Manual wheelchair biomechanics while overcoming various environmental barriers: A systematic review

Trunk and glenohumeral joint adaptations to manual wheelchair propulsion over a cross-slope: An exploratory study

BACKGROUND

Cross-slopes are often encountered by manual wheelchair users propelling within an urban setting. While propulsion over cross-slopes is more difficult than on level surfaces, little is known about how the users counter the downhill turning tendency of the wheelchair over cross-slopes. This study aimed to identify the adaptations of the manual wheelchair users to the presence of cross-slopes and examine how these might impact shoulder injury.

METHODS

Nine manual wheelchair users propelled themselves across a cross-slope and over a level surface. The trunk and glenohumeral joint kinematics, as well as the handrim contact tangential force were compared between both conditions for the uphill and downhill limbs.

FINDINGS

The uphill arm technique used to counter the downhill turning tendency varied greatly in terms of potential injury risk and efficiency between participants. Trunk flexion increased the turning tendency of the manual wheelchair, yet only one participant decreased his flexion when rolling over the cross-slope. Various potential pathomecanisms related to the trunk lateral flexion and the glenohumeral kinematics over a cross-slope were identified.

INTERPRETATION

Both the uphill arm technique and trunk kinematics are important to propel over a cross-slope both efficiently and safely. Accordingly, tips about posture and kinematics are needed to teach this skill to manual wheelchair users. Additionally, as wheelchair positioning seems to influence the cross-slope skill, more research is needed to explore the impact of positioning devices (e.g., lateral supports) and wheelchair modifications (e.g., power assist wheels, handrim projections) on this skill.

Optimal Control Formulation for Manual Wheelchair Locomotion Simulations: Influence of Anteroposterior Stability

Manual wheelchair (MWC) locomotion exposes the user's upper-body to large and repetitive loads, which can lead to upper limbs pain and injuries. A thinner understanding of the influence of MWC settings on propulsion biomechanics could allow for a better adaptation of MWC configuration to the user, thus limiting the risk of developing such injuries. Advantageously compared to experimental studies, simulation methods allow numerous configurations to be tested. Recent studies have developed predictive locomotion simulation using optimal control methods. However, those models do not consider MWC anteroposterior stability, potentially resulting in unreasonable propulsion strategies. To this extent, this study aimed at confirming if constraining MWC anteroposterior stability in the optimal control formulation could lead to a different simulated movement. For this purpose, a four-link rigid-body system was used in a forward dynamics optimization paired with an anteroposterior stability constraint to predict MWC locomotion dynamics of the upper limbs during both startup and steady-state propulsion. Simulation results indicated the occurrence of MWC tipping when stability was not constrained, and that the constrained optimal control algorithm predicted different propulsion strategies. Hence, further proceedings of MWC locomotion simulation and optimal control investigations should take the anteroposterior stability into account to achieve more realistic simulations. Additionally, the implementation of the anteroposterior stability constrains unexpectedly resulted in a reduction of the computational time.

Biomechanics of wheelchair turning manoeuvres: novel insights into wheelchair propulsion

Introduction

Wheelchair turning biomechanics is an under researched area despite its obvious relevance to functional mobility of wheelchair users. Wheelchair turns might be linked to a higher risk of upper limb injuries due to the increased forces and torques potentially associated with asymmetric movement. Our aim was to obtain a better theoretical understanding of wheelchair turning by biomechanically analyzing turns compared to steady-state straightforward propulsion (SSSFP).

Methods

Ten able-bodied men received 12-min familiarization and 10 trials (in a random order) of SSSFP and multiple left and right turns around a rectangular course. A Smart^wheel was mounted at the right wheel of a standard wheelchair to measure kinetic parameters during SSSFP and of the inner hand during right turns and the outer hand during left turns. A repeated measures ANOVA was used to detect differences across tasks.

Results

Two strategies were identified: 3% demonstrated roll turns and 97% spin turns. Spin turns consisted of three phases: approach, turning and depart phase. The turning phase was accomplished by increasing peak force (72.9 ± 25.1 N vs. 43.38 ± 15.9 N in SSSFP) of the inner hand, while maintaining high push frequency of the outer hand (1.09 ± 0.20 push/s vs. 0.95 ± 0.13 push/s in SSSFP). Peak negative force and force impulse during the turning phase were much higher than SSSFP, 15.3 ± 15.7 and 4.5 ± 1.7 times higher, respectively.

Conclusion

The spin turn strategy might carry an increased risk of upper limb injuries due to higher braking force and requires particular attention by rehabilitation professionals to preserve upper limb function of long-term wheelchair users.