Considerations for ensuring safety during telerehabilitation of people with stroke. A protocol for a scoping review

Monitoring walking asymmetries and endpoint control in persons living with chronic stroke: Implications for remote diagnosis and telerehabilitation

Objective

The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of monitoring and diagnosing compromised walking motion in the frontal plane, particularly in persons living with the chronic effects of stroke (PwCS). The study aimed to determine whether active control of walking in the frontal plane could be monitored and provide diagnostic insights into compensations made by PwCS during community living.

Methods

The study recruited PwCS with noticeable walking asymmetries and employed a monitoring method to assess frontal plane motion. Monitoring was conducted both within a single assessment and between assessments. The study aimed to uncover baseline data and diagnostic information about active control in chronic stroke survivors. Data were collected using sensors during 6 minutes of walking and compared between the paretic and non-paretic legs.

Results

The study demonstrated the feasibility of monitoring frontal plane motion and diagnosing disturbed endpoint control (p < 0.0125) in chronic stroke survivors when comparing the paretic leg to the non-paretic leg. A greater variability was observed in the paretic leg (p < 0.0125), and sensors were able to diagnose a stronger coupling of the body with its endpoint on the paretic side (p < 0.0125). Similar results were obtained when monitoring was conducted over a six-minute walking period, and no significant diagnostic differences were found between the two monitoring assessments. Monitoring did not reveal performance fatigue or debilitation over time.

Conclusions

This study's findings indicate that monitoring frontal plane motion is a feasible approach for diagnosing compromised walking motion. The results suggest that individuals with walking asymmetries, exhibit differences in endpoint control and variability between their paretic and non-paretic legs. These insights could contribute to more effective rehabilitation strategies and highlight the potential for monitoring compensations during various activities of daily living.

Measures to ensure safety during telerehabilitation of people with stroke: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Measures used to prevent adverse events during the implementation of exercise sessions delivered via telerehabilitation can be varied, ranging from simple telephone monitoring to synchronous therapist-led sessions. However, this information is scattered in the literature, as evidence synthesis studies have only addressed the safety, satisfaction, and effectiveness aspects of exercise delivered via telerehabilitation.

AIMS

This scoping review aims to describe that measures are used to ensure safety during exercise sessions delivered to people with stroke through telerehabilitation, as reported by authors of primary studies. Secondarily, it describes the designs most frequently used to notify the effects of telerehabilitation and evidence level, the characteristics of the participants and type of stroke, and the characteristics of telerehabilitation.

SUMMARY OF REVIEW

A scoping review was conducted according to the Joana Briggs Institute (JBI) recommendations. A systematic search of MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CENTRAL, and CINHAL was conducted from inception to August 2022, and a review of systematic review references on the topic. We included primary studies that enrolled adults with stroke who underwent exercise delivered via telerehabilitation. Two independent reviewers performed study selection and data extraction, and disagreements were resolved by consensus or a third reviewer. A qualitative analysis of the information was performed. One hundred seven primary studies (3991 participants) published between 2002 and 2022 were included. Most studies were case series (43%) and rated with an Oxford level of evidence of "4" (55.3%). Regarding randomized clinical trials, half included 53 or more participants (IQR 26.75 to 81). Most studies applied the exercises via asynchronous telerehabilitation (55.1%), of which only ten reported measures to avoid adverse events. Some of the measures included assessing the location where exercises are to be performed, only using a seated position, and using live warning systems that prevent or stop exercises when they are risky.

CONCLUSIONS

Reporting of measures implemented to prevent adverse events during exercise delivery via asynchronous telerehabilitation is scarce. Future primary studies should always consider reporting adverse events related to exercise delivery via telerehabilitation and strategies implemented to decrease the incidence of these unwanted safety events.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

INPLASY202290104.