Quality-adjusted life year comparison at medium term follow-up of endovascular versus open surgical repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm in young patients

Treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms in Korea: a nationwide study

Purpose

Although endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been shown to be superior to open surgical repair (OSR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) treatment, no large-scale studies in the Korean population have compared outcomes and costs.

Methods

The National Health Insurance Service database in Korea was screened to identify AAA patients treated with EVAR or OSR from 2008 to 2019. Perioperative, early postoperative, and long-term survival were compared, as were reinterventions and complications. Patients were followed-up through 2020.

Results

Of the 13,631 patients identified, 2,935 underwent OSR and 10,696 underwent EVAR. Perioperative mortality rate was lower in the EVAR group (4.2% vs. 8.0%, P < 0.001) even after excluding patients with ruptured AAA (2.7% vs. 3.3%, P = 0.003). However, long-term mortality rate per 100 person-years was significantly higher in the EVAR than in the OSR group (9.0 vs. 6.4, P < 0.001), and all-cause mortality was lower in the OSR group (hazard ratio, 0.9; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-0.97, P = 0.008). EVAR had a higher AAA-related reintervention rate per 100 person-years (1.75 vs. 0.52), and AAA-related reintervention costs were almost 10-fold higher with EVAR (US dollar [USD] 6,153,463) than with OSR (USD 624,216).

Conclusion

While EVAR may have short-term advantages, OSR may provide better long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness for AAA treatment in the Korean population, under the medical expense system in Korea.

Long-term outcomes of open and endovascular abdominal aortic repair in younger patients

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate long-term results in abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery by either open (OAR) or endovascular (EVAR) repair in patients under 70 years of age.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database of patients with age under 70 years old undergoing elective infrarenal AAA surgery between 2010 and 2018 was performed. The study population was divided into two groups: OAR and EVAR. The primary end-points were overall survival and aneurysm-related death, while secondary outcomes were need for reintervention and development of minor and major complications.

RESULTS

191 patients younger than 70 years old treated for elective AAA surgery were enrolled: 157 OAR (98% males, mean age 65 ± 4 years) and 34 EVAR (94% males, mean age 66 ± 4 years). Hospital stay, 30-day mortality and need for reintervention were similar; OAR population presented higher incidence of postoperative major complications (18% vs 2.9%; p .01) while minor complications were 32% in OAR vs 21% in EVAR group (p .08). Median follow-up was 69 months for OAR (IQR 53 months) vs. 79 months (IQR 51 months) for EVAR (p .9): long-term AAA-related reinterventions were more frequent after EVAR (1.9% OAR vs. 17% EVAR; p .01) while AAA-related long-term mortality was similar in both sugroups (1.3% OAR and 3% EVAR; p .8). At univariate analysis a higher risk of reintervention was reported for conical necks in EVAR group (p .03) and for the concomitant presence of iliac aneurysms in both groups (p .01).

CONCLUSIONS

In our population, the presence of a conical neck is an independent predictor of EVAR failure and late reintervention, while it does not play a significant role in OAR group. For this reason, in such cases, open surgery must be considered as the first option in younger patients with a long-life expectancy.