1
|
Zhao J, McBride CM, Campbell GP, Pentz RD, Escoffery C, Konomos M, Bellcross C, Ward K, Shepperd JR, Guan Y. Your Family Connects: A Theory-Based Intervention to Encourage Communication about Possible Inherited Cancer Risk among Ovarian Cancer Survivors and Close Relatives. Public Health Genomics 2023; 26:77-89. [PMID: 37487468 PMCID: PMC10614520 DOI: 10.1159/000531772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Encouraging family communication about possible genetic risk has become among the most important avenues for achieving the full potential of genomic discovery for primary and secondary prevention. Yet, effective family-wide risk communication (i.e., conveying genetic risk status and its meaning for other family members) remains a critical gap in the field. We aim to describe the iterative process of developing a scalable population-based communication outreach intervention, Your Family Connects, to reach ovarian cancer survivors and close relatives to communicate the potential for inherited risk and to consider genetic counseling. METHODS Relational-level theories (e.g., interdependence theory) suggest that interventions to promote family cancer risk communication will be most effective if they consider the qualities of specific relationships and activate motives to preserve the relationship. Informed by these theories, we collaborated with 14 citizen scientists (survivors of ovarian cancer or relatives) and collected 261 surveys and 39 structured interviews over 12 weeks of citizen science activities in 2020. RESULTS The citizen science findings and consideration of relational-level theories informed the content and implementation of Your Family Connects (www.yourfamilyconnects.org). CS results showed survivors favor personal contact with close relatives, but relatives were open to alternative contact methods, such as through health professionals. Recognizing the need for varied approaches based on relationship dynamics, we implemented a relative contact menu to enable survivors identify at-risk relatives and provide multiple contact options (i.e., survivor contact, health professional contact, and delayed contact). In line with relational autonomy principles, we included pros and cons for each option, assisting survivors in choosing suitable contact methods for each relative. DISCUSSION Our developed intervention represents a novel application of relational-level theories and partnership with citizen scientists to expand genetic services reach to increase the likelihood for fair distribution of cancer genomic advances. The Your Family Connects intervention as part of a randomized trial in collaboration with the Georgia Cancer Registry compared with standard outreach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingsong Zhao
- Department of Behavioral, Social and Health Education Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA,
| | - Colleen M McBride
- Department of Behavioral, Social and Health Education Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Gavin P Campbell
- Department of Behavioral, Social and Health Education Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Rebecca D Pentz
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Cam Escoffery
- Department of Behavioral, Social and Health Education Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | | | - Kevin Ward
- Georgia Center for Cancer Statistics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - James R Shepperd
- Department of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Yue Guan
- Department of Behavioral, Social and Health Education Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bergin RJ, Short CE, Davis N, Marker J, Dawson MT, Milton S, McNamara M, Druce P, Milley K, Karnchanachari N, Skaczkowski G. The nature and impact of patient and public involvement in cancer prevention, screening and early detection research: A systematic review. Prev Med 2023; 167:107412. [PMID: 36592674 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Revised: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Patient and public involvement can produce high-quality, relevant research that better addresses the needs of patients and their families. This systematic review investigated the nature and impact of patient and public involvement in cancer prevention, screening and early detection research. Two patient representatives were involved as members of the review team. Databases (Medline, EMBASE, Emcare, Involve Evidence Library) were searched for English-language studies published 1995-March 2022. Titles/abstracts were screened by two reviewers independently. For eligible studies, data were extracted on study characteristics, patient and public involvement (who, when, how, and impact on research outcomes), and reporting quality using the Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public 2-Short Form. Of 4095 articles screened, 58 were eligible. Most research was from the United States (81%) and examined cancer screening or prevention (82%). Community members/organisations/public were the most involved (71%); fewer studies involved patients and/or carers (14%). Over half reported a high-level of involvement (i.e. partner and/or expert involvement), although this declined in later stages of the research cycle, e.g. data analysis. Common positive impacts included improved study design, research methods and recruitment, although most papers (62%) did not describe methods to determine impact. Reporting quality was sub-optimal, largely due to failure to consider challenges. This review found that high-level involvement of patients and the public in cancer prevention, screening and early detection research is feasible and has several advantages. However, improvements are needed to encourage involvement across the research cycle, and in evaluating and reporting its impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca J Bergin
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia; Department of General Practice/Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Camille E Short
- Melbourne Centre for Behaviour Change, Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences and Melbourne School of Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nikki Davis
- Patient representative, Primary Care Collaborative Cancer Clinical Trials Group (PC4) Community Advisory Group, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Julie Marker
- Patient representative, Primary Care Collaborative Cancer Clinical Trials Group (PC4) Community Advisory Group, Melbourne, Australia; Patient representative, Cancer Voices South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | - Shakira Milton
- Department of General Practice/Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Mairead McNamara
- Department of General Practice/Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Paige Druce
- Department of General Practice/Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Kristi Milley
- Department of General Practice/Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Napin Karnchanachari
- Department of General Practice/Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Gemma Skaczkowski
- Department of Rural Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia; School of Psychology & Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|