Individual and situational predictors of psychological and physiological stress and burnout among maternity providers in Northern Ghana

Lack of autonomy and professional recognition as major factors for burnout in midwives: A systematic mixed-method review

AIM

The aim of this study was to review the existing evidence on burnout levels in midwives and the main related factors.

DESIGN

Mixed studies systematic review.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were sourced from 2018 and 2023.

REVIEW METHODS

Inclusion criteria: quantitative cross-sectional or qualitative articles published in English within the last 5 years.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

studies with undergraduate or trainee midwives, studies examining the factors in a pandemic setting and those not answering the research question. Potential risk of bias was assessed using the Mixed Methods Assessment Tool (MMAT). A convergent synthesis design was followed through a thematic synthesis using Thomas and Harden's three-step method: inductive coding of the text, development of descriptive themes and generation of analytical themes. Qualitative approaches adopted exploratory descriptive studies and participatory action research.

RESULTS

Thirty-six studies were included, with a total of 17,364 participants. There were higher levels of burnout in midwives who were single, under 35-40 years of age, with less than 10 years of experience and those with young children. Stress, anxiety and depression, as well as the emotional impact of traumatic events, have been described as related psychological factors.

CONCLUSION

Although extrinsic work factors such as shifts, workload, pay and interpersonal relationships increase burnout, intrinsic factors such as lack of autonomy and recognition are the main factors related to it.

IMPACT

What problem did the study address? Burnout among healthcare workers has been recognized as a global crisis requiring urgent attention, specifically in midwives. What were the main findings? There is a persistent shortage of midwives that is attributed in part to chronic retention difficulties related to job burnout expressed by these professionals. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? We seek to address the paucity of research on burnout in midwives in the current crisis in the profession. Work factors such as lack of autonomy or recognition in the profession carry an associated risk of burnout and job attrition. Understanding the factors that contribute to burnout will enable healthcare organizations to reduce the current problem.

REPORTING METHOD

PREFERRED: Reporting items for systematic review and meta-analyses (PRISMA).

PATIENT OF PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No patient or public contribution.

Prevalence of burnout and associated factors among midwives, 2023: institution-based cross-sectional study

Background

One of the main characteristics of the mental health condition known as burnout syndrome is an overwhelming feeling of physical and emotional tiredness, particularly with regard to one's work. Midwives are the group most prone to burnout because they work in emergency situations to save two lives at a time, share the stress of laboring women, and put in extra hours without enough payment. Besides this, there is little information on burnout among Ethiopian midwives.

Objectives

To assess burnout and associated factors among midwives working in public health facilities in West Arsi Zone, Ethiopia.

Methods and materials

A census method cross-sectional study was conducted among all 467 midwives working in public health facilities found in the West Arsi Zone, Ethiopia, from September 1 and 30, 2023. A pretested, validated face-to-face interviewer-administered structured questionnaire was used to collect data. Then, binary logistic regression was used for analysis. Bi-variable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were employed to identify factors associated with burnout. The level of statistical significance was declared at p < 0.05 with a 95% CI.

Results

Overall, the prevalence of burnout among midwives was 47.10% (95% CI: 42.55, 51.75%). Marital status not in union 2.03 (95% CI: 1.32-3.13), working more than 40 h per week 2.00 (95% CI: 1.29-3.08), conflict with their metron 2.33 (95% CI: 1.54-3.54), not satisfied with their current job 2.39 (95% CI: 1.56-3.66) and having depression symptoms 1.71 (95% CI: 1.06-2.74) were factors significantly associated with burnout.

Conclusion

This study found that in the study area, almost half of the midwives experienced burnout. Thus, it is recommended that midwives should develop respectful interactions with both their mentors and colleagues. Secondly, we suggest that zonal health offices set up systems that by shortening working hours and boost job satisfaction by creating conducive working environment, provide opportunities for career advancement and increase employee engagement.

Mixed methods evaluation of the Caring for Providers to Improve Patient Experience intervention

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of the Caring for Providers to Improve Patient Experience (CPIPE) intervention, which sought to improve person-centered maternal care (PCMC) by addressing two key drivers: provider stress and bias.

METHODS

CPIPE was successfully piloted over 6 months in two health facilities in Migori County, Kenya, in 2022. The evaluation employed a mixed-methods pretest-posttest nonequivalent control group design. Data are from surveys with 80 providers (40 intervention, 40 control) at baseline and endline and in-depth interviews with 20 intervention providers. We conducted bivariate, multivariate, and difference-in-difference analysis of quantitative data and thematic analysis of qualitative data.

RESULTS

In the intervention group, average knowledge scores increased from 7.8 (SD = 2.4) at baseline to 9.5 (standard deviation [SD] = 1.8) at endline for stress (P = 0.001) and from 8.9 (SD = 1.9) to 10.7 (SD = 1.7) for bias (P = 0.001). In addition, perceived stress scores decreased from 20.9 (SD = 3.9) to 18.6 (SD = 5.3) (P = 0.019) and burnout from 3.6 (SD = 1.0) to 3.0 (SD = 1.0) (P = 0.001), with no significant change in the control group. Qualitative data indicated that CPIPE had an impact at multiple levels. At the individual level, it improved provider knowledge, skills, self-efficacy, attitudes, behaviors, and experiences. At the interpersonal level, it improved provider-provider and patient-provider relationships, leading to a supportive work environment and improved PCMC. At the institutional level, it created a system of accountability for providing PCMC and nondiscriminatory care, and collective action and advocacy to address sources of stress.

CONCLUSION

CPIPE impacted multiple outcomes in the theory of change, leading to improvements in both provider and patient experience, including for the most vulnerable patients. These findings will contribute to global efforts to prevent burnout and promote PCMC and equity.

A scoping review, mapping, and prioritisation process for emergency obstetric and neonatal quality of care indicators: Focus on provision and experience of care

Background

Globally, approximately 800 women and 6400 newborns die around the time of childbirth each day. Many of these deaths could be prevented with high-quality emergency obstetric and newborn care (EmONC). The Monitoring Emergency Obstetric Care: A handbook guides strengthening EmONC services. However, the handbook contains limited quality of care measures. Our study identified and prioritised quality of care indicators for potential inclusion in the handbook, which is undergoing revision.

Methods

We conducted a consultative scoping review, mapping, and prioritisation exercise to select a short list of indicators on facility-based maternal and newborn quality of care. Indicators were identified from literature searches and expert suggestions and organised by the categories of structure, process, and outcomes as defined in the World Health Organization's Standards for Improving Quality of Maternal and Newborn Care in Health Facilities. We focused on process indicators, encompassing the provision of care and experience of care during the intrapartum period, and developed a priority list of indicators using the selection criteria of relevance and feasibility. Experience of care indicators were also mapped against the Person-Centered Maternity Care (PCMC) scale.

Results

We extracted a total of 3023 quality of care indicators. After removing out-of-scope and duplicate indicators and applying our selection criteria, we identified 20 provision of care indicators for possible inclusion in the revised EmONC handbook. We recommend including a score for experience of care that could be measured with the 30-item or the 13-item PCMC scale. We also identified 29 experience of care items not covered by the PCMC scale that could be used. Provider experience, patient safety, and quality of abortion care were identified as areas for which no or few indicators were found through our scoping review.

Conclusions

Through a rigorous, consultative, and multi-step process, we selected a short list of process-related, facility-based quality of care indicators for emergency obstetric and newborn care. This list could be included in the EmONC handbook or used for other monitoring purposes. Country consultations to assess the utility and feasibility of the proposed indicators and their adaptation to local contexts will support their refinement and uptake.

Registration

https://osf.io/msxbd (Open Science Framework).