Approach direction and accuracy, but not response times, show spatial-numerical association in chicks

Hybro chicks outperform Ross308 in a numerical-ordinal task. Cognitive and behavioral comparisons between 2 broiler strains of newborn domestic chicks (Gallus gallus)

Domestic chickens (Gallus gallus) are among those species subject to intensive selection for production. Among the most widely used broiler strains are the Ross308 and the Hybro. From the perspective of animal production, Ross308 were superior to Hybro in weight gain, final body mass, and feed conversion. Intensive selection is thought to also cause behavioral changes and to negatively affect cognitive abilities. Up to date, though, no evidence has been provided on broiler breeds. The aim of this study was to explore cognitive differences among Hybro and Ross308 chickens by assessing their ordinal-numerical abilities. Chicks learned learnt to find a food reward in the 4th container in a series of 10 identical and sagittally aligned containers. We designed a standard training procedure ensuring that all chicks received the same amount of training. The chicks underwent 2 tests: a sagittal and a fronto-parallel one. In the former test, the series was identical to that experienced during training. In the fronto-parallel test, the series was rotated by 90°, thus left-to-right oriented, to assess the capability of transferring the learnt rule with a novel spatial orientation. In the sagittal test, both chicken hybrids selected the 4th item above chance; interestingly the Hybro outperformed the Ross308 chicks. In the fronto-parallel test, both strains selected the 4th left and the 4th right container above chance; nevertheless, the Hybro chicks were more accurate. Our results support the hypothesis that intense selection for production can influence animal cognition and behavior, with implications on animal husbandry and welfare.

Children perform better on left than right targets in an ordinal task

Francis Galton first reported that humans mentally organize numbers from left to right on a mental number line (1880). This spatial-numerical association was long considered to result from writing and reading habits. More recently though, newborns and animals showed a left-to-right oriented spatial numerical association challenging the primary role assigned to culture in determining the link between number and space. Despite growing evidence supporting the intrinsic association between number and space in different species, its adaptive value is still largely unknown. Here we tested for an advantage in identification of left versus right target positions in 3- to 6-year-old children. Children watched as a toy was hidden under one of 10 linearly arranged identical cups and were then asked to help a stuffed animal retrieve the toy. On each trial, the toy was hidden in the 2nd, 3rd, or 4th cup, from the left or right. To prevent children from staring at the target cup, they were asked to pick up the stuffed animal from under their chair after witnessing the hiding of the toy and then to help the stuffed animal find the toy. Older children were more accurate than younger children. Children exhibited a serial position effect, with performance higher for more exterior targets. Remarkably, children also showed a left bias: they remembered the left targets better than the right targets. Only the youngest children were dramatically influenced by the location of the experimenter during search. Additional analyses support the hypothesis that children used a left-to-right oriented searching strategy in this spatial/ordinal task.