Potential application of measuring serum infliximab levels in rheumatoid arthritis management: A retrospective study based on KURAMA cohort data

Rapid and simple quantification of belimumab in human plasma using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry

OBJECTIVE

Belimumab is a monoclonal antibody against the B-lymphocyte stimulating factor and is approved for the treatment of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) not responding adequately to existing therapies. In this study, we established and validated an assay for quantifying belimumab in human plasma.

METHODS

From the peptides generated by trypsin digestion of belimumab, in silico analysis was used to search for unique peptides to determine the surrogate peptides. Samples were trypsin digested, pretreated with solid phase extraction, and analyzed by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS) to quantify the surrogate peptide in the samples. The assay was validated according to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) bioanalytical method validation guidance. We used the established assay to quantify plasma belimumab concentrations in two SLE patients treated with belimumab.

RESULTS

Among the unique peptides identified by the in silico analysis, the peptide with the best peak shape when measured by UHPLC-MS/MS was selected as the surrogate peptide. The validation results of this assay met the acceptable criteria recommended by the FDA guidance. The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) for belimumab was 2 µg/mL. Recovery rates and matrix effects when corrected for internal standards were 91.5-114.3 % and 96.9-108.4 %, respectively. Plasma concentrations of belimumab were measured in 12 samples from two belimumab-treated SLE patients. All concentrations were within the calibration range.

CONCLUSIONS

We have established and validated a method for measuring plasma belimumab concentrations using UHPLC/MS-MS. By measuring plasma belimumab concentrations in more patients, this method is expected to contribute to appropriate use of belimumab.

Advancement in nanotechnology for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: scope and potential applications

Rheumatoid arthritis is a hyperactive immune disorder that results in severe inflammation in synovial joints, cartilage, and bone deterioration, resulting in immobilization of joints. Traditional approaches for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis are associated with some limiting factors such as suboptimal patient compliance, inability to control the progression of disorder, and safety concerns. Therefore, innovative drug delivery carriers for efficient therapeutic delivery at inflamed synovial sites with better safety assessment are urgently needed to address these issues. From this perspective, nanotechnology is an outstanding alternative to traditional drug delivery approaches, and it has shown great promise in developing novel carriers to treat rheumatoid arthritis. Considering the current research and future application of nanocarriers, it is believed that nanocarriers can be a crucial element in rheumatoid arthritis treatment. This paper covers all currently available pathophysiological aspects of rheumatoid arthritis and treatment options. Future research for the reduction of synovial inflammation should focus on developing multifunction nanoparticles capable of delivering therapeutic agents with improved safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness to be commercialized.

Comparison of Immunochemical Reactions of Infliximab Innovator and Biosimilars on an Infliximab Detection Kit Used for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

Monitoring serum infliximab (INF) concentrations is crucial for designing appropriate doses for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. It is recommended to maintain the serum trough INF level at least 1.0 µg/mL. In Japan, an in vitro diagnostic kit using immunochromatography has been approved to determine whether the serum INF concentration is over 1.0 µg/mL or not, and to support the determination of the necessity of increasing the dose or switching to another drug. Biosimilars (BS) of INF may have immunochemical properties different from those of its innovator product, which may show different reactivities on the diagnostic kit. In this study, the responses of the innovator and five BS products on the kit were compared. Based on visually comparing the intensity of color development between the test and control samples, differences were found in the judgment results depending on the analyst. In particular, 1.0 µg/mL was not determined as positive in some cases, whereas 2.0 µg/mL was reliably determined as positive. Overall, no significant difference in reactivity was found between the innovator and five BS products. To further compare the differences in immunochemical properties, the reactivity of these products with three enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits was compared. The results confirmed that there were no significant differences among the innovator and BS products in reactivity with the examined kits. When using that diagnostic kit, the users need to be aware that the judgement around 1.0 µg/mL INF may differ depending on the test conditions, including the analyst.

Association of Serum Dupilumab Levels at 16 Weeks With Treatment Response and Adverse Effects in Patients With Atopic Dermatitis: A Prospective Clinical Cohort Study From the BioDay Registry

Importance

The registered dose of dupilumab for adult patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) is 300 mg every other week. At present, it is unknown whether serum dupilumab levels are associated with treatment response or adverse effects.

Objectives

To evaluate serum dupilumab levels at 16 weeks of treatment and to explore the association of serum dupilumab levels with treatment response and adverse effects in patients with AD.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This clinical, prospective, observational cohort study used data from the prospective BioDay Registry including adult patients with AD who started dupilumab treatment and for whom a serum sample was available at 16 weeks of treatment. All patients were treated according to the BioDay protocol in the University Medical Center Utrecht in the Netherlands. Patients received a loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg subcutaneously, followed by 300 mg every other week. Patients who had a dose adjustment or discontinued treatment before 16 weeks of treatment were excluded. Data analyses were performed from January to June 2022.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Disease severity of AD was assessed at baseline and at weeks 16 and 52 using the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI). Treatment response was defined as the percent reduction in EASI score vs the baseline score (eg, EASI 90 indicated a 90% reduction) and as an absolute EASI cutoff score of 7 or lower (controlled AD). Adverse effects were recorded during the first year. At 16 weeks, dupilumab serum levels and treatment responses were measured and analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression modeling was used to determine the prediction of response (EASI 90; EASI ≤7) and adverse effects at 52 weeks, with serum dupilumab levels at 16 weeks in the presence of the covariates age and sex.

Results

Among the total of 295 patients with AD (mean [SD] age, 41.5 [15.9] years; 170 [57.6%] men), the median (IQR [range]) drug level was 86.6 μg/mL (64.6-110.0 μg/mL [10.1-382.0 μg/mL]) at 16 weeks of treatment. No significant differences were found in serum dupilumab levels between responder statuses (EASI, <50, 50, 75, or 90) at week 16. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed nonsignificant odds ratios (ORs) for serum dupilumab levels at 16 weeks regarding prediction of long-term response (EASI ≥90: OR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.90-1.04; P = .34] and EASI ≤7: OR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.93-1.14; P = .55]) and adverse effects (OR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.95-1.07; P = .83]).

Conclusion and Relevance

This prospective clinical cohort study found a broad range of serum dupilumab levels at 16 weeks of treatment and no association with treatment response and adverse effects during first year of treatment. Response may be dependent on target availability of the interleukin-4 receptor subunit α, with an interpatient variability producing heterogeneity in response.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Antibody Drugs

In recent years, many antibody drugs that play an important role in the pharmacotherapy of several diseases have been developed. Antibody drugs exhibit immunogenicity in vivo leading to the development of antibodies against the antibody drug (anti-drug antibody). Nonetheless, other factors also affect the pharmacokinetics of antibody drugs. Recently, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of infliximab was introduced for personalized medicine. However, the usefulness of TDM in antibody therapy remains unclear. In addition to intervention studies, real-world data analysis is important. Unlike small-molecule drugs, antibody drugs do not have a uniform molecular weight; therefore, using the conventional analysis methods, it is impossible to determine the true pharmacokinetic outcomes of these agents. To analyze structural changes of antibody drugs in the body, new technologies are necessary. In the future, along with the development of new drugs, the establishment of novel analytical methods is essential to facilitate the promotion of personalized medicine.

A rapid and universal liquid chromatograph-mass spectrometry-based platform, refmAb-Q nSMOL, for monitoring monoclonal antibody therapeutics

Accurate multiplexed quantitation of unique signature peptides derived from monoclonal antibody therapeutics with a universal reference antibody refmAb-Q using Fab-selective proteolysis nSMOL coupled with LC-MS/MS.