and upper tracts, document operative outcomes, and oncologic efficacy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Multimodal therapy is key to long-term overall survival for advanced urothelial carcinoma. Radical cystectomy with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection can be performed after an observable response to chemotherapy or immunotherapy for cT4 or cN2 and higher node-positive disease of the bladder. Moreover, radical cystectomy after trimodal therapy similarly yields durable local response. For upper tract disease, nephroureterectomy with regional lymphadenectomy is the primary surgical modality used often in conjunction with perioperative cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

SUMMARY

Surgical resection as a monotherapy is not curative in patients with locally advanced urothelial carcinoma. However, its use in combination with systemic agents can potentiate durable long-term survival in a subset of patients. Future studies investigating patient-reported outcomes among those receiving consolidative surgery for locally advanced disease are warranted to guide clinical recommendations.

Perioperative and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic and open radical nephroureterectomy for locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a single-center cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Open radical nephroureterectomy (ONU) is the standard of care for treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), but laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (LNU) is increasingly being used due to better perioperative outcomes. However, its oncological safety remains controversial, in particular for advanced disease.We aimed to compare perioperative and oncological outcomes between surgical approaches in locally advanced UTUC (≥pT3 and/or pN+).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study was a retrospective analysis of all 48 patients submitted to radical nephroureterectomy for advanced UTUC between 2006 and 2020 in our center.Perioperative data were compared between groups. Bladder tumor-free survival (BTFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves and compared with log-rank p test. Multivariable Cox regression model was used to evaluate their association with surgical approach.

RESULTS

Clinical and pathological characteristics were similar between groups. LNU had lower blood loss (p = 0.031), need for transfusion (p = 0.013) and length of hospital stay (p <0.001), with similar operative time (p = 0.860).LNU was associated with better MFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20-0.93, p = 0.033) and CSS (HR: 0.42, 95%CI 0.19-0.94, p = 0.036). Median time to cancer death was 41 months for LNU and 12 months for ONU (log-rank p = 0.029). BTFS was similar between groups (HR: 0.60, 95%CI 0.17-2.11, p = 0.427). On multivariable Cox regression model, surgical approach wasn't significantly associated with MFS (p = 0.202), CSS (p = 0.149) or BTFS (p = 0.586).

CONCLUSIONS

In our cohort of advanced UTUC, LNU did not result in inferior oncological control compared to ONU. The minimally invasive approach conferred an advantage in perioperative outcomes.