1
|
Cocconi F, Maffulli N, Bell A, Memminger MK, Simeone F, Migliorini F. Sacroiliac joint pain: what treatment and when. Expert Rev Neurother 2024:1-8. [PMID: 39262128 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2024.2400682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2024] [Accepted: 09/01/2024] [Indexed: 09/13/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Spinal and non-spinal pathologies can cause low back pain. Non-spinal sources of low back pain include the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) and the hip. SIJ pain can be treated either conservatively or surgically. Current strategies for managing sacroiliac joint pain are debated, and limited evidence exists. AREAS COVERED The present expert opinion updates current evidence on conservative and surgical modalities for SIJ pain. EXPERT OPINION Surgical management for SIJ pain is effective. However, it exposes patients to surgery and, therefore, related complications. Conservative management may be implemented in patients with moderate SIJ pain, with less than six months of symptoms, or not eligible for surgery. Several noninvasive modalities are available, mostly centered on intra-articular injections. Corticosteroids, platelet-rich plasma, and stem cells have only midterm lasting effects, at most for nine months. Radiofrequency ablation is another methodology for pain relief. Both continuous and pulsatile radiofrequency ablation are associated with good outcomes. SIJ fusion can be performed using different techniques; however, a clear recommendation on the most appropriate modality for the management of SIJ pain is still debated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federico Cocconi
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Academic Hospital of Bolzano (SABES-ASDAA), Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical University, Bolzano, Italy
| | - Nicola Maffulli
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Medicine and Psychology, University La Sapienza, Roma, Italy
- School of Pharmacy and Bioengineering, Keele University Faculty of Medicine, Stoke on Trent, UK
- Centre for Sports and Exercise Medicine, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Mile End Hospital, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Andreas Bell
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Eifelklinik St. Brigida, Simmerath, Germany
| | - Michael Kurt Memminger
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Academic Hospital of Bolzano (SABES-ASDAA), Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical University, Bolzano, Italy
| | - Francesco Simeone
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Academic Hospital of Bolzano (SABES-ASDAA), Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical University, Bolzano, Italy
| | - Filippo Migliorini
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Academic Hospital of Bolzano (SABES-ASDAA), Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical University, Bolzano, Italy
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Eifelklinik St. Brigida, Simmerath, Germany
- Department of Life Sciences, Health, and Health Professions, Link Campus University, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Larivière C, Preuss R, Coutu MF, Sullivan MJ, Roy N, Henry SM. Disability reduction following a lumbar stabilization exercise program for low back pain: large vs. small improvement subgroup analyses of physical and psychological variables. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2024; 25:358. [PMID: 38704535 PMCID: PMC11069239 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07480-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 04/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about why patients with low back pain (LBP) respond differently to treatment, and more specifically, to a lumbar stabilization exercise program. As a first step toward answering this question, the present study evaluates how subgroups of patients who demonstrate large and small clinical improvements differ in terms of physical and psychological changes during treatment. METHODS Participants (n = 110) performed the exercise program (clinical sessions and home exercises) over eight weeks, with 100 retained at six-month follow-up. Physical measures (lumbar segmental instability, motor control impairments, range of motion, trunk muscle endurance and physical performance tests) were collected twice (baseline, end of treatment), while psychological measures (fear-avoidance beliefs, pain catastrophizing, psychological distress, illness perceptions, outcome expectations) were collected at four time points (baseline, mid-treatment, end of treatment, follow-up). The participants were divided into three subgroups (large, moderate and small clinical improvements) based on the change of perceived disability scores. ANOVA for repeated measure compared well-contrasted subgroups (large vs. small improvement) at different times to test for SUBGROUP × TIME interactions. RESULTS Statistically significant interactions were observed for several physical and psychological measures. In all these interactions, the large- and small-improvement subgroups were equivalent at baseline, but the large-improvement subgroup showed more improvements over time compared to the small-improvement subgroup. For psychological measures only (fear-avoidance beliefs, pain catastrophizing, illness perceptions), between-group differences reached moderate to strong effect sizes, at the end of treatment and follow-up. CONCLUSIONS The large-improvement subgroup showed more improvement than the small-improvement subgroup with regard to physical factors typically targeted by this specific exercise program as well as for psychological factors that are known to influence clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Larivière
- Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail (IRSST), 505, boul. De Maisonneuve Ouest, Montreal, QC, H3A 3C2, Canada.
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), 6363, Hudson Road, office 061, Montreal, QC, H3S 1M9, Canada.
| | - Richard Preuss
- School of Physical & Occupational Therapy, McGill University, 845 Sherbrooke Wst, Montreal, QC, H3G 1Y5, Canada
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), 6363, Hudson Road, office 061, Montreal, QC, H3S 1M9, Canada
| | - Marie-France Coutu
- Charles-Le Moyne Hospital Research Centre, University of Sherbrooke, 150 Place Charles-Le Moyne, Office 200, Longueuil, QC, J4K 0A8, Canada
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), 6363, Hudson Road, office 061, Montreal, QC, H3S 1M9, Canada
| | - Michael J Sullivan
- Department of Psychology, McGill University, 1205 Docteur Penfield, Montreal, QC, H3A 1B1, Canada
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), 6363, Hudson Road, office 061, Montreal, QC, H3S 1M9, Canada
| | - Nicolas Roy
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), 6363, Hudson Road, office 061, Montreal, QC, H3S 1M9, Canada
| | - Sharon M Henry
- Department of Neurological Sciences, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, 05401, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Silişteanu SC, Antonescu E, Duică L, Totan M, Cucu AI, Costea AI. Lumbar Paravertebral Muscle Pain Management Using Kinesitherapy and Electrotherapeutic Modalities. Healthcare (Basel) 2024; 12:853. [PMID: 38667615 PMCID: PMC11050304 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12080853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2024] [Revised: 04/05/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low back pain is considered a public health problem internationally. Low back pain is a cause of disability that occurs in adolescents and causes negative effects in adults as well. The work environment and physical and psychosocial factors can influence the occurrence and evolution of low back pain. METHODS The purpose of this paper is to highlight the physiological and functional changes in young adults with painful conditions of the lumbar spine, after using exercise therapy. The study was of the longitudinal type and was carried out over a period 6 months in an outpatient setting. The rehabilitation treatment included electrotherapeutic modalities and kinesitherapy. RESULTS The results obtained when evaluating each parameter, for all moments, show statistically significant values in both groups. The results obtained regarding the relationship between the therapeutic modalities specific to rehabilitation medicine and low back pain are consistent with those reported in studies. CONCLUSIONS Depending on the clinical-functional status of each patient, kinesitherapy can accelerate the heart rate and increase the blood pressure and oxygen saturation of the arterial blood, values that can later return to their initial levels, especially through training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sînziana Călina Silişteanu
- Faculty of Medicine and Biological Sciences, Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, 720229 Suceava, Romania; (S.C.S.); (A.I.C.); (A.I.C.)
| | - Elisabeta Antonescu
- Faculty of Medicine, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, 550169 Sibiu, Romania;
| | - Lavinia Duică
- Faculty of Medicine, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, 550169 Sibiu, Romania;
| | - Maria Totan
- Faculty of Medicine, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, 550169 Sibiu, Romania;
| | - Andrei Ionuţ Cucu
- Faculty of Medicine and Biological Sciences, Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, 720229 Suceava, Romania; (S.C.S.); (A.I.C.); (A.I.C.)
| | - Andrei Ioan Costea
- Faculty of Medicine and Biological Sciences, Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, 720229 Suceava, Romania; (S.C.S.); (A.I.C.); (A.I.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nzamba J, Van Damme S, Favre J, Christe G. The relationships between spinal amplitude of movement, pain and disability in low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Pain 2024; 28:37-53. [PMID: 37475698 DOI: 10.1002/ejp.2162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Revised: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 07/08/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The role of spinal movement alterations in low back pain (LBP) remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analyses examined the relationships between spinal amplitude of movement, disability and pain intensity in patients with LBP. DATABASES AND DATA TREATMENT We searched PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Pedro and Web of Science for relevant articles until 14th March 2023. Risk of bias was assessed with the Quality in Prognostic Studies Tool. We analysed the relationships between amplitude of movement, disability and pain intensity with standard correlational meta-analyses and meta-analytic structural equation modelling (MASEM) in cross-sectional and longitudinal data. RESULTS A total of 106 studies (9001 participants) were included. In cross-sectional data, larger amplitude of movement was associated with lower disability (pooled coefficient: -0.25, 95% confidence interval: [-0.29 to -0.21]; 69/5899 studies/participants) and pain intensity (-0.13, [-0.17 to -0.09]; 74/5806). An increase in amplitude of movement was associated with a decrease in disability (-0.23, [-0.31 to -0.15]; 33/2437) and pain intensity (-0.25, [-0.33 to -0.17]; 38/2172) in longitudinal data. MASEM revealed similar results and, in addition, showed that amplitude of movement had a very small influence on the pain intensity-disability relationship. CONCLUSIONS These results showed a significant but small association between amplitude of movement and disability or pain intensity. Moreover, they demonstrated a direct association between an increase in amplitude of movement and a decrease in pain intensity or disability, supporting interventions aiming to reduce protective spinal movements in patients with LBP. SIGNIFICANCE The large meta-analyses performed in this work revealed an association between reductions in spinal amplitude of movement and increased levels of disability and pain intensity in people with LBP. Moreover, it highlighted that LBP recovery is associated with a reduction in protective motor behaviour (increased amplitude of movement), supporting the inclusion of spinal movement in the biopsychosocial understanding and management of LBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Nzamba
- Division of Physiotherapy, School of Health Professions, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Bern, Switzerland
| | - S Van Damme
- Department of Experimental-Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - J Favre
- Swiss BioMotion Lab, Department of Musculoskeletal Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - G Christe
- Swiss BioMotion Lab, Department of Musculoskeletal Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Physiotherapy, HESAV School of Health Sciences, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Larivière C, Preuss R, Gagnon DH, Mecheri H, Driscoll M, Henry SM. The relationship between clinical examination measures and ultrasound measures of fascia thickness surrounding trunk muscles or lumbar multifidus fatty infiltrations: An exploratory study. J Anat 2023; 242:666-682. [PMID: 36521728 PMCID: PMC10008298 DOI: 10.1111/joa.13807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2022] [Revised: 10/28/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) exhibit remodelling of the lumbar soft tissues such as muscle fatty infiltrations (MFI) and fibrosis of the lumbar multifidus (LuM) muscles, thickness changes of the thoracolumbar fascia (TLF) and perimuscular connective tissues (PMCT) surrounding the abdominal lateral wall muscles. Rehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI) parameters such as thickness and echogenicity are sensitive to this remodelling. This experimental laboratory study aimed to explore whether these RUSI parameters (LuM echogenicity and fascia thicknesses), hereafter called dependent variables (DV) were linked to independent variables (IV) such as (1) other RUSI parameters (trunk muscle thickness and activation) and (2) physical and psychological measures. RUSI measures, as well as a clinical examination comprising physical tests and psychological questionnaires, were collected from 70 participants with LBP. The following RUSI dependent variables (RUSI-DV), measures of passive tissues were performed bilaterally: (1) LuM echogenicity (MFI/fibrosis) at three vertebral levels (L3/L4, L4/L5 and L5/S1); (2) TLF posterior layer thickness, and (3) PMCT thickness of the fasciae between subcutaneous tissue thickness (STT) and external oblique (PMCTSTT/EO ), between external and internal oblique (PMCTEO/IO ), between IO and transversus abdominis (PMCTIO/TrA ) and between TrA and intra-abdominal content (PMCTTrA/IA ). RUSI measures of trunk muscle's function (thickness and activation), also called measures of active muscle tissues, were considered as independent variables (RUSI-IV), along with physical tests related to lumbar stability (n = 6), motor control deficits (n = 7), trunk muscle endurance (n = 4), physical performance (n = 4), lumbar posture (n = 2), and range of motion (ROM) tests (n = 6). Psychosocial measures included pain catastrophizing, fear-avoidance beliefs, psychological distress, illness perceptions and concepts related to adherence to a home-based exercise programme (physical activity level, self-efficacy, social support, outcome expectations). Six multivariate regression models (forward stepwise selection) were generated, using RUSI-DV measures as dependent variables and RUSI-IV/physical/psychosocial measures as independent variables (predictors). The six multivariate models included three to five predictors, explaining 63% of total LuM echogenicity variance, between 41% and 46% of trunk superficial fasciae variance (TLF, PMCTSTT/EO ) and between 28% and 37% of deeper abdominal wall fasciae variance (PMCTEO/IO , PMCTIO/TrA and PMCTTrA/IA ). These variables were from RUSI-IV (LuM thickness at rest, activation of IO and TrA), body composition (percent fat) and clinical physical examination (lumbar and pelvis flexion ROM, aberrant movements, passive and active straight-leg raise, loaded-reach test) from the biological domain, as well as from the lifestyle (physical activity level during sports), psychological (psychological distress-cognitive subscale, fear-avoidance beliefs during physical activities, self-efficacy to exercise) and social (family support to exercise) domains. Biological, psychological, social and lifestyle factors each accounted for substantial variance in RUSI-passive parameters. These findings are in keeping with a conceptual link between tissue remodelling and factors such as local and systemic inflammation. Possible explanations are discussed, in keeping with the hypothesis-generating nature of this study (exploratory). However, to impact clinical practice, further research is needed to determine if the most plausible predictors of trunk fasciae thickness and LuM fatty infiltrations have an effect on these parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Larivière
- Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail (IRSST), Montréal, Québec, Canada.,Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Institut universitaire sur la réadaptation en déficience physique de Montréal (IURDPM), Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Ile-de-Montréal (CCSMTL), Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Richard Preuss
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Institut universitaire sur la réadaptation en déficience physique de Montréal (IURDPM), Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Ile-de-Montréal (CCSMTL), Montréal, Québec, Canada.,School of Physical & Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Dany H Gagnon
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Institut universitaire sur la réadaptation en déficience physique de Montréal (IURDPM), Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Ile-de-Montréal (CCSMTL), Montréal, Québec, Canada.,School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Hakim Mecheri
- Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail (IRSST), Montréal, Québec, Canada.,Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Institut universitaire sur la réadaptation en déficience physique de Montréal (IURDPM), Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Ile-de-Montréal (CCSMTL), Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Mark Driscoll
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Sharon M Henry
- Department of Neurological Sciences, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Development of a Clinical Prediction Rule for Treatment Success with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Knee Osteoarthritis Pain: A Secondary Analysis of a Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Biomedicines 2022; 11:biomedicines11010004. [PMID: 36672512 PMCID: PMC9855334 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11010004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Revised: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The study’s objective was to develop a clinical prediction rule that predicts a clinically significant analgesic effect on chronic knee osteoarthritis pain after transcranial direct current stimulation treatment. This is a secondary analysis from a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Data from 51 individuals with chronic knee osteoarthritis pain and an impaired descending pain inhibitory system were used. The intervention comprised a 15-session protocol of anodal primary motor cortex transcranial direct current stimulation. Treatment success was defined by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities’ Osteoarthritis Index pain subscale. Accuracy statistics were calculated for each potential predictor and for the final model. The final logistic regression model was statistically significant (p < 0.01) and comprised five physical and psychosocial predictor variables that together yielded a positive likelihood ratio of 14.40 (95% CI: 3.66−56.69) and an 85% (95%CI: 60−96%) post-test probability of success. This is the first clinical prediction rule proposed for transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with chronic pain. The model underscores the importance of both physical and psychosocial factors as predictors of the analgesic response to transcranial direct current stimulation treatment. Validation of the proposed clinical prediction rule should be performed in other datasets.
Collapse
|