Intense pulsed light improves signs and symptoms of dry eye disease due to meibomian gland dysfunction: A randomized controlled study

Predisposing factors for poor outcomes after intense pulsed light treatment for dry eye disease: A retrospective case-control study

Purpose: To evaluate the potential risk factors for poor dry eye disease (DED) outcomes after intense pulse light (IPL) treatment. Methods: A retrospective case-control study was conducted, and patients who received IPL were enrolled. A total of 63 eyes were included in the present study after exclusion and were divided into a fair outcome group and a poor outcome group according to posttreatment improvements in DED-related signs and symptoms. The primary outcomes are the pretreatment parameters between the two groups. The Mann‒Whitney U test and generalized linear model were adopted to analyze the differences in pretreatment indices between the two groups. Results: Both the fluorescein stain results and the Schirmer II test results after IPL treatment were significantly better than those before IPL treatment (both P < 0.05). Nevertheless, the overall DED-related symptoms did not significantly improve after IPL treatment (P = 0.834). In terms of indicators of poor outcomes after IPL treatment, the rates of advanced age, female sex, previous refractive surgery, lower pretreatment noninvasive tear break-up time (NITBUT) and greater meibomian gland loss were significantly greater in the poor outcome group (all P < 0.05). Female sex and previous refractive surgery were associated with less improvement in DED-related symptoms (all P < 0.05), whereas advanced age, a lower pretreatment NITBUT and a higher meibomian gland loss rate were related to poor DED sign improvement (all P < 0.05). Conclusion: The major limitations are the retrospective design, small study population, and absence of detailed posttreatment exams. In conclusion, old age, female sex, previous refractive surgery, a lower NITBUT, and a higher meibomian gland loss rate are associated with worse outcomes after IPL treatment.

Tolerability of Current Treatments for Dry Eye Disease: A Review of Approved and Investigational Therapies

Dry eye disease (DED) is a common, multifactorial ocular disease impacting 5% to 20% of people in Western countries and 45% to 70% in Asian countries. Despite the prevalence of DED and the number of treatment approaches available, signs and symptoms of the disease continue to limit the quality of life for many patients. Standard over-the-counter treatment approaches and behavior/environmental modifications may help some cases but more persistent forms often require pharmacological interventions. Approved and investigational pharmaceutical approaches attempt to treat the signs and symptoms of DED in different ways and tend to have varying tolerability among patients. While several pharmacological approaches are the standard for persistent and severe disease, mechanical options provide alternate treatment modalities that attempt to balance efficacy and comfort. Newer approaches target the causes of DED, utilizing novel delivery methods to minimize irritation and adverse events. Here, we review approved and investigational approaches to treating DED and compare patient tolerability.

The Usage of Different Hyaluronic-Acid-Containing Artificial Tears and the Treatment Outcome of Intense Pulsed Light Therapy for Dry Eye Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study

In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of different hyaluronic acid (HA)-containing artificial tears on dry eye disease (DED) treatment in combination with intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy. A retrospective cohort study was conducted, and the participants received IPL therapy and HA-containing artificial tears. There were 42 and 40 eyes in the 0.10% and 0.15% HA groups after selection, respectively. The main outcomes were the postoperative non-invasive tear break-up time (NITBUT), Schirmer II test results, ocular surface stain, and numbers of DED-related symptoms. A generalized linear model was utilized to produce the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of the main outcomes between groups. At the three-month follow-up, the NITBUT was significantly higher in the 0.15% HA group (p = 0.023), and the NITBUT recovery was also significantly better in the 0.15% HA group compared to the 0.10% HA group (p = 0.039). The multiple DED-related symptoms significantly correlated with no DED symptom improvement in both the 0.10% and 0.15% HA groups (both p < 0.05), while the low pre-treatment NITBUT was marginally related to no DED symptom improvement in the 0.10% HA group (p = 0.047). A low NITBUT and Schirmer II test result correlated with no DED symptom improvement in both the groups (all p < 0.05). In conclusion, the application of 0.10% and 0.15% HA-containing artificial tears revealed similar effects to IPL therapy for DED.

A Review of Intense Pulsed Light in the Treatment of Ocular Rosacea

INTRODUCTION

Ocular rosacea is an underdiagnosed form of rosacea that may occur with or without typical cutaneous signs of rosacea. One of the common manifestations is dry eyes. Although the use of intense pulsed light (IPL) in the treatment of rosacea-related dry eyes has been reported, a recent review is lacking.

METHODS

A scoping review was performed to summarize the efficacy of IPL in the treatment of ocular rosacea.

RESULTS

Five articles were included, representing 108 patients, with a mean age of 58.4 years. Based on available data, 59.2% (n = 58/98) were female. The studies detailed the use of IPL in combination with meibomian gland expression treatment. Overall, 91% (n = 89/98) of patients with ocular rosacea treated with IPL had a partial response and 9% (n = 9/98) had no response. IPL therapy did not lead to complete recovery in any of the included patients. One participant experienced an adverse event across the included studies.

CONCLUSIONS

IPL is a promising treatment modality for ocular rosacea, as demonstrated by its ability to relieve dry eye symptoms with limited adverse events. Further research into this novel treatment is necessary to ascertain its role in the management of ocular rosacea.

Intense pulsed light treatment for the management of meibomian gland dysfunction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is one of the most common disorders encountered by ophthalmologists, and its management can prove challenging for both clinicians and patients. Intense pulsed light (IPL), which has been historically used in the field of dermatology, has emerged as a tool to help improve meibomian gland function. The goal of this review is to assess the clinical efficacy, utility, and safety of IPL for the treatment of MGD.

RECENT FINDINGS

In recent randomized controlled trials, IPL has been shown to improve meibomian gland function, and subsequently tear film quality and dry eye symptoms. The mechanism of action still remains unclear. Recent literature suggests that IPL may also be used in conjunction with other therapies, such as meibomian gland expression, low-level light therapy, and thermal pulsation. Careful attention should be placed on each patient's Fitzpatrick skin type, as well as protecting the ocular structures to reduce the risk of adverse effects. Cost, accessibility, as well as a limited duration of efficacy may be drawbacks.

SUMMARY

There is significant evidence supporting that IPL may be used as a potential well tolerated and effective treatment for MGD, though there are certain caveats regarding its long-term efficacy, accessibility, and cost.

Need to Increase the Number of Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) Treatment Sessions for Patients with Moderate to Severe Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (MGD) Patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether patients with moderate-to-severe meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) will benefit from increasing the number of intense pulsed light (IPL) treatment sessions.

METHODS

Ninety Asian adult with MGD (stages 3-4) were enrolled in this retrospective study. In Group1, 30 patients completed the five-session IPL treatment, 63.33% of which also received meibomian gland expression (MGX). In Group 2, 60 patients received three-session IPL treatment, 60.0% of which also accepted MGX. Both intragroup and intergroup analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

The population characteristics, clinical baseline characteristics and therapeutic regimen were comparable between Group1 and Group2. The symptoms and most clinical indices improved after IPL treatment finished in both two groups. No statistical difference was found in any improvement level of all symptomatic and physical indices, including the Ocular surface disease index, tear break-up time, Demodex, corneal staining, meibum quality, meibomian gland expressibility, and MGD stage (all p ≥ 0.05) between the two groups at any time, not only month by month, but also at the terminal visit. However, the response rate of Group1 after the five-session treatment (70.00%) was increased compared to that of Group2 after the three-session treatment (63.33%).

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing the number of IPL sessions is beneficial for patients with moderate to severe MGD to increase the response rate of treatment, rather than the improvement level. However, there is no need for patients who respond well to a routine number of IPL treatments to undergo additional IPL sessions.

Current application of intense pulsed light for the management of dry eye disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

This review explored intense pulsed light (IPL) as an alternative treatment for dry eye disease (DED) symptom relief by correcting tear-film homeostasis. A systematic search was performed in March 2022 on five databases (Medline, Embase, SCOPUS, ProQuest, and EBSCO). Studies were extracted for the following outcomes of interest: standard patient evaluation of eye dryness questionnaire (SPEED), ocular surface disease index (OSDI), tear break-up time (TBUT), and corneal fluorescein staining (CFS). All studies published up to March 2022 were reviewed. Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB 2) was used to screen studies for risk of bias where appropriate. A meta-analysis was done to quantify any reported quantitative data. Thirteen studies were included in this study. A total of 931 individuals and 1454 numbers of eyes were reviewed in this meta-analysis. Among studies that explored and reported the effect of IPL in individuals with DED, TBUT and OSDI improved significantly post intervention, with a standardized mean difference (SMD) of 1.02 [95% CI 0.41-1.64] and 0.28 [95% CI 0.04-0.52], respectively. CFS and SPEED scores, however, showed no statistically significant difference, with an SMD of 0.22 [95% CI -0.19 to 0.64] and 0.28 [95% CI -0.11 to 0.66], respectively. In conclusion, current evidence indicates IPL as a possible adjunctive treatment in individuals with DED in an otherwise limited treatment option. Further studies through more extensive trials are needed to validate this finding and elucidate its mechanism.

Update on Dry Eye Disease Treatment: Evidence From Randomized Controlled Trials

ABSTRACT

Although the ultimate goal of dry eye disease (DED) management is to restore the ocular surface and tear film homeostasis and address any accompanying symptoms, addressing this is not an easy task. Despite the wide range of current treatment modalities targeting multiple aspects of DED, the available DED management literature is quite heterogeneous, rendering evaluation or comparison of treatment outcomes hard or almost impossible. There is still a shortage of well-designed, large-scale, nonsponsored, randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating long-term safety and efficacy of many targeted therapies individually or used in combination, in the treatment of identified subgroups of patients with DED. This review focuses on the treatment modalities in DED management and aims to reveal the current evidence available as deduced from the outcomes of RCTs.

Multi-Frequency RF Combined with Intense Pulsed Light Improves Signs and Symptoms of Dry Eye Disease Due to Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy of multi-frequency RF and IPL + MGX combination for treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (MGD).

Patients and Methods

Eligible subjects had signs and moderate-to-severe symptoms of DED (Dry Eye Disease) due to MGD. Subjects underwent 4 treatments at 2-week intervals. Each treatment consisted of intense pulsed light (IPL) followed by radiofrequency (RF) on the periocular skin, followed by meibomian gland expression (MGX). The main outcome measure was the quality of meibum in 15 meibomian glands along the lower eyelid, using the modified Meibomian Gland Score (mMGS). The main hypothesis was a reduction of mMGS between the baseline (BL) and the follow-up (FU). Other outcome measures, such as symptoms measured with the OSDI (Ocular Surface Disease Index) questionnaire, meibography, non-invasive tear break-up time (NIBUT), and matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP-9) levels in tear samples were evaluated as well.

Results

31 subjects completed the FU. Between BL and FU, mMGS decreased from 30.4 (8.5) to 9.3 (9.5) (-69.3%, 95% CI: -55.6% to -82.9%, p<0.0001); OSDI decreased from 63.6 (17.2) to 25.0 (20.6) (-60.7%, 95% CI: -47.8% to -73.5%, p<0.0001); NIBUT did not change (p=0.92). An adjusted model with a historical control was constructed to allow the comparison of these subjects with those treated similarly with IPL+MGX (but without RF) in a different study. This analysis identified that the change in mMGS was larger when RF was included (-20.9 vs -18.3, adjusted p-value (p_adjusted) <0.05). The difference in OSDI change was not significant (-38.1 vs -25.5, p_adjusted = 0.196).

Conclusion

Combination of multi-frequency RF and IPL+MGX improves signs and symptoms of MGD. In comparison to a historical control, improvements were generally larger. A randomized controlled study comparing the combination of RF and IPL+MGX with IPL+MGX alone is required to further elaborate the relative contribution of RF.

Protocol for a parallel assignment prospective, randomised, comparative trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intense pulsed light (IPL) combined with 3% diquafosol (DQS) ophthalmic solution in dry eye syndrome

INTRODUCTION

Evaporative dry eye (EDE) is common and can lead to ocular pain, decreased visual quality and reduced quality of life. Intense pulsed light (IPL) and 3% diquafosol ophthalmic solution have been found to be beneficial in reducing signs and symptoms of dry eye.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A randomised clinical trial will be performed at He Eye Specialist Hospital in Shenyang. 360 dry eye disease patients will be equally divided randomly into the IPL group, DQS group (3% diquafosol ophthalmic solution eye-drops) and IPL+group (IPL combined with 3% diquafosol eye-drops). All groups will be followed up for 4 weeks. The primary outcome measures will be the non-invasive tear break-up time and the Ocular Surface Disease Index change from the baseline. The secondary outcome measures willincludeconjunctival and cornea staining with fluorescein and lissamine, meibomian gland function and secretion quality, tear film lipid layer score, tear meniscus height, conjunctival hyperemia (redness score) changes . Adverse events also will be monitored and documented.

DISCUSSION

This study aimed to assess whether the combination of IPL with 3% diquafosol ophthalmic solution (study group), IPL+ (study group), is more effective than IPL (active control group) or DQS (active control group) in participants with EDE.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Management of dry eye with IPL combined with 3% diquafosol ophthalmic solution, registered on 23 January 2023. Ethics approval number: IRB (2022) K029.01. The study's findings will be shared regardless of the effect's direction.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05694026.

A Review of Applications and Intracellular Mechanisms of Intense Pulsed Light in Eyelid Inflammatory Diseases

Objective: To evaluate relevant clinical outcomes and conclude possible mechanisms of intense pulsed light (IPL) in eyelid inflammation. Background: IPL devices were primarily applied in cutaneous vascular malformations and have been used in ocular diseases for about 20 years, mostly including meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD), blepharitis, and ocular rosacea. Recent findings: Seventy-two original clinical researches were included, 57 for MGD, 4 for blepharitis or blepharitis-related keratoconjunctivitis, and 11 for rosacea. Dry eye symptoms, (tear) break-up time (BUT), and meibomian structure and/or functions were improved in most patients, but production of reactive oxygen species is an important link in the photobiomodulation mediated by IPL, which can influence numerous signal pathways to achieve anti-inflammatory, anti-infective, and prodifferentiation effects. Conclusions: The evidence suggests that IPL is an effective therapeutic tool for most patients with MGD, but more clinical evidence is needed for other indications.

Different Number of Sessions of Intense Pulsed Light and Meibomian Gland Expression Combination Therapy for Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of the intense pulsed light (IPL) and meibomian gland (MG) expression (MGX) combination therapy according to the total numbers of sessions in the meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD).

METHODS

Ninety patients with MGD were included. Patients had maximal five sessions of IPL (Aqua Cel, Jeisys Medical) and MGX combination therapy at 2-week intervals. The ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaire score, MG profile grades, tear matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), tear break-up time (BUT), tear osmolarity, tear secretion, and corneal erosions were evaluated.

RESULTS

The number of patients who had a total of one to five sessions (1S to 5S) was 10, 25, 17, 20, and 18, respectively. The time-serial decrease of OSDI scores was significant in patients who had three or more sessions (3S, p = 0.002; 4S, p < 0.001; 5S, p < 0.001). The MG expressibility grade decreased with two or more sessions (2S-5S, p < 0.001), but the meibum quality significantly improved with all sessions (1S, p = 0.012; 2S, p = 0.024; 3S, p = 0.015; 4S, p < 0.001; 5S, p < 0.001). Although tear BUT increased even in patients with one session (1S, p = 0.040; 3S, p = 0.005; 4S, p = 0.006; 5S, p = 0.021), tear MMP-9, osmolarity, Schirmer I, and corneal erosions were not improved in every number of sessions. The female sex was the sole contributor to the final symptomatic improvement (p = 0.042), and the MGD stages were not related to the final OSDI decrease.

CONCLUSIONS

The OSDI score, MGD grades, and BUT were improved after the IPL and MGX combination therapy in MGD patients. Unlike MGD grades and tear film instability might be improved just after a few sessions, the overall subjective relief was accomplished in three or more sessions.

Pulsed Light Therapy in the Management of Dry Eye Disease: Current Perspectives

Purpose

To review the indications and efficacy of Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) application in the treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (MGD). Its main purpose is to describe its physiology, efficacy, indications, and adverse effects.

Patients and Methods

A two database (PubMed, EMBASE) search was performed from July 2017 to July 2022 using the MeSH terms ("Intense Pulsed Light" AND ("Meibomian Gland Dysfunction" OR "Dry Eye"). We included randomized studies and systematic reviews with meta-analysis. Exclusion criteria were non-randomized trials, studies enrolling non-MGD dry eye disease, and other works older than 5 years.

Results

Current literature shows that IPL is an effective and safe treatment modality for severe dry eye. Available evidence shows improvement of symptoms and objective indicators, such as noninvasive breakup time, thickness of lipid layer, and Schirmer test. However, our review concluded that the beneficial effects of IPL may lose some efficacy at 6-months after the initial session, and subsequent sessions may be required. Thus, IPL treatment should not be considered as first-line therapy for MGD but instead as an adjuvant option to the standard of care. The optimal treatment modality remains unknown and should be tailored according to each patient's phenotype, clinician's experience, and available technology. There is evidence that IPL treatment may down-regulate pro-inflammatory markers (such as interleukin (IL) 6, IL17a, IL-1) and Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2).

Conclusion

MGD is a multifactorial disease and IPL treatment seems a promising treatment modality. Despite this, more evidence is needed to study its benefits - since this is an emerging technology, it is expected an increase in comparative studies in the following years, with longer follow-up periods, which may enable more precise conclusions about this treatment modality.