Effect of a hybrid team-based advanced cardiopulmonary life support simulation program for clinical nurses

Integrating mixed reality preparation into acute coronary syndrome simulation for nursing students: a single-group pretest-posttest study

BACKGROUND

Timely and effective intervention within the 'golden hour'-the critical first 90 min after the symptom onset-is crucial for initiating life-saving treatment and reducing mortality in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This highlights the need for nursing students to be proficient in ACS care, emphasizing the importance of preparatory training. This study enhanced traditional simulation methods by integrating a mixed reality (MR) preparation step, offering a more immersive learning experience. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of integrating MR preparation into ACS simulation education, focusing on enhancements in knowledge, self-confidence in learning, and self-efficacy in learning. Additionally, we examined performance, practice immersion, and satisfaction to comprehensively evaluate the MR application.

METHODS

One-group pretest-posttest design was implemented in a convenience sample of thirty-nine senior nursing students from a university in South Korea in August 2022. We developed a simulation program integrating MR preparation into ACS simulation (IMRP-ACSS), which was validated through expert review for content validity. The students participated in the simulation program over six hours across two days, including a 40-minute individual session of MR-based simulation preparation using head-mounted displays (the HoloLens 2). Individual changes in knowledge, self-confidence in learning, and self-efficacy in learning evaluated by the survey were analyzed using paired t-tests. Additionally, group performance assessed using the checklist was analyzed. Immersion and satisfaction were measured with a tool and a 10-point Likert scale, respectively.

RESULTS

Individually, participants demonstrated significantly increased knowledge (t = 11.87, p < .001), self-confidence in learning (t = 7.17, p < .001), and self-efficacy in learning (t = 4.70, p < .001) post-education. Group performance yielded a mean score of 56.43/70 ± 7.45. Groups scored higher in electrocardiogram interpretation, patient safety, and heparin administration. Participants reported a practice immersion level of 37.82/50 ± 9.13 and expressed satisfaction with the program, achieving an average score of 8.85/10 ± 1.35.

CONCLUSION

Integrating MR preparation into ACS simulation enhanced nursing students' knowledge, self-confidence in learning, and self-efficacy in ACS care, providing a replicable and immersive learning experience. This method is an effective addition to nursing education, preparing students through comprehensive, technology-enhanced training.

Enhancing ACLS training effects through video-assisted boosting methods: A comparative analysis of self-simulation and model simulation videos

AIMS

To assess the impact of learner-participation and instructor-led simulation videos on nurses' CPR skills, focusing on iterative learning to boost proficiency in ACLS.

BACKGROUND

Advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) training is crucial for nurses, especially to improve cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) proficiency, for which an effective training strategy is needed.

DESIGN

A quasi-experimental, pretest-posttest design was implemented to assess the impact of self-simulation and model simulation videos on sustaining CPR education.

METHODS

The research was carried out at a university hospital in Korea from August 2021 to July 2022. A total of 110 nurses were allocated into three groups based on the building of their workplace in the hospital. Each group watched training videos at 4-month intervals after the simulation training. The self-video group viewed simulations featuring their participation, while the model video group watched instructor-led simulations. A comparison group participated in the simulations without subsequent video boosting.

RESULTS

Both the self-video and model video groups exhibited significantly superior ACLS performance compatred with the comparison group at both four months (H = 70.33, p <.001) and eight months (H = 81.52, p <.001) following the intervention, with large effect sizes (self-video vs. comparison: d = 4.73 at four months, d = 12.54 at eight months; model video vs. comparison: d = 4.53 at four months, d = 11.01 at eight months). ACLS knowledge scores also significantly increased over time in both intervention groups (self-video: χ² = 22.09, p <.001; model video: χ² = 24.13, p <.001), but not in the comparison group (χ² = 3.75, p =.153). There were no significant differences among the groups in terms of CPR self-efficacy or stress at either time point.

CONCLUSION

Supplementary training using simulation videos is an effective method for maintaining and enhancing nurses' ACLS competency, offering a sustainable approach to repetitive CPR training. This study underscores the value of incorporating recorded simulation videos in clinical training, offering insights into efficient methods for continuous learning and CPR proficiency among nursing professionals.

A comparison between the effects of simulation of basic CPR training and workshops on firefighters' knowledge and skills: experimental study

BACKGROUND

One of the most common causes of death worldwide is cardiopulmonary arrest. Firefighters are among the first responders at the scenes of accidents and can, therefore, play a key part in performing basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for victims who need it. The present study was conducted to compare the effects of simulation training against workshops on the CPR knowledge and skills of firefighters in the south of Iran.

METHODS

This experimental (Interventional) study was conducted on 60 firefighters of south of Fars province, Iran. The study was undertaken from March to July 2023. Through random allocation, the participants were divided into two groups: simulation-based training (30 members) and traditional workshop training (30 members). The participants' CPR knowledge and practical skills were measured before, immediately after, and three months after intervention.

RESULTS

The findings of the study revealed a statistically significant difference between the pretest and posttest CPR knowledge and skill mean scores of the simulation groups as compared to the workshop group (p < 0.001). As measured three months after the intervention, the firefighters' knowledge and skill mean scores were still significantly different from their pretest mean scores (p < 0.001); however, they had declined, which can be attributed to the fact that the study population did not frequently exercise CPR.

CONCLUSION

Based on the findings of the study, even though both methods of education were effective on enhancing the firefighters' CPR knowledge and skill, simulation training had a far greater impact than training in workshops. In view of the decline in the participants' knowledge and skill scores over time, it is recommended that short simulation training courses on CPR should be repeated on a regular basis.