1
|
Ahn HJ. Anesthesia and cancer recurrence: a narrative review. Anesth Pain Med (Seoul) 2024; 19:94-108. [PMID: 38725164 PMCID: PMC11089301 DOI: 10.17085/apm.24041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2024] [Revised: 04/24/2024] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide. With the increasingly aging population, the number of emerging cancer cases is expected to increase markedly in the foreseeable future. Surgical resection with adjuvant therapy is the best available option for the potential cure of many solid tumors; thus, approximately 80% of patients with cancer undergo at least one surgical procedure during their disease. Agents used in general anesthesia can modulate cytokine release, transcription factors, and/or oncogenes. This can affect host immunity and the capability of cancer cells to survive and migrate, not only during surgery but for up to several weeks after surgery. However, it remains unknown whether exposure to anesthetic agents affects cancer recurrence or metastasis. This review explores the current literature to explain whether and how the choice of anesthetic and perioperative medication affect cancer surgery outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyun Joo Ahn
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tang Y, Tang L, Yao Y, Huang H, Chen B. Effects of anesthesia on long-term survival in cancer surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Heliyon 2024; 10:e24791. [PMID: 38318020 PMCID: PMC10839594 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2023] [Revised: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Backgrounds The association between anesthesia and long-term oncological outcome after cancer surgery remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the effect of propofol-based anesthesia and inhalation anesthesia on long-term survival in cancer surgery. Methods A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed, Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library until November 15, 2023. The outcomes included overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). The hazard ratio (HR) and 95 % confidence interval (CI) were calculated with a random-effects model. Results We included forty-two retrospective cohort studies and two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 686,923 patients. Propofol-based anesthesia was associated with improved OS (HR = 0.82, 95 % CI:0.76-0.88, P < 0.00001) and RFS (HR = 0.80, 95 % CI:0.73-0.88, P < 0.00001) than inhalation anesthesia after cancer surgery. However, these positive results were only observed in single-center studies (OS: HR = 0.76, 95 % CI:0.68-0.84, P < 0.00001; RFS: HR = 0.76, 95 % CI:0.66-0.87, P < 0.0001), but not in multicenter studies (OS: HR = 0.98, 95 % CI:0.94-1.03, P = 0.51; RFS: HR = 0.95, 95 % CI:0.87-1.04, P = 0.26). The subgroup analysis revealed that propofol-based anesthesia provided OS and RFS advantages in hepatobiliary cancer (OS: HR = 0.58, 95 % CI:0.40-0.86, P = 0.005; RFS: HR = 0.62, 95 % CI:0.44-0.86, P = 0.005), gynecological cancer (OS: HR = 0.52, 95 % CI:0.33-0.81, P = 0.004; RFS: HR = 0.51, 95 % CI:0.36-0.72, P = 0.0001), and osteosarcoma (OS: HR = 0.30, 95 % CI:0.11-0.81, P = 0.02; RFS: HR = 0.32, 95 % CI:0.14-0.75, P = 0.008) surgeries. Conclusion Propofol-based anesthesia may be associated with improved OS and RFS than inhalation anesthesia in some cancer surgeries. Considering the inherent weaknesses of retrospective designs and the strong publication bias, our findings should be interpreted with caution. Well-designed multicenter RCTs are still urgent to further confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaxing Tang
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Lele Tang
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Yuting Yao
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - He Huang
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Bing Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Owrey M, Min KJ, Torjman M. Propofol Infusions and Their Role for Patients Undergoing Surgery for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Cureus 2024; 16:e53447. [PMID: 38435231 PMCID: PMC10909378 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.53447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Propofol infusions may improve survival for patients undergoing surgery for various types of cancer. However, propofol has not been shown to improve survival for all cancer types. The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate whether propofol infusions during surgery for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) improved survival. METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed on all patients undergoing surgery for HNSCC with neck dissection at one institution between June 15, 2017, and April 28, 2021. The primary analysis was performed as a cohort study, with one cohort receiving a propofol infusion and the other cohort not receiving a propofol infusion. A second analysis was performed as a case-control study with matching by cancer staging, human papillomavirus (HPV)/p16 status, pathology margin status, surgical duration within 90 minutes, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) within a score of 1. Cases included patients who received a propofol infusion, and controls were patients who did not receive a propofol infusion. RESULTS For the primary analysis, there was no statistically significant difference in age (p=0.650), BMI (p=0.956), sex (p=0.069), and CCI (p=0.351), but there was a statistically significant difference in ASA status (p=0.003). The time exposed to sevoflurane (MAC >0.3) was significantly higher in the no-propofol group (p<0.001). The duration of surgery was significantly longer in the propofol patient group compared to the no-propofol group (p=0.013). The length of hospital stay was roughly two days longer for the propofol group (p=0.029). There was no difference in survival for patients who did not receive propofol versus those who did (p=0.247), even after adjusting for HPV/p16 tumor marker status (p=0.223). When patients were matched in a case-control approach, there were no differences in age (p=0.956), BMI (p=0.828), CCI (p=1.000), or ASA status (p=1.000). The death rate was not significant between the cases and controls (p=0.311). CONCLUSIONS This data suggests that propofol may not influence survival in patients with HNSCC. Larger studies are necessary to better characterize the effect of propofol infusions on patients with HNSCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Owrey
- Anesthesiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Kevin J Min
- Anesthesiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Marc Torjman
- Anesthesiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Li R, Mukherjee MB, Jin Z, Liu H, Lin K, Liu Q, Dilger JP, Lin J. The Potential Effect of General Anesthetics in Cancer Surgery: Meta-Analysis of Postoperative Metastasis and Inflammatory Cytokines. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:2759. [PMID: 37345096 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15102759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2023] [Revised: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Metastasis or recurrence following curative surgery is the main indicator of tumor progress and is the main cause of patient death. For more than three decades, the potential for general anesthesia to affect cancer outcomes has been a subject of concern with considerable research interest. Here, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the effect of inhalational anesthesia (IHNA) vs. propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) on metastasis and recurrence after cancer surgery from clinical and pre-clinical studies. The relative risk for metastasis/recurrence in TIVA is 0.61 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.46 to 0.82, p = 0.0009) compared to IHNA. Inflammatory cytokines have been implicated in cancer metastasis following cancer surgery, thus we analyzed inflammatory cytokines levels after surgery under IHNA or TIVA. Based on pooled analysis, a lower IL-6 level was noticed in TIVA in comparison to IHNA (standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.097 to 1.44, I2 = 92%, p = 0.02) but not TNF-α or IL-10. Preclinical animal model studies show that inhalational anesthetics increase the risk of breast cancer metastasis compared to propofol. In conclusion, the current evidence suggests intravenous anesthetic propofol is associated with less metastasis/recurrence and lower postoperative IL-6 level over inhaled anesthetics in the oncological surgery. We urge more well-designed clinical and preclinical studies in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ru Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook University Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8480, USA
| | - Mousumi Beto Mukherjee
- Department of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook University Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8480, USA
| | - Zhaosheng Jin
- Department of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook University Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8480, USA
| | - Hengrui Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook University Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8480, USA
| | - Kevin Lin
- Department of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook University Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8480, USA
| | - Qiuyue Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook University Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8480, USA
| | - James P Dilger
- Department of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook University Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8480, USA
| | - Jun Lin
- Department of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook University Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8480, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Influence of Perioperative Anesthesia on Cancer Recurrence: from Basic Science to Clinical Practice. Curr Oncol Rep 2023; 25:63-81. [PMID: 36512273 PMCID: PMC9745294 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-022-01342-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSEOF REVIEW In this review, we will summarize the effects of these perioperative anesthetics and anesthetic interventions on the immune system and tumorigenesis as well as address the related clinical evidence on cancer-related mortality and recurrence. RECENT FINDINGS Cancer remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. For many solid tumors, surgery is one of the major therapies. Unfortunately, surgery promotes angiogenesis, shedding of circulating cancer cells, and suppresses immunity. Hence, the perioperative period has a close relationship with cancer metastases or recurrence. In the perioperative period, patients require multiple anesthetic management including anesthetics, anesthetic techniques, and body temperature control. Preclinical and retrospective studies have found that these anesthetic agents and interventions have complex effects on cancer outcomes. Therefore, well-planned, prospective, randomized controlled trials are required to explore the effects of different anesthetics and techniques on long-term outcomes after cancer surgery. Due to the conflicting effects of anesthetic management on cancer recurrence, further preclinical and clinical trials are required and beneficial to the development of systemic cancer therapies.
Collapse
|
6
|
Influence of Sevoflurane Inhalation Anesthesia on Clinical Outcomes of Morbidly Obese Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery. EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE 2022; 2022:1408948. [PMID: 36110186 PMCID: PMC9470298 DOI: 10.1155/2022/1408948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2022] [Revised: 08/08/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Background. Morbid obesity is one of the fastest-growing subgroups of obesity and is associated with high mortality, with an estimated 2.8 million people dying from obesity each year. Objective. This research sets out to elucidate the impact of sevoflurane (Sevo) inhalation anesthesia on the clinical outcome of morbidly obese (MO) patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery (LBS). Methods. A retrospective study was conducted on 150 MO patients undergoing LBS in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University from November 2019 to November 2021. According to the difference of anesthesia methods, 100 patients with Sevo anesthesia were set as group A, and 50 patients with propofol (P) anesthesia were set as group B. Intergroup comparisons were performed in terms of eye-opening time, tracheal intubation removal time, directional force recovery, heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), peak airway pressure (Ppeak), plateau pressure (Pplat), standard time out of PACU, postoperative food intake (FI), length of stay (LOS), and complication rate. Results. Group A had a shorter time to open eyes, remove tracheal intubation, and restore directional force than Group B, with better recovery of HR, MAP, Ppeak, and Pplat. Group A was also superior to Group B in the standard time out of PACU, postoperative FI, and LOS, with a lower complication rate. Conclusions. Sevo inhalation anesthesia is more effective and safer for MO patients undergoing LBS.
Collapse
|
7
|
Jing Y, Zhang Y, Pan R, Ding K, Chen R, Meng Q. Effect of Inhalation Anesthetics on Tumor Metastasis. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2022; 21:15330338221121092. [PMID: 36131554 PMCID: PMC9502254 DOI: 10.1177/15330338221121092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Many factors affect the prognosis of patients undergoing tumor surgery, and anesthesia is one of the potential influencing factors. In general anesthesia, inhalation anesthesia is widely used in the clinic because of its strong curative effect and high controllability. However, the effect of inhalation anesthetics on the tumor is still controversial. More and more research has proved that inhalation anesthetics can intervene in local recurrence and distant metastasis of tumor by acting on tumor biological behavior, immune response, and gene regulation. In this paper, we reviewed the research progress of diverse inhalation anesthetics promoting or inhibiting cancer in the critical events of tumor recurrence and metastasis, and compared the effects of inhalation anesthetics on patients' prognosis in clinical studies, to provide theoretical reference for anesthesia management of patients undergoing tumor surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yixin Jing
- Department of Anesthesiology, 117921Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Yiguo Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, 117921Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Rui Pan
- Department of Anesthesiology, 117921Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Ke Ding
- Department of Anesthesiology, 117921Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Rong Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology, 117921Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.,Department of Anesthesiology, East Hospital, 117921Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Qingtao Meng
- Department of Anesthesiology, 117921Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.,Department of Anesthesiology, East Hospital, 117921Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|